Philip Drinker versus John Haven Emerson: Battle of the iron lung machines, 1928-1940.

The "iron lung," originally known as the Drinker respirator, was developed in 1928 by Dr Philip Drinker and Dr Louis Agassiz Shaw to improve the respiration of polio patients. In 1931, John Haven Emerson, an inventor from Cambridge, MA, enhanced the design of the Drinker respirator and introduced a new and highly improved model of the iron lung that was cheaper and significantly lighter. Dr Drinker eventually filed a lawsuit against Emerson for alleged patent infringement. In his defense, Emerson argued that devices that help save human lives should be widely accessible to all patients. He also questioned the novelty of Drinker's design, claiming that Drinker's device comprised of patented technology that existed since the late 1800s, and that he therefore did not have full ownership of the machine's intellectual property. Ultimately, the case backfired on Drinker, as he not only lost the court case but also lost the entire panel of patents that were in his possession.

Thunberg's Barospirator, a Fully Encasing Predecessor of the Iron Lung.

Used as a ventilator for assisting victims of polio, the barospirator was described by Swedish physician-scientist Torsten Thunberg in 1924. An immediate predecessor of the iron lung of Philip Drinker, the barospirator fully encased the entire body. Cyclic air-pressure changes within the chamber achieved ventilation during equilibrations of intrapulmonary and ambient pressures. Pulmonary medicine innovator Alvan Leroy Barach used a modified barospirator for lung rest as a treatment of tuberculosis in the 1940s. Adverse effects included damage to patients' tympanic membranes. Despite its limited clinical success, the barospirator was successfully used by one of Drinker's competitors, John H. Emerson, to invalidate Drinker's US patent filings.

Ventilación mecánica: una breve historia / Mechanical ventilation: a short history

This review is a short history of mechanical ventilation, from its origins to the present day. This changing history provides the basis for speculation on the future innovations in the ventilatory support.

Se revisa la historia de la ventilación mecánica desde sus orígenes hasta el presente, una historia cambiante que permite especular sobre las futuras innovaciones en el soporte ventilatorio.

Notable Australian contributions to the management of ventilatory failure of acute poliomyelitis: with special reference to the Both respirator and Dr. John A. Forbes.

When Australia's 1937 epidemic of poliomyelitis created an urgent need for extra ventilating machines to compensate for respiratory paralysis, Edward Both, an innovative Adelaide biomedical engineer, invented a wooden-cabinet respirator capable of being made relatively quickly in sufficient quantity. His device, here called "the Both", alleviated the problem at Adelaide's Northfield Infectious Diseases Hospital and others, and in late 1938 was introduced into England when Both was visiting there. Appreciating its merits, Lord Nuffield financed assembly-line production at the Morris motor works in Cowley, Oxford. Then, through the Nuffield Department of Anaesthetics in Oxford's Radcliffe Infirmary, he had the Both distributed Commonwealth-wide, as a gift for treating ventilatory failure in polio - especially in children. For the 1937 epidemic in Victoria, and to the design of Melbourne University's Professor of Engineering, Aubrey Burstall, nearly 200 of another wooden-cabinet respirator were ultimately built. Some were installed at the Acute Respiratory Unit of the Infectious Diseases Hospital at Fairfield, then others "all over Australia". However, by the early 1950s, the Both had replaced Fairfield Hospital's "Burstall", which had functioned as Victoria's favoured respirator since 1937. Dr John Forbes at Fairfield became the foremost Australian clinician for expertise with the Both. Before the advent of intermittent positive pressure ventilation, the Both's usefulness had seen it tried for ventilatory failure in some non-polio conditions, but uptake of that application was limited. Nonetheless, Nuffield's philanthropy with the (Nuffield-)Both ultimately furthered progress along the 20th century pathway to intensive care medicine.

[Two scientific controversies shaping the development of surgery in the 20th century]. / Zwei wissenschaftliche Kontroversen, die die Entwicklung der Chirurgie im 20. Jahrhundert mitbestimmten.

By way of example, two scientific controversies that played a decisive role in shaping and determining the development--in the areas of chest and trauma surgery--of 20th century surgery, were discussed. In the former area, the spectacular method involving the use of a negative-pressure chamber, developed by Sauerbruch in 1904 was described--an innovation representing an enormous step forward in the field of surgery on the chest. However, the method failed to find widespread favour, and the opposite concept involving the use of positive-pressure was developed, and intratracheal ventilation--already under discussion at the beginning of the 20th century--finally won the day, and still remains in use. Medullary nailing of bone fractures as introduced by Küntscher initially prompted controversial discussion and at first appeared to have been rejected--only to find widespread acceptance nevertheless. It continues to be a justified method of achieving a stable osteosynthesis which, thanks to methodological refinements and improvements over the years, is an important option in the list of indications for surgical treatment of bone fractures. All in all, the following remark would appear applicable: An achievement alone does not suffice--someone is needed to recognize and endorse it.

Negative pressure ventilation in the treatment of acute respiratory failure: an old noninvasive technique reconsidered.

Noninvasive mechanical ventilatory techniques include the use of negative and positive pressure ventilators. Negative pressure ventilators, such as the "iron lung", support ventilation by exposing the surface of the chest wall to subatmospheric pressure during inspiration; whereas, expiration occurs when the pressure around the chest wall increases and becomes atmospheric or greater than atmospheric. In this review, after a description of the more advanced models of tank ventilators and the physiological effects of negative pressure ventilation (NPV), we summarize the recent application of this old technique in the treatment of acute respiratory failure (ARF). Several uncontrolled studies suggest that NPV may have a potential therapeutic role in the treatment of acute on chronic respiratory failure in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and restrictive thoracic disorders, reducing the need for endotracheal intubation. In the paediatric field, after substantial technical improvement, NPV has been successfully reintroduced for the treatment of ARF due to neonatal distress syndrome and bronchopulmonary dysplasia, and for the weaning from positive pressure ventilation in intubated patients. The positive results of these reports need to be formally confirmed by further prospective and controlled studies before recommending the generalized use of negative pressure ventilation in acute respiratory failure as a standard of care.

Body ventilators. Equipment and techniques.

Body ventilators have been used since the late 1800s and are still used today. This article reviews all of the body ventilators available today including tanks, cuirasses, wraps, rocking beds, and intermittent abdominal pressure ventilators. Diaphragm pacers and glossopharyngeal breathing also are reviewed. Clinical application of the ventilators, initiation, patient monitoring, and follow-up are reviewed.

Reminiscences of poliomyelitis past.

The article by Markel in the new Historical Perspectives of Pediatrics section of the ARCHIVES brings back a flood of memories, as I belong to the generation of pediatricians who actually used tank respirators in treating patients with poliomyelitis. In 1949, the city of Baltimore, Md, closed its contagious disease hospital (Sydenham), which served all of Maryland, and transferred its function to the Baltimore City Hospitals. The reasoning, in addition to a very low occupancy rate at Sydenham, was that the only contagious disease then likely ever to occur in epidemic form was poliomyelitis.

Negative-pressure ventilation.

In this review, we make the following major points: (1) Canine experiments indicate that in an experimental model of ARDS, cyclic NPV plus NEEP is as effective as cyclic PPV plus PEEP in treating arterial hypoxemia. Because cyclic NPV plus NEEP does not depress cardiac output as much as cyclic PPV plus PEEP, further study of this potential therapy is warranted. (2) At the present time, NPV has little use in neonatal medicine. (3) However, in adult medicine, NPV is efficacious for providing chronic ventilatory support in patients with neuromuscular and chest wall diseases. Additionally, the role of NPV in postoperative weaning warrants further study. (4) Some data in the literature suggest that some subsets of patients with CAL may benefit from chronic intermittent NPV therapy. However, criteria for identifying these patients have not been established. (5) Some investigators have recently demonstrated that PPV delivered via the nares can elicit VMR. Because this technique provides us with the opportunity to elicit VMR by a method other than NPV, nasal PPV provides us with a method to directly validate our presumption that improvements in COPD patients are related to VMR per se.