Nanoemulsion as a feasible and biocompatible carrier for ocular delivery of travoprost: Improved pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties.

Travoprost is a synthetic prostaglandin F2α analogue used in treatment of glaucoma. Due to its water insolubility and oily nature, novel delivery systems need to be developed to enhance its bioavailability, and sustain its release. In the current work, travoprost nanoemulsion was explored as a novel carrier prepared using low energy technique. Results showed that travoprost nanoemulsions exhibited suitable nanodroplet size, zeta potential, pH, refractive index, controlled release, as well as sufficient stability under accelerated conditions. In vivo studies delineated the enhanced absorption of travoprost nanoemulsion compared to the marketed eye drops Travatan®, as proven by the higher Cmax and AUC of the former, and its prolonged intraocular pressure reduction time. Moreover, the nanoemulsion formulation was proven safe and non-irritant to ocular surfaces. Therefore, it can be suggested that travoprost nanoemulsion is a promising ocular delivery system for glaucoma treatment.

The Impact of Glaucoma Medications on Corneal Wound Healing.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of antiglaucoma drugs on the corneal healing process and corneal toxicity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four eye drops to treat glaucoma--Xalatan (latanoprost 50 µg/mL; Pfizer), Monoprost (latanoprost 50 µg/mL; Théa Pharma), Taflotan Sine (tafluprost 15 µg/mL; Santen Pharmaceutical Co.), Travatan (travoprost 40 µg/mL; Alcon), and 0.02% benzalkonium chloride (BAC) solution and HyloComod (1 mg/mL sodium hyaluronate; Ursapharm) as positive and negative control were tested regarding corneal irritability and effect on corneal healing. Formulas were tested over 3 days and administered 6 times daily on rabbit corneas cultured on an artificial anterior chamber (the Ex Vivo Eye Irritation Test system). Initially, 4 corneal abrasions (2.5 to 5.7 mm2) were applied. All defects were monitored during drug application by fluorescein stains and photographs. Glucose/lactate concentrations were monitored for corneal metabolic activity evaluation. RESULTS: For Xalatan and BAC, the corneal erosion size increased from 14.65 to 66.57 mm2 and 14.80 to 87.26 mm2. Travatan and Taflotan Sine did not interfere with corneal healing. Monoprost delayed corneal healing. For Xalatan and BAC, histology showed severe alteration of the superficial cornea. An increase in anterior chamber lactate concentration indicates corneal toxicity for Xalatan, BAC, and Monoprost. CONCLUSIONS: Corneal toxicity of Xalatan is most probably caused by BAC. Monoprost delays corneal healing, which is not well understood. The Monoprost effects could be caused by its additive, macrogolglycerolhydroxystearate 40. This excipient is a known skin irritant, and its concentration is relatively elevated in Monoprost, 50 mg/mL, compared with its active ingredient, latanoprost (0.05 mg/mL).