Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Fed Regist ; 76(139): 43119-21, 2011 Jul 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21774154

ABSTRACT

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is classifying the focused ultrasound stimulator system for aesthetic use into class II (special controls). The special control(s) that will apply to the device is the guidance document entitled "Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Focused Ultrasound Stimulator System for Aesthetic Use." The Agency is classifying the device into class II (special controls) in order to provide a reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness of the device.


Subject(s)
Device Approval/legislation & jurisprudence , Equipment Safety/classification , High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation/instrumentation , Surgery, Plastic/instrumentation , Ultrasonic Therapy/instrumentation , High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation/adverse effects , High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation/classification , Humans , Surgery, Plastic/legislation & jurisprudence , Ultrasonic Therapy/adverse effects , Ultrasonic Therapy/classification , United States , United States Food and Drug Administration
2.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants ; 24(4): 591-6, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19885398

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Ultrasound therapy induces clinical healing of irradiated avascular mandibular bone and fractures. In vitro ultrasound in tissue culture has been shown to stimulate bone formation synthesis and bone remodeling factors and to stimulate osteoblast proliferation. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of short-wave (1-MHz) and long-wave (45-kHz) ultrasound on the vascularity of the chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) of a fertilized egg. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The nature of the angiogenic effect was investigated using the CAM of a fertilized egg by: (1) application of sonicated fibroblast media incorporated into methylcellulose disks onto the CAM and (2) direct application of the ultrasound, using both long-wave (45-kHz) and short-wave (1-MHz) frequencies at a range of intensities, to the surface of the egg. Angiogenesis was assessed quantitatively by three independent observers. RESULTS: Both ultrasound methods showed evidence of an angiogenic effect compared to controls. The most effective results were seen with direct application of a 45-kHz wave at an intensity of 15 mW/cm(2) and indirect application of the media of fibroblasts ultrasonicated at 1 MHz with an intensity of 0.4 W/cm(2). CONCLUSION: This model confirms that ultrasound can induce neoangiogenesis in vivo.


Subject(s)
Chorioallantoic Membrane/blood supply , Neovascularization, Physiologic/physiology , Ultrasonic Therapy , Animals , Chick Embryo , Culture Media , Fibroblasts/cytology , Methylcellulose , Physical Stimulation , Ultrasonic Therapy/classification , Ultrasonic Therapy/instrumentation , Ultrasonics/classification
4.
Fed Regist ; 70(214): 67353-5, 2005 Nov 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16273747

ABSTRACT

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is classifying the low energy ultrasound wound cleaner into class II (special controls). The special control that will apply to the device is the guidance document entitled "Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Low Energy Ultrasound Wound Cleaner." The agency is taking this action in response to a petition submitted under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the act) as amended by the Medical Device Amendments of 1976, the Safe Medical Devices Act of 1990, and the Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act of 1997 (FDAMA). The agency is classifying this device into class II (special controls) in order to provide a reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness of the device. Elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register, FDA is announcing the availability of the guidance document that will serve as the special control for the class II device.


Subject(s)
Debridement/instrumentation , Ultrasonic Therapy/instrumentation , Debridement/classification , Device Approval/legislation & jurisprudence , Equipment Safety/classification , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Nebulizers and Vaporizers/classification , Ultrasonic Therapy/classification , United States , United States Food and Drug Administration , Wound Healing
5.
Eur J Ultrasound ; 9(1): 3-9, 1999 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10099161

ABSTRACT

Therapeutic ultrasound has been in use for many years. Early applications were those for which tissue heating was the goal, and so it was used for soft tissue injuries such as may be incurred during sport. More recently, attention has been drawn both to high intensity focused beams that may be used for thermal ablation of selected regions, and also to low intensity fields that appear to be able to stimulate physiological processes, such as tissue repair, without biologically significant temperature rises. Ultrasonic tools are used for therapeutic effect in dentistry and are being investigated for use in thrombolysis. This paper reviews the various therapeutic applications of ultrasound.


Subject(s)
Ultrasonic Therapy , Athletic Injuries/therapy , Body Temperature/physiology , Dental Care , Humans , Physical Therapy Modalities , Soft Tissue Injuries/therapy , Thrombosis/therapy , Ultrasonic Therapy/classification , Ultrasonic Therapy/instrumentation , Ultrasonic Therapy/methods , Wound Healing
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...