Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
HLA ; 89(2): 71-76, 2017 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28102037

ABSTRACT

The availability of hematopoietic cell transplantation as curative therapy for blood disorders has been dramatically improved through a better understanding of the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) barrier. Although a fully compatible unrelated donor is preferable, transplantation from donors with a limited degree of HLA mismatching is associated with acceptable outcomes in many cases. Research on the limits of HLA mismatching, and the features that define permissible HLA mismatches will continue to enable transplantation to be more broadly available to patients in need.


Subject(s)
HLA Antigens/genetics , Hematologic Diseases/therapy , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Histocompatibility Testing/statistics & numerical data , Registries , Unrelated Donors/supply & distribution , Alleles , Allergy and Immunology/history , Graft vs Host Disease/prevention & control , HLA Antigens/classification , HLA Antigens/immunology , Hematologic Diseases/genetics , Hematologic Diseases/immunology , Hematologic Diseases/pathology , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/history , History, 20th Century , Humans , Italy , Myeloablative Agonists/therapeutic use , Transplantation Conditioning/methods , Transplantation, Homologous , Unrelated Donors/classification , Workforce
2.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant ; 20(1): 89-97, 2014 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24161923

ABSTRACT

We evaluated outcomes and associated prognostic factors in 233 patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for primary myelofibrosis (MF) using reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC). The median age at RIC HCT was 55 yr. Donors were a matched sibling donor (MSD) in 34% of RIC HCTs, an HLA well-matched unrelated donor (URD) in 45%, and a partially matched/mismatched URD in 21%. Risk stratification according to the Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS) was 12% low, 49% intermediate-1, 37% intermediate-2, and 1% high. The probability of survival at 5 yr was 47% (95% confidence interval [CI], 40% to 53%). In a multivariate analysis, donor type was the sole independent factor associated with survival. Adjusted probabilities of survival at 5-yr were 56% (95% CI, 44% to 67%) for MSD, 48% (95% CI, 37% to 58%) for well-matched URD, and 34% (95% CI, 21% to 47%) for partially matched/mismatched URD (P = .002). The relative risk (RR) for NRM was 3.92 (P = .006) for well-matched URD and 9.37 (P < .0001) for partially matched/mismatched URD. Trends toward increased NRM (RR, 1.7; P = .07) and inferior survival (RR, 1.37; P = .10) were observed in DIPSS intermediate-2/high-risk patients compared with DIPSS low/intermediate-1 risk patients. Our data indicate that RIC HCT is a potentially curative option for patients with MF, and that donor type is the most important factor influencing survival in these patients.


Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Myeloablative Agonists/therapeutic use , Primary Myelofibrosis/therapy , Transplantation Conditioning/methods , Adult , Aged , Cohort Studies , Female , HLA Antigens/immunology , Histocompatibility Testing , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Primary Myelofibrosis/immunology , Primary Myelofibrosis/mortality , Primary Myelofibrosis/pathology , Prognosis , Recurrence , Risk , Siblings , Survival Analysis , Transplantation, Homologous , Unrelated Donors/classification
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...