Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 92
Filter
1.
J Breath Res ; 15(4)2021 07 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34293732

ABSTRACT

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has imposed a considerable burden on hospitals and healthcare workers (HCWs) worldwide, increasing the risk of outbreaks and nosocomial transmission to 'non-COVID-19' patients, who represent the highest-risk population in terms of mortality, and HCWs. Since HCWs are at the interface between hospitals on the one hand and the community on the other, they are potential reservoirs, carriers, or victims of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 cross-transmission. In addition, there has been a paradigm shift in the management of viral respiratory outbreaks, such as the widespread testing of patients and HCWs, including asymptomatic individuals. In hospitals, there is a risk of aerosol transmission in poorly ventilated spaces, and when performing aerosol-producing procedures, it is imperative to take measures against aerosol transmission. In particular, spatial separation of the inpatient ward for non-COVID-19 patients from that designated for patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 as well as negative-pressure isolation on the floor of the ward, using an airborne infection isolation device could help prevent nosocomial infection.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals , Infection Control , Physical Distancing , Ventilation , Aerosols , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/transmission , COVID-19 Testing , Cross Infection/diagnosis , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/transmission , Humans , Infection Control/methods , Infection Control/statistics & numerical data , SARS-CoV-2 , Ventilation/methods , Ventilation/statistics & numerical data
2.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 70(12): 449-455, 2021 Mar 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33764961

ABSTRACT

Many kindergarten through grade 12 (K-12) schools offering in-person learning have adopted strategies to limit the spread of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19 (1). These measures include mandating use of face masks, physical distancing in classrooms, increasing ventilation with outdoor air, identification of close contacts,* and following CDC isolation and quarantine guidance† (2). A 2-week pilot investigation was conducted to investigate occurrences of SARS-CoV-2 secondary transmission in K-12 schools in the city of Springfield, Missouri, and in St. Louis County, Missouri, during December 7-18, 2020. Schools in both locations implemented COVID-19 mitigation strategies; however, Springfield implemented a modified quarantine policy permitting student close contacts aged ≤18 years who had school-associated contact with a person with COVID-19 and met masking requirements during their exposure to continue in-person learning.§ Participating students, teachers, and staff members with COVID-19 (37) from 22 schools and their school-based close contacts (contacts) (156) were interviewed, and contacts were offered SARS-CoV-2 testing. Among 102 school-based contacts who received testing, two (2%) had positive test results indicating probable school-based SARS-CoV-2 secondary transmission. Both contacts were in Springfield and did not meet criteria to participate in the modified quarantine. In Springfield, 42 student contacts were permitted to continue in-person learning under the modified quarantine; among the 30 who were interviewed, 21 were tested, and none received a positive test result. Despite high community transmission, SARS-CoV-2 transmission in schools implementing COVID-19 mitigation strategies was lower than that in the community. Until additional data are available, K-12 schools should continue implementing CDC-recommended mitigation measures (2) and follow CDC isolation and quarantine guidance to minimize secondary transmission in schools offering in-person learning.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/transmission , Schools/organization & administration , Schools/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing , Child , Child, Preschool , Contact Tracing , Female , Humans , Male , Masks/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Missouri/epidemiology , Physical Distancing , Pilot Projects , Quarantine , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Ventilation/statistics & numerical data
3.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl ; 103(3): 145-150, 2021 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33645280

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The relation between type of ventilation used in the operating theatre and surgical site infection has drawn considerable attention. It has been reported that there is a possible relationship between the type of ventilation used in the operation theatre and surgical site infection. This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate this relationship. METHODS: Through a systematic literature search up to May 2020, 14 studies describing 590,121 operations, 328,183 were performed under laminar airflow ventilation and 2,611,938 were performed under conventional ventilation. Studies were identified that reported relationships between type of ventilation with its different categories and surgical site infection (10 studies were related to surgical site infection in total hip replacement, 7 in total knee arthroplasties and 3 in different abdominal and open vascular surgery). Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated comparing surgical site infection prevalence and type of theatre ventilation using the dichotomous method with a random or fixed-effect model. FINDINGS: No significant difference was found between surgery performed under laminar airflow ventilation and conventional ventilation in total hip replacement (OR 1.23; 95% CI 0.97-1.56, p = 0.09), total knee arthroplasties (OR 1.14; 95% CI 0.62-2.09, p = 0.67) or different abdominal and open vascular surgery (OR 0.75; 95% CI 0.43-1.33, p = 0.33). The impact of the type of theatre ventilation may have no influence on surgical site infection as a tool for decreasing its occurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this meta-analysis, operating under laminar airflow or conventional ventilation may have no independent relationship with the risk of surgical site infection. This relationship forces us not to recommend the use of laminar airflow ventilation since it has a much higher cost compared with conventional ventilation.


Subject(s)
Operating Rooms , Surgical Procedures, Operative , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Ventilation/statistics & numerical data , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee , Environment, Controlled , Humans , Vascular Surgical Procedures , Ventilation/methods
4.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 70(4): 130-135, 2021 Jan 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33507889

ABSTRACT

The National Football League (NFL) and the NFL Players Association (NFLPA) began the 2020 football season in July, implementing extensive mitigation and surveillance measures in facilities and during travel and gameplay. Mitigation protocols* were evaluated and modified based on data from routine reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests for SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19); proximity tracking devices; and detailed interviews. Midseason, transmission was observed in persons who had cumulative interactions of <15 minutes' duration, leading to a revised definition of high-risk contacts that required consideration of mask use, setting and room ventilation in addition to proximity and duration of interaction. The NFL also developed an intensive protocol that imposed stricter infection prevention precautions when a case was identified at an NFL club. The intensive protocol effectively prevented the occurrence of high-risk interactions, with no high-risk contacts identified for 71% of traced cases at clubs under the intensive protocol. The incorporation of the nature and location of the interaction, including mask use, indoor versus outdoor setting, and ventilation, in addition to proximity and duration, likely improved identification of exposed persons at higher risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Quarantine of these persons, along with testing and intensive protocols, can reduce spread of infection.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Testing , COVID-19/prevention & control , Contact Tracing , Football , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/transmission , Humans , Masks/statistics & numerical data , Physical Distancing , Quarantine/statistics & numerical data , Risk Assessment , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Time Factors , United States/epidemiology , Ventilation/statistics & numerical data
5.
Int J Environ Health Res ; 31(4): 374-388, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31455092

ABSTRACT

Spreading and distribution of selected volatile organic compounds (VOCs) released as point source emissions in a hospital environment were investigated in two office rooms and two patient rooms. Six tracer compounds were released from six locations and their concentrations were measured in five sampling sites during two consecutive days. The air flow rates, velocity and flow direction, air temperature, pressure differences between adjacent rooms, and relative humidity and concentrations of the tracer compounds were measured. The results revealed that the size of the examined space and ventilation rates, the monitoring point should be either close to the exhaust terminal device or in the middle of the occupied zone the way that supply air flows do not interfere the measurements. Depending on the inlet terminal device and its location, the air is either delivered parallel to the ceiling or it can be directed to a desired spot into the occupied zone. The tracer compounds did spread evenly within the room and their concentrations decreased inversely with the distance. In rooms with a good ventilation, the concentrations at the exhaust air terminal units were close to those measured near the source point. The results obtained from modeling were consistent with the measurements.


Subject(s)
Air Movements , Air Pollutants/analysis , Air Pollution, Indoor/analysis , Hospitals , Ventilation/statistics & numerical data , Volatile Organic Compounds/analysis , Models, Theoretical
7.
Trials ; 21(1): 1014, 2020 Dec 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33302976

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: SARS-Cov-2 virus preferentially binds to the Angiotensin Converting Enzyme 2 (ACE2) on alveolar epithelial type II cells, initiating an inflammatory response and tissue damage which may impair surfactant synthesis contributing to alveolar collapse, worsening hypoxia and leading to respiratory failure. The objective of this study is to evaluate the feasibility, safety and efficacy of nebulised surfactant in COVID-19 adult patients requiring mechanical ventilation for respiratory failure. TRIAL DESIGN: This study is a dose-escalating randomized open-label clinical trial of 20 COVID-19 patients. PARTICIPANTS: This study is conducted in two centres: University Hospital Southampton and University College London Hospitals. Eligible participants are aged ≥18, hospitalised with COVID-19 (confirmed by PCR), who require endotracheal intubation and are enrolled within 24 hours of mechanical ventilation. For patients unable to consent, assent is obtained from a personal legal representative (PerLR) or professional legal representative (ProfLR) prior to enrolment. The following are exclusion criteria: imminent expected death within 24 hours; specific contraindications to surfactant administration (e.g. known allergy, pneumothorax, pulmonary hemorrhage); known or suspected pregnancy; stage 4 chronic kidney disease or requiring dialysis (i.e., eGFR < 30); liver failure (Child-Pugh Class C); anticipated transfer to another hospital, which is not a study site, within 72 hours; current or recent (within 1 month) participation in another study that, in the opinion of the investigator, would prevent enrollment for safety reasons; and declined consent or assent. INTERVENTION AND COMPARATOR: Intervention: The study is based on an investigational drug/device combination product. The surfactant product is Bovactant (Alveofact®), a natural animal derived (bovine) lung surfactant formulated as a lyophilized powder in 108 mg vials and reconstituted to 45 mg/mL in buffer supplied in a prefilled syringe. It is isolated by lung lavage and, by weight, is a mixture of: phospholipid (75% phosphatidylcholine, 13% phosphatidylglycerol, 3% phosphatidylethanolamine, 1% phosphatidylinositol and 1% sphingomyelin), 5% cholesterol, 1% lipid-soluble surfactant-associated proteins (SP-B and SP-C), very low levels of free fatty acid, lyso-phosphatidylcholine, water and 0.3% calcium. The Drug Delivery Device is the AeroFact-COVID™ nebulizer, an investigational device based on the Aerogen® Solo vibrating mesh nebulizer. The timing and escalation dosing plans for the surfactant are as follows. Cohort 1: Three patients will receive 10 vials (1080 mg) each of surfactant at dosing times of 0 hours, 8 hours and 24 hours. 2 controls with no placebo intervention. Cohort 2: Three patients will receive 10 vials (1080 mg) of surfactant at dosing times of 0 hours and 8 hours, and 30 vials (3240 mg) at a dosing time of 24 hours. 2 controls with no placebo intervention. Cohort 3: Three patients will receive 10 vials (1080 mg) of surfactant at a dosing time of 0 hours, and 30 vials (3240 mg) at dosing times of 8 hours and 24 hours. 2 controls with no placebo intervention. Cohort 4: Three patients will receive 30 (3240 mg) vials each of surfactant at dosing times of 0 hours, 8 hours and 24 hours. 2 controls. 2 controls with no placebo intervention. The trial steering committee, advised by the data monitoring committee, will review trial progression and dose escalation/maintenance/reduction after each cohort is completed (48-hour primary outcome timepoint reached) based on available feasibility, adverse event, safety and efficacy data. The trial will not be discontinued on the basis of lack of efficacy. The trial may be stopped early on the basis of safety or feasibility concerns. Comparator: No placebo intervention. All participants will receive usual standard of care in accordance with the local policies for mechanically ventilated patients and all other treatments will be left to the discretion of the attending physician. MAIN OUTCOMES: The co-primary outcome is the improvement in oxygenation (PaO2/FiO2 ratio) and pulmonary ventilation (Ventilation Index (VI), where VI = [RR x (PIP - PEEP) × PaCO2]/1000) at 48 hours after study initiation. The secondary outcomes include frequency and severity of adverse events (AEs), Adverse Device Effects (ADEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Serious Adverse Device Events (SADEs), change in pulmonary compliance, change in positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) requirement of ventilatory support at 24 and 48 hours after study initiation, clinical improvement defined by time to one improvement point on the ordinal scale described in the WHO master protocol (2020) recorded while hospitalised, days of mechanical ventilation, mechanical ventilator free days (VFD) at day 21, length of intensive care unit stay, number of days hospitalised and mortality at day 28. Exploratory end points will include quantification of SARS-CoV-2 viral load from tracheal aspirates using PCR, surfactant dynamics (synthesis and turnover) and function (surface tension reduction) from deep tracheal aspirate samples (DTAS), surfactant phospholipid concentrations in plasma and DTAS, inflammatory markers (cellular and cytokine) in plasma and DTAS, and blood oxidative stress markers. RANDOMISATION: After informed assent, patients fulfilling inclusion criteria will be randomised to 3:2 for the treatment and control arms using an internet-based block randomization service (ALEA tool for clinical trials, FormsVision BV) in combination with electronic data collection. Randomisation will be done by the recruiting centre with a unique subject identifier specific to that centre. BLINDING (MASKING): This is an open-labelled unblinded study. NUMBERS TO BE RANDOMISED (SAMPLE SIZE): The total sample size is 20 COVID-19 mechanically ventilated patients (12 intervention; 8 control). TRIAL STATUS: Current protocol version is V2 dated 5th of June 2020. The recruitment is currently ongoing and started on the 14th of October 2020. The anticipated study completion date is November 2021. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04362059 (Registered 24 April 2020), EUDAMED number: CIV-GB-20-06-033328, EudraCT number: 2020-001886-35 (Registered 11 May 2020) FULL PROTOCOL: The full protocol is attached as an additional file, accessible from the Trials website (Additional file 1). In the interest in expediting dissemination of this material, the familiar formatting has been eliminated; this Letter serves as a summary of the key elements of the full protocol. The study protocol has been reported in accordance with the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Clinical Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) guidelines (Additional file 2).


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Nebulizers and Vaporizers/standards , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Surface-Active Agents/therapeutic use , Adult , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/mortality , COVID-19/virology , Case-Control Studies , Feasibility Studies , Humans , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , London/epidemiology , Mortality/trends , Nebulizers and Vaporizers/statistics & numerical data , Respiration, Artificial/methods , Respiratory Insufficiency/metabolism , Respiratory Insufficiency/physiopathology , Respiratory Insufficiency/therapy , Safety , Surface-Active Agents/administration & dosage , Surface-Active Agents/chemistry , Treatment Outcome , Ventilation/statistics & numerical data
8.
Malar J ; 19(1): 273, 2020 Jul 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32736629

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: African houses are frequently too hot and uncomfortable to use a bed net at night. Indoor thermal comfort is often evaluated by measuring temperature and humidity, ignoring ventilation. This study explored ways to measure ventilation in single-roomed rural Gambian houses during the malaria transmission season and evaluated building designs that could increase airflow at night and help keep the occupants comfortable. METHODS: Two identical mud-walled houses were constructed with a metal roof, three doors and closed eaves. Experiment 1 compared five methods for measuring ventilation in a building: (1) using a blower door, (2) increasing carbon dioxide (CO2) levels indoors using an artificial source of CO2 and then measuring the rate of gas decay, (3) using a similar approach with a natural source of CO2, (4) measuring the rise of CO2 when people enter a building and (5) using hot-wire anemometers. Experiment 2 used CO2 data loggers to compare ventilation in a reference metal-roofed house with closed eaves and badly-fitting doors with a similar house with (1) thatched roof and open eaves, (2) eaves tubes, (3) screened doors and (4) screened doors and windows. RESULTS: In experiment 1, CO2 data loggers placed indoors in two identical houses showed similar changes in airflow (p > 0.05) for all three methods recording either decreasing or increasing CO2. Blower doors were unable to measure airflow in houses with open eaves or screened windows and the anemometers broke down under field conditions. In experiment 2, open eaves in thatched houses, screened doors alone, and screened doors and windows increased indoor ventilation compared to the reference metal-roofed house with closed eaves and badly fitting doors (p < 0.05). Eaves tubes did not increase ventilation in comparison to the reference house. CONCLUSION: CO2 data loggers proved to be a simple and efficient method for measuring ventilation in rural houses at night. Ventilation of metal-roofed houses can be improved by adding two screened doors and windows on opposite walls. Improved ventilation will result in increased thermal comfort making it more likely that people will sleep under a bed net.


Subject(s)
Housing/statistics & numerical data , Ventilation/statistics & numerical data , Carbon Dioxide/analysis , Gambia , Housing/classification , Malaria/transmission , Rural Population , Seasons
10.
Indoor Air ; 30(1): 31-39, 2020 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31541483

ABSTRACT

It is difficult to evaluate long-term ventilation and indoor-outdoor temperature variation on-site in the birth residence so as to investigate their associations with learning capacity from childhood through adolescence. Here, we conducted a questionnaire-based retrospective cohort study in ten schools from two northeast China cities with warm summers and severe cold winters when residences had very low air exchange rates. Scores for Chinese, Mathematics, and English in the final exams of the summer semester in June 2018 were collected to evaluate learning capacity. We surveyed 6238 students aged 14.7 (SD: 2.1) years old. Using the 2nd quarter (April-May-June) birth as reference, 4th quarter (October-November-December) birth consistently was significantly associated with lower scores in Chinese in bivariate (ß, 95%CI: -3.2, -4.3 to -2.0) and multivariate (-1.8, -2.4 to -0.8) linear regression analyses. Stratified sub-analyses showed significant associations for male (-2.4, -3.7 to -1.1), urban (-2.4, -3.4 to -1.4), and primary students (-2.9, -4.5 to -1.4). Since household ventilation and indoor-outdoor temperature variation had great differences between the 2nd and 4th quarter of year, our results suggest that these two factors in the birth residence could be associated with learning capacity in childhood, especially for male and primary students in northeast China.


Subject(s)
Academic Performance/statistics & numerical data , Environmental Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Temperature , Ventilation/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Age Factors , Air Pollution, Indoor/statistics & numerical data , Child , Child, Preschool , China , Chronology as Topic , Humans , Learning , Parturition , Residence Characteristics/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Schools
12.
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) ; 21(10): 1551-1557, 2019 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31448861

ABSTRACT

We sought to assess functional capacity in recently diagnosed untreated hypertensive patients with different 24-hour blood pressure (BP) patterns (dipping, non-dipping, extreme dipping, and reverse dipping). This cross-sectional study involved 164 untreated hypertensive patients who underwent 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring and cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Our findings showed that 24-hour and daytime BP values did not differ between four groups. Nighttime BP significantly and gradually increased from extreme dippers to reverse dippers. There was no significant difference in BPs at baseline and at the peak of exercise among four observed groups. Peak oxygen consumption (peak VO2) was significantly lower in reverse dippers than in dippers and extreme dippers. Heart rate recovery was significantly lower among reverse dippers than in dippers and extreme dippers. Ventilation/carbon dioxide slope (VE/VCO2) was significantly higher in reverse dippers and non-dippers in comparison with dippers and extreme dippers. Non-dipping BP pattern (non-dippers and reverse dippers together) was independently and negatively associated lower heart rate recovery in the first minute and peak VO2. Reverse dipping BP pattern was independently associated not only with heart rate recovery in the first minute and peak VO2, but also with VE/VCO2. In conclusion, untreated hypertensive patients with reverse dipping BP patterns showed significantly worse functional capacity than those with dipping and extreme dipping BP patterns. Circadian BP rhythm is related with functional capacity and should be taken into account in the risk assessment of hypertensive patients.


Subject(s)
Blood Pressure/physiology , Heart/physiopathology , Hypertension/physiopathology , Adult , Aged , Blood Pressure Determination/methods , Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory/methods , Carbon Dioxide/metabolism , Case-Control Studies , Circadian Rhythm , Cross-Sectional Studies , Exercise Test/methods , Female , Heart Rate/physiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Oxygen Consumption/physiology , Risk Assessment , Serbia/epidemiology , Ventilation/statistics & numerical data
13.
BMC Anesthesiol ; 19(1): 112, 2019 06 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31248376

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Early extubation after liver transplantation is safe and accelerates patient recovery. Patients with end-stage liver disease undergo sarcopenic changes, and sarcopenia is associated with postoperative morbidity and mortality. We investigated the impact of core muscle mass on the feasibility of immediate extubation in the operating room (OR) after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). METHODS: A total of 295 male adult LDLT patients were retrospectively reviewed between January 2011 and December 2017. In total, 40 patients were excluded due to emergency surgery or severe encephalopathy. A total of 255 male LDLT patients were analyzed in this study. According to the OR extubation criteria, the study population was classified into immediate and conventional extubation groups (39.6 vs. 60.4%). Psoas muscle area was estimated using abdominal computed tomography and normalized by height squared (psoas muscle index [PMI]). RESULTS: There were no significant differences in OR extubation rates among the five attending transplant anesthesiologists. The preoperative PMI correlated with respiratory performance. The preoperative PMI was higher in the immediate extubation group than in the conventional extubation group. Potentially significant perioperative factors in the univariate analysis were entered into a multivariate analysis, in which preoperative PMI and intraoperative factors (i.e., continuous renal replacement therapy, significant post-reperfusion syndrome, and fresh frozen plasma transfusion) were associated with OR extubation. The duration of ventilator support and length of intensive care unit stay were shorter in the immediate extubation group than in the conventional extubation group, and the incidence of pneumonia and early allograft dysfunction were also lower in the immediate extubation group. CONCLUSIONS: Our study could improve the accuracy of predictions concerning immediate post-transplant extubation in the OR by introducing preoperative PMI into predictive models for patients who underwent elective LDLT.


Subject(s)
Airway Extubation/methods , Liver Transplantation/methods , Living Donors , Operating Rooms , Perioperative Period/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Airway Extubation/adverse effects , Humans , Incidence , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Pneumonia/epidemiology , Primary Graft Dysfunction/epidemiology , Psoas Muscles/anatomy & histology , Republic of Korea/epidemiology , Respiratory Physiological Phenomena , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Ventilation/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
14.
Environ Pollut ; 247: 431-437, 2019 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30690239

ABSTRACT

Roadside food-vending shanties using coal cookstoves may be an important source of carbon monoxide (CO) exposure in megacities in India. The shanties are often small, congested and poorly ventilated, and very little is known about the level of human exposure to CO. Here, we assessed the level of exposure to CO in 25 roadside food-vending shanties using coal cookstoves in Kolkata, India. Portable electrochemical CO monitors were used to measure CO concentrations during peak and non-peak customer-periods in closed (blocked from three sides) and semi-closed (blocked from two sides) shanties. Measurements were taken where customers sit indoor about 5-7 ft away from the cookstoves. The shanties' ventilation rates were measured using tracer gas concentration-decay technique. Levels of blood carboxyhaemoglobin (COHb) and exhaled CO were estimated using regression models. The 1-hr time weighted average (TWA) indoor CO exposure levels ranged from 7.8 to 18.1 ppm during peak-periods, and 0.7-3.1 ppm during non-peak-periods. The exposure levels during peak-periods exceeded the USEPA's reference limit of 9 ppm in all cases in the closed shanties, and in 71% of cases in the semi-closed shanties. The ventilation rates ranged from 5.5 to 23.4 and 14.8 to 32.5 cubic feet per minute (cfm) per person for the closed and semi-closed shanties, respectively, indicating poor ventilation in some shanties. There was significant variation (p = 0.01) in the level of indoor CO exposure between peak and non-peak periods, and between shanty types. The estimated levels of blood COHb during peak and non-peak hours were 0.78 ±â€¯0.7% and 0.35 ±â€¯0.07%, respectively, that were within the normal physiological values in non-smokers.


Subject(s)
Air Pollutants/analysis , Air Pollution, Indoor/statistics & numerical data , Carbon Monoxide/analysis , Environmental Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Particulate Matter/analysis , Air Pollution, Indoor/analysis , Coal , Cooking/instrumentation , Humans , India , Ventilation/methods , Ventilation/statistics & numerical data
15.
PLoS One ; 13(11): e0208049, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30496317

ABSTRACT

We have developed a computational model of gas mixing and ventilation in the human lung represented as a bifurcating network. We have simulated multiple-breath washout (MBW), a clinical test for measuring ventilation heterogeneity (VH) in patients with obstructive lung conditions. By applying airway constrictions inter-regionally, we have predicted the response of MBW indices to obstructions and found that they detect a narrow range of severe constrictions that reduce airway radius to 10%-30% of healthy values. These results help to explain the success of the MBW test to distinguish obstructive lung conditions from healthy controls. Further, we have used a perturbative approach to account for intra-regional airway heterogeneity that avoids modelling each airway individually. We have found, for random airway heterogeneity, that the variance in MBW indices is greater when indices are already elevated due to constrictions. By quantifying this effect, we have shown that variability in lung structure and mechanical properties alone can lead to clinically significant variability in MBW indices (specifically the Lung Clearance Index-LCI, and the gradient of phase-III slopes-Scond), but only in cases simulating obstructive lung conditions. This method is a computationally efficient way to probe the lung's sensitivity to structural changes, and to quantify uncertainty in predictions due to random variations in lung mechanical and structural properties.


Subject(s)
Pulmonary Ventilation/physiology , Respiratory Function Tests/methods , Computer Simulation , Forced Expiratory Volume , Forecasting/methods , Humans , Lung Diseases, Obstructive/diagnosis , Respiration , Tidal Volume , Ventilation/methods , Ventilation/statistics & numerical data , Vital Capacity/physiology
16.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 97(25): e11190, 2018 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29924038

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: It is very rare but challenging to perform emergency airway management for accidental extubation in a patient whose head and neck are fixed in the prone position when urgently turning the patient to the supine position would be unsafe. The authors hypothesized that tracheal intubation with a videolaryngoscope would allow effective airway rescue in this situation compared with a supraglottic airway device and designed a randomized crossover manikin study to test this hypothesis. METHODS: The authors compared airway rescue performances of the 3 devices-the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA; Teleflex Medical, Westmeath, Ireland) as a reference; the Pentax AWS (AWS; Nihon Kohden, Tokyo, Japan) as a channeled blade-type videolaryngoscope; and the McGRATH videolaryngoscope (McGRATH; Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) as a nonchanneled blade type in a manikin fixed to the operating table in the prone position. Twenty-one anesthesiologists performed airway management on the prone manikin with the 3 devices, and the time required for intubation/ventilation and the success rates were recorded. RESULTS: The median (range) intubation/ventilation times with the PLMA, AWS, and McGRATH were 24.5 (13.5-89.5) s, 29.9 (17.1-79.8) s, and 46.7 (21.9-211.7) s, respectively. There was no significant difference in intubation/ventilation times between the PLMA and AWS. The AWS permitted significantly faster tracheal intubation than did the McGRATH (P = 0.006). The success rates with the PLMA (100%) and AWS (100%) were significantly greater than that with the McGRATH (71.4%). Airway management performance of the PLMA and AWS was comparable between devices and better than that of the McGRATH in the prone position. CONCLUSIONS: Considering that tracheal intubation can provide a more secure airway and more stable ventilation than the PLMA, re-intubation with a channeled blade-type videolaryngoscope such as the AWS may be a useful method of airway rescue for accidental extubation in patients in the prone position.


Subject(s)
Airway Extubation/adverse effects , Airway Management/instrumentation , Laryngoscopes/standards , Prone Position/physiology , Airway Extubation/statistics & numerical data , Airway Management/methods , Anesthesiology/education , Clinical Competence , Humans , Intubation, Intratracheal/instrumentation , Intubation, Intratracheal/statistics & numerical data , Laryngeal Masks/standards , Laryngoscopes/trends , Laryngoscopy/methods , Manikins , Time Factors , Ventilation/instrumentation , Ventilation/statistics & numerical data
17.
J Environ Radioact ; 192: 81-85, 2018 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29908412

ABSTRACT

Elevated indoor radon concentrations (222Rn) in dwellings pose generally a potential health risk to the inhabitants. During the last decades a considerable number of studies discussed both the different sources of indoor radon and the drivers for diurnal and multi day variations of its concentration. While the potential sources are undisputed, controversial opinions exist regarding their individual relevance and regarding the driving influences that control varying radon indoor concentrations. These drivers include (i) cyclic forced ventilation of dwellings, (ii) the temporal variance of the radon exhalation from soil and building materials due to e.g. a varying moisture content and (iii) diurnal and multi day temperature and pressure patterns. The presented study discusses the influences of last-mentioned temporal meteorological parameters by effectively excluding the influences of forced ventilation and undefined radon exhalation. The results reveal the continuous variation of the indoor/outdoor pressure gradient as key driver for a constant "breathing" of any interior space, which affects the indoor radon concentration with both diurnal and multi day patterns. The diurnally recurring variation of the pressure gradient is predominantly triggered by the day/night cycle of the indoor temperature that is associated with an expansion/contraction of the indoor air volume. Multi day patterns, on the other hand, are mainly due to periods of negative air pressure indoors that is triggered by periods of elevated wind speeds as a result of Bernoulli's principle.


Subject(s)
Air Pollutants, Radioactive/analysis , Meteorological Concepts , Radiation Monitoring , Radon/analysis , Air Pollution, Indoor/analysis , Air Pollution, Indoor/statistics & numerical data , Construction Materials/analysis , Soil , Ventilation/methods , Ventilation/statistics & numerical data
18.
Indoor Air ; 28(4): 473-487, 2018 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29705988

ABSTRACT

This paper reviews studies of the relationships between ventilation rates (VRs) in homes and occupant health, primarily respiratory health. Five cross-sectional studies, seven case-control studies, and eight intervention studies met inclusion criteria. Nearly all studies controlled for a range of potential confounders and most intervention studies included placebo conditions. Just over half of studies reported one or more statistically significant (SS) health benefits of increased VRs. Wheeze was most clearly associated with VR. No health outcomes had SS associations with VRs in the majority of statistical tests. Most studies that reported SS health benefits from increased VRs also had additional health outcomes that did not improve with increased VRs. Overall, the number of SS improvements in health with increased VRs exceeded the anticipated chance improvements by approximately a factor of seven. The magnitude of the improvements in health outcomes with increased VRs ranged from 20% to several-fold improvements. In summary, the available research indicates a tendency for improvements in respiratory health with increased home VRs; however, health benefits do not occur consistently and other exposure control measures should be used together with ventilation. The research did not enable identification of a threshold VR below which adverse health effects occur.


Subject(s)
Air Pollution, Indoor/adverse effects , Health Status , Housing/statistics & numerical data , Respiratory Tract Diseases/etiology , Ventilation/statistics & numerical data , Humans
19.
Sci Total Environ ; 633: 308-316, 2018 Aug 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29574375

ABSTRACT

Impacts on indoor air quality of dining areas from cooking activities were investigated in eight categories of commercial restaurants including Szechwan Hotpot, Hunan, Shaanxi Noodle, Chinese Barbecue, Chinese Vegetarian, Korean Barbecue, Italian, and Indian, in Northwestern China during December 2011 to January 2012. Chemical characterization and health risk assessment for airborne carbonyls, and particulate-bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and heavy metals were conducted under low ventilation conditions in wintertime. The highest total quantified carbonyls (Σcarbonyls) concentration of 313.6µgm-3 was found in the Chinese Barbecue, followed by the Szechwan Hotpot (222.6µgm-3) and Indian (221.9µgm-3) restaurants. However, the highest Σcarbonyls per capita was found at the Indian restaurant (4500µgcapita-1), suggesting that cooking methods such as stir-fly and bake for spices ingredients released more carbonyls from thermal cooking processes. Formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, and acetone were the three most abundant species, totally accounting for >60% of mass concentrations of the Σcarbonyls. Phenanthrene, chrysene, and benzo[a]anthracene were the three most abundant PAHs. Low molecular weight fraction (ΣPAHs≤178) had the highest contributions accounting for 40.6%-65.7%, much greater than their heaver counterparts. Diagnostic PAHs ratios suggest that cooking fuel and environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) contribute to the indoor PAHs profiles. Lead was the most abundant heavy metal in all sampled restaurants. High quantity of nickel was also found in samples due to the emissions from stainless-steel made kitchen utensils and cookware and ETS. Cancer risk assessments on the toxic substances demonstrate that the working environment of dining areas were hazard to health. Formation of reactive organic species (ROS) from the cooking activities was evidenced by measurement of hydroxyl radical (OH) formed from simulating particulate matter (PM) react with surrogate lung fluid. The highest OH concentration of 294.4ngm-3 was detected in Chinese Barbecue. In addition, the elevation of the concentrations of PM and OH after non-dining periods implies that the significance of formation of oxidizing-active species indoor at poor ventilation environments.


Subject(s)
Air Pollutants/analysis , Air Pollution, Indoor/statistics & numerical data , Inhalation Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Restaurants/statistics & numerical data , Air Pollution, Indoor/analysis , China , Cooking/statistics & numerical data , Environmental Monitoring , Humans , Particulate Matter/analysis , Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons/analysis , Risk Assessment , Ventilation/methods , Ventilation/statistics & numerical data
20.
J Occup Environ Hyg ; 15(5): 376-388, 2018 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29420141

ABSTRACT

Residential inter-zonal (e.g., between rooms) ventilation is comprised of fresh air infiltration in and exfiltration out of the whole house plus the "fresh" air that is entering (and exiting) the room of interest from other rooms or areas within the house. Clearly, the inter-zone ventilation rate in any room of interest will be greater than the infiltration/exfiltration ventilation rate of outdoor air for the whole house. The purpose of this study is to determine how much greater the inter-zonal ventilation rate is in typical U.S. residences compared to the whole house ventilation rate from outdoor air. The data for this statistical analysis came from HouseDB, a 1995 EPA database of residential ventilation rates. Analytical results indicate that a lognormal distribution provides the best fit to the data. Lognormal probability distribution functions (PDFs) are provided for various inter-zonal ventilation rates for comparison to the PDF for the whole house ventilation rates. All ventilation rates are expressed as air change rates per hour (ACH). These PDFs can be used as inputs to exposure models. This analysis suggests that if one were performing a deterministic analysis for unknown housing stocks in the U.S., a default mean and median ACH values of 0.4/hr and 0.3/hr, respectively, for whole house ventilation would be appropriate; and 0.7/hr and 0.6/hr, respectively, for inter-zonal ventilation.


Subject(s)
Housing , Ventilation/statistics & numerical data , Air Pollution, Indoor , Environmental Monitoring/statistics & numerical data , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...