Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 15 de 15
Filter
1.
J Occup Environ Med ; 62(7): e295-e301, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32730032

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The Department of Defense (DoD) implemented numerous occupational health policies to guide opioid prescribing to active duty military service members (ADSM). This retrospective time series analysis evaluated the impact of DoD policies on opioid prescribing trends in ADSM from 2006 to 2018. METHODS: Bayesian structural time-series models with a Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm for posterior inference and a semi-local linear trend were constructed to estimate the impact of polices. RESULTS: Results indicate annual opioid proportions significantly decreased after the introduction of occupational health policies introduced in 2011 to 2012. Collectively, occupational policies were associated with a significant reduction (6.6%) in annual opioid rates to ADSM following 2012. This observed effect was associated with approximately 121,000 less opioid prescriptions dispensed in 2018 alone. CONCLUSIONS: Occupational health policy interventions were associated with reductions in opioid prescribing within the DoD.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Drug Prescriptions/statistics & numerical data , Military Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Occupational Health/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Policy/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/trends , Retrospective Studies , United States , United States Department of Defense/legislation & jurisprudence
3.
Hear Res ; 349: 172-176, 2017 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27847300

ABSTRACT

The Federal Food and Drug Administration, or FDA is generally considered a powerful gatekeeper, able to deliver or withhold life-saving cures and create or destroy economic windfalls. As the decades go by, and technologies, diseases, public health demands, and politics evolve, we can identify patterns of change, action and inter-action among some of these traditional stakeholders in the FDA's policy sphere. A careful examination of this agency's colorful history can shed light on central features of the agency's policy process, which has been quite receptive to its stakeholders and adaptive to change over the decades and, in turn, show the way for development in lanes which do not fit neatly into the current paradigms offered by the agency. This paper will explore the history of FDA policy process, through examination of seminal moments in FDA history, the prominent actors and focusing events within them, and the outcomes of those events, in an attempt to illuminate a pattern of behavior or processes by which a struggling field of pharmaceutical development such as interventions for hearing loss can advance.


Subject(s)
Drug Approval/legislation & jurisprudence , Drug Discovery/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Policy/legislation & jurisprudence , Hearing Loss/drug therapy , Hearing/drug effects , Occupational Diseases/drug therapy , United States Food and Drug Administration/legislation & jurisprudence , Government Regulation , Hearing Loss/diagnosis , Hearing Loss/physiopathology , Humans , Interdisciplinary Communication , Military Medicine/legislation & jurisprudence , Military Personnel/legislation & jurisprudence , Occupational Diseases/diagnosis , Occupational Diseases/physiopathology , Policy Making , United States , United States Department of Defense/legislation & jurisprudence
5.
Fed Regist ; 80(122): 36653-88, 2015 Jun 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26121770

ABSTRACT

This rule reissues the current regulations and: Establishes policy, assigns responsibilities, and implements the non-funding and non-reporting provisions in DoD for: Provision of early intervention services (EIS) to infants and toddlers with disabilities and their families, as well as special education and related services to children with disabilities entitled under this part to receive education services from the DoD; implementation of a comprehensive, multidisciplinary program of EIS for infants and toddlers with disabilities and their families who, but for age, are eligible to be enrolled in DoD schools; provision of a free appropriate public education (FAPE), including special education and related services, for children with disabilities, as specified in their individualized education programs (IEP), who are eligible to enroll in DoD schools; and monitoring of DoD programs providing EIS, and special education and related services for compliance with this part. This rule also establishes a DoD Coordinating Committee to recommend policies and provide compliance oversight for early intervention and special education.


Subject(s)
Disabled Children/education , Disabled Children/legislation & jurisprudence , Early Intervention, Educational/legislation & jurisprudence , Education, Special/legislation & jurisprudence , United States Department of Defense/legislation & jurisprudence , Child , Child, Preschool , Developmental Disabilities/therapy , Humans , Infant , United States
6.
J Occup Environ Med ; 57 Suppl 3: S4-11, 2015 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25741614

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Primary health care providers may not be familiar with the Federal Employees' Compensation Act (FECA) and Department of Defense regulations that govern injured workers' rights, benefits, and procedures to follow when an injured employee is seen in the military medical treatment facility. METHODS: The FECA program was examined and each section reviewed to facilitate provider involvement from time of injury to final disposition of a claim and employee return to work. The best practices in case management are highlighted as well. RESULTS: Several areas of the FECA program require coordination between members of the installation Federal Worker's Compensation team. Areas requiring extensive communication by all team members were emphasized. CONCLUSIONS: Successful installation FECA programs engage all members of the FECA team in a collaborative fashion to share information, prevent injuries, and keep costs low.


Subject(s)
Cost Savings , Federal Government , Physician's Role , Primary Health Care , United States Department of Defense/organization & administration , Workers' Compensation/organization & administration , Forms and Records Control , Humans , Occupational Health , Occupational Injuries/prevention & control , Safety Management , United States , United States Department of Defense/legislation & jurisprudence , Workers' Compensation/economics , Workers' Compensation/legislation & jurisprudence
7.
US Army Med Dep J ; : 25-31, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25651142

ABSTRACT

Healthcare providers are often surprised that regulations promulgated by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) apply to patient care settings. Many find it strange that processes meant to heal have the potential to harm human health and the environment, and are, therefore, regulated by federal and state environmental agencies. The importance of compliance is emphasized by the fact that both the EPA and individual state agencies have the authority to impose civil and criminal penalties if they discover violations. The Joint Commission considers compliance important enough to include it as an element of performance in the Environment of Care standard.


Subject(s)
Environmental Pollution/legislation & jurisprudence , Hazardous Waste/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Facilities/legislation & jurisprudence , Medical Waste Disposal/legislation & jurisprudence , Military Personnel , United States Department of Defense/legislation & jurisprudence , United States Environmental Protection Agency/legislation & jurisprudence , Delivery of Health Care , Environmental Pollution/prevention & control , Government Agencies , Guideline Adherence , Hazardous Waste/classification , Humans , Patient Care Team , State Government , United States
10.
Fed Regist ; 78(153): 48303-11, 2013 Aug 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23977716

ABSTRACT

This Final Rule implements for Sole Community Hospitals (SCHs) the statutory provision at title 10, United States Code (U.S.C.), section 1079(j)(2) that TRICARE payment methods for institutional care be determined, to the extent practicable, in accordance with the same reimbursement rules as those that apply to payments to providers of services of the same type under Medicare. This Final Rule implements a reimbursement methodology similar to that applicable to Medicare beneficiaries for inpatient services provided by SCHs. It will be phased in over a several-year period. This Final Rule also provides for special reimbursement for labor/delivery and nursery services in SCHs and creates a possible General Temporary Military Contingency Payment Adjustment (GTMCPA) for inpatient services in SCHs and for Critical Access Hospitals (CAHs).


Subject(s)
Critical Care/economics , Hospitals, Community/economics , Insurance, Health, Reimbursement/economics , Military Medicine/economics , Critical Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Diagnosis-Related Groups , Health Care Reform/economics , Health Care Reform/legislation & jurisprudence , Hospitals, Community/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Insurance, Health, Reimbursement/legislation & jurisprudence , Medicare/economics , Medicare/legislation & jurisprudence , Military Medicine/legislation & jurisprudence , United States , United States Department of Defense/economics , United States Department of Defense/legislation & jurisprudence
12.
Fed Regist ; 77(18): 4239-47, 2012 Jan 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22359798

ABSTRACT

This part implements Department of Defense (DoD) policy and assigns responsibilities for the SAPR Program on prevention, response, and oversight to sexual assault. It is DoD policy to establish a culture free of sexual assault by providing an environment of prevention, education and training, response capability, victim support, reporting procedures, and accountability that enhances the safety and well being of all persons covered by the regulation.


Subject(s)
Crime Victims/legislation & jurisprudence , Military Medicine/legislation & jurisprudence , Military Personnel/legislation & jurisprudence , Sex Offenses/prevention & control , United States Department of Defense/legislation & jurisprudence , Emergency Medical Services/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , United States
13.
Fed Regist ; 76(203): 65133-5, 2011 Oct 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22013621

ABSTRACT

This document amends the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) regulation pertaining to the applicability of certain VA regulations that restrict the disclosure of certain medical information to the Department of Defense (DoD). This interim final rule removes a restriction that is not required by the applicable statute, 38 U.S.C. 7332(e), and is inconsistent with the intent and purpose of that statute.


Subject(s)
Electronic Health Records/legislation & jurisprudence , Information Dissemination/legislation & jurisprudence , Medical Records/legislation & jurisprudence , Military Medicine/legislation & jurisprudence , United States Department of Defense/legislation & jurisprudence , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , United States
15.
J Public Health Policy ; 32(3): 334-49, 2011 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21368849

ABSTRACT

We conducted a content analysis of the US military tobacco policies at the Department of Defense, each respective military service (Army, Air Force, Navy, and Marine Corps), and their Major Commands (MAJCOM). Ninety-seven policies were evaluated using the Military Tobacco Policy Rating Form (MTPRF). More than three quarters addressed the following domains: (1) deleterious health effects of tobacco use; (2) environmental tobacco smoke; (3) designation of smoking areas; (4) tobacco prevention/cessation programs; and (5) smokeless tobacco. Few policies (2.1 per cent) mentioned relevant Department of Defense and respective service tobacco use prevalence statistics. Smoking as non-normative or incompatible with military service, the impact of tobacco use on military readiness, and the tobacco industry were addressed infrequently (6.2 per cent, 33.0 per cent, and 8.2 per cent, respectively). Future military tobacco policies should address important omissions of critical information such as the current service tobacco use prevalence, effects on readiness, and smoking as non-normative.


Subject(s)
Health Policy , Nicotiana , Smoking/legislation & jurisprudence , United States Department of Defense/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Promotion/organization & administration , Humans , Military Personnel/legislation & jurisprudence , Prevalence , Smoking/epidemiology , Smoking Cessation/methods , Tobacco Industry/legislation & jurisprudence , Tobacco Smoke Pollution/adverse effects , Tobacco Smoke Pollution/legislation & jurisprudence , Tobacco, Smokeless , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...