Comparative cost of transoral robotic surgery and radiotherapy (IMRT) in early stage tonsil cancer.

PURPOSE: To compare treatment costs and cost-effectiveness for transoral robotic surgery (TORS) and definitive intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in managing early stage tonsil cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Direct treatment costs for surgery and IMRT were calculated from SEER-Medicare data for a cohort with clinically early stage (cT1/2N0) p16+ tonsillar squamous cell carcinoma from Kaiser Permanente Southern California Health Plan between 2012 and 2017. A Markov decision tree model with a 5-year time horizon was then applied to the cohort which incorporated costs associated with treatment, surveillance, and recurrence. RESULTS: IMRT cost up to $19,000 more (35%) than TORS in direct treatment costs. When input into the Markov model, TORS dominated IMRT with lower cost and better effectiveness over a range of values. CONCLUSION: TORS is a more cost-effective treatment method than IMRT in early stage (cT1/2N0) tonsil cancer.

Cost analysis comparing brachytherapy versus surgery for primary carcinoma of the tonsillar fossa and/or soft palate.

PURPOSE: Locoregional control rates, late normal tissue sequelae, and functional outcome scores have not been different for tonsillar fossa and/or soft palate tumors treated by either brachytherapy (BT) or surgery in an organ function preservation protocol. For additional prioritizing in clinical decision-making, we focused on a comparison of the full hospital costs of the different treatment options. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1986 and 2001, tonsillar fossa and/or soft palate tumors were treated by external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) to the primary tumor and neck, followed by fractionated BT to the primary. Neck dissection (ND) was performed for node-positive disease (BT group; 104 patients). If BT was not feasible, resection combined with postoperative EBRT was executed (surgery group; 86 patients). Locoregional control, disease-free survival, and overall survival were calculated according to the Kaplan-Meier method. The performance status scales, late side effects, and degree of xerostomia have been previously reported. This paper focused on the hospital and follow-up costs for the treatment groups EBRT and BT with or without ND compared with surgery followed by postoperative RT (PORT). Finally, these costs were also computed for future treatment strategies (e.g., better sparing of normal tissues by intensity-modulated RT [IMRT]). RESULTS: Locoregional control, disease-free survival, and overall survival rate at 5 years for patients treated with EBRT and BT with or without ND vs. surgery plus PORT was 80% vs. 78%, 58% vs. 55%, and 67% vs. 57%, respectively. The major late side effect was xerostomia. Dry mouth syndrome affected the BT group and surgery group equally. The total costs for all treatment groups were 14,262 euro (BT group), 16,628 euro (BT plus ND group), 18,782 euro (surgery plus PORT group), 14,532 euro (IMRT group), and 16,897 euro (IMRT plus ND group). CONCLUSION: Excellent locoregional tumor control was observed with either modality, with no statistically significant differences in the incidence of the most noted side effect xerostomia. The total costs for BT were less than for surgery: 16,628 euro (19,452 dollars) for EBRT plus BT plus ND vs. 18,782 euro(22,074 dollars) for surgery plus PORT. To reduce the morbidity of xerostomia, we propose further optimizing our organ function preservation protocol by implementing IMRT as a more conformal, tissue-sparing, RT technique. This is of particular interest because the costs of IMRT plus ND (16,897 euro; 19,767 dollars) were not very different from those for BT plus ND (16,628 euro; 19,452 dollars) and were far less than the costs for surgery.

Carcinoma of the tonsil.

Although the experts acknowledge that there is no conclusive evidence linking secondhand smoke to head and neck cancer, a recent report by the Environmental Protection Agency classifies secondhand smoke as a group A carcinogen. There is strong evidence linking it to carcinoma of the lung. Whereas you may not be able to tell your patient that the same cause and effect is present for head and neck cancer, it is the editor's belief that this will one day be proven. Three experts agreed to treat this patient with surgery followed by full-course radiotherapy, although the surgical approaches differed. They included a marginal mandibulectomy, radical neck dissection, and plating of the remaining mandible (Dr. Strome) and a composite resection (Drs. Ward and Johnson). For reconstruction, options included a modified FAMM flap or a split-thickness skin graft (Dr. Strome), tongue flap or pectoralis major myocutaneous flap (Dr. Ward), or a split-thickness skin graft (Dr. Johnson). One consultant suggested resecting the neck mass and treating the primary tumor and neck with radiotherapy. A dental consultation is in order prior to radiotherapy (Dr. Goepfert). With regard to this woman's mental status, all the experts called for counseling. The husband should be included in the discussions (Dr. Strome and Ward) and consideration should be given to the Women's Right Advocacy Group (Dr. Johnson).