Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
J ECT ; 34(3): 137-143, 2018 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30095680

ABSTRACT

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) devices apply direct current through electrodes on the scalp with the intention to modulate brain function for experimental or clinical purposes. All tDCS devices include a current controlled stimulator, electrodes that include a disposable electrolyte, and headgear to position the electrodes on the scalp. Transcranial direct current stimulation dose can be defined by the size and position of electrodes and the duration and intensity of current applied across electrodes. Electrode design and preparation are important for reproducibility and tolerability. High-definition tDCS uses smaller electrodes that can be arranged in arrays to optimize brain current flow. When intended to be used at home, tDCS devices require specific device design considerations. Computational models of current flow have been validated and support optimization and hypothesis testing. Consensus on the safety and tolerability of tDCS is protocol specific, but medical-grade tDCS devices minimize risk.


Subject(s)
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/history , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/instrumentation , Biophysics , Electronics , Equipment Design , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Humans , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/adverse effects
4.
Brain Stimul ; 10(2): 187-195, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27965065

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In recent years, neuroscientists and ethicists have warned of the dangers of the unsupervised home use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), in which individuals stimulate their own brains with low levels of electricity for self-improvement purposes. Although the home use of tDCS is often referred to as a novel phenomenon, in reality the late nineteenth and early twentieth century saw a proliferation of electrical stimulation devices for home use. In particular, the use of an object known as the medical battery bears a number of striking similarities to the modern-day use of tDCS. OBJECTIVE: This article reviews a number of features thought to be unique to the present day home use of brain stimulation, with a particular focus on analogies between tDCS and the medical battery. METHODS: Archival research was conducted at the Bakken Museum and at the American Medical Association's Historical Health Fraud Archives. RESULTS: Many of the features characterizing the contemporary home use tDCS-a do-it-yourself (DIY) movement, anti-medical establishment themes, conflicts between lay and professional usage-are a repetition of themes that occurred a century ago with regard to the medical battery. A number of features, however, seem to be unique to the present, such as the dominant discourse about risk and safety, the division between cranial and non-cranial stimulation, and utilization for cognitive enhancement purposes. CONCLUSION(S): Viewed in the long durée, the contemporary use of electrical stimulation at home is not a novel phenomenon, but rather the latest wave in a series of ongoing attempts by lay individuals to utilize electricity for therapeutic purposes.


Subject(s)
Advertising/history , Self Care/history , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/history , Brain/physiology , Electric Stimulation/instrumentation , History, 19th Century , History, 20th Century , Humans , Self Care/instrumentation , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/instrumentation
6.
Expert Rev Med Devices ; 13(4): 391-404, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26894636

ABSTRACT

Recently, techniques to non-invasively modulate specific brain areas gained popularity in the form of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation. These non-invasive techniques have already shown promising outcomes in various studies with healthy subjects as well as patient populations. Despite widespread dissemination of tDCS, there remain significant unknowns about the influence of a diverse number of tDCS parameters (e.g. polarity, size, position of electrodes & duration of stimulation) in inducing neurophysiological and behavioral effects. This article explores both techniques starting with the history of tDCS, to the differences between conventional tDCS and high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation, the underlying physiological mechanism, the (in)direct effects, the applications of tDCS with varying parameters, the efficacy, the safety issues and the opportunities for future research.


Subject(s)
Postsynaptic Potential Summation , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/instrumentation , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/methods , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Humans , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/history
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...