Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Vaccine ; 28(3): 714-23, 2010 Jan 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19895923

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Between July 1997 and April 1998, Canadian public health agencies switched from the whole cell vaccine to the acellular vaccine for pertussis immunization. The acellular vaccine provided better efficacy and fewer adverse events than the whole cell vaccine did. OBJECTIVE: To determine the economic impact of replacing the whole cell vaccine with an acellular vaccine in Canada. METHODS: A decision analytic model was developed comparing costs and outcomes of pertussis vaccination for Canadian children born in the years 1991-2004. Effectiveness was measured as number of avoided pertussis cases as well as the number of avoided hospital admissions. Incremental costs per avoided pertussis case and per avoided hospital admission were calculated for Ministry of Health (MoH) and societal (SOC) perspectives. Various one-way sensitivity analyses as well as a Monte Carlo simulation were performed by varying key model parameters. RESULTS: The switch in immunization programs resulted in an incremental cost to the MoH of CAD $108 per pertussis case avoided (CAD $0.96 per child-year). From the SOC perspective, there was a savings of CAD $184 per pertussis case avoided (CAD $0.13 per child-year). The one-way sensitivity analyses provided incremental cost-effective ratios (ICERs) ranging from an incremental cost of CAD $1034 per avoided pertussis case from the MoH perspective to a saving of CAD $1583 per avoided case from the SOC perspective. The Monte Carlo simulation confirmed the robustness of these results. CONCLUSIONS: Pertussis vaccination with AcE was cost-saving from the societal perspective and cost-effective from the Ministry of Health perspective.


Subject(s)
Pertussis Vaccine/economics , Pertussis Vaccine/immunology , Whooping Cough/economics , Whooping Cough/prevention & control , Adolescent , Canada/epidemiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infant , Male , Treatment Outcome , Vaccines, Acellular/economics , Vaccines, Acellular/immunology , Whooping Cough/epidemiology
2.
Int J Health Care Finance Econ ; 10(1): 1-27, 2010 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19294502

ABSTRACT

The cost of a six-dose pertussis immunization programs for children and adolescents is investigated in relation to estimators of the price of acellular vaccine, the value of a child's life, levels of vaccination rate and discount rates. We compare the cost of the program maintained over time at 90% with three alternative strategies, each involving a decrease in vaccination coverage. Data from England and Wales, 1966-2005, is used to formalize a delay in occurrence of pertussis cases as a result of a fall in coverage. We first apply the criterion of minimization of the total social cost of pertussis to identify the best cost saving immunization strategy. The results are also discussed in form of the discounted present value of the total social net benefits. We find that the discounted present value of the total social net benefit is maximized when a stable vaccination program at 90% is compared to a gradual decrease in vaccination coverage leading to the lowest vaccination rate. The benefits to society of providing sustained immunization strategy, vaccinating the highest proportion of children and adolescents, are systematically proved on the basis of the second optimisation criterion, independently of the level of estimators applied during economic evaluation for the cost variables.


Subject(s)
Immunization Programs/economics , Pertussis Vaccine/economics , Whooping Cough/economics , Whooping Cough/prevention & control , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Cost of Illness , Cost-Benefit Analysis , England/epidemiology , Humans , Immunization Schedule , Immunization, Secondary/economics , Incidence , Infant , Models, Econometric , Pertussis Vaccine/administration & dosage , Pertussis Vaccine/adverse effects , Vaccines, Acellular/administration & dosage , Vaccines, Acellular/adverse effects , Vaccines, Acellular/economics , Wales/epidemiology , Whooping Cough/epidemiology
3.
Pediatrics ; 118(2): e251-7, 2006 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16831895

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: On December 13, 2002, Pediarix, a combination vaccine that contains diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis; hepatitis B; and inactivated polio vaccines, was licensed by the Food and Drug Administration for use in the primary immunization series. Use of this vaccine decreases the number of injections that children receive when completing their primary immunization series at the 2-, 4-, and 6-month well-child visits. The objective of this study was to determine the factors that influence the use of this combined vaccine in private pediatric practices, with particular attention to the perceived economic impact of Pediarix and actions taken to address this impact within the private pediatric setting. METHODS: A mail survey study was conducted of a random sample of 565 practicing pediatricians that was obtained from the American Medical Association Masterfile. Frequency distributions were developed for all responses, and the vaccine financing policies of the state of practice for each respondent were determined. Chi2 analysis was performed to assess any associations of the predictor variables with the outcome variables of interest, use or consideration of use of the Pediarix vaccine. Logistic regression was used to determine the independent association of the predictor variables with use or consideration of use of Pediarix. Regression models that did and did not include practice ownership as a predictor variable were developed. RESULTS: Response rate was 63% (N = 355). A total of 39% (n = 123) of the respondents' practices were purchasing Pediarix for use with their private patients. An additional 18% (n = 55) were considering purchasing the vaccine. Those who were in practices that were owned by hospitals or health systems were more likely than those who were in solo or group practices to purchase Pediarix for their private patients. Approximately half of the remaining respondents order Pediarix through their state immunization program. Among the 52% of respondents who did not, 23% reported that the vaccine was not yet available through their state program, and 47% stated that they did not want to use different vaccines for their public and private patients. Only 11% believed that Pediarix was not compatible with their other vaccine products. Physicians that currently were purchasing or considering purchasing Pediarix were more likely to be influenced by both parental and provider desire to decrease the number of injections at a single visit and the reduced time for immunization delivery. Fewer than 1% of respondents reported either having experienced or expecting to experience a significant decrease in practice revenue as a result of the use of Pediarix. CONCLUSIONS: Although use of the vaccine results in fewer administration fees for most physicians, the magnitude of the change seemed not to be significant for the majority of respondents or was outweighed by other factors. It also is possible that larger practices or buying cooperatives were able to negotiate discounted rates for Pediarix relative to the constituent products. This may have been a strategy of manufacturers and/or distributors to provide incentive for practices to switch to the combination product. Of note was the appreciation of respondents for the preferences of patients for fewer vaccines and, to a lesser degree, for the decrease in office staff time required to provide vaccination with multiple antigens when using Pediarix. Also, the role of the availability of a given vaccine through the Vaccines for Children program is important in its adoption into practice.


Subject(s)
Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis Vaccine/administration & dosage , Hepatitis B Vaccines/administration & dosage , Pediatrics/statistics & numerical data , Poliovirus Vaccine, Inactivated/administration & dosage , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Data Collection , Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis Vaccine/economics , Drug Utilization/statistics & numerical data , Fees and Charges , Female , Hepatitis B Vaccines/economics , Humans , Infant , Male , Middle Aged , Pediatrics/economics , Poliovirus Vaccine, Inactivated/economics , Professional Practice/statistics & numerical data , United States , Vaccination/economics , Vaccines, Acellular/administration & dosage , Vaccines, Acellular/economics , Vaccines, Combined/administration & dosage , Vaccines, Combined/economics
4.
Health Policy ; 74(3): 287-303, 2005 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15951048

ABSTRACT

Based on a transfer function intervention model applied to epidemiological data of pertussis incidence and pertussis vaccination in England and Wales, the consequences of pertussis vaccination strategies were estimated in terms of health effects and economic direct costs. It was established that sixth dose pertussis vaccination programs at 90% coverage were the most cost saving for short-term and for long-term vaccination prevention strategies. We considered two alternative strategies with whole-cell or acellular vaccines for primary course and acellular vaccine for two booster doses in children and one booster in adolescents. As a rule, programs based on exclusive use of acellular vaccines for all the doses were more expensive. Direct costs of programs with the vaccination rate at 90% remained systematically lower than the expected cost of pertussis disease in the case of non prevention. The stability over time of the vaccination coverage at a constant level of 90% made it possible to ensure the largest cost saving strategy during the period of 14 years of analysis. Transitions to programs with a lower proportion of vaccinated children systematically incurred an incremental direct cost for society. The amount of that cost rose with the size of the drop in the new vaccination coverage and diminished, due to the J-curve optimistic effect, when the fall in vaccination rate generated a delayed increase in notification cases of pertussis.


Subject(s)
Immunization Programs/economics , Pertussis Vaccine/administration & dosage , Vaccines, Acellular/administration & dosage , Whooping Cough/prevention & control , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Cost Savings/methods , Cost-Benefit Analysis , England/epidemiology , Humans , Immunization Programs/methods , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Pertussis Vaccine/economics , Vaccines, Acellular/economics , Wales/epidemiology , Whooping Cough/epidemiology
5.
Vaccine ; 23(3): 353-61, 2004 Dec 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15530680

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Lifetime protection against pertussis has been adopted as a goal of immunization programs in Canada. To anticipate adult coverage with a combined product containing tetanus (T) and diphtheria (d) toxoids and acellular pertussis (aP) vaccine as a booster dose, we conducted a survey of households in British Columbia, Canada. METHODS: In a random telephone survey involving 800 adults, 25 years of age and older, we assessed current behaviors related to adult Td immunization and beliefs regarding pertussis vaccine under various scenarios relevant to adult decision-making. RESULTS: Forty-five percent of participants reported having received tetanus vaccine within the previous 10 years; this rate was lowest amongst elderly persons 65 years of age or more (28%). On multi-variate analysis, being up-to-date with tetanus immunization was independently associated with belief that an adult should be immunized against tetanus and perception that tetanus is life-threatening and inversely associated with being elderly. At baseline, 59% of respondents indicated willingness to receive pertussis immunization if provided free; this increased to 76% following sequential information about communicability and severity of pertussis illness and safety, efficacy and convenience of vaccine and up to 87% if accompanied by physician or nurse recommendation. Sixty-three percent of adults indicated they would receive the vaccine if required to pay $40.00 (Cdn) for it. CONCLUSIONS: Personal risk perception, public funding and physician recommendation are important to adults when considering tetanus and pertussis immunization. These factors may be relevant as immunization programs are expanded to include more adults generally.


Subject(s)
Attitude to Health , Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis Vaccine/immunology , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , British Columbia , Diphtheria/immunology , Diphtheria/prevention & control , Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis Vaccine/economics , Female , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Immunization, Secondary , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Sex Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Telephone , Tetanus/immunology , Tetanus/prevention & control , Vaccines, Acellular/economics , Vaccines, Acellular/immunology , Whooping Cough/immunology , Whooping Cough/prevention & control
6.
Vaccine ; 20(9-10): 1316-30, 2002 Jan 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11818150

ABSTRACT

A cost-effectiveness analysis of the introduction of acellular pertussis booster doses at either 4 or 15 years of age was performed. A transmission dynamic model was used to predict the level of indirect protection in those too young to be vaccinated. Multivariate sensitivity analyses were performed. In England and Wales there are an estimated 35,000 general practitioner (GP) consultations, 5500 inpatient days, and nine deaths annually attributable to pertussis, despite high levels of coverage for the primary course (approximately 95%). Around 80% of the bed-days and 90% of the deaths occur in those too young to be immunised (< 3 months of age). The introduction of acellular booster doses at 4 years is expected to reduce morbidity and mortality in the younger age groups by 40-100%, and at 15 years by 0-100%. From the perspective of the health care provider, roughly 50% of the simulations result in a cost per life-year gained of less than 10,000 pounds for vaccination at 4 years, the corresponding proportion for vaccination at 15 years being only 35%. Apart from the degree of indirect protection the model was most sensitive to the discount rate, the price of the vaccine, and the mortality rate. Significant uncertainty remains regarding the epidemiology of pertussis and the impact of booster doses. Nevertheless, the introduction of acellular boosters, particularly at 4 years, has the potential to be cost-effective in the UK.


Subject(s)
Immunization, Secondary/economics , Pertussis Vaccine/economics , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Cost-Benefit Analysis , England , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Vaccines, Acellular/economics , Wales
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...