Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 87
Filter
1.
New Solut ; 31(1): 72-88, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33615877

ABSTRACT

Eula Bingham, a toxicologist who invigorated the Occupational Safety and Health Administration as its director and set stringent standards to protect workers from hazardous materials, died on 13 June 2020 in Cincinnati. Throughout Dr. Bingham's long career, she insisted tirelessly that workers had the absolute right to be safe on the job. Her thoughtful and generous wisdom shaped the entire field of occupational safety and health. Her bold and courageous actions prevented countless illnesses and injuries in workers around the world. This article presents the edited transcript from a Virtual Memorial Remembrance of Eula Bingham.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Funeral Rites , United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration/organization & administration , Humans , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , United States , United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration/standards
6.
Am J Public Health ; 110(5): 631-635, 2020 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32191515

ABSTRACT

The passage of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 brought unprecedented changes in US workplaces, and the activities of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) have contributed to a significant reduction in work-related deaths, injuries, and illnesses. Despite this, millions of workers are injured annually, and thousands killed.To reduce the toll, OSHA needs greater resources, a new standard-setting process, increased civil and criminal penalties, full coverage for all workers, and stronger whistleblower protections. Workers should not be injured or made sick by their jobs. To eliminate work injuries and illnesses, we must remake and modernize OSHA and restructure the relationship of employers and workers with the agency and each other.This includes changing the expectation of what employers must do to protect workers and implementing a requirement that firms have a "duty of care" to protect all people who may be harmed by their activities. Only by making major changes can we ensure that every worker leaves work as healthy as they were when their work shift began.


Subject(s)
Occupational Health/standards , United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration/organization & administration , Workplace/standards , Accidents, Occupational/prevention & control , Federal Government , Humans , Occupational Diseases/prevention & control , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Occupational Health/legislation & jurisprudence , Safety Management/standards , United States , United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration/legislation & jurisprudence , United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration/standards , Workplace/legislation & jurisprudence
7.
Workplace Health Saf ; 67(8): 439-440, 2019 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31313647

ABSTRACT

Occupational health nurses can ensure that gig workers are aware of health and safety requirements, receive appropriate training for the job, and use appropriate personal protective equipment.


Subject(s)
Health Planning/methods , Occupational Health/trends , Health Planning/trends , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic , United States , United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration/organization & administration , Workforce/legislation & jurisprudence
8.
Workplace Health Saf ; 67(5): 264, 2019 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30917773

ABSTRACT

The updated Occupational Safety and Health Administration's (OSHA) beryllium standard for general industry, construction, and shipyards reduced exposure limits for this known human carcinogen and became effective in 2018. Occupational and environmental health nurses need to monitor updates recently proposed for general industry to clarify implementation of the standard.


Subject(s)
Beryllium/adverse effects , United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration/trends , Humans , Industry/organization & administration , Industry/trends , Reference Standards , United States , United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration/organization & administration
10.
Radiology ; 284(3): 870-876, 2017 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28430556

ABSTRACT

Purpose To assess the level of concordance between chest radiographic classifications of A and B Readers in a national surveillance program offered to U.S. coal miners over an approximate 36-year period. Materials and Methods The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Coal Workers' Health Surveillance Program (CWHSP) is a surveillance program with nonresearch designation and is exempt from Human Subjects Review Board approval (11-DRDS-NR03). Thirty-six years of data (1979-2015) from the CWHSP were analyzed, which included all conventional screen-film radiographs with a classification by at least one A Reader and one B Reader. Agreement was assessed by using κ statistics; prevalence ratios were used to describe differences between A and B Reader determinations of image technical quality, small opacity profusion, and presence of large opacities and pleural abnormalities. Results The analysis included 79 185 matched A and B Reader chest radiograph classifications. A majority of both A and B Readers were radiologists (74.2% [213 of 287] vs 64.7% [22 of 34]; P = .04). A and B Readers had minimal agreement on technical image quality (κ = 0.0796; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.07, 0.08) and the distribution of small opacity profusion (subcategory κ, 0.2352; 95% CI: 0.22, 0.25). A Readers classified more images as "good" quality (prevalence ratio, 1.38; 95% CI: 1.35, 1.41) and identified more pneumoconiosis (prevalence ratio, 1.22; 95% CI: 1.20, 1.23). Conclusion A Readers classified substantially more radiographs with evidence of pneumoconiosis and classified higher small opacity profusion compared with B Readers. These observations reinforce the importance of multiple classifications by readers who have demonstrated ongoing competence in the International Labour Office classification system to ensure accurate radiographic classifications. © RSNA, 2017.


Subject(s)
Occupational Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Occupational Health/standards , Pneumoconiosis/diagnostic imaging , Radiography, Thoracic/classification , Coal Industry , Humans , Observer Variation , Reproducibility of Results , United States , United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration/organization & administration
15.
Ann Occup Hyg ; 57(1): 77-97, 2013 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22952385

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Inspectors from the US Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) have been collecting industrial hygiene samples since 1972 to verify compliance with Permissible Exposure Limits. Starting in 1979, these measurements were computerized into the Integrated Management Information System (IMIS). In 2010, a dataset of over 1 million personal sample results analysed at OSHA's central laboratory in Salt Lake City [Chemical Exposure Health Data (CEHD)], only partially overlapping the IMIS database, was placed into public domain via the internet. We undertook this study to inform potential users about the relationship between this newly available OSHA data and IMIS and to offer insight about the opportunities and challenges associated with the use of OSHA measurement data for occupational exposure assessment. METHODS: We conducted a literature review of previous uses of IMIS in occupational health research and performed a descriptive analysis of the data recently made available and compared them to the IMIS database for lead, the most frequently sampled agent. RESULTS: The literature review yielded 29 studies reporting use of IMIS data, but none using the CEHD data. Most studies focused on a single contaminant, with silica and lead being most frequently analysed. Sixteen studies addressed potential bias in IMIS, mostly by examining the association between exposure levels and ancillary information. Although no biases of appreciable magnitude were consistently reported across studies and agents, these assessments may have been obscured by selective under-reporting of non-detectable measurements. The CEHD data comprised 1 450 836 records from 1984 to 2009, not counting analytical blanks and erroneous records. Seventy eight agents with >1000 personal samples yielded 1 037 367 records. Unlike IMIS, which contain administrative information (company size, job description), ancillary information in the CEHD data is mostly analytical. When the IMIS and CEHD measurements of lead were merged, 23 033 (39.2%) records were in common to both IMIS and CEHD datasets, 10 681 (18.2%) records were only in IMIS, and 25 012 (42.6%) records were only in the CEHD database. While IMIS-only records represent data analysed in other laboratories, CEHD-only records suggest partial reporting of sampling results by OSHA inspectors into IMIS. For lead, the percentage of non-detects in the CEHD-only data was 71% compared to 42% and 46% in the both-IMIS-CEHD and IMIS-only datasets, respectively, suggesting differential under-reporting of non-detects in IMIS. CONCLUSIONS: IMIS and the CEHD datasets represent the biggest source of multi-industry exposure data in the USA and should be considered as a valuable source of information for occupational exposure assessment. The lack of empirical data on biases, adequate interpretation of non-detects in OSHA data, complicated by suspected differential under-reporting, remain the principal challenges to the valid estimation of average exposure conditions. We advocate additional comparisons between IMIS and CEHD data and discuss analytical strategies that may play a key role in meeting these challenges.


Subject(s)
Management Information Systems/statistics & numerical data , Occupational Exposure/analysis , United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration/statistics & numerical data , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Humans , Occupational Health/statistics & numerical data , Research Design , United States , United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration/history , United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration/organization & administration
20.
New Solut ; 19(3): 271-88, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19778828

ABSTRACT

The March 2005 British Petroleum (BP) Texas City Refinery disaster provided a stimulus to examine the state of process safety in the U.S. refining industry. Participatory action researchers conducted a nation-wide mail-back survey of United Steelworkers local unions and collected data from 51 unionized refineries. The study examined the prevalence of highly hazardous conditions key to the Texas City disaster, refinery actions to address those conditions, emergency preparedness and response, process safety systems, and worker training. Findings indicate that the key highly hazardous conditions were pervasive and often resulted in incidents or near-misses. Respondents reported worker training was insufficient and less than a third characterized their refineries as very prepared to respond safely to a hazardous materials emergency. The authors conclude that the potential for future disasters plagues the refining industry. In response, they call for effective proactive OSHA regulation and outline ten urgent and critical actions to improve refinery process safety.


Subject(s)
Extraction and Processing Industry/organization & administration , Labor Unions , Petroleum , Safety Management/organization & administration , Disaster Planning/organization & administration , Disasters , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Inservice Training/organization & administration , Occupational Health , United States , United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration/organization & administration
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...