Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 20
Filter
1.
J Public Health Policy ; 41(3): 286-302, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32366990

ABSTRACT

We undertook a systematic review to identify and summarise studies on hardcore smoking and hardening to: determine the degree of variability in definitions of hardcore smoking and hardening; assess the evidence for claims that smokers are becoming increasingly hardened within the context of harm reduction as a policy initiative; and identify the determining characteristics of a hardcore smoker. We searched five electronic databases from 1970 to mid-April 2018 using the search term "smok* AND hard* AND (tobacco OR cigar* OR nicotin*)". We included studies if they included a definition of hardcore smokers and/or hardening, and provided a prevalence rate for hard core smokers or empirical evidence for hardening. Definitions of hardcore smoker varied substantially across studies. Hardening was not evident in the general smoking population and we found mounting evidence of softening occurring in smoking populations. These results indicate that hardening of smokers is not occurring and that calls for policy interventions on this basis should be challenged.


Subject(s)
Harm Reduction , Smokers/statistics & numerical data , Smoking Cessation/methods , Smoking/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Smokers/psychology , Smoking/psychology , Smoking Cessation/psychology , Socioeconomic Factors , Tobacco Products/supply & distribution , Tobacco Use Cessation Devices/supply & distribution
2.
Addict Sci Clin Pract ; 15(1): 11, 2020 02 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32075695

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cigarette smoking is much more prevalent among young people experiencing homelessness than in the general population of adolescents and young adults. Although many young homeless smokers are motivated to quit, there are no empirically-evaluated smoking cessation programs for this population. It is important that any such program address the factors known to be associated with quitting-related outcomes among homeless young people, to provide ongoing support in a way that accommodates the mobility of this population, and does not rely on scarce service provider resources for its delivery. The objective of this project is to develop and pilot test a text messaging-based intervention (TMI), as an adjunct to brief cessation counseling and provision of nicotine patches, to help homeless young people who want to quit smoking. METHODS/DESIGN: This pilot study will utilize a cluster cross-over randomized controlled design with up to 80 current smokers who desire to quit and are recruited from three drop-in centers serving young people experiencing homelessness in the Los Angeles area. All participants will be provided with a minimum standard of care: a 30-min group-based smoking cessation counseling session and free nicotine replacement. Half of these smokers will then also receive the TMI, as an adjunct to this standard care, which will provide 6 weeks of ongoing support for quitting. This support includes continued and more intensive education regarding nicotine dependence, quitting smoking, and relapse; does not require additional agency resources; can be available "on demand" to users; and includes features to personalize the quitting experience. This study will investigate whether receiving the TMI adjunct to standard smoking cessation care results in greater reductions in cigarette smoking compared to standard care alone over a 3-month period. DISCUSSION: This study has the potential to address an important gap in the clinical research literature on cigarette smoking cessation and provide empirical support for using a TMI to provide ongoing assistance and support for quitting among young smokers experiencing homelessness. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03874585. Registered March 14, 2019, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT03874585.


Subject(s)
Cigarette Smoking/psychology , Cigarette Smoking/therapy , Ill-Housed Persons , Smoking Cessation/methods , Text Messaging , Adolescent , Adult , Behavior Therapy/methods , Cigarette Smoking/epidemiology , Cross-Over Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Pilot Projects , Tobacco Use Cessation Devices/supply & distribution , Young Adult
4.
Am J Health Promot ; 33(2): 183-190, 2019 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29747516

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To examine 2-week nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) starter kit quit outcomes and predictors and the impact of adding this new service on treatment reach. DESIGN: Observational study of a 1-year cohort of QUITPLAN Services enrollees using registration and utilization data and follow-up outcome survey data of a subset of enrollees who received NRT starter kits. SETTING: ClearWay Minnesota's QUITPLAN Services provides a quit line that is available to uninsured and underinsured Minnesotans and NRT starter kits (a free 2-week supply of patches, gum, or lozenges) that are available to all Minnesota tobacco users. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 15 536 adult QUITPLAN Services enrollees and 818 seven-month follow-up survey NRT starter kit respondents. MEASURES: Treatment reach for all services and tobacco quit outcomes and predictors for starter kit recipients. ANALYSIS: Descriptive analyses, χ2 analyses, and logistic regression. RESULTS: Treatment reach increased 3-fold after adding the 2-week NRT starter kit service option to QUITPLAN Services compared to the prior year (1.86% vs 0.59%). Among all participants enrolling in QUITPLAN services during a 1-year period, 83.8% (13 026/15 536) registered for a starter kit. Among starter kit respondents, 25.6% reported being quit for 30 days at the 7-month follow-up. After controlling for other factors, using all NRT and selecting more cessation services predicted quitting. CONCLUSION: An NRT starter kit brought more tobacco users to QUITPLAN services, demonstrating interest in cessation services separate from phone counseling. The starter kit produced high quit rates, comparable to the quit line in the same time period. Cessation service providers may want to consider introducing starter kits to reach more tobacco users and ultimately improve population health.


Subject(s)
Health Promotion/organization & administration , Smoking Cessation/methods , Tobacco Use Cessation Devices/supply & distribution , Tobacco Use Cessation/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Combined Modality Therapy , Counseling/methods , Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems/statistics & numerical data , Female , Hotlines/methods , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Minnesota , Sex Factors , Socioeconomic Factors , Young Adult
9.
Rev. panam. salud pública ; 38(4): 316-325, oct. 2015. ilus, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-770691

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine how policies adopted in Mexico in response to the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control affected smoking prevalence and smoking-attributable deaths. METHODS: The SimSmoke simulation model of tobacco control policy is applied to Mexico. This discrete time, first-order Markov model uses data on population size, smoking rates and tobacco control policy for Mexico. It assesses, individually and jointly, the effects of seven types of policies: cigarette taxes, smoke-free air laws, mass media campaigns, advertising bans, warning labels, cessation treatment, and youth tobacco access policies. RESULTS: The Mexico SimSmoke model estimates that smoking rates have been reduced by about 30% as a result of policies implemented since 2002, and that the number of smoking-attributable deaths will have been reduced by about 826 000 by 2053. Increases in cigarette prices are responsible for over 60% of the reductions, but health warnings, smoke-free air laws, marketing restrictions and cessation treatments also play important roles. CONCLUSIONS: Mexico has shown steady progress towards reducing smoking prevalence in a short period of time, as have other Latin American countries, such as Brazil, Panama and Uruguay. Tobacco control policies play an important role in continued efforts to reduce tobacco use and associated deaths in Mexico.


OBJETIVO: Analizar cómo las políticas adoptadas en México en respuesta al Convenio Marco para el Control del Tabaco han tenido efecto en la prevalencia de tabaquismo y en la mortalidad atribuible al tabaco. MÉTODOS: Se aplicó en México el modelo de simulación SimSmoke de la política de control del tabaco. Este modelo de Markov de tiempo discreto y de primer orden utiliza datos sobre el tamaño de la población, las tasas de tabaquismo y la política de control del tabaco en México. También evalúa individual y conjuntamente los efectos de siete tipos de políticas: impuestos sobre el tabaco, legislaciones de ambientes libres de humo de tabaco, campañas en medios de comunicación, prohibiciones de publicidad, etiquetas de advertencias sanitarias, tratamientos de cesación y regulaciones del acceso al tabaco por parte de los jóvenes. RESULTADOS: Mediante el modelo SimSmoke aplicado en México, se calculó que las tasas de tabaquismo se han reducido aproximadamente en un 30% como resultado de las políticas implantadas desde el 2002, y que el número de defunciones atribuibles al tabaquismo podrían reducirse aproximadamente en 826 000 para el 2053. Los aumentos de precios de los cigarros son responsables de más del 60% de las reducciones, pero las advertencias sanitarias, las leyes de ambientes libres de humo de tabaco, las restricciones a la mercadotecnia y los tratamientos de cesación también desempeñan una función importante. CONCLUSIONES: En México, análogamente a lo ocurrido en otros países latinoamericanos, como Brasil, Panamá y Uruguay, se ha observado un constante progreso en la reducción de la prevalencia del tabaquismo en poco tiempo. Las políticas de control del tabaco desempeñan una importante función en las iniciativas continuadas para reducir el consumo de tabaco y las defunciones asociadas a este en México.


Subject(s)
Nicotiana/adverse effects , Tobacco Use Cessation Devices/supply & distribution , Smoking Prevention/organization & administration , Mexico
10.
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) ; 55(4): 405-12, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26115460

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To compare availability of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), tobacco products, and electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) in pharmacies in St. Louis, MO. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study, on-site store audits of 322 pharmacies. SETTING: St. Louis, MO. PARTICIPANTS: 242 eligible community pharmacies located in the study area. INTERVENTION: Pharmacies were visited by trained research assistants who conducted a 5- to 10-minute store audit using a paper-based data collection tool. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Availability, accessibility, and pricing of NRT as a function of neighborhood poverty rate and proportion of black residents as well as availability of tobacco products and e-cigarettes. RESULTS: NRT availability decreased as neighborhood poverty rate increased (P = 0.02). Availability without pharmacy personnel assistance also decreased with increasing poverty rate (r = -0.19; 95% CI = -0.06, -0.31) and higher percentage of black residents (r = -0.18; 95% CI = -0.06, -0.31). Prices were lower in neighborhoods with higher poverty rates (P = 0.02) and a higher percentage of black residents (P = 0.03). E-cigarettes were available in 43% of pharmacies, and their availability and price did not differ by poverty rate or percentage of black residents. CONCLUSION: Low access to NRT might perpetuate smoking disparities in disadvantaged and racially diverse neighborhoods. Study data support policies to ensure equal NRT access to reduce disparities.


Subject(s)
Community Pharmacy Services/supply & distribution , Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems , Health Services Accessibility , Nicotinic Agonists/supply & distribution , Smoking Cessation/methods , Smoking Prevention , Tobacco Products/supply & distribution , Tobacco Use Cessation Devices/supply & distribution , Black or African American , Community Pharmacy Services/economics , Cross-Sectional Studies , Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems/economics , Health Care Surveys , Health Services Accessibility/economics , Health Status Disparities , Healthcare Disparities/economics , Healthcare Disparities/ethnology , Humans , Missouri/epidemiology , Nicotinic Agonists/economics , Poverty , Residence Characteristics , Smoking/economics , Smoking/ethnology , Smoking Cessation/economics , Smoking Cessation/ethnology , Tobacco Products/economics , Tobacco Use Cessation Devices/economics , Urban Health
11.
Addict Behav ; 42: 136-9, 2015 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25462661

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The provision of smoking cessation interventions in hospitals has been strongly recommended. The aim of this study is to determine the maintenance of smoking cessation programmes for inpatients and hospital workers in hospitals of Catalonia (Spain) seven years after the implementation of a Tobacco Cessation Programme. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in all hospitals that offer public service in Catalonia, Spain (n=73). An online questionnaire was sent to all coordinators of the smoke-free hospital project or managers of each hospital. The survey included questions about the type of hospital, type of programmes implemented and availability and source of smoking cessation drugs. RESULTS: Responses to the questionnaire were submitted by 58 hospitals (79.5%). 74% and 93.1% of the hospitals had smoking cessation programmes for inpatients and workers, respectively. Most of the hospitals maintained the programmes and started routinely buying smoking cessation drugs after a period of receiving them free-of-charge. However, 17.2% of the hospitals refused to buy these drugs and 24% never had these drugs available. CONCLUSIONS: Through a supportive Tobacco Cessation Programme, most hospitals have smoking cessation programmes for both patients and workers. Most of them have incorporated smoking cessation drugs as a regular resource in their services' portfolio. The lack of these resources may jeopardise the maintenance of well-established programmes in hospitals.


Subject(s)
Smoking Cessation/methods , Tobacco Use Cessation Devices/supply & distribution , Benzazepines/supply & distribution , Bupropion/supply & distribution , Cross-Sectional Studies , Dopamine Uptake Inhibitors/supply & distribution , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Public/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Inpatients , Nicotinic Agonists/supply & distribution , Personnel, Hospital , Quinoxalines/supply & distribution , Smoking Cessation/statistics & numerical data , Tobacco Use Cessation Devices/statistics & numerical data , Varenicline
13.
Prev Med ; 60: 3-9, 2014 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24321456

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Epidemiological and toxicological evidence suggests lower risk of smokeless tobacco (ST) products compared to cigarettes. Less is known, however, about consumer perceptions and use of novel forms of ST, including snus and dissolvable tobacco. METHODS: In this study, we conducted in-person experimental auctions in Buffalo, NY, Columbia, SC, and Selinsgrove, PA with 571 smokers to test the impact of information and product trials on smokers' preferences. Auctions were conducted between November 2010-November 2011. RESULTS: We found no evidence of an impact of product trials on demand in our auctions. Anti-ST information increased demand for cigarettes when presented alone, but when presented with pro-ST information it decreased demand for cigarettes. It did not decrease demand for ST products. Anti-smoking information increased demand for ST products, but did not affect cigarette demand. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that credible and effective communications about tobacco harm reduction should reinforce the negative effects of smoking.


Subject(s)
Competitive Bidding , Health Education/organization & administration , Product Labeling , Smoking/psychology , Tobacco Use Cessation Devices/supply & distribution , Tobacco, Smokeless/supply & distribution , Adult , Attitude to Health , Female , Health Education/methods , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , New York/epidemiology , Observation , Pennsylvania/epidemiology , Persuasive Communication , Regression Analysis , Smoking/adverse effects , Smoking/epidemiology , Smoking Cessation , Social Class , South Carolina/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Tobacco Use Cessation Devices/economics , Tobacco Use Cessation Devices/statistics & numerical data , Tobacco, Smokeless/adverse effects , Tobacco, Smokeless/statistics & numerical data , Urban Population/statistics & numerical data
14.
Tob Control ; 22 Suppl 1: i38-9, 2013 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23591506

ABSTRACT

'Endgame' is a term from chess, a complex game with a simple objective: to checkmate the king. Tobacco control is not so simple. We do not have one uniform agreed objective but a multiplicity of goals some of which may be incompatible. We are not playing a global game of chess, but a multiplicity of battles and skirmishes played out with different rules and on different terrains. This paper examines these issues and goes on to summarise the situation in England and what the endgame will mean in our circumstances. In particular, it sets out how harm reduction, as defined by ensuring access to alternative clean nicotine products, has become an integral part of our endgame, while acknowledging that this may not be feasible or relevant for all parts of the world.


Subject(s)
Harm Reduction , Smoking Prevention , Tobacco Use Cessation Devices/supply & distribution , Health Promotion/methods , Humans , Smoking Cessation/methods , United Kingdom
16.
Health Promot Pract ; 14(5): 767-76, 2013 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23315310

ABSTRACT

Since 2006, the New York City (NYC) Department of Health and Mental Hygiene has conducted the Nicotine Patch and Gum Program (NPGP) in collaboration with 311, NYC's non-emergency information line. In two prior years, the program was conducted in collaboration with the New York State (NYS) Smokers' Quitline and with community-based organizations. The NPGP is an annual, brief, population-based nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) giveaway for NYC residents, complementing the NYS Quitline's year-round NRT distribution program. Since 2006, 168,000 smokers have enrolled, with the largest number of enrollees in 2010 (n = 40,000) and the smallest number in 2009 (n = 28,000). A 2003 program evaluation demonstrated that smokers who received NRT through the NPGP had higher quit rates than smokers who did not receive NRT; these results were replicated in 2006 and 2008. Lessons learned from implementing the NPGP include: 1) time-limited NRT interventions are important complements to year-round NRT distribution; 2) expanding NRT distribution to light smokers increases treatment reach; and 3) employing multiple enrollment mechanisms, including telephone and online options, extends program reach to diverse groups of smokers. The NPGP provides a model for other jurisdictions considering implementing time-limited, population-based NRT programs as a complementary strategy to enhance ongoing tobacco control efforts.


Subject(s)
Health Promotion/organization & administration , Smoking Cessation/methods , Tobacco Use Cessation Devices/supply & distribution , Tobacco Use Disorder/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Health Promotion/economics , Hotlines , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Motivation , New York City , Smoking Cessation/economics , Socioeconomic Factors , Tobacco Use Cessation Devices/economics , Young Adult
17.
Tob Control ; 22(3): e4, 2013 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22496352

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There are important inequities in smoker access to clinic-based smoking cessation services. Low barrier high-reach interventions are proposed as solutions to these inequities. Although effective, telephone quitlines, which provide multi-session counselling but no medication, have low utilization with high attrition. The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of free nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), brief advice and self-help materials on quit attempts and 6-month quit rates in motivated smokers. METHODS: In this open-label naturalistic study, 14,000 treatments of 5 weeks in duration of either nicotine patch (n=10,000) or nicotine gum (n=4000) were made available to all eligible adult smokers in Ontario, Canada, who called a toll-free number to register with the STOP (Smoking Treatment for Ontario Patients) Study and receive a single brief intervention. The primary outcome measure was self-reported abstinence rates at 6 months post-treatment among STOP participants. These data were compared with quit rates that were reported in a concurrent no-intervention cohort of Ontario smokers matched for eligibility. RESULTS: 16 405 callers were assessed and 13143 eligible participants were mailed a treatment package with 5 weeks of NRT (choice of patch or gum), self-help and community resource materials. Among the 6261 participants who consented to follow-up, 2601 (42%) had complete follow-up data. Of those with complete follow-up data, the percentage reporting abstinence after 6 months in the treatment cohort was 21.4%, relative to 11.6% in the no-intervention cohort (rate ratio of 1.84; 95% CI 1.79 to 1.89), with the 30-day point prevalence of 17.8% and 9.8% for the intervention and no-intervention cohorts, respectively (rate ratio 1.81; CI 1.75 to 1.87). CONCLUSIONS: Provision of free NRT by mail following a brief telephone intervention is an effective strategy to reach and assist a large number of smokers making a quit attempt.


Subject(s)
Smoking Cessation/methods , Tobacco Use Cessation Devices/supply & distribution , Adult , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Health Promotion/economics , Health Promotion/methods , Hotlines , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Ontario/epidemiology , Postal Service , Program Evaluation , Smoking/epidemiology , Smoking Cessation/economics , Smoking Cessation/statistics & numerical data , Smoking Prevention , Socioeconomic Factors
19.
BMJ ; 344: e1696, 2012 Mar 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22446739

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of free nicotine replacement therapy or proactive telephone counselling in addition to standard smoking cessation support offered through a telephone quitline. DESIGN: Parallel group, 2 × 2 factorial, randomised controlled trial. SETTING: National quitline, England. PARTICIPANTS: 2591 non-pregnant smokers aged 16 or more residing in England who called the quitline between February 2009 and February 2010 and agreed to set a quit date: 648 were each randomised to standard support, proactive support, or proactive support with nicotine replacement therapy, and 647 were randomised to standard support with nicotine replacement therapy. INTERVENTIONS: Two interventions were offered in addition to standard support: six weeks' nicotine replacement therapy, provided free, and proactive counselling sessions (repeat telephone calls from, and interaction with, cessation advisors). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was self reported smoking cessation for six or more months after the quit date. The secondary outcome was cessation validated by exhaled carbon monoxide measured at six or more months. RESULTS: At six months, 17.7% (n = 229) of those offered nicotine replacement therapy reported smoking cessation compared with 20.1% (n = 261) not offered such therapy (odds ratio 0.85, 95% confidence interval 0.70 to 1.04), and 18.2% (n = 236) offered proactive counselling reported smoking cessation compared with 19.6% (n = 254) offered standard support (0.91, 0.75 to 1.11). Data validated by carbon monoxide readings changed the findings for nicotine replacement therapy only, with smoking cessation validated in 6.6% (85/1295) of those offered nicotine replacement therapy compared with 9.4% (122/1296) not offered such therapy (0.67, 0.50 to 0.90). CONCLUSIONS: Offering free nicotine replacement therapy or additional (proactive) counselling to standard helpline support had no additional effect on smoking cessation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00775944.


Subject(s)
Financial Support , Hotlines/organization & administration , Remote Consultation/organization & administration , Smoking Cessation/methods , Smoking/therapy , Tobacco Use Cessation Devices , Adolescent , Adult , Directive Counseling/methods , England , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Smoking/psychology , Smoking Cessation/economics , Smoking Cessation/psychology , Social Support , Tobacco Use Cessation Devices/economics , Tobacco Use Cessation Devices/supply & distribution , Treatment Outcome
20.
Drug Alcohol Depend ; 118(2-3): 244-50, 2011 Nov 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21531090

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is growing recognition regarding the clinical importance of integrating smoking cessation services, such as nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), within programs that treat substance use disorders (SUDs) since the majority of individuals receiving treatment also smoke. Previous research has not examined the organizational characteristics associated with NRT availability over time in SUD treatment programs. METHOD: Using longitudinal data collected from administrators of 868 SUD treatment programs over a four-year period, the availability of NRT in the forms of the nicotine patch or nicotine gum was measured. Associations between organizational covariates and NRT adoption were estimated using multinomial logistic regression. RESULTS: The rate of NRT availability significantly decreased over time from 38.0% of SUD programs at baseline to 33.8% at follow-up. The multinomial logistic regression model indicated programs that sustained adoption of NRT over time were more medically oriented, as measured by location in a hospital setting and access to physicians, and were less likely to offer outpatient services. Sustained and recent adopters of NRT were more likely to offer other smoking cessation interventions at follow- up than NRT discontinuers or NRT non-adopters. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that patients' access to NRT varies across different types of treatment organizations. Future research should continue to measure the availability of NRT and other smoking cessation interventions in SUD treatment since these services may help patients to quit smoking and reduce the likelihood of SUD relapse.


Subject(s)
Nicotine/therapeutic use , Nicotinic Agonists/therapeutic use , Smoking Cessation/methods , Substance-Related Disorders/drug therapy , Tobacco Use Cessation Devices/supply & distribution , Tobacco Use Disorder/drug therapy , Adult , Follow-Up Studies , Health Promotion/methods , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Longitudinal Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...