Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 770
Filter
1.
Clin Exp Dent Res ; 10(2): e879, 2024 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38558512

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Orthodontic treatment is often accompanied by discomfort and pain in patients, which are believed to be a result of orthodontic tooth displacement caused by the mechanical forces exerted by the orthodontic appliances on the periodontal tissues. These lead to change blood oxygen level dependent response in related brain regions. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aims to assess the impact of experimental orthodontic tooth displacement on alterations in central nervous system activation assessed by tasked based and resting state fMRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search was conducted using online databases, following PRISMA guidelines and the PICO framework. Selected studies utilized magnetic resonance imaging to examine the brain activity changes in healthy participants after the insertion of orthodontic appliances. RESULTS: The initial database screening resulted in 791 studies. Of these, 234 were duplicates and 547 were deemed irrelevant considering the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of the ten remaining potential relevant studies, two were excluded during full-text screening. Eight prospective articles were eligible for further analysis. The included studies provided evidence of the intricate interplay between orthodontic treatment, pain perception, and brain function. All of the participants in the included studies employed orthodontic separators in short-term experiments to induce tooth displacement during the early stage of orthodontic treatment. Alterations in brain activation were observed in brain regions, functional connectivity and brain networks, predominantly affecting regions implicated in nociception (thalamus, insula), emotion (insula, frontal areas), and cognition (frontal areas, cerebellum, default mode network). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that orthodontic treatment influences beyond the pain matrix and affects other brain regions including the limbic system. Furthermore, understanding the orthodontically induced brain activation can aid in development of targeted pain management strategies that do not adversely affect orthodontic tooth movement. Due to the moderate to serious risk of bias and the heterogeneity among the included studies, further clinical trials on this subject are recommended.


Subject(s)
Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Malocclusion , Humans , Prospective Studies , Tooth Movement Techniques/adverse effects , Tooth Movement Techniques/methods , Pain/etiology , Brain/diagnostic imaging
2.
Angle Orthod ; 94(3): 294-302, 2024 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38412960

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the change in tooth root volume using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in a group of patients treated concurrently with clear aligners and an adjunctive photobiomodulation (PBM) device. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort pilot study included the records of 32 consecutively treated clear aligner patients (23 female, 9 male) from the private practice of one orthodontist. The PBM group (n = 16) used the device once per day for 5 minutes per arch and was compared with a matched control group (n = 16). A semiautomated segmentation technique was used to obtain tooth volume of anterior teeth from CBCT imaging prior to (T0) and during or immediately following (T1) orthodontic treatment with clear aligners. The change in root volume between time points was assessed. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between the pre- and posttreatment root volumes of maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth, regardless of which intervention group the patient belonged to (P > .05). There was also no difference in the mean percentage change in root volume between clear aligner patients in this study who were treated with the PBM device compared with a matched control group (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Clear aligner patients in this study who changed their aligners every 3 to 5 days and used adjunctive photobiomodulation therapy did not experience clinically relevant orthodontically induced external root resorption. Due to the small sample size and measurement error in the root segmentation process, the results should be interpreted with caution.


Subject(s)
Low-Level Light Therapy , Orthodontic Appliances, Removable , Root Resorption , Humans , Male , Female , Root Resorption/diagnostic imaging , Root Resorption/etiology , Pilot Projects , Retrospective Studies , Low-Level Light Therapy/adverse effects , Tooth Movement Techniques/adverse effects , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
3.
Orthod Craniofac Res ; 27(2): 211-219, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37553952

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Root resorption in orthodontics is associated with direction and magnitude of force application as primary etiological factors. Well-controlled trials that utilize three-dimensional segmentation to detect volumetric changes in tooth structure are required to assess the quantitative nature of root resorption. OBJECTIVE: To assess the severity of root resorption (RR) during retraction of maxillary anteriors with three different force vectors (with and without skeletal anchorage) via cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) superimpositions. TRIAL DESIGN: Three-arm parallel randomized clinical trial (RCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-two (16 males, 26 females) patients, (17-28 years), in permanent dentition with bimaxillary protrusion were randomly allocated to three groups of 14 patients each using block randomization (1:1:1 ratio) and allocation concealment. En-masse anterior retraction post first premolar extractions was carried out with modified force vectors in the three groups based on anchorage type [Molar, Mini-implant and Infrazygomatic crest (IZC) bone screws]. Volumetric root loss and linear dimensional changes were blindly assessed on initial (T0) and final (T1, end of space closure) CBCT scans. Normality distribution of values was done using Shapiro-Wilk's test. ANOVA and Post-hoc Tukey HSD test were done to compare measurements between groups at significance levels (P < .05). RESULTS: Forty patients were analysed (14, 14, and 12 in three groups). Significant volumetric loss was noted in all groups. Central incisors demonstrated a significant reduction in IZC group (81.5 ± 21.1 mm3 ) compared to conventional (50.1 ± 26.5 mm3 ) and mini-implant groups (76.1 ± 27.6 mm3 ). Canines demonstrated a significant reduction in mini-implant group (108.9 ± 33.9 mm3 ) compared to conventional (68.8 ± 42.5 mm3 ) and IZC groups (103.1 ± 29.1 mm3 ). Regarding linear parameters, central incisors and canines revealed significant root length reduction in both skeletal anchorage groups. Lateral incisors showed no significant changes between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Intrusive force vectors generated during skeletally anchored retraction can predispose anteriors to an increased risk of resorption. Greater loss of root volume was noted in the centrals and canines when retracted with skeletal anchorage. LIMITATIONS: Small sample size and variations during CBCT acquisition. HARMS: Low-dose CBCT scans were taken at T0 and T1 treatment intervals.


Subject(s)
Orthodontic Anchorage Procedures , Root Resorption , Female , Humans , Male , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography , Incisor/diagnostic imaging , Maxilla/diagnostic imaging , Molar , Orthodontic Anchorage Procedures/methods , Root Resorption/diagnostic imaging , Root Resorption/etiology , Tooth Movement Techniques/adverse effects , Adolescent , Young Adult , Adult
4.
Angle Orthod ; 94(2): 240-246, 2024 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37963565

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of orthodontic pressure on periodontal ligament (PDL) compression in rats and assess correlation between PDL compression and orthodontically induced root resorption (OIRR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight female Wistar rats aged 10 weeks underwent surgery to place 2 mini-screws at the center of the palatal plate. 25 cN coil springs connecting the maxillary first molars and mini-screws were applied bilaterally to generate mesial force. Maxillary first molars were assigned to undergo either bodily or tipping movements. Micro-computed tomography (µCT) scans were taken on days 0, 3, 7, and 14, and histological sections were taken on day 14. OIRR was measured from histological sections, and the corresponding PDL compression ratio was quantified using µCT images. RESULTS: The PDL was compressed by approximately 76% in tipping movement and 55% in bodily movement after 3 days, and by approximately 47% in bodily and tipping movements after 7 days of orthodontic force application. The extent of OIRR in tipping movement was significantly greater than that in bodily movement. A strong positive correlation between OIRR and PDL compression ratio was observed on day 3; however, no correlation was observed on day 7. CONCLUSIONS: A strong correlation between PDL compression ratio and OIRR was observed at an early stage after the application of orthodontic force regardless of the tooth movement type (bodily or tipping), implying the importance of early stage PDL compression in the induction of OIRR.


Subject(s)
Root Resorption , Rats , Female , Animals , Root Resorption/diagnostic imaging , Root Resorption/etiology , Rats, Wistar , Periodontal Ligament/diagnostic imaging , X-Ray Microtomography/methods , Tooth Movement Techniques/adverse effects , Tooth Movement Techniques/methods
5.
Nutrients ; 15(23)2023 Nov 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38068764

ABSTRACT

Osteoporosis (OP) leads to the acceleration of tooth movement and aggravation of periodontal bone loss during orthodontic treatment. Chroogomphus rutilus (CR) is abundant in nutrients and demonstrates remarkable antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. In the present study, the components of CR, including 35.00% total sugar, 0.69% reducing sugar, 14.40% crude protein, 7.30% total ash, 6.10% crude fat, 0.51% total flavonoids, 1.94% total triterpenoids, 0.32% total sterol, 1.30% total saponins, 1.69% total alkaloids, and 1.02% total phenol, were first systematically examined, followed by an investigation into its regulatory effects on bone metabolism in order to mitigate bone loss during orthodontic tooth movement in osteoporotic rats. The results of the imaging tests revealed that CR treatment reduced periodontal bone loss and normalized tooth movement in the OP. In conjunction with analyses of intestinal flora and metabolomics, CR enhances the prevalence of anti-inflammatory genera while reducing the production of inflammatory metabolites. Meanwhile, CR reduced the levels of periodontal inflammatory factors, including TNF-α, IL-1ß, and IL-6, by activating Wnt/ß-catenin signaling, and promoted periodontal bone formation. These findings imply that CR is a potent supplementary therapy for controlling periodontal bone remodeling in patients with OP undergoing orthodontic treatment.


Subject(s)
Alveolar Bone Loss , Osteoporosis , Humans , Rats , Animals , Alveolar Bone Loss/prevention & control , Tooth Movement Techniques/adverse effects , Tooth Movement Techniques/methods , Anti-Inflammatory Agents , Osteoporosis/prevention & control , Sugars
6.
Aust Dent J ; 68 Suppl 1: S66-S81, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37961018

ABSTRACT

The literature is replete with articles describing the many and varied interactions between endodontic treatment and orthodontic tooth movement (OTM), often reporting conflicting views and findings, which creates confusion for clinicians. Original research and review articles have described aspects such as apical root resorption and potential pulpal complications of teeth related to OTM. Some interactions are of relatively minor clinical significance, whilst others may have adverse consequences. A history of dental trauma before or during OTM further complicates the interactions. This review re-assesses the historical literature on endodontic-orthodontic interactions in light of more recent research and presents guidelines for managing clinical situations involving both disciplines. © 2023 Australian Dental Association.


Subject(s)
Root Resorption , Humans , Root Resorption/etiology , Root Resorption/therapy , Australia , Dental Pulp , Tooth Movement Techniques/adverse effects , Root Canal Therapy
7.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 59(11)2023 Nov 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38004013

ABSTRACT

Background and Objectives: Herein we used numerical analysis to study different biomechanical behaviors of mandibular bone subjected to 0.6 N, 1.2 N, and 2.4 N orthodontic loads during 0-8 mm periodontal breakdown using the Tresca failure criterion. Additionally, correlations with earlier FEA reports found potential ischemic and resorptive risks. Materials and Methods: Eighty-one models (nine patients) and 243 simulations (intrusion, extrusion, rotation, tipping, and translation) were analyzed. Results: Intrusion and extrusion displayed after 4 mm bone loss showed extended stress display in the apical and middle third alveolar sockets, showing higher ischemic and resorptive risks for 0.6 N. Rotation, translation, and tipping displayed the highest stress amounts, and cervical-third stress with higher ischemic and resorptive risks after 4 mm loss for 0.6 N. Conclusions: Quantitatively, rotation, translation, and tipping are the most stressful movements. All three applied forces produced similar stress-display areas for all movements and bone levels. The stress doubled for 1.2 N and quadrupled for 2.4 N when compared with 0.6 N. The differences between the three loads consisted of the stress amounts displayed in color-coded areas, while their location and extension remained constant. Since the MHP was exceeded, a reduction in the applied force to under 0.6 N (after 4 mm of bone loss) is recommended for reducing ischemic and resorptive risks. The stress-display pattern correlated with horizontal periodontal-breakdown simulations.


Subject(s)
Cancellous Bone , Tooth Movement Techniques , Humans , Tooth Movement Techniques/adverse effects , Computer Simulation , Finite Element Analysis , Periodontal Ligament
8.
Trials ; 24(1): 684, 2023 Oct 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37872599

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: With regard to the esthetics and comfort of orthodontic treatment, the requirement for removable clear aligners (CAs) is increasing. Unlike conventional fixed orthodontic appliances, CAs were made of thermoplastic film by thermoforming on the personalized dental models. The construction of orthodontic thermoplastic is a critical factor for orthodontic tooth movement (OTM). Polyethylene terephthalate glycol-modified (PETG) and thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) are the most commonly orthodontic thermoplastics; however, the evidence of the differences between different orthodontic thermoplastic are limited to vitro environment and the evidence in vivo environment is not available. Therefore, this trial aims to provide reliable evidence for orthodontists' personalized treatment plans whether the two most commonly used orthodontic thermoplastics of PETG and TPU have differences in the efficiency of OTM. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This randomized controlled clinical study will recruit 44 orthodontic patients for orthodontic treatment. All the subjects will be randomized into two groups (PETG and TPU, n = 22 for each group). In the first stage (M0 to M1), clear aligners will be made of two orthodontic thermoplastics and move the maxillary first or second premolars 2 mm. In the second stage, patients will take the standard orthodontic treatments. The primary outcome will be the efficiency of clear aligners made of different materials on the digital models. The secondary outcome will be the efficiency of clear aligners made of different materials on the cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). The efficiency will be calculated through the superimposition of the digital models and CBCT. DISCUSSION: The results from this trial will serve as evidence for orthodontists and manufacturers and clarify whether the difference in orthodontic thermoplastics significantly impacts the efficiency of OTM. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2300070980. Registered on 27 April 2023. https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=186253.


Subject(s)
Orthodontic Appliances, Removable , Tooth Movement Techniques , Humans , Tooth Movement Techniques/adverse effects , Orthodontic Appliances, Fixed , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
9.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; 6: CD010887, 2023 06 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37339352

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Deviation from a normal bite can be defined as malocclusion. Orthodontic treatment takes 20 months on average to correct malocclusion. Accelerating the rate of tooth movement may help to reduce the duration of orthodontic treatment and associated unwanted effects including orthodontically induced inflammatory root resorption (OIIRR), demineralisation and reduced patient motivation and compliance. Several non-surgical adjuncts have been advocated with the aim of accelerating the rate of orthodontic tooth movement (OTM).         OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of non-surgical adjunctive interventions on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement and the overall duration of treatment. SEARCH METHODS: An information specialist searched five bibliographic databases up to 6 September 2022 and used additional search methods to identify published, unpublished and ongoing studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of people receiving orthodontic treatment using fixed or removable appliances along with non-surgical adjunctive interventions to accelerate tooth movement. We excluded split-mouth studies and studies that involved people who were treated with orthognathic surgery, or who had cleft lip or palate, or other craniofacial syndromes or deformities. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors were responsible for study selection, risk of bias assessment and data extraction; they carried out these tasks independently. Disagreements were resolved by discussion amongst the review team to reach consensus.  MAIN RESULTS: We included 23 studies, none of which were rated as low risk of bias overall. We categorised the included studies as testing light vibrational forces or photobiomodulation, the latter including low level laser therapy and light emitting diode. The studies assessed non-surgical interventions added to fixed or removable orthodontic appliances compared to treatment without the adjunct. A total of 1027 participants (children and adults) were recruited with loss to follow-up ranging from 0% to 27% of the original samples.  Certainty of the evidence For all comparisons and outcomes presented below, the certainty of the evidence is low to very low. Light vibrational forces  Eleven studies assessed how applying light vibrational forces (LVF) affected orthodontic tooth movement (OTM). There was no evidence of a difference between the intervention and control groups for duration of orthodontic treatment (MD -0.61 months, 95% confidence interval (CI) -2.44 to 1.22; 2 studies, 77 participants); total number of orthodontic appliance adjustment visits (MD -0.32 visits, 95% CI -1.69 to 1.05; 2 studies, 77 participants); orthodontic tooth movement during the early alignment stage (reduction of lower incisor irregularity (LII)) at 4-6 weeks (MD 0.12 mm, 95% CI -1.77 to 2.01; 3 studies, 144 participants), or 10-16 weeks (MD -0.18 mm, 95% CI -1.20 to 0.83; 4 studies, 175 participants); rate of canine distalisation (MD -0.01 mm/month, 95% CI -0.20 to 0.18; 2 studies, 40 participants); or rate of OTM during en masse space closure (MD 0.10 mm per month, 95% CI -0.08 to 0.29; 2 studies, 81 participants). No evidence of a difference was found between LVF and control groups in rate of OTM when using removable orthodontic aligners. Nor did the studies show evidence of a difference between groups for our secondary outcomes, including patient perception of pain, patient-reported need for analgesics at different stages of treatment and harms or side effects.  Photobiomodulation Ten studies assessed the effect of applying low level laser therapy (LLLT) on rate of OTM. We found that participants in the LLLT group had a statistically significantly shorter length of time for the teeth to align in the early stages of treatment (MD -50 days, 95% CI -58 to -42; 2 studies, 62 participants) and required fewer appointments (-2.3, 95% CI -2.5 to -2.0; 2 studies, 125 participants). There was no evidence of a difference between the LLLT and control groups in OTM when assessed as percentage reduction in LII in the first month of alignment (1.63%, 95% CI -2.60 to 5.86; 2 studies, 56 participants) or in the second month (percentage reduction MD 3.75%, 95% CI -1.74 to 9.24; 2 studies, 56 participants). However, LLLT resulted in an increase in OTM during the space closure stage in the maxillary arch (MD 0.18 mm/month, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.33; 1 study; 65 participants; very low level of certainty) and the mandibular arch (right side MD 0.16 mm/month, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.19; 1 study; 65 participants). In addition, LLLT resulted in an increased  rate of OTM during maxillary canine retraction (MD 0.01 mm/month, 95% CI 0 to 0.02; 1 study, 37 participants). These  findings were not clinically significant. The studies showed no evidence of a difference between groups for our secondary outcomes, including OIIRR, periodontal health and patient perception of pain at early stages of treatment. Two studies assessed the influence of applying light-emitting diode (LED) on OTM. Participants in the LED group required a significantly shorter time to align the mandibular arch compared to the control group (MD -24.50 days, 95% CI -42.45 to -6.55, 1 study, 34 participants). There is no evidence that LED application increased the rate of OTM during maxillary canine retraction (MD 0.01 mm/month, 95% CI 0 to 0.02; P = 0.28; 1 study, 39 participants ). In terms of secondary outcomes, one study assessed patient perception of pain and found no evidence of a difference between groups.   AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The evidence from randomised controlled trials concerning the effectiveness of non-surgical interventions to accelerate orthodontic treatment is of low to very low certainty. It suggests that there is no additional benefit of light vibrational forces or photobiomodulation for reducing the duration of orthodontic treatment. Although there may be a limited benefit from photobiomodulation application for accelerating discrete treatment phases, these results have to be interpreted with caution due to their questionable clinical significance. Further well-designed, rigorous RCTs with longer follow-up periods spanning from start to completion of orthodontic treatment are required to determine whether non-surgical interventions may reduce the duration of orthodontic treatment by a clinically significant amount, with minimal adverse effects.


Subject(s)
Low-Level Light Therapy , Malocclusion , Humans , Tooth Movement Techniques/adverse effects , Tooth Movement Techniques/methods , Malocclusion/therapy , Malocclusion/etiology , Dental Care , Pain/etiology , Low-Level Light Therapy/adverse effects
10.
Eur J Orthod ; 45(5): 612-626, 2023 09 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37366151

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The application of orthodontic forces causes root resorption of variable severity with potentially severe clinical ramifications. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review reports on the pathophysiological mechanisms of orthodontically induced inflammatory root resorption (OIIRR) and the associated risk factors based on in vitro, experimental, and in vivo studies. SEARCH METHODS: We undertook an electronic search of four databases and a separate hand-search. SELECTION CRITERIA: Studies reporting on the effect of orthodontic forces with/without the addition of potential risk factors on OIIRR, including (1) gene expression in in-vitro studies, the incidence root resorption in (2) animal studies, and (3) human studies. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Potential hits underwent a two-step selection, data extraction, quality assessment, and systematic appraisal performed by duplicate examiners. RESULTS: One hundred and eighteen articles met the eligibility criteria. Studies varied considerably in methodology, reporting of results, and variable risk of bias judgements.In summary, the variable evidence identified supports the notion that the application of orthodontic forces leads to (1) characteristic alterations of molecular expression profiles in vitro, (2) an increased rate of OIIRR in animal models, as well as (3) in human studies. Importantly, the additional presence of risk factors such as malocclusion, previous trauma, and medications like corticosteroids increased the severity of OIIRR, whilst other factors decreased its severity, including oral contraceptives, baicalin, and high caffeine. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the systematically reviewed evidence, OIIRR seems to be an inevitable consequence of the application of orthodontic forces-with different risk factors modifying its severity. Our review has identified several molecular mechanisms that can help explain this link between orthodontic forces and OIIRR. Nevertheless, it must be noted that the available eligible literature was in part significantly confounded by bias and was characterized by substantial methodological heterogeneity, suggesting that the results of this systematic review should be interpreted with caution. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42021243431).


Subject(s)
Malocclusion , Root Resorption , Animals , Humans , Root Resorption/etiology , Risk Factors , Malocclusion/etiology , Tooth Movement Techniques/adverse effects
11.
Dent Traumatol ; 39(5): 495-508, 2023 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37283243

ABSTRACT

Symmetric extraction of premolars is a frequently used orthodontic treatment for dental crowding and protrusion. However, when a patient has incisors with ankylosis, the establishment of a treatment protocol often plagues orthodontists. An adolescent patient with a history of incisor trauma sought treatment for dental protrusion and crowding. Upon percussion of his infrapositioned maxillary central incisors, characteristic dull metallic sounds were noted, and a lack of normal mobility of these teeth under the application of external forces was detected. Follow-up radiographs after the trauma showed replacement root resorption of the maxillary central incisors. Based on clinical and radiological findings, ankylosis of the maxillary central incisors was tentatively diagnosed. A combination of orthodontic and prosthodontic treatment options involving extraction of the maxillary central incisors and mandibular first premolars was chosen to resolve the functional and esthetic problems. After treatment, well-aligned dentition, improved smile esthetics, and a more harmonious facial profile were achieved, and these outcomes remained stable during the follow-up period. This case report illustrates a viable treatment strategy for tackling predicaments caused by ankylosed incisors, which is unusual in the literature.


Subject(s)
Root Resorption , Tooth Ankylosis , Humans , Adolescent , Incisor/diagnostic imaging , Incisor/injuries , Prosthodontics , Tooth Ankylosis/therapy , Root Resorption/etiology , Maxilla , Tooth Movement Techniques/adverse effects
12.
Eur J Orthod ; 45(5): 505-516, 2023 09 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37167078

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Orthodontic treatment is a long process that requires patient cooperation. Risks of side effects such as caries formation, periodontal problems, and root resorption increases as well as problems in patient cooperation arises with longer treatments. Several different techniques were developed that may shorten the treatment time. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of micro-osteoperforations (MOPs) performed during the alignment stage. TRIAL DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. METHODS: Twenty-eight subjects who had crowding in the mandibular arch were included in the study. The first group (4 boys and 10 girls, mean age = 17.21 ± 3.76 years) was treated with MOP (MOP) and the second group (8 boys and 6 girls, mean age = 15.29 ± 1.77 years) was treated without MOP (control). Cephalometric variables, periodontal parameters, Little irregularity index, alignment duration, patient satisfaction, and ease of operation were evaluated. The level of statistical significance was P ≤ 0.05. RESULTS: Alignment duration was shorter (P = 0.000) in the MOP group (105.57 ± 18.34 days) compared to control group (135.86 ± 15.12 days). Alleviating of the crowding was more in the MOP group, compared to the control group in all time points. The pain level in the MOP group in the first appointment was higher compared to control group (P = 0.002). There was no significant difference between the groups in cephalometric parameters. Higher increases were found for gingival index (P = 0.008) and bleeding index (P = 0.039) in the control group compared to MOP group at the end of treatment. LIMITATIONS: The study was a single-centre study. CONCLUSION: Alignment stage was shortened with MOP application. There was no difference between groups for patient satisfaction and pain level except for the first appointment. No difference was observed between the groups regarding cephalometric values. Clinically insignificant inflammation was observed in periodontal tissues for both groups. REGISTRATION: This study was registered at the Clinical Trials Registry (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03652454).


Subject(s)
Malocclusion , Male , Female , Humans , Adolescent , Young Adult , Adult , Malocclusion/therapy , Malocclusion/etiology , Mandible , Dental Care , Tooth Movement Techniques/adverse effects , Pain/etiology
13.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci ; 27(5): 1729-1735, 2023 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36930469

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the effect of obesity prospectively on tooth movement via an orthodontic device and changes in inflammatory cytokines, periodontal tissues, and orofacial pain. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Prospective design in which data was gathered at baseline T0, 1 hour, 24 hours, and 1 week after the application of fixed orthodontic appliances. The total sample size was 60 participants aged between 12 to 18 years and divided into 2 groups based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Anthropometrical estimation was made using a bioimpedance meter. A clinical assessment was performed before the application of fixed appliance bonding (T0) one hour after bonding (T1), after 24 hours (T2), and finally after one week (T3). At T0 little irregularity index was assessed, gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) was collected and periodontal examination including probing depth (PD), gingival bleeding (GB), and the presence or absence of calculus were measured. Orofacial pain was assessed at three levels: 1 hours, 24 hours, and 1 week after application of fixed orthodontics using a visual analog scale. For inter-group comparison, Mann-Whitney and t-tests were used and for interphase, comparison cluster analysis was performed. The level of significance was p<0.05. RESULTS: The participants in obese groups were significantly higher in terms of weight, BMI, WHR, FM, and BF than in the non-obese group (p<0.05). Obese participants had significantly more PD 4-5 mm (0.64±0.23 mm) and significantly higher BoP than non-obese participants (0.13±0.10 mm). Little's irregularity index at T0 and T3 showed no significant difference among obese and non-obese participants. The inflammatory cytokines level of IL-ß was higher in the obese group compared to non-obese groups. CONCLUSIONS: The intensity of orofacial pain was higher in obese participants after 24 hours along with high levels of IL-ß pro-inflammatory cytokines before and during orthodontic treatment. No difference was noted in tooth movement in both obese and non-obese during orthodontic treatment in the first week.


Subject(s)
Cytokines , Orthodontic Appliances, Fixed , Humans , Child , Adolescent , Tooth Movement Techniques/adverse effects , Obesity , Facial Pain
14.
Int Orthod ; 21(1): 100714, 2023 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36502787

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Micro-osteoperforations (MOPs) as a surgical technique is increasingly being used as a method to enhance orthodontic tooth movement. However, its iatrogenic effects on root and alveolar bone morphology have been less studied. OBJECTIVE: This parallel-groups single-centered trial aimed to assess the impact of micro-osteoperforations (MOPs) on orthodontically induced inflammatory root resorption (OIIRR) and alveolar bone during en-masse retraction stage of maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth. METHODS: Fifty-two patients (mean age 21.35±2.2 years) with Class I bi-dentoalveolar protrusion, requiring all 1st premolar extractions and miniscrews for anchorage, were randomly distributed into two groups (n=26 each): MOP group treated using single application of MOP's and control group treated with routine sliding mechanics, for en-masse retraction. The primary outcomes were assessed using CBCT-based measurements. RESULTS: Anterior teeth in MOP group showed increased mean OIIRR than control group, though the difference was statistically non-significant [maxillary anteriors, MOP group - OIIRR=0.78±0.29mm and control group OIIRR=0.73±0.36mm; mandibular anteriors, MOP group - OIIRR=0.733±0.20mm and control group OIIRR=0.70±0.24mm]. Levander and Malmgren's Index for objective scoring of OIIRR revealed only mild resorption with most teeth in both the groups (47% and 51%, respectively). Lateral incisors showed highest OIIRR followed by central incisors and canines in both groups. Lingual side bone thickness and height decreased significantly, however, the differences between the two groups were non-significant (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Within the settings of the current RCT, en-masse retraction when combined with single application of micro-osteoperforations did not pose an increased risk of root resorption or alveolar bone changes compared to routine sliding mechanics.


Subject(s)
Orthodontic Anchorage Procedures , Root Resorption , Spiral Cone-Beam Computed Tomography , Humans , Root Resorption/diagnostic imaging , Root Resorption/etiology , Orthodontic Anchorage Procedures/methods , Bicuspid/diagnostic imaging , Bicuspid/surgery , Incisor , Tooth Movement Techniques/adverse effects , Tooth Movement Techniques/methods
15.
Eur J Orthod ; 45(2): 186-195, 2023 03 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36056904

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Humans may consume various beverages in everyday life. Previous research has shown that the administration of different substances (medicinal or not) may affect bone turnover and, thus, orthodontic tooth movement. It would be anticipated that the substances contained in beverages could have an impact on tooth movement, as well. OBJECTIVE: To investigate in a systematic way and appraise the quality of the available evidence from animal studies regarding the impact of various drinks or the main ingredients included in beverages on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement. SEARCH METHODS: Search without restriction in six databases (including grey literature) and hand searching were performed until March 2022. SELECTION CRITERIA: We looked for controlled animal studies investigating the effect of drinks, or the main ingredients included in beverages, on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: After study retrieval and selection, relevant data was extracted, and the risk of bias was assessed using the SYRCLE's Risk of Bias Tool. The quality of available evidence was assessed with the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. RESULTS: The initially identified records were finally reduced to nine studies conducted on animals. Carbonated soft drinks were shown to decrease the rate of tooth movement, but alcohol consumption did not have an impact. Exploratory meta-analysis showed that caffeine exhibited an acceleratory effect after 3 weeks of force application. Exploratory meta-regression results indicated that high dosages of caffeine reduced the rate of tooth movement. CONCLUSIONS: The located animal experiments reported that caffeine accelerates, carbonated drinks decelerate, while alcohol does not affect the rate of orthodontic tooth movement. However, due to various limitations it remains unclear whether caffeine, alcohol, or carbonated drinks finally influence tooth movement in animal studies. REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/jyhbd/).


Subject(s)
Caffeine , Tooth Movement Techniques , Humans , Animals , Tooth Movement Techniques/adverse effects , Tooth Movement Techniques/methods
16.
Eur J Orthod ; 45(2): 196-207, 2023 03 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36056906

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Autologous platelet-rich concentrates (PRCs) are recently used as a local biological substance in orthodontics to accelerate the rate of tooth movement. OBJECTIVES: This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effects of PRCs on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement (OTM). SEARCH METHODS: Unrestricted search of five electronic databases supplemented by the manual and gray literature search were undertaken in March 2022. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effect of PRCs on the rate of OTM with their side effect were included in this systematic review. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data items were extracted by two authors using a pre-piloted extraction form. Similar outcomes within a comparable time frame were synthesized in a meta-analysis. RESULTS: Fourteen studies were deemed eligible for inclusion and seven RCTs were pooled in a meta-analysis. Canine retraction rate was higher in the side of PRCs injection than the control side by 0.28 mm/month (95% CI: 0.16-0.40, I2 = 95.6 per cent, P < 0.001, 345 patients) in the first 4 months after PRCs injection. There was no statistically significant difference between the PRCs side and the control side regarding molar anchorage loss (MAL) (MD = 0.03 mm, 95% CI: -0.18 to 0.24, I2 = 46.3 per cent, P = 0.78, 44 patients), canine rotation (MD = -0.19o, 95% CI: -1.95 to 1.57, I2 = 45.4 per cent, P = 0.96, 48 patients), or en-masse retraction. Likewise, there was no difference between both groups in terms of the duration of de-crowding. The mandibular canine retraction was statistically higher on the PRCs side than on the control side by 0.17 mm/month (P < 0.001, one trial). Regarding root resorption, there was no statistically significant difference between the experimental and control sides within the follow-up time. Mild pain scores were reported by the patients in the first 24 hours after injections. CONCLUSIONS: Low-level evidence indicates that the effect of PRCs on OTM is minor and clinically insignificant. The findings should be interpreted with caution due to the inherent limitations in the included RCTs. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42022300026).


Subject(s)
Malocclusion , Orthodontics , Root Resorption , Humans , Tooth Movement Techniques/adverse effects , Malocclusion/etiology , Dental Care , Root Resorption/etiology
17.
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi ; 40(6): 629-637, 2022 Dec 01.
Article in English, Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36416314

ABSTRACT

External apical root resorption is among the most common risks of orthodontic treatment, and it cannot be completely avoided and predicted. Risk factors causing orthodontic root resorption can generally be divided into patient- and treatment-related factors. Root resorption that occurs during orthodontic treatment is usually detected by radiographical examination. Mild or moderate root absorption usually does no obvious harm, but close attention is required. When severe root resorption occurs, it is generally recommended to suspend the treatment for 3 months for the cementum to be restored. To unify the risk factors of orthodontic root resorption and its clinical suggestions, we summarized the theoretical knowledge and clinical experience of more than 20 authoritative experts in orthodontics and related fields in China. After discussion and summarization, this consensus was made to provide reference for orthodontic clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Root Resorption , Tooth Movement Techniques , Humans , Tooth Movement Techniques/adverse effects , Root Resorption/diagnostic imaging , Root Resorption/etiology , Consensus , Dental Cementum , Risk Factors
18.
Georgian Med News ; (330): 43-48, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36427840

ABSTRACT

According to the literature, more than 60% of orthodontic patients take certain medications and/or nutritional supplements on regular basis. To improve the efficiency and quality of treatment an orthodontic treatment algorithm has been developed for patients taking bisphosphonates, drugs for the treatment of diabetes (except thiazolidinediones and SGLT-2 inhibitors), hypotensive agents, antihistamines, statins, NSAIDs, estrogen-containing drugs, tetracycline, interferon-γ (copyright database IREG deposit certificate No. 2080699). The result of the study showed that 12,6% of patients, who came for consultation and orthodontic treatment, use different drugs on regular basis, with potential ability to slow down tooth movement. ; Algorithm helps orthodontist to make correct treatment plan, select appropriate orthodontic appliance activation regime, choose additional diagnostic procedures and consultations with doctors of other medical specialities according to patient's drug history.


Subject(s)
Diphosphonates , Tooth Movement Techniques , Humans , Tooth Movement Techniques/adverse effects , Tooth Movement Techniques/methods , Diphosphonates/pharmacology , Orthodontic Appliances , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/pharmacology , Algorithms , Estrogens
19.
Orphanet J Rare Dis ; 17(1): 376, 2022 10 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36253866

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this systematic review was to determine the orthodontic and dentofacial orthopedic treatments carried out in patients with ectodermal dysplasia to facilitate functional and aesthetic rehabilitation. METHODS: The systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis statement. We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Scielo, LILACS, EBSCOhost and Embase databases up to 6 January 2022. We included articles describing patients with any type of ectodermal dysplasia who received orthodontic or dentofacial orthopedic treatment to facilitate functional and aesthetic oral rehabilitation. The search was not restricted by language or year of publication. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Quality Assessment Scale of the University of Adelaide for case series and case reports. The review was registered at the University of York Centre for reviews (CRD42021288030). RESULTS: Of the initial 403 studies found, 29 met the inclusion criteria. After applying the quality scale, 23 were left for review-21 case reports and 2 case series. The initial age of patients ranged from 34 months to 24 years. Thirteen studies were on hypohidrotic and/or anhidrotic ectodermal dysplasia, of which two were X-chromosome linked. In one study, the patient had Wiktop syndrome, and in nine the type of ectodermal dysplasia was not specified. The duration of treatment was 7 weeks to 10 years. The treatments described were: fixed orthodontic appliances or simple acrylic plates designed for tooth movement, including leveling and aligning, closing of diastemata, retraction of impacted teeth in the dental arch; clear aligners; fixed and/or removable appliances for the correction of skeletal and/or dentoalveolar relationships; palatal expanders in combination with face masks for orthopedic traction of the maxilla; and orthognathic surgery. Only three studies provided cephalometric data. CONCLUSION: The level of evidence of the articles reviewed was low and most orthopedic and dentofacial orthodontic treatments described were focused on correcting dental malpositioning and jaw asymmetries and not on stimulating growth from an early age. Studies with greater scientific evidence are needed to determine the best treatment for these patients.


Subject(s)
Ectodermal Dysplasia 1, Anhidrotic , Ectodermal Dysplasia , Child, Preschool , Ectodermal Dysplasia/therapy , Humans , Tooth Movement Techniques/adverse effects
20.
J Pak Med Assoc ; 72(9): 1740-1745, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36280967

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of localized vibration on amount of canine retraction after 1st premolar extractions and to assess the anchorage loss. Methods: This quasi-experimental clinical study was conducted at University College of dentistry, Department of Orthodontics, University of Lahore. Data was collected from 30 patients who were already undergoing orthodontic treatment after taking their consent. The study was completed in one year, from Jan 2019 to Feb 2020. Results were compared with independent samples t-test using IBM-SPSS version 23.0. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in the amount of tooth movement between the experimental and control side (p= 0.22). There was also no significant difference in the loss of anchorage (in terms of mesial movement of molar and rotation of canine) between both the groups (p > 0.05). Patients reported the use of electric tooth brush very practical and comfortable. No harm was observed. Conclusion: Supplemental vibrations induced by electric tooth brush did not increase the amount of tooth movement in terms of canine retraction nor did it decrease the loss of anchorage.


Subject(s)
Orthodontic Anchorage Procedures , Orthodontic Anchorage Procedures/methods , Cuspid , Vibration , Cross-Sectional Studies , Tooth Movement Techniques/adverse effects , Tooth Movement Techniques/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...