ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to determine if the degree of hydronephrosis on focused emergency renal ultrasound correlates with kidney stone size on computed tomography. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed on all adult patients in the emergency department who had a focused emergency renal ultrasound and ureterolithiasis on noncontrast computed tomography. Severity of hydronephrosis was determined by the performing physician. Ureteral stone size was grouped into 5 mm or less and larger than 5 mm based on likelihood of spontaneous passage. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-seven ultrasound scans were performed on patients with ureteral calculi. When dichotomized using test characteristic analysis, patients with none or mild hydronephrosis (72.9%) were less likely to have ureteral calculi larger than 5 mm than those with moderate or severe hydronephrosis (12.4% vs 35.4%; P < .001) with a negative predictive value of 0.876 (95% confidence interval, 0.803-0.925). CONCLUSION: Patients with less severe hydronephrosis were less likely to have larger ureteral calculi.
Subject(s)
Hydronephrosis/diagnostic imaging , Hydronephrosis/etiology , Severity of Illness Index , Ureterolithiasis/complications , Ureterolithiasis/diagnostic imaging , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Chi-Square Distribution , Emergency Medicine , Emergency Service, Hospital , Emergency Treatment , Female , Humans , Hydronephrosis/classification , Male , Middle Aged , Observer Variation , Predictive Value of Tests , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Sensitivity and Specificity , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Ultrasonography , Ureterolithiasis/classificationABSTRACT
Percutaneous endoscopic ureterolithotomy is not a well-known method for the treatment of impacted ureteral stones. The authors performed a retrospective study to compare the effectiveness of this procedure to ureteroscopy for the treatment of ureteral calculi. Impacted ureteral stones were removed in 93 patients by percutaneous endoscopic ureterolithotomy (Group 1). In 142 patients, ureteroscopy was performed for the treatment of the ureteral stones (Group 2). The same instruments were used to carry out percutaneous endoscopic ureterolithotomy as were used for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. During these interventions, a direct percutaneous puncture and extraction of the stones was performed. The average diameter of the stones was 11 +/- 4 mm in Group 1 and 7 +/- 2 mm in Group 2. The average operating time was 32 +/- 11 minutes in Group 1 and 41 +/- 29 minutes in Group 2. The average duration of hospitalization following the operations was 7.2 +/- 3.1 days in Group 1 and 3.5 +/- 2.5 days in Group 2. In Group 1, the average time of the operations was significantly lower (p 0.006), and the duration of postoperative hospital stay was significantly higher (p < 0.001), compared to Group 2. In Group 1, retroperitoneal hematoma occurred in 1 patient and prolonged urine leakage was detected in 2 cases, whereas in Group 2, pyelonephritis occurred in 5 patients following the operation. In conclusion, the operating time of percutaneous endoscopic ureterolithotomy is shorter and the rate of complications comparable with that of ureteroscopy. Percutaneous endoscopic ureterolithotomy is suggested for the removal of impacted ureteral stones instead of open surgical ureterolithotomy.
