Analysis of urinary retention after endoscopic prostate enucleation and its subsequent impact on surgical outcomes.

PURPOSE: Postoperative urinary retention (PUR) is a common complication after prostate enucleation, which leads to an increased length of hospital stay and decreased postoperative satisfaction. This study determined the predictive factors of postoperative urine retention within 1 month after prostate enucleation and investigated whether PUR influences surgical outcomes at the 2-week, 3-month, and 6-month follow-up time points. METHODS: Data were collected from the electronic medical records of 191 patients with benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) during October 2018 to September 2021. Of them, 180 patients who underwent thulium laser or plasma kinetic enucleation of the prostate (ThuLEP, PKEP) were separated into the PUR group (n = 24) and the non-PUR (NPUR) group (n = 156). Uroflowmetry and the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) questionnaire were followed up at 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: The PUR group had a significantly higher percentage of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) than the NPUR group. Postoperatively, compared with the NPUR group, the PUR group had significantly less improvement in changes in the IPSS Quality of Life scores at 2 weeks, the total IPSS(International Prostate Symptom Score) at all follow-up times, the IPSS-S(IPSS storage subscores) at 2 weeks and 3 months, and the IPSS-V(IPSS voiding subscores) at all follow-up times. Predictive factors for PUR include lower preoperative maximum urinary flow (Qmax), lower preoperative total IPSS, and higher operation time. CONCLUSION: Lower preoperative Qmax, lower IPSS scores, and longer operation time were risk factors for PUR. Furthermore, PUR could be a prognostic factor for prostatic enucleation surgical outcomes.

Comparison of early and late removal of the urinary catheter after rectal cancer surgery.

OBJECTIVE: This study is aiming to compare the results of early and late removal of urinary catheters after rectal cancer surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who undergone rectal cancer surgery in a single center were included in this prospective randomized study. The timing of the urinary catheter removal was randomized by a computer-assisted program and divided into 2 groups, which are early (first 48 h) and late (after 48 h). The primary outcome of this study was to compare the urinary retention and re-catheterization rates between patients with early and those with late catheter removal. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients were included in this study. The median age was 60 (31-88 years), and the patient group was predominantly male (n: 40, 60.9%). Urinary retention after catheter removal developed in 8 (12%) of 66 patients. There was no difference between the two groups in terms of the need for re-catheterization (14% vs. 10%, p: 0.63). All the patients who required re-catheterization (n: 8) and were discharged with a urinary catheter (n: 4) were male. When the male and female patients were evaluated separately, there was no difference in urinary retention in the early or late groups. CONCLUSIONS: Early or late removal of the catheter does not play a role in the development of urinary retention in patients undergoing rectal cancer surgery.

OBJETIVO: Comparar los resultados de la retirada precoz y tardía de la sonda urinaria tras la cirugía de cáncer rectal. MÉTODO: Estudio prospectivo aleatorizado que incluyó pacientes sometidos a cirugía de cáncer rectal en un único centro. El momento de la retirada de la sonda urinaria se aleatorizó y se dividió en dos grupos: primeras 48 horas y después de 48 horas. Se compararon las tasas de retención urinaria y de nueva cateterización entre los pacientes con retirada precoz y tardía de la sonda. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 66 pacientes, con una mediana de edad de 60 años (31-88 años) y predominio del sexo masculino (n = 40, 60.9%). Se produjo retención urinaria tras la retirada de la sonda en 8 (12%). No hubo diferencias entre los dos grupos en cuanto a necesidad de nueva cateterización (14% frente a 10%, p = 0.63). Todos los pacientes que precisaron un nuevo cateterismo (n = 8) y fueron dados de alta con una sonda urinaria (n = 4) eran varones. CONCLUSIONES: La retirada precoz o tardía de la sonda no influye en la aparición de retención urinaria en pacientes intervenidos de cáncer de recto.

Focused abdominal ultrasound.

A focused point-of-care abdominal ultrasound is an examination performed at the patient's location and interpreted within the clinical context. This review gives an overview of this examination modality. The objective is to rapidly address predefined dichotomised questions about the presence of an abdominal aortic aneurysm, gallstones, cholecystitis, hydronephrosis, urinary retention, free intraperitoneal fluid, and small bowel obstruction. FAUS is a valuable tool for emergency physicians to promptly confirm various conditions upon the patients' arrival, thus reducing the time to diagnosis and in some cases eliminating the need for other imaging.

Intermittent catheterisation.

When an individual has voiding difficulties, the person may require a urinary catheter. Enabling the person to choose an appropriate method of catheterisation and supporting them can have an enormous impact on the individual's health and wellbeing. Indwelling urethral catheters are suitable for some people but for others they can affect a person's lifestyle and lead to depression. Intermittent catheterisation can work well for some people. Intermittent self-catheterisation has been used to manage urinary retention for over 3500 years. It remains the 'gold standard' in terms of bladder drainage, but it is under-used and indwelling catheters remain more common. This article examines the history of intermittent catheterisation, indications for self-catheterisation and how to support people to use self-catheterisation.

Enhanced recovery urinary protocol for patients undergoing hip surgery: a quasi-experimental study.

INTRODUCTION: Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is a common complication after hip surgery. The enhanced recovery urinary protocol (ERUP) is a tool that employs several perioperative strategies to facilitate optimal conditions for surgery and recovery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of ERUP on POUR in patients undergoing hip surgery. METHODOLOGY: A controlled pre- and post-quasi-experimental study was conducted. Data was collected between May 2018 and January 2019 at the orthopedic department of one of the largest teaching hospitals affiliated with Menoufia University in Egypt. A convenience sample of 100 Egyptian patients (of both genders) undergoing elective hip surgery was equally allocated into two groups. The control group (n = 50) was given traditional routine perioperative nursing care, while the intervention group (n = 50) was subjected to ERUP. Data was collected from socio-demographic, medical, and surgical data sheets, preoperative medication assessment sheets, postoperative data sheets, and fluid balance charts. RESULTS: ERUP application significantly reduced the length of hospital stay and the incidence of POUR in the intervention group. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the ERUP is recommended for patients undergoing hip surgery, as it has a significantly positive effect on reducing the incidence of POUR.

Do alpha blockers reduce the risk of urinary retention post-transperineal prostate biopsy? A systematic narrative review.

BACKGROUND: Transperineal Prostate Biopsy (TPB) is a commonly used technique for the diagnosis of prostate cancer due to growing concerns related to infectious complications associated with transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUSB). TPB is associated with an infective complication rate of near zero, however, acute urinary retention (AUR) remains the leading complication causing morbidity. Previously in TRUSB, there was weak evidence that alpha-blockers reduce AUR rates, and their usage has been extrapolated to clinical practice with TPB. This review aims to explore if there is an evidence base for using alpha-blockers to prevent AUR following TPB. METHODS: A systematic approach was used to search Ovid Medline and Embase using keywords related to "Transperineal" and "Retention". Articles were then screened by applying inclusion and exclusion criteria to find studies that compared alpha-blocker recipients to no alpha-blocker use in the perioperative period and the subsequent effect on AUR in TPB. RESULTS: 361 records were identified in the initial search to produce 5 studies included in the final review. No randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were identified. One observational study showed a reduction in AUR rate from 12.5% to 5.3% with a single dose of tamsulosin. A previous systematic review of complications associated with prostate biopsy concluded there may be a potential benefit to alpha-blockers given in the TPB perioperative period. Three observational studies demonstrated a harmful effect related to alpha-blocker use; however, this was well explained by their clear limitations. CONCLUSION: Based on this review and the extrapolation from TRUSB data, perioperative alpha-blockers may offer some weak benefits in preventing AUR following TPB. However, there is significant scope and need for an RCT to further develop the evidence base further given the significant gap in the literature and lack of a standard alpha blocker protocol in TPB.

Megacystis microcolon intestinal hypoperistalsis syndrome (MMIHS): challenges in diagnosis and management.

Megacystis microcolon intestinal hypoperistalsis syndrome (MMIHS) is a rare, congenital functional intestinal obstruction, characterised by megacystis (bladder distention in the absence of mechanical obstruction), microcolon and intestinal hypoperistalsis (dysmotility).We are reporting a case of a female child with normal antenatal course who presented with recurrent episodes of abdominal distension since the second day of life and underwent negative exploratory laparotomy on multiple occasions. She also had urinary retention with a grossly distended bladder, requiring drainage by clean intermittent catheterisation. Surgical procedures for bowel decompression, including gastrostomy and ileostomy, were carried out without success. Genetic analysis revealed a mutation in the human smooth muscle (enteric) gamma-actin gene (ACTG2 gene), clinching the diagnosis of MMIHS. The patient was managed with parenteral nutrition and prokinetic medications and tolerated jejunostomy feeds for a brief period before she succumbed to the illness.Female neonates or infants presenting with abdominal distension and dilated urinary tract should be investigated for MMIHS early on. A timely diagnosis will enable the early involvement of a multidisciplinary team to provide the best options available for management.

Ultrasound-guided intersphincteric space block combined with spinal anesthesia for hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to compare the analgesic effects and incidence of urinary retention between ultrasound-guided intersphincteric space block combined with low-dose ropivacaine spinal anesthesia and conventional-dose ropivacaine spinal anesthesia post-hemorrhoidectomy. METHODS: Fifty patients aged 20-65 years who underwent elective hemorrhoidectomy were stochastically assigned to one of two groups. Spinal anesthesia was induced with 8 mg ropivacaine, combined with ultrasound-guided intersphincteric space block in the treatment group. Spinal anesthesia was induced with 12 mg ropivacaine in the control group. The primary outcome was the postoperative pain score, measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 hours and at the first defecation postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included urinary retention, extent of anal sphincter relaxation, and the time required to lift the lower limbs out of bed postoperatively. RESULTS: The treatment group showed markedly lower VAS scores than those of the control group at 8, 12, 24, and 48 h, and at the first postoperative defecation time (P<0.05). The incidence of urinary retention was considerably lower in the treatment group than in the control group (24% vs. 52%, P=0.04). No remarkable difference in the degree of anal sphincter relaxation was observed between the two groups (P=0.556). The time taken by the treatment group patients to lift their lower limbs off the bed was much shorter than that in the control group (1.3±0.6 h vs. 3.2±1.2 h, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-guided intersphincteric space block combined with low-dose ropivacaine spinal anesthesia provides good anesthesia and analgesia for hemorrhoidectomy.

Giant Midline Prostatic Cyst: An Unusual Cause of Acute Urinary Retention.

Midline prostatic cysts are infrequent and mostly asymptomatic. We presented a striking case of a giant midline cyst and detailed its diagnosis, evolution, and treatment. From this case, we offered a comparison of congenital intraprostatic midline cysts, namely, Müller's cysts and utricle cysts. A 40-year-old male experienced recurrent urinary retention. A 10 × 11 mm2 cyst in the mid-prostatic region was diagnosed through transrectal ultrasound, leading to a transperineal puncture as a minimally invasive intervention. Seven years later, the cyst recurred, manifesting obstructive symptoms such as a weak urinary stream, frequent urination, and residual urine sensation. Laparoscopic surgery was then performed for the confirmed 98 × 13 mm2 cystic recurrence. The postoperative course was favourable with no complications. Symptoms were completely resolved, which was maintained over a three-year follow-up period. The therapeutic approach to midline cysts targets symptomatic cases or infertility, ranging from cyst puncture to transurethral endoscopic treatment. Recurrence after minimally invasive interventions is a challenge, with laparoscopic surgery as an alternative post-failed conservative approach. Although total cyst removal risks adjacent structure damage, marsupialisation improves the clinical outcomes. In summary, symptomatic midline prostatic cysts present challenges owing to recurrences after minimally invasive approaches. Enhanced laparoscopic techniques offer a solution, particularly in highly symptomatic cases requiring definitive treatment, as illustrated by this outstanding case report.

Effect of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation on postoperative urinary function in elderly patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. / ç»çš®ç©´ä½ç”µåˆºæ¿€å¯¹è€å¹´æ‚£è€ å ¨é«‹å ³èŠ‚ç½®æ¢æœ¯åŽæŽ’å°¿åŠŸèƒ½çš„å½±å“.

OBJECTIVES: To observe the effect of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) on postoperative urinary function in elderly patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: One hundred and eighty elderly patients undergoing unilateral THA without indwelling urinary catheters were randomly assigned to a TEAS group (90 cases, 3 cases dropped out, 4 cases were eliminated) and a sham TEAS group (90 cases, 1 case dropped out, 4 cases were eliminated). Both groups received fascia iliac block and subarachnoid block anesthesia under ultrasound guidance. The patients in the TEAS group were treated with TEAS at Zhongji (CV 3), Guanyuan (CV 4), and bilateral Huiyang (BL 35), Ciliao (BL 32) 30 minutes before anesthesia initiation, with dissperse-dense wave, frequency of 2 Hz/100 Hz, until 30 minutes after surgery. The patients in the sham TEAS group underwent the same procedure with the device applied at the same acupoints but without electrical stimulation. The incidence of postoperative urinary retention (POUR), time to first void, voiding threshold, urinary adenosine triphosphate (ATP) level, postoperative abnormal voiding status (bladder residual volume, re-catheterization rate, nocturia occurrence), and postoperative incidence of urinary tract infection (UTI) and prosthetic joint infection (PJI) were observed in both groups. RESULTS: The incidence of POUR in the TEAS group was lower than that in the sham TEAS group (P<0.05); the time to first void in the TEAS group was shorter than that in the sham TEAS group (P<0.05); the voiding threshold in the TEAS group was lower than that in the sham TEAS group (P<0.05); the urinary ATP level in the TEAS group was higher than that in the sham TEAS group (P<0.05); the bladder residual volume in the TEAS group was lower than that in the sham TEAS group (P<0.05); the nocturia occurrence in the TEAS group was lower than that in the sham TEAS group (P<0.05). However, there was no statistically significant difference in re-catheterization rate, incidence of UTI, and incidence of PJI between the two groups (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: TEAS could effectively reduce the occurrence of postoperative urinary retention and improve the postoperative urinary function in elderly patients undergoing THA, which might be related with increasing the urinary ATP level.

Predicting the risk of failed trial without catheter following Rezum™ therapy.

PURPOSE: Convective water vapor thermal therapy or "Rezum™" treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostate hypertrophy require postoperative catheterization to avoid acute urinary retention. Unsuccessful catheter removal is still unpredictable. We, therefore, aimed to identify the risk factors of failed initial trial without catheter (TWOC) after Rezum™ therapy inside a large cohort of patients. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on patients who underwent Rezum™ therapy by three referent urologists across two academic hospitals between January 2022 and January 2023. A Foley catheter was systematically placed after therapy for 7 days in all patients before TWOC. Patients characteristics [age, imagery, maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), postvoid residual (PVR)], and treatment outcomes (International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL), adverse events) were analyzed at baseline and 3 months from procedure. Failed initial TWOC was defined as the incapacity to pass urine or measured PVR > 300 mL. After univariate selection, the risk factors for TWOC failure were identified using multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: 216 patients qualified for analysis with 23 (10.6%) failing the first TWOC after 7 days of catheterization. After multivariate logistic regression, only preoperative PVR predicted TWOC failure (OR 1.01; p = 0.007). The cut-off of preoperative PVR increasing this risk was 120 mL (p = 0, 02). CONCLUSION: Over 10% of men undergoing Rezum™ therapy for LUTS/BPH will experience TWOC failure and AUR after 7 days of catheterization. Preoperative PVR seems to be the only independent risk factor of unsuccessful catheter removal.

Sacral Neuromodulation: Device Improvement and Current Applications in Urology.

Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) offers a therapeutic approach to urological patients suffering from idiopathic overactive bladder (OAB) syndrome, with or without incontinence and non-obstructive urinary retention (NOR), who are not responding to or are not compliant with conservative or medical therapies. The exact mechanism of action of SNM is not fully understood but modulation of the spinal cord reflexes and brain networks by peripheral afferents is regarded as the main pathway. Over the years, surgical techniques improved, leading to the development of the modern two-stage implantation technique. The quadripolar lead is positioned percutaneously under fluoroscopy guidance through the third sacral foramen following the trajectory of S3. The procedure can be performed under local or general anesthesia with the patient in prone position. Current applications of sacral neuromodulation in urology are increasing thanks to the recent improvements of the devices that make this a valuable option not only in conditions such as overactive bladder and non-obstructing urinary retention but also neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction.

Reconstruction of Urethral Sphincter With Polyacrylamide Hydrogel.

IMPORTANCE: Urethral bulking is an alternative to synthetic midurethral sling for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in women. Urethral bulking agents, which are injected in the submucosal tissues of the proximal urethra/bladder neck, have demonstrated less adverse effects with similar satisfaction rates but lower subjective and objective cure rates when compared with midurethral sling. Cystoscopic Reconstruction of External Sphincter Technique (CREST) is a novel technique, which reinforces the natural closure mechanism of the external urinary sphincter (EUS). OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to provide safety and efficacy data for injecting polyacrylamide hydrogel (PAHG) in the components of the female EUS. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective chart review of patients using CREST with PAHG as initial treatment for SUI by a single surgeon from January 2022 to October 2022. Exclusion criteria are as follows: younger than 18 years, prior SUI surgery, concomitant pelvic organ prolapse or reconstructive procedure, neurological conditions, or history of radiation. Subjective and objective cure rates were measured by patient-reported symptoms and cough stress test. Urinary retention, postoperative urinary infection, and de novo urinary urgency were assessed. RESULTS: One hundred and thirteen consecutive patients met inclusion criteria with median follow-up of 3 months. Eighty-five percent of participants reported subjective improvement, 69% reported subjective cure, and 69% demonstrated objective cure. Nine patients reported transient postoperative retention, 8 reported postoperative urinary tract infections, and 5 reported de novo urgency. There were no serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: CREST is a novel technique for injection of PAHG, into the EUS to treat SUI. Our data suggest that this technique could improve urethral injection outcomes with minimal complications.

Active Compared With Passive Voiding Trials After Midurethral Sling Surgery: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: To compare active with passive voiding trials on the rate of passing a trial of void and discharge rates with catheter in women who have undergone midurethral sling for treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI). DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched through February 24, 2023. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Our population included women undergoing midurethral sling, with or without anterior or posterior repair, for treatment of SUI. Our two primary outcomes were rate of passing voiding trial and rate of discharge with a catheter. Our secondary outcome was the rate of delayed postoperative urinary retention, when a patient initially passes a trial of void but then subsequently presents in retention. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Abstracts were doubly screened; full-text articles were doubly screened; and accepted articles were doubly extracted. In single-arm studies evaluating either passive or active voiding trial, random-effects meta-analyses of pooled proportions were used to assess outcomes. Of 3,033 abstracts screened, 238 full-text articles were assessed, and 26 met inclusion criteria. Ten studies including 1,370 patients reported active trial of void. Sixteen studies including 3,643 patients reported passive trial of void. We included five randomized controlled trials, five comparative retrospective studies, five prospective single group studies, and 11 retrospective single group studies. Five of the studies included patients with a concomitant anterior or posterior colporrhaphy. On proportional meta-analysis, the active trial of void group was less likely to pass the voiding trial (81.0%, 95% CI, 0.76-0.87% vs 89.0%, 95% CI, 0.84-0.9%3, P =.029) with high heterogeneity ( I2 =93.0%). Furthermore, there were more discharges with catheter in active trial of void compared with passive trial of void (19.0%, 95% CI, 0.14-0.24% vs 7.0%, 95% CI, 0.05-0.10%, P <.01). The rates of delayed postoperative urinary retention were low and not different between groups (0.6%, 95% CI, 0.00-0.02% vs 0.2%, 95% CI, 0.00-0.01%, P =.366) with low heterogeneity ( I2 =0%). Sling revisions were statistically lower in the active trial of void group (0.5%, 95% CI, 0.00-0.01% vs 1.5%, 95% CI, 0.01-0.02%, P =.035) with low heterogeneity ( I2 =10.4%). CONCLUSION: Passive trial of void had higher passing rates and lower discharge with catheter than active trial of void. Rates of most complications were low and similar between both groups, although passive trial of void had higher sling revisions. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, CRD42022341318.

The impact of anticholinergic burden on clinical outcomes in older hospitalised surgical patients.

Polypharmacotherapy is an ever-increasing issue with an ageing patient population. Anticholinergic medications make up a large proportion of patient medication but cause significant side effects, contributing to well-documented issues within the older population and in hospital medicine. This review explores the documented impact of anticholinergic burden in older surgical patients on postoperative delirium, infection, length of stay and readmission, urinary retention, ileus and mortality. It also highlights the need for further high-quality research into anticholinergic burden management among older surgical patients to further impact practice and policy in the area.

Self bladder emptying compared with Foley catheter placement for planned cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The global cesarean delivery rate is high and continues to increase. A bladder catheter is usually placed for the cesarean delivery because a distended bladder is assumed to be at higher risk of injury during surgery and to compromise surgical field exposure. Preliminary data suggest that self bladder emptying (no catheter) at cesarean delivery may have advantages and be safe. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the effects of self bladder emptying and indwelling Foley bladder catheterization for planned cesarean delivery on the rate of postpartum urinary retention and maternal satisfaction. STUDY DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial was conducted in a tertiary university hospital from January 10, 2022 to March 22, 2023. A total of 400 participants scheduled for planned cesarean delivery were randomized: 200 each to self bladder emptying or indwelling Foley catheter. The primary outcomes were postpartum urinary retention (overt and covert) and maternal satisfaction with allocated bladder care. Analyses were performed using t test, Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square test, or Fisher exact test, as appropriate. Logistic regression was used to adjust for differences in characteristics. RESULTS: Postpartum urinary retention rates were 1 per 200 (0.6%) and 0 per 200 (P>.99) (a solitary case of covert retention) and maternal satisfaction scores (0-10 visual numerical rating scale), expressed as median (interquartile range) were 9 (8-9.75) and 8 (8-9) (P=.003) in the self bladder emptying and indwelling Foley catheter arms, respectively. Regarding secondary outcomes, time to flatus passage, satisfactory ambulation, urination, satisfactory urination, satisfactory breastfeeding, and postcesarean hospital discharge was quickened in the self bladder emptying group. Pain scores at first urination were decreased and no lower urinary tract symptom was more likely to be reported with self bladder emptying. Surgical field view, operative blood loss, duration of surgery, culture-derived urinary tract infection, postvoid residual volume, and pain score at movement were not different. There was no bladder injury. CONCLUSION: Self bladder emptying increased maternal satisfaction without adversely affecting postpartum urinary retention. Recovery was enhanced and urinary symptoms were improved. The surgeon was not impeded at operation. No safety concern was found.

Preoperative Bladder Scanning Can Predict Postoperative Urinary Retention Following Total Joint Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: As total joint arthroplasty (TJA) moves to the outpatient setting, it is becoming clear that postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is a potential impediment to same-day discharge. Although risk factors for POUR have been widely studied, the lack of their clinical utility warrants investigation of specific preoperative factors that can assist in surgical planning and patient optimization. The purpose of the current study was to determine whether preoperative symptom surveys and bladder scanning are useful tools in identifying POUR risk. METHODS: We performed a prospective analysis of patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) at a high-volume orthopaedic hospital between December 1, 2020, and September 30, 2021. A total of 507 patients (324 female and 183 male) undergoing TJA completed the American Urological Association (AUA) symptom index preoperatively and then again at 14 and 64 days postoperatively. Post-void bladder scans were obtained in the immediate preoperative setting. POUR was defined as a bladder volume of >500 mL that required catheterization. Chi-square and quintile analysis were used to compare bladder scanning volumes, and Student t tests were used to compare AUA scores. RESULTS: The rate of POUR was 37% (66 female and 34 male) and 23% (37 female and 19 male) in the TKA and THA groups, respectively. Increasing post-void residual volume (PVRV) measured on preoperative bladder scanning was found to be predictive of POUR. Among the TKA cohort, younger age and lower body mass index were also associated with increased catheterization, although age was not statistically significant. The AUA symptom survey was not found to correlate with POUR in either population. CONCLUSIONS: There was a predictable and exponential increase in the rate of catheterization as preoperative PVRV increased from 50 to 200 mL. The AUA symptom score showed no utility in predicting POUR in our study population. We propose that preoperative bladder ultrasonography become standard practice in TJA, especially among patients scheduled for same-day discharge. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level II . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Simple versus Radical Hysterectomy in Women with Low-Risk Cervical Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Retrospective data suggest that the incidence of parametrial infiltration is low in patients with early-stage low-risk cervical cancer, which raises questions regarding the need for radical hysterectomy in these patients. However, data from large, randomized trials comparing outcomes of radical and simple hysterectomy are lacking. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, randomized, noninferiority trial comparing radical hysterectomy with simple hysterectomy including lymph-node assessment in patients with low-risk cervical cancer (lesions of ≤2 cm with limited stromal invasion). The primary outcome was cancer recurrence in the pelvic area (pelvic recurrence) at 3 years. The prespecified noninferiority margin for the between-group difference in pelvic recurrence at 3 years was 4 percentage points. RESULTS: Among 700 patients who underwent randomization (350 in each group), the majority had tumors that were stage IB1 according to the 2009 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) criteria (91.7%), that had squamous-cell histologic features (61.7%), and that were grade 1 or 2 (59.3%). With a median follow-up time of 4.5 years, the incidence of pelvic recurrence at 3 years was 2.17% in the radical hysterectomy group and 2.52% in the simple hysterectomy group (an absolute difference of 0.35 percentage points; 90% confidence interval, -1.62 to 2.32). Results were similar in a per-protocol analysis. The incidence of urinary incontinence was lower in the simple hysterectomy group than in the radical hysterectomy group within 4 weeks after surgery (2.4% vs. 5.5%; P = 0.048) and beyond 4 weeks (4.7% vs. 11.0%; P = 0.003). The incidence of urinary retention in the simple hysterectomy group was also lower than that in the radical hysterectomy group within 4 weeks after surgery (0.6% vs. 11.0%; P<0.001) and beyond 4 weeks (0.6% vs. 9.9%; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with low-risk cervical cancer, simple hysterectomy was not inferior to radical hysterectomy with respect to the 3-year incidence of pelvic recurrence and was associated with a lower risk of urinary incontinence or retention. (Funded by the Canadian Cancer Society and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01658930.).