Expert consensus to optimize the treatment of elderly patients with luminal metastatic breast cancer

Most patients diagnosed with luminal metastatic breast cancer (MBC) who are seen in oncology consultations are elderly. MBC in elderly patients is characterized by a higher percentage of hormone receptor (HR) expression and a lower expression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). The decision regarding which treatment to administer to these patients is complex due to the lack of solid evidence to support the decision-making process. The objective of this paper is to review the scientific evidence on the treatment of elderly patients with luminal MBC. For this purpose, the Oncogeriatrics Section of the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM), the Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM) and the SOLTI Group appointed a group of experts who have worked together to establish consensus recommendations to optimize the treatment of this population. It was concluded that the chronological age of the patient alone should not guide therapeutic decisions and that a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) should be performed whenever possible before establishing treatment. Treatment selection for the elderly population should consider the patient’s baseline status, the expected benefit and toxicity of each treatment, and the impact of treatment toxicity on the patient’s quality of life and functionality.

Cardiotoxicity screening of long-term, breast cancer survivors-The CAROLE (Cardiac-Related Oncologic Late Effects) Study.

BACKGROUND: Long-term breast cancer survivors are at risk for cardiotoxicity after treatment, but there is insufficient evidence to provide long-term (~10 years) cardiovascular disease (CVD) screening recommendations. We sought to evaluate a tri-modality CVD screening approach. METHODS: This single-arm, feasibility study enrolled 201 breast cancer patients treated ≥6 years prior without CVD at diagnosis. Patients were sub-grouped: cardiotoxic (left-sided) radiation (RT), cardiotoxic (anthracycline-based) chemotherapy, both cardiotoxic chemotherapy and RT, and neither cardiotoxic treatment. Patients underwent electrocardiogram (EKG), transthoracic echocardiogram with strain (TTE with GLS), and coronary artery calcium computed tomography (CAC CT). The primary endpoint was preclinical or clinical CVD. RESULTS: Median age was 50 (29-65) at diagnosis and 63 (37-77) at imaging; median interval was 11.5 years (6.7-14.5). Among sub-groups, 44% had no cardiotoxic treatment, 31.5% had cardiotoxic RT, 16% had cardiotoxic chemotherapy, and 8.5% had both. Overall, 77.6% showed preclinical and/or clinical CVD and 51.5% showed clinical CVD. Per modality, rates of any CVD and clinical CVD were, respectively: 27.1%/10.0% on EKG, 50.0%/25.3% on TTE with GLS, and 50.8%/45.8% on CAC CT. No statistical difference was seen among the treatment subgroups (NS, χ2 test, p = 0.58/p = 0.15). CONCLUSION: This study identified a high incidence of CVD in heterogenous long-term breast cancer survivors, most >10 years post-treatment. Over half had clinical CVD findings warranting follow-up and/or intervention. Each imaging test independently contributed to the detection rate. This provides early evidence that long-term cardiac screening may be of value to a wider group of breast cancer survivors than previously recognized.

Contrast enhanced ultrasound quantitative parameters for assessing neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in patients with locally advanced breast cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) quantitative parameters in predicting neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) response in patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). METHODS: 30 patients with histologically proven LABC scheduled for NACT were recruited. CEUS was performed using a contrast bolus of 4.8 ml and time intensity curves (TICs) were obtained by contrast dynamics software. CEUS quantitative parameters assessed were peak enhancement (PE), time-to-peak (TTP), area under the curve (AUC) and mean transit time (MTT). The parameters were documented on four consecutive instances: before NACT and 3 weeks after each of the three cycles. The gold-standard was pathological response using Miller Payne Score obtained pre NACT and post-surgery. RESULTS: A decrease in mean values of PE and an increase in mean values of TTP and MTT was observed with each cycle of NACT among responders. Post each cycle of NACT (compared with baseline pre-NACT), there was a statistically significant difference in % change of mean values of PE, TTP and MTT between good responders and poor responders (p-value < 0.05). The diagnostic accuracy of TTP post-third cycle was 87.2% (p = 0.03), and MTT post--second and third cycle was 76.7% (p = 0.004) and 86.7% (p = 0.006) respectively. CONCLUSION: In responders, a decrease in the tumor vascularity was reflected in the CEUS quantitative parameters as a reduction in PE, and a prolongation in TTP, MTT. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Prediction of NACT response by CEUS has the potential to serve as a diagnostic modality for modification of chemotherapy regimens during ongoing NACT among patients with LABC, thus affecting patient prognosis.

Clinical practice of breast cancer protontherapy: A single-centre experience from selection to treatment.

PURPOSE: Breast protontherapy efficiently limits cardiac, lung and contralateral breast exposure, which may clinically translate into better late tolerance profile compared with classic photon techniques. While breast protontherapy is already implemented in the United States and in some European countries, clinical experience of breast cancer protontherapy is currently limited in France. The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical practice of breast cancer protontherapy at the Institut Curie in order to implement this technique at a larger scale. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from all breast cancer patients that have been addressed to the protontherapy centre of Orsay (CPO, Institut Curie) for adjuvant breast protontherapy were retrieved. We analysed why these patients were ultimately treated with protontherapy or not. RESULTS: Between November 2019 and November 2020, eleven breast cancer patients have been evaluated for adjuvant protontherapy at the CPO. Two of them were ultimately treated with proton beams; adjuvant breast protontherapy therapy was well tolerated. The nine other patients were not treated with protontherapy due to lack of availability of protontherapy treatment rooms in acceptable time limits, at the time of patient evaluation. CONCLUSION: Despite dosimetric advantages and excellent clinical tolerance, lack of availability of protontherapy machines currently limits wider implementation of breast protontherapy.

Cardiac substructures exposure in left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy: Is the mean heart dose a reliable predictor of cardiac toxicity?

PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess radiation dose distribution to cardiac subvolumes in left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy (LBCRT) and to clarify whether the mean heart dose (MHD) reliably reflects cardiac substructures exposure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty women referred for adjuvant LBCRT were prospectively evaluated. All patients received 3D-conformal hypofractionated radiotherapy (40Gy delivered in 15 fractions of 2.67Gy±boost of 13.35Gy). Cardiac substructures were contoured using the F. Duane's cardiac atlas. Dose distribution to cardiac chambers, left main (LM), left anterior descending (LAD), left circumflex (LCx) and right coronary artery (RCA)) was assessed. Dosimetric associations were analysed. RESULTS: The mean MHD was 3.08Gy (EQD2=3.67Gy). The mean Dmean/Dmax LAD was 11.45Gy (EQD2=13.64Gy)/29.5Gy (EQD2=35.15Gy). Low doses were delivered to LM, LCx, and RCA (Dmean≤1.3Gy). The left ventricle (LV) was the most exposed cardiac chamber with Dmean/Dmax of 4.78Gy/37Gy. The strongest correlation with MHD was found for Dmean LAD (r=0.81). For every 1Gy increase in MHD, Dmean LAD rose by 3.4Gy. However, the proportion of variance in Dmean LAD predictable from MHD was moderate (R2=0.65). For all other cardiac substructures, R2 values were<0.7. CONCLUSION: Our study showed high exposure of LAD and LV in LBCRT. With poor predictive value, MHD may underestimate doses to cardiac substructures. For optimal heart sparing radiotherapy, we recommend to consider LV and LAD as separate organ at risk.

Early Cardiac Effects of Contemporary Radiation Therapy in Patients With Breast Cancer.

PURPOSE: To characterize the early changes in echocardiographically derived measures of cardiac function with contemporary radiation therapy (RT) in breast cancer and to determine the associations with radiation dose-volume metrics, including mean heart dose (MHD). METHODS AND MATERIALS: In a prospective longitudinal cohort study of 86 patients with breast cancer treated with photon or proton thoracic RT, clinical and echocardiographic data were assessed at 3 time points: within 4 weeks before RT initiation (T0), within 3 days before 6 weeks after the end of RT (T1), and 5 to 9 months after RT completion (T2). Associations between MHD and echocardiographically derived measures of cardiac function were assessed using generalized estimating equations to define the acute (T0 to T1) and subacute (T0 to T2) changes in cardiac function. RESULTS: The median estimates of MHD were 139 cGy (interquartile range, 99-249 cGy). In evaluating the acute changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) from T0 to T1, and accounting for the time from RT, age, race, preexisting cardiovascular disease, and an interaction term with anthracycline or trastuzumab exposure and MHD, there was a modest decrease in LVEF of borderline significance (0.22%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.44% to 0.01%; P = .06) per 30-day interval for every 100 cGy increase of MHD. Similarly, there was a modest worsening in longitudinal strain (0.19%; 95% CI, -0.01% to 0.39%; P = .06) per 30-day interval for each 100 cGy increase in MHD. We did not find significant associations between MHD and changes in circumferential strain or diastolic function. CONCLUSIONS: With modern radiation planning techniques, there are modest subclinical changes in measures of cardiac function in the short-term. Longer-term follow-up studies are needed to determine whether these early changes are associated with the development of overt cardiac disease.

Sarcoma primitivo de mama: presentación de un caso / Primary breast sarcoma: case report

Fundamento: el sarcoma primitivo de la mama es el tumor maligno no epitelial menos frecuente de este órgano, representa menos del 1 porciento de los cánceres de la mama. Presentan un pronóstico sombrío con presencia de metástasis tempranas y una supervivencia muy pobre.Objetivo: presentar el caso de una paciente femenina que presenta un sarcoma primitivo gigante de mama. Presentación del caso:paciente femenina, de 56 años de edad que presenta sarcoma primitivo que ocupa prácticamente toda la mama izquierda.Conclusiones:el sarcoma primitivo de la mama es una enfermedad de infrecuente aparición, por lo cual se considera de interés para los profesionales de la salud su publicación (AU)

Background: primary breast sarcoma is the least frequent non-epithelial malignant tumor, representing less than 1 porciento of all breast cancers. It has a dismal prognosis with the presence of early metastases and a very poor survival.Objective: to explain a case of a 56 years old female patient with a large ulcerated primary breast sarcoma.Case report: a case of a 56 years old female patient with a large ulcerated primitive sarcoma in the left breast is presented. Conclusions: the publication of this report has clinical interest for health professionals due to the rarity of the primary sarcoma of the breast (AU)

Non small cell lung cancer metastasized to the breast and treated with modified radical mastectomy: a case report.

Breast metastasis from extra-mammary malignancy is extremely rare with an incidence from 0.4% to 1.3%. Several types of malignancies that most commonly metastasize to the breast include leukemia, lymphoma, and melanoma. AIM: We report a case of a 57-year-old male with a history of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who manifested a left breast mass, two years and four months after the initial diagnosis and treatRomament of NSCLC. METHOD: Physical examination revealed a poorly defined mass in the upper outer quadrant of the left breast, suspicious for breast cancer. After mammography results, the patient underwent Fine Needle Aspiration that was indicative of cancer. He underwent then modified radical mastectomy and axillary lymph node dissection. Histology and immunohistochemical analyses were conducted, that revealed a NSCLC that metastasized to the left breast. RESULTS: Finally, the prognosis of the patient was poor, as NSCLC relapsed from IIB to stage IV. CONCLUSIONS: An accurate differentiation of metastasis to the breast from primary breast cancer is of paramount importance because the therapeutic approach and prognosis of the two differ significantly.

Assessment of a guideline-based heart substructures delineation in left-sided breast cancer patients undergoing adjuvant radiotherapy : Quality assessment within a randomized phase III trial testing a cardioprotective treatment strategy (SAFE-2014).

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In our institute, breast cancer patients undergoing adjuvant treatment are included in a protocol aimed to reduce cardiovascular morbidity (SAFE-2014, NCT2236806), assessing preclinical heart damage with heart speckle-tracking ultrasound. To develop a dose constraint related to subclinical heart damage, a reliable delineation of heart substructures based on a pre-existing guideline was made. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Heart substructures of 16 left-sided breast cancer patients included in the SAFE protocol were delineated by five operators. For each substructure, a multi-contour delineation based on a majority vote algorithm (MCD) was created. A consensus-based delineation (CBD) was developed by an independent team of two blinded operators. Dice similarity coefficients (DSC) between volumes delineated by different operators and the MCD were collected and reported, as well as DSC between CBD and MCD. RESULTS: Mean DSCs between heart chambers delineated by each operator and the corresponding MCDs ranged between 0.78 and 0.96. Mean DSC between substructures delineated by all single operators and the corresponding MCD ranged between 0.84 and 0.94. Mean DSC between CBD and the corresponding MCD ranged from 0.89 to 0.97. CONCLUSION: Results showed low inter-observer variability of heart substructure delineation. This constitutes an external validation of the contouring atlas used, allowing a reliable dosimetric assessment of these volumes within the SAFE-2014 trial.

Increased Number of Beam Angles Is Associated With Higher Cardiac Dose in Adjuvant Fixed Gantry Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy of Left-Sided Breast Cancer.

PURPOSE: To analyze the relationship between angle number and mean heart dose (MHD) in adjuvant fixed gantry intensity modulated radiation therapy (FG-IMRT) treatment of left-sided breast cancer as is currently practiced in the community. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We performed a retrospective, multi-institutional review of women with left-sided breast cancer receiving adjuvant FG-IMRT between 2012 and 2014, encompassing 85 centers in 15 states. Bivariate and multivariate regression analyses were done to identify factors associated with MHD. Long-term cardiac risk was estimated according to a previously published model. RESULTS: Of the 538 women included, 284 had >2 gantry angle treatment plans (multi-angle), and 254 had 2 gantry angle (standard) plans. Median MHD was higher in patients with multi-angle plans compared with standard (median 475 vs 203 cGy). Number of gantry angles was significantly associated with MHD, with multi-angle plans independently increasing MHD by 229 cGy. Absolute risk of acute coronary events 20 years after treatment was estimated as 7 excess events per 1000 women for standard plans, compared with 12 excess events for multi-angle plans. CONCLUSIONS: Fixed gantry IMRT breast treatment plans with >2 gantry angles were associated with increased MHD, which translated to an increased cardiac risk. Clinicians should account for this potential drawback in treatment technique when assessing overall plan quality.

Cardiac Function After Multimodal Breast Cancer Therapy Assessed With Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Echocardiography Imaging.

PURPOSE: Breast intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) reduces high-dose heart volumes but increases low-dose volumes. We prospectively assessed heart changes after 3D conformal RT (3DCRT) and IMRT for left-sided breast cancer. Heart dose was analyzed individually, 3DCRT patients were moderately exposed, and IMRT was performed only in patients with unacceptably high heart doses upon 3DCRT planning. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In 49 patients (38 patients received 3DCRT; 11 patients received IMRT; and 20 patients received neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and echocardiography were performed before and at 6, 12, and 24 months after treatment. RESULTS: Mean heart dose for IMRT was 12.9 ± 3.9 Gy versus 4.5 ± 2.4 Gy for 3DCRT. Heart volumes receiving >40 Gy were 2.6% (3DCRT) versus 1.3% (IMRT); doses were >50 Gy only with 3DCRT. Temporary ejection fraction (EF) decrease was observed on MRI after 6 months (63%-59%, P=.005) resolving at 24 months. Only 3 patients had pronounced largely transient changes of EF and left ventricular enddiastolic diameter (LVEDD). Mitral (M) and tricuspid (T) annular plane systolic excursion (MAPSE and TAPSE) were reduced over the whole cohort (still within normal range). After 24 months left ventricular remodeling index decreased in patients receiving chemotherapy (0.80 vs 0.70, P=.028). Neither wall motion abnormalities nor late enhancements were found. On echocardiography, in addition to EF findings that were similar to those on MRI, global strain was unchanged over the whole cohort at 24 months after a transient decrease at 6 and 12 months. Longitudinal strain decreased in the whole cohort after 24 months in some segments, whereas it increased in others. CONCLUSIONS: Until 24 months after risk-adapted modern multimodal adjuvant therapy, only subclinical cardiac changes were observed in both 3DCRT patients with inclusion of small to moderate amounts of heart volume in RT tangents and in the patients treated with IMRT and reduced high-dose heart exposure.

Contouring Guidelines for the Axillary Lymph Nodes for the Delivery of Radiation Therapy in Breast Cancer: Evaluation of the RTOG Breast Cancer Atlas.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to identify the axillary lymph nodes on pretreatment diagnostic computed tomography (CT) of the chest to determine their position relative to the anatomic axillary borders as defined by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) breast cancer atlas for radiation therapy planning. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Pretreatment diagnostic CT chest scans available for 30 breast cancer patients with clinically involved lymph nodes were fused with simulation CT. Contouring of axillary levels I, II, and III according to the RTOG guidelines was performed. Measurements were made from the area of distal tumor to the anatomic borders in 6 dimensions for each level. RESULTS: Of the 30 patients, 100%, 93%, and 37% had clinical involvement of levels I, II, and III, respectively. The mean number of lymph nodes dissected was 13.6. The mean size of the largest lymph node was 2.4 cm. Extracapsular extension was seen in 23% of patients. In 97% of patients, an aspect of the involved lymph node lay outside of the anatomic border of a level. In 80% and 83% of patients, tumor extension was seen outside the cranial (1.78 ± 1.0 cm; range, 0.28-3.58 cm) and anterior (1.27 ± 0.92 cm; range, 0.24-3.58 cm) borders of level I, respectively. In 80% of patients, tumor extension was seen outside the caudal border of level II (1.36 ± 1.0 cm, range, 0.27-3.86 cm), and 0% to 33% of patients had tumor extension outside the remaining borders of all levels. CONCLUSIONS: To cover 95% of lymph nodes at the cranial and anterior borders of level I, an additional clinical target volume margin of 3.78 cm and 3.11 cm, respectively, is necessary. The RTOG guidelines may be insufficient for coverage of axillary disease in patients with clinical nodal involvement who are undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy, incomplete axillary dissection, or treatment with intensity modulated radiation therapy. In patients with pretreatment diagnostic CT chest scans, fusion with simulation CT should be considered for tumor delineation.

Evaluation of Hormone Receptor Status (ER/PR/HER2-neu) in Breast Cancer in Pakistan.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the biological markers that are commonly assessed in breast cancer to estimate a patient's response to endocrine therapy and their prognosis for better clinical outcomes. METHODS: The retrospective study was conducted at Bahawalpur Institute of Nuclear Oncology and comprised record of early breast cancer patients who gave positive diagnostic tests for hormone receptors status i.e. immunohistochemical test and were treated during 2007-2013. Data of oestrogen, progesterone and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 expression status was analysed. SPSS 12 was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Overall record of 345 patients was studied of whom 149(43%) were identified to have positive hormone receptor status.. The age of the patients ranged from 24 to 86 years with 97(65%) in 25-50 years, 46(30.8%) 51-75 years and 6(4.08%)in 76-100 years. Besides, 76(51%) patients had carcinoma of right breast; 86(58%) were diagnosed as Stage III, 55(37%) Stage II and 8(5.3%) Stage IV. Those diagnosed with oestrogen receptor (positive status) were 16(10.7%), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 over-expression 13(8.7%), oestrogen/progesterone hormone receptor positivity (or luminal A) 76(51%) and 35(23.4%) patients were positive for all the three receptors. CONCLUSIONS: About half of the patients were diagnosed with a positive hormone status and it was observed that in most of the cases disease was metastasised to distant organs.