Sister Mary Joseph nodule.

Sister Mary Joseph nodule (SMJN) is a rare clinical finding in patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma. This is a case report of a 69-year-old man, who presented with a cutaneous element by his umbilicus at his GP. He was referred to a dermatologist, then a plastic surgeon. The element was a metastasis from adenocarcinoma originating from his caecum. It is important for doctors to know of SMJN as a rare presentation of metastatic cancer, and to clinically examine the patient for an abdominal starting point, when presented with a cutaneous tumour at the position of the umbilicus.

Ileal prolapse through patent omphalomesenteric duct in a two year-old boy: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Patent omphalomesenteric duct is one of the birth defects included in the spectrum of vitelline duct abnormalities. It is a rare anomaly with estimated prevalence of 0.13-0.2% in the general population. The most common presentation of patent vitelline duct is yellowish or mucoid type umbilical discharge which is usually noted in neonatal age or infancy. The main stay of diagnosis is clinical and outcome is favorable as long as timely surgical correction is offered. Here we present a 2 years old male child who presented with ileal prolapse through patent vitelline duct which is an exceptional mode of presentation of this pathology. CASE PRESENTATION: 2 years old Ethiopian male child who was noticed to have umbilical discharge since early infancy presented with protrusion of pinkish mass per the umbilicus of 4 h duration. He had no signs and symptoms of bowel obstruction. Abdominal examination revealed a prolapsed bowel which was viable via the umbilicus which was about 6 cm long. Otherwise, he had no abdominal tenderness or rigidity. He was explored with a smiley incision just above the umbilicus. The prolapsed bowel was reduced gently to the abdominal cavity. The tract of the Patent vitelline duct was identified and completely resected along with a wedge of ileum at its base. Primary repair of the ileal end where the tract was inserted was done in two layers and abdomen was closed in layers. The child had smooth post op course and was discharged on the 4th post-operative day. CONCLUSION: Prolapse of a bowel through the umbilicus is unusual presentation of a rare anomaly namely patent vitelline duct. This presentation warrants early surgical intervention before bowel ischemia issues. Hence, all clinicians dealing with children should be aware of this rare pathology so that urgent surgical management can be offered.

Is transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy feasible for complicated appendicitis? A single-center experience.

PURPOSE: Transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted surgery (TULS) mixed benefits of laparoscopic and open surgeries. Transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy (TULAA) is a well-known procedure, accepted and currently used by pediatric surgeons for treatment of uncomplicated appendicitis (UA). There is no current agreement in its use for the complicated appendiceal infections (CA). We reported our results using TULAA for both UA and CA. METHODS: We retrospectively collected TULAA performed between April 2017 and April 2022. Appendicitis were classified in UA and CA. We analyzed conversion rate, operative time, length of stay, surgical site infections (SSIs) rate, postoperative intra-abdominal abscess and costs. RESULTS: Over 5 years, 316 children underwent TULAA. Conversion rate was 3%. Mean age at surgery was 9.36 years (IQR 2-16). Forty-nine appendicitis were CA. Operative time and hospital stay was higher in CA than in UA group (38.33 vs. 60.73 min, p < 0.00001; 4 vs. 7 days, p < 0.00001). SSIs rate showed no statistically significant difference between two groups. Incidence of postoperative intra-abdominal collections was 11% in CA and 1% in UA. TULAA's cost was 192.07 €. CONCLUSION: In our series, TULAA seems to be safe, feasible and cost-effective for both uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis, with no disadvantage in terms of outcomes compared to what is reported in literature for CLS.

Patent vitellointestinal duct with ileal prolapse in a newborn: A case report and literature review.

RATIONALE: Patent vitellointestinal duct is the most common omphalomesenteric duct anomaly to present with symptoms. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 10-day-old child presented with increase in the size of a polypoidal lesion into a large, "Y"-shaped reddish, prolapsing lesion, discharging gaseous, and fecal matter at her umbilicus. A laparoscopic exploration was performed, followed by wedge resection and anastomosis. No complications occurred during postoperative follow-up. DIAGNOSES: A patent vitellointestinal duct with ileal prolapse. INTERVENTIONS: The resection of extended intraperitoneal intestinal tube was performed. OUTCOMES: During the follow-up 3 months after surgery, the umbilical cord of the child healed well after surgery. LESSONS: Timely surgical treatment can minimize the occurrence of complications, and the overall prognosis is good after surgery.

Indications, outcomes, and complications of neoumbilical reconstruction: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Neoumbilicoplasty aims to reconstruct an aesthetically pleasing new umbilicus following agenesis, malignancy, anatomical distortion, or umbilicus loss. Despite the wide variety of surgical techniques described, literature is scarce when it comes to standardized categorization of these as well as the clear definition of patients' selections, specific indications, final outcomes, and possible complications. According to available literature, this work aims to evaluate different surgical approaches, and correlate them to specific surgical needs, to simplify the surgical choice and patient management. METHODS: A systematic review was performed in December 2020 in PubMed, Web of Science, and MedLine Ovid databases according to the PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 41 studies and 588 patients were finally included. On the basis of the evidence of the literature collected, we divided the studies into four groups according to the neoumbilicoplasty techniques: single suture or purse-string suture, single flap, multiple flap, and skin graft. Patients' surgical comorbidities, neoumbilicoplasty indications, and aesthetic and surgical outcomes were investigated. Direct suture and single and multiple flap techniques assured overall, satisfactory cosmetic outcomes with a low rate of surgical complications. Whereas suture-only techniques were chosen mostly by general surgeons/urologists in laparoscopic surgery, the single flap was the preferred method to reconstruct the umbilicus in open abdominal surgery or combined abdominoplasty with herniorrhaphy. Multiple flap and skin grafts were adopted in abdominoplasty-related umbilicus reconstruction, although the latter option showed impactful aesthetic and surgical complications. CONCLUSIONS: Umbilicoplasty can assure generally pleasant aesthetic outcomes with relatively low complication rates. Indications for specific techniques correspond to different patient populations and surgical scenarios.

Quality of life amongst patients with diverting umbilical stomas in rectal surgery: a single centre prospective randomized controlled pilot study.

BACKGROUND: The umbilical stoma (umbistoma) has been proposed as a viable alternative site for a temporary defunctioning stoma. Suggested advantages of the umbistoma include decreased number of surgical incisions required, improved cosmesis and ease of reversal surgery. This study aimed to assess the patient experience of umbilical loop ileostomies in rectal surgery, with the primary outcome being patient reported quality of life (QoL). METHODS: A total of 20 patients undergoing laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery were randomly allocated to have a defunctioning ileostomy at a conventional site (right iliac fossa) or at the umbilicus. Patient-reported QoL was assessed at 6 weeks using the Stoma-QoL questionnaire. Secondary outcomes were number of stomas reversed, length of time awaiting stoma reversal surgery, duration of operative time for stoma reversal, length of hospital stay following stoma reversal and rate of parastomal or post reversal incisional hernias. RESULTS: Patients who had an umbilical stoma scored significantly lower on the Stoma-QoL questionnaire compared to the conventional group, particularly on questions regarding feelings of tiredness, body insecurity and anxiety. No significant differences were observed between the two groups in relation to secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: There may be potential disadvantages to the umbilical stoma with negative impacts on body image and subsequent increased social anxiety. Patient selection and adequate counselling will be important when considering an umbilical stoma. Further larger scale prospective studies are required to further validate the feasibility and longer-term safety of umbilical stomas in both clinical outcomes as well as patient QoL.

Intraoperative and Postoperative Outcomes of Modified Bidirectional Intra-Umbilical Incision versus Infra-Umbilical Incision for Direct Trocar Insertion in Gynaecological Laparoscopy: A randomised controlled trial.

Objectives: This study aimed to describe a modified, curved, deep, bidirectional, intra-umbilical, vertical incision for primary trocar insertion and prospectively compare its intraoperative and postoperative outcomes with an infra-umbilical incision in gynaecologic laparoscopy. Methods: Between August 2019 and March 2021, 110 patients subjected to the direct trocar insertion technique for laparoscopic intervention were classified into two groups. Group A comprised 55 cases of infra-umbilical incision, whereas group B comprised 55 cases of a modified, curved, longitudinal, deep, bidirectional, intra-umbilical incision. Afterwards, intraoperative and postoperative assessments were performed. Results: The increase in the numbers of parity, gravidity and previous caesarean sections was found to be statistically significant; a smaller number of infertility complaints were observed in group B. Similarly, group B expressed a statistically significant less peri-trocar CO2 leakage (46 [83.6%] patients versus 28 [50.9%] patients) and more tightness of the primary portal entry (45 [81.8%] patients versus 30 [54.5%] patients) when compared to group A throughout the whole operation. After a one-month follow-up, a statistically significant (P = 0.029) decrease in the Observer Scar Assessment Scale and Patient Scar Assessment Scale scores in group B (10.4 ± 4.2 and 11.8 ± 4.3, respectively), demonstrating better cosmoses when compared to group A (13.3 ± 5.7 and 16.0 ± 6.8, respectively). Conclusion: Performing a modified, curved, deep, bidirectional, intra-umbilical, vertical incision for the insertion of a primary laparoscopic trocar (i.e. Darwish laparoscopic entry) is a simple and fast step that results in the elimination of intraoperative gas leakage and trocar slippage without the need for any additional sutures. Aesthetically, it results in a better scar with satisfactory cosmoses when compared to an infra-umbilical incision.

[Umbilical pilonidal sinus - a rare disease?] / Pilonidalsinus i naveln ­ ovanlig diagnos eller stort mörkertal?

Umbilical pilonidal sinus is a rare diagnosis which is characterized by an inflammatory granulomatous reaction to hair shafts penetrating the epidermis. It is most often seen in adolescent male with a hairy abdomen. The patients often present with a history of pain and umbilical discharge. Conservative treatment with hair extraction and personal hygiene is prioritized and surgery is only recommended in recurrent cases. Here one such case is presented, which was resistant to conservative treatment and where surgical excision and primary repair was indicated. No recurrence was observed 6 months postoperatively.

Umbilical Pilonidal Sinus.

Null.

[Villar's nodule]. / Nodule de Villar.

Umbilical endometriosis is a rare manifestation, most often isolated, of endometriosis, accounting for 0,5-1 % of all cases. It can be primary or secondary following surgery. It usually presents as a solid, skin-colored, red or purple-black nodule, frequently associated with pain and/or perimenstrual bleeding. Because it has a potential for malignant transformation, the gold standard of treatment is surgical removal.

L'endométriose ombilicale, ou nodule de Villar, est une manifestation rare et le plus souvent isolée d'endométriose, survenant dans 0,5 à 1 % des cas. Elle peut être primaire ou secondaire à une intervention chirurgicale. Elle se manifeste habituellement par un nodule ferme, de couleur chair, rouge ou violet-noir, fréquemment associé à des douleurs et/ou des saignements péri-menstruels. Il existe un risque potentiel de transformation maligne, raison pour laquelle le traitement de première intention est l'exérèse chirurgicale.

Fascia turnover procedure at breast reconstruction using free TRAM flap for decreasing umbilical migration.

BACKGROUND: The ideal umbilical position is midway between the two iliac crests. Some patients complained that the umbilicus position shifted from the midline after the breast reconstruction with a free muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (MS-TRAM) flap. We considered that the fascia of the external oblique muscle could be applied to the rectus abdominis fascia defect. This study aimed to introduce this "fascia turnover procedure" and compare the umbilical position in this procedure with that in primary fascial closure for the MS-TRAM flap of breast reconstruction. METHODS: A total of 152 patients were enrolled (80 patients with fascia turnover (+) vs. 72 patients (-)). The patients' demographics were compared. Horizontal distances (right side: a; left side: b) were measured bilaterally from the lateral abdominal wall to the center of the umbilicus. Frontal abdominal photographs were taken preoperatively (a1, b1) and postoperatively (a2, b2). The rate of umbilical migration (= | (a1 - b1) / (a1 + b1) - (a2 - b2) / (a2 + b2) | × 100%) was calculated. Because the aponeurosis of the external oblique muscle is confirmed in front of the lateral side of the anterior rectus sheath, this procedure could be performed in cases with a medial defect. RESULTS: No significant differences in the patients' demographics, including abdominal bulging rates and abdominal wall defect widths were observed between the two groups. The rate of umbilical migration showed a significant difference (median 1.78% vs. 3.70%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This procedure could decrease the rate of umbilical migration.

The First Application of Intraumbilical Longitudinal Incision to Pyloromyotomy for Hypertrophic Pyloric Stenosis.

OBJECTIVE: There are several approaches to pyloromyotomy for the treatment of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis including open transumbilical pyloromyotomy and laparoscopic pyloromyotomy. Beginning in 2012, we adopted intraumbilical longitudinal incision as a new transumbilical approach for pyloromyotomy. We describe details of the operative technique and results of this new approach. METHODS: We reviewed records of patients undergoing transumbilical pyloromyotomy from 2005 to 2018. Perioperative outcomes were compared between intraumbilical longitudinal incision and supraumbilical incision, the latter of which is the conventional incision for transumbilical pyloromyotomy. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients underwent pyloromyotomy with intraumbilical longitudinal incision (intraumbilical group) and 28 patients with supraumbilical incision (supraumbilical group). The median operative time was longer in the intraumbilical group (58.0 vs. 43.5 min, p = 0.002). However, the time to full feeding did not differ significantly between the two groups, and the median postoperative stay was shorter in the intraumbilical group (3 vs. 5.5 days, p = 0.003). There was no difference in the rate of complications (4.2% vs. 7.1%, p = 1.0). Scars after intraumbilical longitudinal incision were localized inside the umbilicus. CONCLUSION: Pyloromyotomy can be performed through intraumbilical longitudinal incision as safely as supraumbilical incision and intraumbilical longitudinal incision may improve cosmetic results. This approach can be an alternative technique for pyloromyotomy.

The Comparison of Postoperative Umbilical Port Site-Related Complications Between Transumbilical and Periumbilical Incision After Laparoscopic Surgery in Children.

Introduction: No studies have directly compared postoperative umbilical port site (UPS)-related complications between transumbilical and periumbilical incisions (TUI and PUI) after laparoscopic surgery in children. Patients and Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 324 children of ≤15 years of age who underwent laparoscopic repair (LR) for inguinal hernia, via either a TUI or PUI, between 2010 and 2020. UPS-related complications, such as wound infection and umbilical deformity, were compared between TUI and PUI. We also investigated the risk factors for the development of UPS-related complications after LR. Results: TUIs and PUIs were used for 228 and 96 children, respectively. The incidence rates of postoperative wound infection and umbilical deformity in the PUI group were higher in comparison to the TUI group; although not to a statistically significant extent (7.3% versus 5.3%, P = .451, 6.3% versus 4.8%, P = .593). One case of incisional hernia at the UPS was seen in the TUI group. In the univariate analysis, sex, age, weight for age Z-score, nutrition status, insertion and closure time, total operative time, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, blood loss, and comorbidities were not significantly associated with the development of UPS-related complications after LR. Conclusion: The incidence of UPS-related complications in TUI and PUI was not significantly different. Due to the low incidence of UPS-related complications, it was difficult to draw conclusions regarding contributing factors; however, meticulous care should be taken to avoid UPS-related complications when closing the UPS (Ethical approval No. 2019-24).

Colecistectomía pediátrica por puerto único transumbilical: ¿aporta algo al paciente? / Single-port transumbilical pediatric cholecystectomy: any benefits for the patient?

Objetivo: Comparar los resultados perioperatorios de la colecistectomía laparoscópica por puerto único (CLPU) respecto a la colecistectomía laparoscópica (CL) y analizar si, en nuestra casuistica, existendiferencias entre estas tecnicas. Material y métodos: Análisis retrospectivo y observacional engrupos no homogeneos de pacientes menores de 15 años sometidos aCL y CLPU durante un periodo de 6 años. La CL se realizó con cuatropuertos y la CLPU mediante una incisión umbilical y colocación deun retractor de heridas al que se acopló un guante quirúrgico, a travésdel cual se insertaron 3 trócares para el instrumental convenientementecurvado. Se compararon 15 variables clínicas, quirúrgicas y económicasmediante análisis univariado y bivariado. Resultados: Fueron intervenidos 11 pacientes, cinco medianteCLPU y 6 por CL. No hubo diferencias significativas en el tiempooperatorio medio (CLPU: 144 minutos vs. CL: 139, P= 0,855) ni enestancia hospitalaria, aunque sí un ligero aumento del coste hospitalario(CLPU:1.160 €, CL:1.177 €). El coste de la CL fue de 1.322 € frentea 1.367 de la CLPU, con un sobreprecio de +44,30 € debido al uso delretractor de heridas. Ningún paciente presentó complicaciones perioperatorias y todos percibían un resultado cosmético excelente. Conclusiones: Las diferencias entre CLPU y CL, en nuestra reduci-da experiencia, no justifican decidirse claramente por una u otra técnica.La CLPU podría aportar al paciente un mejor resultado cosmético y alcirujano una mejora de sus habilidades, aunque creemos que la colecistectomía no es la intervención adecuada para iniciarse en laparoscopiapor puerto único debido a la gravedad de las posibles complicaciones.(AU)

Objective: To compare the perioperative results of single-portlaparoscopic cholecystectomy (SPLC) with those of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), and to analyze whether there were any differencesbetween both techniques in our patients. Materials and methods: A retrospective, observational analysis wascarried out in non-homogeneous groups of patients under 15 years ofage undergoing LC and SPLC over a 6-year period. LC was conductedusing four ports, while SPLC was performed through an umbilical incision using a wound retractor to which a surgical glove was coupled forthe insertion of 3 ports and instruments curved as required. 15 clinical,surgical, and economic variables were compared by means of a univariate and bivariate analysis. Results: 11 patients underwent surgery – 5 through SPLC and 6through LC. No significant differences were found in terms of meanoperating time (SPLC: 144 minutes vs. LC: 139, P= 0.855) or hospitalstay, but a slight increase in hospital cost was noted (SPLC: 1,160 € vs.LC: 1,177 €). The cost of LC was 1,322 € vs. 1,367 € for SPLC, witha premium of 44.30 € owing to the use of the wound retractor. Noneof the patients had perioperative complications, and all of them felt thecosmetic result was excellent. Conclusions: In our limited experience, the differences betweenSPLC and LC do not clearly support one or the other. SPLC couldprovide patients with a better cosmetic result and allow surgeons toimprove their skills. However, we believe cholecystectomy is not themost adequate procedure to start a career in single-port laparoscopybecause potential complications may be severe.(AU)

Modified Diamond-Shaped Umbilicoplasty in Abdominoplasty.

BACKGROUND: The aim in umbilicoplasty is to obtain a scar that is less visible, the appropriate navel shape and depth. In our study, we aimed to achieve a more natural and younger appearance of the navel which significantly affects the aesthetic result after abdominoplasty. Modification of diamond-shaped umbilicoplasty technique and clinical results were evaluated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-three patients were included in the study. Modified diamond-shaped umbilicoplasty was performed in 21 patients, and diamond-shaped umbilicoplasty was performed in 32 patients. Demographic data, complications, revision surgery, and follow-up periods of the patients were reviewed retrospectively. Different from the standard technique, we deepithelialized the diamond-shaped skin over the abdomen flap and designed four triangular flaps. Then, the navel was inset over these four flaps. RESULTS: Forty-six (86.8%) of the patients were females and 7 (13.2%) were males, with a mean age of 39.49 ± 9.18 years, ranging from 22 to 57 years. Complications were occurred in 9 patients in total. There was no difference between groups in complication rates. The mean VAS value of the patients in the MDSU group was 9.48 ± 0.75, it was 8.28 ± 0.99 in the DSU group, and the difference was statistically significant (p:0.001). The mean age of the MDSU group was found to be significantly higher than the DSU group (p:0.008). The BMI of the MDSU group was found to be significantly higher between two groups (p:0.009). DISCUSSION: In our study, there was no difference between the complication rates of the two techniques. Therefore, MDSU is a reliable technique. High VAS score of the patients of MDSU was statistically significant. This shows that this modification provides good aesthetic results. CONCLUSION: Modified diamond-shaped umbilicoplasty is easy to perform and provides better aesthetic results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .