Comparing the cost of preparing matched unrelated donor and TCR α+ ß+ /CD19+ depleted donor material for pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplants in Australia.

Use of TCR α+ ß+ /CD19+ depletion in a pediatric setting has improved the utility of haploidentical donor material, resulting in better rates of engraftment, lower rates of graft vs host disease (GVHD), and improved transplant-related mortality. There are currently no data available on the costs of TCR α+ ß+ /CD19+ depletion. This study assessed the costs of acquiring and preparing TCR α+ ß+ /CD19+ depleted haploidentical donor cells in comparison with matched unrelated donor (MUD) products for use in pediatric patients in Australia. Data from four pediatric transplant centers were used to estimate the resources required for donor work-up, graft acquisition, and laboratory procedures for graft preparation. Information on MUD work-up and graft acquisition was also acquired from these sites and from the national coordinating donor center in Australia. Australian-specific prices and fees were used to estimate total average costs for each transplant type, converted to USD. Preparation of graft material (including work-up, acquisition, and laboratory processes) costs USD 28 963 for TCR α+ ß+ /CD19+ depleted haploidentical grafts and USD 27 297 for MUD grafts. The estimated difference of USD 1666 is largely attributed to the process and consumables to perform TCR α+ ß+ /CD19+ depletion. Given the potential for recipients of TCR α+ ß+ /CD19+ depleted grafts to require minimal GVHD prophylaxis and experience less transplant-related morbidity and mortality, use of TCR α+ ß+ /CD19+ depletion appears favorable despite the higher initial cost. Research is currently ongoing to assess the clinical effectiveness and potential cost-effectiveness of TCR α+ ß+ /CD19+ depletion over a patients' lifetime.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of haploidentical vs matched unrelated allogeneic hematopoietic stem cells transplantation in patients older than 55 years.

Due to limited donor availability, high comorbidities, and cost issues, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant is not universally accessible. The aim of this study was to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of haploidentical vs matched unrelated transplant. This retrospective study included patients with hematological malignancies older than 55 years who underwent haploidentical or matched unrelated transplant between 2011 and 2013 in Marseille. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio has been calculated using the mean overall survival and the mean transplant costs. Costs were calculated using a micro-costing strategy from the hospital perspective and a time horizon at 2 years. Haploidentical transplant was considered an innovative procedure and matched unrelated transplant as the reference. Probabilistic and sensitivity analyses were performed on the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. During inclusion, 29 patients underwent haploidentical transplant and 63 matched unrelated transplant. In haploidentical and matched unrelated transplant, the mean overall survival was 19.4 (1.6) months and 15.1 (1.2) months (p = 0.06), respectively, and the mean cost was 98,304 (40,872) € and 151,373 (65,742) € (p < 0.01), respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was assessed to -148,485 (-1,265,550; -64,368) € per life year gained. Among older patients suffering from hematological malignancies, haploidentical transplant seemed in our analysis to be cost-effective compared with matched unrelated transplant.