The first archaeal agmatinase from anaerobic hyperthermophilic archaeon Pyrococcus horikoshii: cloning, expression, and characterization.

Agmatinase is one of the key enzymes in the biosynthesis of polyamines such as putrescine and sperimidine from arginine in microorganisms. The gene (PH0083) encoding the putative agmatinase of hyperthermophilic archaeon Pyrococcus horikoshii was identified based on the genome database. The gene was cloned and expressed, and the product was mainly obtained as inactive inclusion body in Escherichia coli. The inclusion body was dissolved in 6 M guanidine-HCl and successively refolded to active enzyme by the dilution of the denaturant. The enzyme exclusively catalyzed the hydrolysis of agmatine, but not arginine. This indicates that PH0083 codes agmatinase. The enzyme required divalent cations such as Co(2+), Ca(2+) and Mn(2+) for the activity. The highest activity was observed under fairly alkaline conditions, like pH 11. The purified recombinant enzyme consisted of four identical subunits with a molecular mass of 110-145 kDa. The enzyme was extremely thermostable: the full activity was retained on heating at 80 degrees C for 10 min, and a half of the activity was retained by incubation at 90 degrees C for 10 min. From a typical Michaelis-Menten type kinetics, an apparent K(m) value for agmatine was determined to be 0.53 mM. Phylogenic analysis revealed that the agmatinase from P. horikoshii does not belong to any clusters of enzymes found in bacteria and eukarya. This is the first description of the presence of archaeal agmatinase and its characteristics.

Phylogeny of related functions: the case of polyamine biosynthetic enzymes.

Genome annotation requires explicit identification of gene function. This task frequently uses protein sequence alignments with examples having a known function. Genetic drift, co-evolution of subunits in protein complexes and a variety of other constraints interfere with the relevance of alignments. Using a specific class of proteins, it is shown that a simple data analysis approach can help solve some of the problems posed. The origin of ureohydrolases has been explored by comparing sequence similarity trees, maximizing amino acid alignment conservation. The trees separate agmatinases from arginases but suggest the presence of unknown biases responsible for unexpected positions of some enzymes. Using factorial correspondence analysis, a distance tree between sequences was established, comparing regions with gaps in the alignments. The gap tree gives a consistent picture of functional kinship, perhaps reflecting some aspects of phylogeny, with a clear domain of enzymes encoding two types of ureohydrolases (agmatinases and arginases) and activities related to, but different from ureohydrolases. Several annotated genes appeared to correspond to a wrong assignment if the trees were significant. They were cloned and their products expressed and identified biochemically. This substantiated the validity of the gap tree. Its organization suggests a very ancient origin of ureohydrolases. Some enzymes of eukaryotic origin are spread throughout the arginase part of the trees: they might have been derived from the genes found in the early symbiotic bacteria that became the organelles. They were transferred to the nucleus when symbiotic genes had to escape Muller's ratchet. This work also shows that arginases and agmatinases share the same two manganese-ion-binding sites and exhibit only subtle differences that can be accounted for knowing the three-dimensional structure of arginases. In the absence of explicit biochemical data, extreme caution is needed when annotating genes having similarities to ureohydrolases.