Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 133
Filter
1.
PLoS One ; 19(5): e0301851, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38696453

ABSTRACT

This study tested the usability of a home-based self-administration transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) device designed specifically for women's health needs. This is a single center triple blinded clinical usability study for a new wireless, Bluetooth-controlled wearable tDCS device for women's health. The study aims to evaluate the usability and effective blinding of a home-based tDCS system. A total of forty-nine women of reproductive age were randomly allocated (1:1) to receive one session of active tDCS (n = 24) or sham tDCS (n = 25) over the motor and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Each participant self-administered one 20-minute session without supervision following guidance on a software application alone. The System Usability Scale (SUS) and the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) were used to evaluate the usability of the system. Regardless of sham or active conditions, all users found the system easy to use without the support of researchers. Usability scores were considered to be "excellent" in both groups and no significant difference was found between sham and active groups showing effective blinding of the device (Active group: 93.7 (83.1-97.5); Sham group 90 (86.2-95) p = 0.79) and PGIC (Active group: 2 (1-2.75); Sham group 2 (1-2) p = 0.99) using an unpaired t-test or non-parametric statistical tests accordingly. The new Bluetooth-controlled wearable tDCS device is easy, safe to use and completely controlled by a smartphone app. This device is focused on women's health and will be tested as an alternative treatment for chronic pelvic pain and mood disturbance associated with menstrual cycles in further research.


Subject(s)
Dysmenorrhea , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation , Humans , Female , Adult , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/methods , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/instrumentation , Dysmenorrhea/therapy , Young Adult , Self Administration/instrumentation , Wearable Electronic Devices , Prefrontal Cortex/physiology
2.
Sensors (Basel) ; 24(8)2024 Apr 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38676129

ABSTRACT

This study presents phosphenotron, a device for enhancing the sensory spatial resolution of phosphenes in the visual field (VF). The phosphenotron employs a non-invasive transcranial alternating current stimulation (NITACS) to modulate brain activity by applying weak electrical currents to the scalp or face. NITACS's unique application induces phosphenes, a phenomenon where light is perceived without external stimuli. Unlike previous invasive methods, NITACS offers a non-invasive approach to create these effects. The study focused on assessing the spatial resolution of NITACS-induced phosphenes, crucial for advancements in visual aid technology and neuroscience. Eight participants were subjected to NITACS using a novel electrode arrangement around the eye orbits. Results showed that NITACS could generate spatially defined phosphene patterns in the VF, varying among individuals but consistently appearing within their VF and remaining stable through multiple stimulations. The study established optimal parameters for vibrant phosphene induction without discomfort and identified electrode positions that altered phosphene locations within different VF regions. Receiver Operating characteristics analysis indicated a specificity of 70.7%, sensitivity of 73.9%, and a control trial accuracy of 98.4%. These findings suggest that NITACS is a promising, reliable method for non-invasive visual perception modulation through phosphene generation.


Subject(s)
Phosphenes , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation , Visual Fields , Humans , Phosphenes/physiology , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/methods , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/instrumentation , Male , Visual Fields/physiology , Female , Adult , Visual Perception/physiology , Young Adult , Electrodes
3.
Neurosci Lett ; 764: 136211, 2021 11 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34481881

ABSTRACT

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been shown to enhance or block online learning of motor skills, depending on the current direction. However, most research on the use of tDCS has been limited to the study of relatively simple motor tasks. The purpose of the present study was to examine the influence of anodal (a-tDCS) and cathodal (c-tDCS) direct current stimulation on the online learning during a single session of dart throwing. Fifty-eight young adults were randomized to a-tDCS, c-tDCS, or SHAM groups and completed a pre-test block of dart throws, a 20-minute practice block of throws while receiving their stimulation condition, and a post-test block of dart throws. The results showed that a-tDCS accelerated the skill learning of dart throwing more than SHAM and c-tDCS conditions. The SHAM and c-tDCS conditions were not different. We conclude that a-tDCS may have a positive effect in a single training session which would be ideal in a recreational game environment where repeated practice is not common.


Subject(s)
Education, Distance , Learning/physiology , Motor Cortex/physiology , Motor Skills/physiology , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/methods , Adult , Double-Blind Method , Electrodes , Healthy Volunteers , Humans , Recreation , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/instrumentation , Young Adult
4.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 19134, 2021 09 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34580390

ABSTRACT

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) has been shown to promote working memory (WM), however, its efficacy against time-on-task-related performance decline and associated cognitive fatigue remains uncertain. This study examined the impact of anodal tDCS of the left DLPFC on performance during a fatiguing visuospatial WM test. We adopted a repeated measures design, where 32 healthy adults (16 female), underwent anodal, control and sham tDCS on separate days. They completed an hour long two-back test, with stimulation intensity, onset, and duration set at 1 mA, at the 20th minute for 10 minutes respectively. Task performance, subjective responses, and heart rate variability (HRV) were captured during the experiment. Anodal tDCS substantially improved WM relative to sham tDCS and control in both sexes. These benefits lasted beyond the stimulation interval, and were unique across performance measures. However, no perceptual changes in subjective effort or fatigue levels were noted between conditions, although participants reported greater discomfort during stimulation. While mood and sleepiness changed with time-on-task, reflecting fatigue, these were largely similar across conditions. HRV increased under anodal tDCS and control, and plateaued under sham tDCS. We found that short duration anodal tDCS at 1 mA was an effective countermeasure to time-on-task deficits during a visuospatial two-back task, with enhancement and preservation of WM capacity. However, these improvements were not available at a perceptual level. Therefore, wider investigations are necessary to determine "how" such solutions will be operationalized in the field, especially within human-centered systems.


Subject(s)
Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex/physiology , Fatigue/therapy , Memory, Short-Term/physiology , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Electrodes , Female , Healthy Volunteers , Humans , Male , Time Factors , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/instrumentation , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
5.
J Alzheimers Dis ; 83(2): 753-769, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34366347

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The optimal stimulation parameters when using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to improve memory performance in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) are lacking. In healthy individuals, inter-individual differences in brain anatomy significantly influence current distribution during tDCS, an effect that might be aggravated by variations in cortical atrophy in AD patients. OBJECTIVE: To measure the effect of individualized HD-tDCS in AD patients. METHODS: Nineteen AD patients were randomly assigned to receive active or sham high-definition tDCS (HD-tDCS). Computational modeling of the HD-tDCS-induced electric field in each patient's brain was analyzed based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. The chosen montage provided the highest net anodal electric field in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). An accelerated HD-tDCS design was conducted (2 mA for 3×20 min) on two separate days. Pre- and post-intervention cognitive tests and T1 and T2-weighted MRI and diffusion tensor imaging data at baseline were analyzed. RESULTS: Different montages were optimal for individual patients. The active HD-tDCS group improved significantly in delayed memory and MMSE performance compared to the sham group. Five participants in the active group had higher scores on delayed memory post HD-tDCS, four remained stable and one declined. The active HD-tDCS group had a significant positive correlation between fractional anisotropy in the anterior thalamic radiation and delayed memory score. CONCLUSION: HD-tDCS significantly improved delayed memory in AD. Our study can be regarded as a proof-of-concept attempt to increase tDCS efficacy. The present findings should be confirmed in larger samples.


Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease/therapy , Computer Simulation , Electrodes , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Prefrontal Cortex/physiology , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/instrumentation , Brain/physiology , Diffusion Tensor Imaging , Female , Humans , Male , Neuropsychological Tests/statistics & numerical data , Pilot Projects
6.
Iran J Med Sci ; 46(4): 272-280, 2021 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34305239

ABSTRACT

Background: Epilepsy is a chronic disorder that affects both sexes and causes some physiological and psychological disabilities. The present study aimed to examine the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on the psychological profile of patients with epilepsy. Methods: The design of the present study was a randomized clinical trial with a pretest-posttest and a control group. The statistical population comprised patients with epilepsy, who were referred for treatment to a private health center in Urmia in 2019. The sample consisted of 30 patients with epilepsy selected via the convenience sampling method. Data collection was performed through the use of the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21) questionnaire. After the pretest, 15 subjects were randomly assigned to the intervention group, and 15 subjects were placed in the control group. The intervention was performed in 10 sessions, and the duration of stimulation was 20 minutes. The anode was placed in the F3 region (left hemisphere), the cathode in the F4 (right hemisphere), and the current intensity was 1.5 mA. After the intervention, the posttest was conducted for both groups, and the data were analyzed using a univariate covariance analysis in the SPSS software, version 23. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The results of the ANCOVA analyses revealed significant differences between the intervention and control groups. The tDCS group represented a significant decrease in the scales of depression, anxiety, and stress in the posttest in comparison with the pretest (P≤0.001). Conclusion: The results showed that tDCS could reduce depression, anxiety, and stress with the changes caused in the brain system. Trial Registration Number: IRCT20190803044417N1.


Subject(s)
Anxiety/therapy , Depression/therapy , Epilepsy/complications , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/standards , Adolescent , Adult , Anxiety/psychology , Depression/psychology , Epilepsy/therapy , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Stress, Psychological/psychology , Stress, Psychological/therapy , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/instrumentation , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/methods , Treatment Outcome
7.
PLoS One ; 16(7): e0254695, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34270620

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Cognitive impairments are a frequent and difficult to treat symptom in patients with schizophrenia and the strongest predictor for a successful reintegration in occupational and everyday life. Recent research suggests transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to enhance cognition in this patient group. However, the question regarding its acute effectiveness on executive functions remains largely unanswered. Here, we examined in a randomized, double blind, sham-controlled repeated-measures design the impact of tDCS on performance in several executive functions in patients with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder or acute transient psychotic disorder. METHODS: Patients (N = 48) were tested twice using standardized, well-constructed and clinically validated neuropsychological tests assessing verbal working memory, response inhibition, mental flexibility and problem solving. In session 1 they solely underwent the neuropsychological assessment, whereas in session 2 they additionally received 2 mA of anodal tDCS stimulation over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), cathode right supraorbital ridge, or sham stimulation for 20 minutes. RESULTS: Patients of both groups were not able to correctly discriminate the type of stimulation received confirming the success of the blinding procedure. However, analyzing the whole sample the change in performance from session 1 to session 2 was the same in the verum as in the sham condition (all p >.5). Moreover, a subsequent exploratory analysis showed that performance in the response inhibition task was worse for patients that engaged in the task within 20 minutes after the end of the verum stimulation. CONCLUSION: Hence, 2 mA of anodal tDCS applied over the left DLPFC did not acutely enhance executive functions in patients with schizophrenia or related disorders but impaired performance in the response inhibition task shortly after. Future studies should continue to seek for effective stimulation configurations for this patient group. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study is registered in the "Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien DRKS", German Clinical Trial Register and has been allocated the following number: DRKS00022126.


Subject(s)
Executive Function/physiology , Prefrontal Cortex/physiopathology , Schizophrenia/therapy , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/methods , Adult , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Neuropsychological Tests , Prospective Studies , Schizophrenia/diagnosis , Schizophrenia/physiopathology , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/instrumentation , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
8.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 118(30)2021 07 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34301889

ABSTRACT

Wireless, battery-free, and fully subdermally implantable optogenetic tools are poised to transform neurobiological research in freely moving animals. Current-generation wireless devices are sufficiently small, thin, and light for subdermal implantation, offering some advantages over tethered methods for naturalistic behavior. Yet current devices using wireless power delivery require invasive stimulus delivery, penetrating the skull and disrupting the blood-brain barrier. This can cause tissue displacement, neuronal damage, and scarring. Power delivery constraints also sharply curtail operational arena size. Here, we implement highly miniaturized, capacitive power storage on the platform of wireless subdermal implants. With approaches to digitally manage power delivery to optoelectronic components, we enable two classes of applications: transcranial optogenetic activation millimeters into the brain (validated using motor cortex stimulation to induce turning behaviors) and wireless optogenetics in arenas of more than 1 m2 in size. This methodology allows for previously impossible behavioral experiments leveraging the modern optogenetic toolkit.


Subject(s)
Brain/physiology , Optogenetics , Prostheses and Implants/statistics & numerical data , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/instrumentation , Wireless Technology/instrumentation , Animals , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL
10.
Nat Commun ; 12(1): 3151, 2021 05 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34035240

ABSTRACT

Computational modeling and human studies suggest that transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) modulates alpha oscillations by entrainment. Yet, a direct examination of how tACS interacts with neuronal spiking activity that gives rise to the alpha oscillation in the thalamo-cortical system has been lacking. Here, we demonstrate how tACS entrains endogenous alpha oscillations in head-fixed awake ferrets. We first show that endogenous alpha oscillations in the posterior parietal cortex drive the primary visual cortex and the higher-order visual thalamus. Spike-field coherence is largest for the alpha frequency band, and presumed fast-spiking inhibitory interneurons exhibit strongest coupling to this oscillation. We then apply alpha-tACS that results in a field strength comparable to what is commonly used in humans (<0.5 mV/mm). Both in these ferret experiments and in a computational model of the thalamo-cortical system, tACS entrains alpha oscillations by following the theoretically predicted Arnold tongue. Intriguingly, the fast-spiking inhibitory interneurons exhibit a stronger entrainment response to tACS in both the ferret experiments and the computational model, likely due to their stronger endogenous coupling to the alpha oscillation. Our findings demonstrate the in vivo mechanism of action for the modulation of the alpha oscillation by tACS.


Subject(s)
Alpha Rhythm/physiology , Thalamus/physiology , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/methods , Visual Cortex/physiology , Animals , Computer Simulation , Electrodes, Implanted , Electroencephalography , Female , Ferrets , Interneurons/physiology , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Microelectrodes , Models, Animal , Models, Neurological , Nerve Net/physiology , Optogenetics , Thalamus/cytology , Thalamus/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/instrumentation , Visual Cortex/cytology , Visual Cortex/diagnostic imaging
11.
Clin Neurophysiol ; 132(7): 1444-1451, 2021 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34023626

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and temporal dynamic of the antiepileptic effect of spaced transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in different focal epilepsies. METHODS: Cathodal tDCS with individual electrode placement was performed in 15 adults with drug resistant focal epilepsy. An amplitude of 2 mA was applied twice for 9 minutes, with an interstimulation interval of 20 minutes. Tolerability was assessed via the Comfort Rating Questionnaire and the frequency of interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) was sequentially compared between the 24 hours before and after tDCS. RESULTS: TDCS led to a significant reduction in the total number of IEDs/24 h by up to 68% (mean ± SD: -30.4 ± 21.1%, p = 0.001) as well as in seizure frequency (p = 0.041). The maximum IED reduction was observed between the 3rd and 21st hour after stimulation. Favorable clinical response was associated with structural etiology and clearly circumscribed epileptogenic foci but did not differ between frontal and temporal epilepsies. Overall, the tDCS treatment was well tolerated and did not lead to severe adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: The spaced stimulation approach proved to be safe and well-tolerated in patients with drug-resistant unifocal epilepsies, leading to sustained IED and seizure frequency reduction. SIGNIFICANCE: Spaced tDCS induces mediate antiepileptic effects with promising therapeutic potential.


Subject(s)
Drug Resistant Epilepsy/diagnosis , Drug Resistant Epilepsy/therapy , Electroencephalography/methods , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/instrumentation , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/methods , Adult , Cohort Studies , Drug Resistant Epilepsy/physiopathology , Electrodes , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
12.
Nat Commun ; 12(1): 2243, 2021 04 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33854049

ABSTRACT

Diverse transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) techniques have recently been developed to elucidate the role of neural oscillations, but critically, it remains questionable whether neural entrainment genuinely occurs and is causally related to the resulting behavior. Here, we provide a perspective on an emerging integrative research program across systems, species, theoretical and experimental frameworks to elucidate the potential of tES to induce neural entrainment. We argue that such an integrative agenda is a requirement to establish tES as a tool to test the causal role of neural oscillations and highlight critical issues that should be considered when adopting a translational approach.


Subject(s)
Nervous System Physiological Phenomena , Nervous System/chemistry , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation , Animals , Biological Clocks , Humans , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/instrumentation , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/methods
13.
Int J Sports Med ; 42(1): 66-73, 2021 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32781476

ABSTRACT

Several types of routines and methods have been experimented to gain neuromuscular advantages, in terms of exercise performance, in athletes and fitness enthusiasts. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of biemispheric transcranial direct current stimulation on physical fitness indicators of healthy, physically active, men. In a randomized, single-blinded, crossover fashion, seventeen subjects (age: 30.9 ± 6.5 years, BMI: 24.8±3.1 kg/m2) underwent either stimulation or sham, prior to: vertical jump, sit & reach, and endurance running tests. Mixed repeated measures anova revealed a large main effect of stimulation for any of the three physical fitness measures. Stimulation determined increases of lower limb power (+ 5%), sit & reach amplitude (+ 9%) and endurance running capacity (+ 12%) with respect to sham condition (0.16<ηp2 < 0.41; p<0.05). Ratings-of-perceived-exertion, recorded at the end of each test session, did not change across all performances. However, in the stimulated-endurance protocol, an average lower rate-of-perceived-exertion at iso-time was inferred. A portable transcranial direct current stimulation headset could be a valuable ergogenic resource for individuals seeking to improve physical fitness in daily life or in athletic training.


Subject(s)
Athletic Performance/physiology , Physical Fitness/physiology , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation , Adult , Cross-Over Studies , Exercise Test , Humans , Lower Extremity/physiology , Male , Perception/physiology , Physical Conditioning, Human/methods , Physical Endurance/physiology , Physical Exertion/physiology , Single-Blind Method , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/instrumentation , Wearable Electronic Devices , Young Adult
14.
Burns ; 47(3): 525-537, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33293156

ABSTRACT

Burn survivors experience myriad associated symptoms such as pain, pruritus, fatigue, impaired motor strength, post-traumatic stress, depression, anxiety, and sleep disturbance. Many of these symptoms are common and remain chronic, despite current standard of care. One potential novel intervention to target these post burn symptoms is transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). tDCS is a non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) technique that modulates neural excitability of a specific target or neural network. The aim of this work is to review the neural circuits of the aforementioned clinical sequelae associated with burn injuries and to provide a scientific rationale for specific NIBS targets that can potentially treat these conditions. We ran a systematic review, following the PRISMA statement, of tDCS effects on burn symptoms. Only three studies matched our criteria. One was a feasibility study assessing cortical plasticity in chronic neuropathic pain following burn injury, one looked at the effects of tDCS to reduce pain anxiety during burn wound care, and one assessed the effects of tDCS to manage pain and pruritus in burn survivors. Current literature on NIBS in burn remains limited, only a few trials have been conducted. Based on our review and results in other populations suffering from similar symptoms as patients with burn injuries, three main areas were selected: the prefrontal region, the parietal area and the motor cortex. Based on the importance of the prefrontal cortex in the emotional component of pain and its implication in various psychosocial symptoms, targeting this region may represent the most promising target. Our review of the neural circuitry involved in post burn symptoms and suggested targeted areas for stimulation provide a spring board for future study initiatives.


Subject(s)
Burns/complications , Models, Neurological , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/methods , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation/methods , Brain/abnormalities , Brain/metabolism , Burns/physiopathology , Humans , Peripheral Nerves/abnormalities , Peripheral Nerves/metabolism , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/adverse effects , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/instrumentation , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation/adverse effects , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation/instrumentation
15.
Phys Med Biol ; 65(22): 225018, 2020 11 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32916670

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: During transcranial electrical stimulation (tES), including transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), current density concentration around the electrode edges that is predicted by simplistic skin models does not match experimental observations of erythema, heating, or other adverse events. We hypothesized that enhancing models to include skin anatomical details, would alter predicted current patterns to align with experimental observations. METHOD: We develop a high-resolution multi-layer skin model (epidermis, dermis, and fat), with or without additional ultra-structures (hair follicles, sweat glands, and blood vessels). Current flow patterns across each layer and within ultra-structures were predicted using finite element methods considering a broad range of modeled tissue parameters including 78 combinations of skin layer conductivities (S m-1): epidermis (standard: 1.05 × 10-5; range: 1.05 × 10-6 to 0.465); dermis (standard: 0.23; range: 0.0023 to 23), fat (standard: 2 × 10-4; range: 0.02 to 2 × 10-5). The impact of each ultra-structures in isolation and combination was evaluated with varied basic geometries. An integrated final model is then developed. RESULTS: Consistent with prior models, current flow through homogenous skin was annular (concentrated at the electrode edges). In multi-layer skin, reducing epidermis conductivity and/or increasing dermis conductivity decreased current near electrode edges, however no realistic tissue layer parameters produced non-annular current flow at both epidermis and dermis. Addition of just hair follicles, sweat glands, or blood vessels resulted in current peaks around each ultrastructure, irrespective of proximity to electrode edges. Addition of only sweat glands was the most effective approach in reducing overall current concentration near electrode edges. Representation of blood vessels resulted in a uniform current flow across the vascular network. Finally, we ran the first realistic model of current flow across the skin. CONCLUSION: We confirm prior models exhibiting current concentration near hair follicles or sweat glands, but also exhibit that an overall annular pattern of current flow remains for realistic tissue parameters. We model skin blood vessels for the first time and show that this robustly distributes current across the vascular network, consistent with experimental erythema patterns. Only a state-of-the-art precise model of skin current flow predicts lack of current concentration near electrode edges across all skin layers.


Subject(s)
Skin/cytology , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation , Adipose Tissue/cytology , Dermis/cytology , Electrodes , Epidermis/metabolism , Hot Temperature , Humans , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/adverse effects , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/instrumentation
16.
Cerebellum ; 19(6): 812-823, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32734378

ABSTRACT

Balance control is essential to maintain a stable body position and to prevent falls. The aim of this study was to determine whether balance control could be improved by using cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and visual feedback in a combined approach. A total of 90 healthy volunteers were randomly assigned to six groups defined by the delivery of tDCS (cathodal or anodal or sham) and the provision or not of visual feedback on balance during the acquisition phase. tDCS was delivered over the cerebellar hemisphere ipsilateral to the dominant leg for 20 min at 2 mA during a unipedal stance task. Body sway (i.e., ankle angle and hip position) was measured as an overall maximal unit in anteroposterior and mediolateral direction, together with participant rating of perception of stability, before (baseline), during (acquisition), and after (final) the intervention. We found a reduction in body sway during the acquisition session when visual feedback alone was provided. When the visual feedback was removed (final session), however, body sway increased above baseline. Differently, the reduction in overall maximal body sway was maintained during the final session when the delivery of cathodal tDCS and visual feedback was combined. These findings suggest that cathodal tDCS may support the short-term maintenance of the positive effects of visual feedback on balance and provide the basis for a new approach to optimize balance control, with potential translational implications for the elderly and patients with impaired posture control.


Subject(s)
Cerebellum/physiology , Feedback, Sensory/physiology , Postural Balance/physiology , Psychomotor Performance/physiology , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/methods , Adult , Electrodes , Female , Humans , Male , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/instrumentation , Young Adult
17.
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol ; 38: 63-72, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32768154

ABSTRACT

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) induces polarity-dependent neuroplasticity: with conventional protocols, anodal tDCS results in excitability enhancement while cathodal stimulation reduces excitability. However, partially non-linear responses are observed with increased stimulation intensity and/or duration. Cathodal tDCS with 2 mA for 20 min reverses the excitability-diminishing plasticity induced by stimulation with 1 mA into excitation, while cathodal tDCS with 3 mA again results in excitability diminution. Since tDCS generates NMDA receptor-dependent neuroplasticity, such non-linearity could be explained by different levels of calcium concentration changes, which have been demonstrated in animal models to control for the directionality of plasticity. In this study, we tested the calcium dependency of non-linear cortical plasticity induced by cathodal tDCS in human subjects in a placebo controlled, double-blind and randomized design. The calcium channel blocker flunarizine was applied in low (2.5 mg), medium (5 mg) or high (10 mg) dosages before 20 min cathodal motor cortex tDCS with 3 mA in 12 young healthy subjects. After-effects of stimulation were monitored with TMS-induced motor evoked potentials (MEPs) until 2 h after stimulation. The results show that motor cortical excitability-diminishing after-effects of stimulation were unchanged, diminished, or converted to excitability enhancement with low, medium and high dosages of flunarizine. These results suggest a calcium-dependency of the directionality of tDCS-induced neuroplasticity, which may have relevant implications for future basic and clinical research.


Subject(s)
Calcium Channel Blockers/pharmacology , Calcium Channels/physiology , Evoked Potentials, Motor/physiology , Motor Cortex/physiology , Neuronal Plasticity/physiology , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/methods , Adult , Cross-Over Studies , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Double-Blind Method , Electrodes , Evoked Potentials, Motor/drug effects , Female , Humans , Male , Motor Cortex/drug effects , Neuronal Plasticity/drug effects , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/instrumentation , Young Adult
18.
Expert Rev Med Devices ; 17(9): 867-878, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32820677

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a prevalent and debilitating condition. First-line treatments include antidepressants and cognitive-behavioral psychotherapy (CBT). However, several patients present treatment-resistance and/or adverse effects. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a noninvasive neuromodulation technique, is an effective alternative for MDD. AREAS COVERED: We hereby review a portable tDCS device designed to be combined with a cognitive-behavioral intervention. This home-use device was developed by Flow Neuroscience™ and was recently approved in the UK and European Union. We discuss present evidence on tDCS efficacy and safety, both as a monotherapy and as a combined treatment. Moreover, we show a computer modeling tDCS procedure based on Flow parameters and montage. EXPERT OPINION: Electric field simulations revealed that Flow's tDCS device targets prefrontal cortical areas involved in MDD pathophysiology. In addition, the safety and efficacy profile revealed from prior tDCS studies support its use in depression. Finally, combining tDCS with cognitive-behavioral interventions might further enhance overall efficacy, although this aspect should be investigated in upcoming randomized, placebo-controlled trials.


Subject(s)
Depression/therapy , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/adverse effects , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/instrumentation , Cognitive Behavioral Therapy , Equipment Design , Humans , Treatment Outcome
19.
Sci Rep ; 10(1): 12114, 2020 07 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32694653

ABSTRACT

Despite promising preliminary results of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) treatment in patients with fibromyalgia (FM), several issues need to be addressed, including its limited efficacy, low response rate, and poor tolerability. We investigated the efficacy and safety of tDCS as an add-on treatment for chronic pain in Korean patients with FM. This study enrolled 46 patients who were refractory to pain medications from May 2016 to February 2017. A conventional tDCS device was used to supply 2 mA of current for 20 min on five consecutive days. The primary end-point was a change in visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score at the end of treatment; secondary end-points included changes in Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ), Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), and Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) scores. After tDCS, 46 patients showed clinical improvements in VAS pain scores on days 6, 13, and 36 compared with day 0 (p < 0.001). Improvement in FIQ was seen on day 13. The BDI decreased significantly on days 6 and 36, and BFI improved significantly on days 6 and 13. There were no significant improvements in STAI-I, STAI-II, and MOS-SS scores after tDCS. No serious adverse events were observed. Our results suggest that tDCS can result in significant pain relief in FM patients and may be an effective add-on treatment.


Subject(s)
Fibromyalgia/psychology , Fibromyalgia/therapy , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/instrumentation , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Pain Measurement , Republic of Korea , Surveys and Questionnaires , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
20.
PLoS One ; 15(7): e0236061, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32663223

ABSTRACT

Non-invasive neuromodulatory techniques, including transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), have been shown to modulate neuronal function and are used both in cognitive neuroscience and to treat neuropsychiatric conditions. In this context, animal models provide a powerful tool to identify the neurobiological mechanisms of action of tDCS. However, finding a current generator that is easily usable and which allows a wide range of stimulation parameters can be difficult and/or expensive. Here, we introduce the Open-tES device, a project under a Creative Commons License (CC BY, SA 4.0) shared on the collaborative platform Git-Hub. This current generator allows tDCS (and other kinds of stimulations) to be realized, is suitable for rodents, is easy to use, and is low-cost. Characterization has been performed to measure the precision and accuracy of the current delivered. We also aimed to compare its effects with a commercial stimulator used in clinical trials (DC-Stimulator Plus, NeuroConn, Germany). To achieve this, a behavioral study was conducted to evaluate its efficacy for decreasing depression related-behavior in mice. The stimulator precision and accuracy were better than 250 nA and 25 nA, respectively. The behavioral evaluation performed in mice in the present study did not reveal any significant differences between the commercial stimulator used in clinical trials and the Open-tES device. Accuracy and precision of the stimulator ensure high repeatability of the stimulations. This current generator constitutes a reliable and inexpensive tool that is useful for preclinical studies in the field of non-invasive electrical brain stimulation.


Subject(s)
Research/instrumentation , Software , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/instrumentation , Animals , Female , Mice , Reaction Time
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...