Haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for patients with myeloid sarcoma: a single center retrospective study.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) has been regarded as a potential strategy for myeloid sarcoma (MS). The previous reports focused mainly on matched sibling donor (MSD) or matched unrelated donor (MUD) transplantation. There are no reports on haploidentical HSCT (haplo-HSCT) in MS. We retrospectively reviewed 14 MS patients who underwent haplo-HSCT. All patients achieved complete donor engraftment. The median time for neutrophil engraftment and platelet engraftment were 10 (12-21) days and 18 (8-31) days. The 100-day cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and 3-year cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD were 37.7% (95%CI, 23.2-52.1%) and 35.7% (95%CI, 22.2-49.2%). Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation was documented in 86% patients, and only one patient developed CMV pneumonia. Treatment-related mortality occurred in one (7%) patient. The 1- and 3-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 21.4% (95%CI, 11.8-31.1%) and 35.7% (95%CI, 22.4-49.0%). The probability of overall survival at 1 and 3 years was 71.4% (95%CI, 51.3-99.5%) and 64.3% (95%CI, 43.5-95.0%), respectively. The probability of disease-free survival at 1 and 3 years was 71.4% (95%CI, 51.3-99.5%) and 57.1% (95%CI, 36.3-89.9%), respectively. In conclusion, haplo-HSCT is a feasible method for patients with MS who have no MSD or MUD.

Haploidentical transplantation in pediatric non-malignant diseases: A retrospective analysis on behalf of the Spanish Group for Hematopoietic Transplantation (GETH).

OBJECTIVE: Describe the GETH haploidentical stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) activity in non-malignant disease (NMDs). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from children with NMDs who underwent haplo-HSCT. RESULTS: From January 2001 to December 2016, 26 pediatric patients underwent 31 haplo-HSCT through ex vivo T cell-depleted (TCD) graft platforms or post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) at 7 Spanish centers. Five cases employed unmanipulated PT-Cy haplo-HSCT, 16 employed highly purified CD34+ cells, and 10 employed ex vivo TCD grafts manipulated either with CD3+ CD19+ depletion, TCRαß+ CD19+ selection or naive CD45RA+ T-cell depletion. Peripheral blood stem cells were the sole source for patients following TCD haplo-HSCT, and bone marrow was the source for one PT-Cy haplo-HSCT. The most common indications for transplantation were primary immunodeficiency disorders (PIDs), severe aplastic anemia, osteopetrosis, and thalassemia. The 1-year cumulative incidence of graft failure was 27.4%. The 1-year III-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) and 1-year chronic GvHD rates were 34.6% and 16.7%, respectively. The 2-year overall survival was 44.9% for PIDs, and the 2-year graft-versus-host disease-free and relapse-free survival rate was 37.6% for the other NMDs. The transplantation-related mortality at day 100 was 30.8%. CONCLUSION: Although these results are discouraging, improvements will come if procedures are centralized in centers of expertise.

Comparison of central nervous system relapse outcomes following haploidentical vs identical-sibling transplant for acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

To explore the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of central nervous system (CNS) relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and to compare the differences in CNS relapse between haploidentical donor HSCT (HID-HSCT) and HLA-identical sibling donor HSCT (ISD-HSCT). We performed a retrospective nested case-control study on patients with CNS relapse after allo-HSCT. The cumulative incidence of CNS relapse was 4.06% after allo-HSCT in ALL, with a significantly poor prognosis. The incidence was 3.91% and 5.36% in HID-HSCT and ISD-HSCT, respectively (p = .227). Among the patients with CNS relapse, the overall survival (OS) at 3 years was 56.2 ± 6.8% in the HID-HSCT subgroup and 76.9 ± 10.2% in the ISD-HSCT subgroup (p = .176). The 3-year cumulative incidence of systemic relapse was also comparable between the two subgroups (HID-HSCT, 40.6 ± 7.4%; ISD-HSCT, 13.3 ± 8.7%, respectively, p = .085). Younger age (p = .045), T-ALL (p = .035), hyperleukocytosis at diagnosis (p < .001), advanced disease stage at transplant (p < .001), pre-HSCT CNS involvement (p < .001), and absence of chronic graft vs host disease (cGVHD) (p < .001) were independent risk factors for CNS relapse after allo-HSCT. In conclusion, CNS relapse was a significant complication after allo-HSCT in ALL and was associated with poor prognosis. The incidences and outcomes were comparable between HID-HSCT and ISD-HSCT.

Cutaneous graft-versus-host disease incidence is similar in haploidentical and matched unrelated hematopoietic transplant recipients: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Cutaneous graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is common after hematopoietic cell transplants. Haploidentical transplants (Haplo) have historically higher rates of GVHD with overall outcomes improved with the use of posttransplant cyclophosphamide. Specific cutaneous outcomes have not been explored in haploidentical versus matched unrelated donor (MUD) transplants. OBJECTIVE: We sought to examine the incidence of GVHD in MUD and Haplo transplants. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients' records that received MUD or Haplo transplants between 2010 and 2015 with determination of GVHD severity and features by one investigator. RESULTS: The Haplo cohort included more minorities (22.7% vs 6.8%; P < .001). The incidence of acute cutaneous GVHD was similar (Haplo 47.7% [95% confidence interval {CI} 37.0-58.6%] vs MUD 42.6% [95% CI 37.9-47.3%]; P = .41). Chronic GVHD was also similar (Haplo 17.1% [95% CI 9.9-26.6%] vs MUD 12.8% [95% CI 9.9-16.3%]; P = .31). The Haplo group had lower rates of sclerosis (13.3% [95% CI 1.7-4.05%] vs 50.9% [95% CI 37.3-64.4%]; P = .0095). Other secondary outcomes showed no difference. LIMITATIONS: Severity of GVHD was determined retrospectively and not all patients were seen by a dermatologist. CONCLUSIONS: No difference was observed between rates or severity of acute or chronic GVHD. Sclerosis was less common in the Haplo group.

Comparison of frontline treatment with intensive immunosuppression therapy and HLA-haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for young patients with severe aplastic anemia - A meta analysis.

AIM: To compare the survivals and treatment related complications between immunosuppression therapy (IST) and haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) on children and young adults with severe aplastic anemia (SAA) in East Asia during the last 10 years. METHODS: After looking through Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science and Wanfang Data, a total of 491 patients from 7 retrospective studies conducted in East-Asia were included for meta-analysis based on Stata program. Publication bias was measured by Begger and Egger tests. 1/3/5/10 years overall survivals (OS), failure free survivals (FFS), incidence rates of adverse events and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled and compared. RESULTS: There was no difference of 1/3/5/10 years OS between IST group and haplo-HSCT group, but the 1/3/5/10 years FFS were significantly better in haplo-HSCT group compared with IST group (p < 0.01). However, higher incidence of infections was observed in haplo-HSCT group compared with IST group (76% versus 45%, p < 0.001). The pooled estimates for acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD) and chronic graft versus host disease (cGVHD) were 54% (95% Cl, 43%～64%) and 43% (95% CI, 18%～68%), respectively for haplo-HSCT group. Among them 38% (95%CI, 22%～54%) was grade III aGVHD and 11% (95% Cl, 0%～22%) was grade III-IV aGVHD. Death causes included severe infection, bleeding in IST group and infection, GVHD in haplo-HSCT group. CONCLUSIONS: The long-term survivals were similar for young patients with SAA who received IST or haplo-HSCT as the frontline treatment. The haplo-HSCT group showed a better FFS, on the other hand, had higher incidence of infection and GVHD.

Impact of conditioning intensity on outcomes of haploidentical stem cell transplantation for patients with acute myeloid leukemia 45 years of age and over.

BACKGROUND: T cell-replete haploidentical stem cell transplantation (haplo-SCT) is a valid therapeutic option for adult patients with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) lacking an HLA-matched sibling or unrelated donor. METHOD: We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of 912 AML patients ≥45 years of age who had undergone haplo-SCT with either myeloablative conditioning (MAC; n = 373) or reduced intensity conditioning (RIC; n = 539) regimens. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 31.1 and 25.7 months for MAC and RIC, respectively. The incidence of relapse and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) were 25.1% versus 28.7% and 31.0% versus 30.3% for MAC and RIC, respectively; 2-year leukemia-free survival (LFS) was 43.9% for MAC versus 41.0% for RIC. In multivariate analysis, the use of MAC versus RIC was not associated with a difference in the outcomes. Results were confirmed in the propensity score-weighted analysis. Disease status and performance status at transplantation were associated with outcomes. Notably, the use of posttransplantation cyclophosphamide was associated with reduced acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) stage III-IV, and NRM and increased overall survival, LFS, and GVHD-free, relapse-free survival. The use of mobilized peripheral blood stem cells was associated with an increased risk of stage II-IV aGVHD. CONCLUSION: No differences were found between MAC and RIC regimens for haplo-SCT in adults with AML who were ≥45 years of age. The type of GVHD prophylaxis, disease status, and performance status were the major predictors of transplantation outcome. These results may serve as the background for randomized study comparing RIC versus MAC for haplo-SCT in adults with AML.