Economic evaluation of deep-brain stimulation for Tourette's syndrome: an initial exploration.

BACKGROUND: Deep-brain stimulation (DBS) can be effective in controlling medically intractable symptoms of Tourette's syndrome (TS). There is no evidence to date, though, of the potential cost-effectiveness of DBS for this indication. OBJECTIVE: To provide the first estimates of the likely cost-effectiveness of DBS in the treatment of severe TS. METHODS: We conducted a cost-utility analysis using clinical data from 17 Australian patients receiving DBS. Direct medical costs for DBS using non-rechargeable and rechargeable batteries and for the alternative best medical treatment (BMT), and health utilities for BMT were sourced from the literature. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were estimated using a Markov models with a 10-year time horizon and 5% discount rate. RESULTS: DBS increased quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained from 2.76 to 4.60 over a 10-year time horizon. The ICER for DBS with non-rechargeable (rechargeable) batteries, compared to BMT, was A$33,838 (A$15,859) per QALY. The ICER estimates are sensitive to DBS costs and selected time horizon. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that DBS may be a cost-effective treatment for severe TS, based on the very limited clinical data available and under particular assumptions. While the limited availability of data presents a challenge, we also conduct sensitivity analyses to test the robustness of the results to the assumptions used in the analysis. We nevertheless recommend the implementation of randomised controlled trials that collect a comprehensive range of costs and the use of a widely accepted health-related quality of life instrument to enable more definitive statements about the cost-effectiveness of DBS for TS.

Cost of illness in patients with Gilles de la Tourette's syndrome.

We evaluated the health economic burden of patients with Gilles de la Tourette's syndrome (GTS) in Germany over a 3-month observation period. Direct and indirect costs were evaluated in 200 outpatients with GTS (mean age 35 +/- 11.5 years) in Germany. Patients were recruited from three outpatient departments that specialized in GTS and completed a semi-structured and self-rating interview with questionnaires screening for direct and indirect medical and non-medical costs, health status, depression, amount and severity of symptoms. Costs were obtained from various German medical economic resources. Indirect costs for lost productivity were calculated using the human capital approach. Costs were calculated from the point of view of healthcare and transfer payment providers and the individual patient. Multivariate regression analyses were performed to identify independent cost predictors. Costs are in year 2006-2007 values. Direct costs were 620 +/- 1,697.1euro, including rehabilitation 98.8 +/- 993.6euro, hospitalization 195.8 +/- 1,267.8euro, outpatient treatment 14.0 +/- 40.6euro, ancillary treatment 51.9 +/- 137.4euro. Drug costs were 223.1 +/- 430.4. The indirect medical costs amounted to 2,511.3 +/- 3,809.5euro for productivity loss and to 220.0 +/- 1,092euro for absenteeism. The following variables were found to impact on direct costs: employment status, occupational advancement, depression, quality of life, age. Disease severity had no influence on cost. Because of the earlier age of disease onset, indirect costs are higher than direct costs. Interestingly, disease severity did not influence the resource need in this population. Unfortunately, no cost of illness studies are available for comparison. Further health economic studies, especially cost-effectiveness studies, are necessary for a basis for rational resource allocation.