Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 70
Filter
1.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord ; 24(1): 222, 2024 Apr 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38654152

ABSTRACT

The most common mechanical complications of acute myocardial infarction include free-wall rupture, ventricular septal rupture (VSR), papillary muscle rupture and pseudoaneurysm. It is rare for a patient to experience more than one mechanical complication simultaneously. Here, we present a case of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) complicated with three mechanical complications, including ventricular apical wall rupture, ventricular aneurysm formation and ventricular septal dissection (VSD) with VSR. Cardiac auscultation revealed rhythmic S1 and S2 with a grade 3 holosystolic murmur at the left sternal border. Electrocardiogram indicated anterior ventricular STEMI. Serological tests showed a significant elevated troponin I. Bedside echocardiography revealed ventricular apical wall rupture, apical left ventricle aneurysm and VSD with VSR near the apex. This case demonstrates that several rare mechanical complications can occur simultaneously secondary to STEMI and highlights the importance of bedside echocardiography in the early diagnosis of mechanical complications.


Subject(s)
Heart Aneurysm , Heart Rupture, Post-Infarction , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction , Ventricular Septal Rupture , Aged , Humans , Electrocardiography , Heart Aneurysm/diagnostic imaging , Heart Aneurysm/etiology , Heart Aneurysm/complications , Heart Aneurysm/physiopathology , Heart Rupture, Post-Infarction/etiology , Heart Rupture, Post-Infarction/diagnostic imaging , Heart Rupture, Post-Infarction/diagnosis , Point-of-Care Testing , Predictive Value of Tests , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/etiology , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/complications , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/therapy , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/physiopathology , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/diagnostic imaging , Treatment Outcome , Ventricular Septal Rupture/etiology , Ventricular Septal Rupture/diagnostic imaging , Ventricular Septal Rupture/physiopathology , Ventricular Septal Rupture/diagnosis , Ventricular Septal Rupture/surgery , Female
2.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord ; 21(1): 605, 2021 12 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34922437

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Ventricular septal rupture (VSR) is a rare but severe complication of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). For such cases, surgical repair is recommended by major guidelines, but not always possible for such cases. CASE PRESENTATION: A 72-year-old man presented to the emergency room. ECG showed the ST-segment was elevated by 2-3 mm in lead II, III, and aVF, with Q-waves. Coronary angiography (CAG) showed multi-vessel disease with a total occlusion of the right coronary artery (RCA) and severe stenosis of the left anterior descending artery (LAD). A diagnosis of acute inferior myocardial infarction was made. VSR occurred immediately after percutaneous coronary intervention (a 2.5 × 20 mm drug-eluting stent implanted in RCA), and the patient developed cardiogenic shock. An intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) was used to stabilize the hemodynamics. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) revealed an 11.4-mm left-to-right shunt in the interventricular septum. An attempt was made to reduce the IABP augmentation ratio for weaning on day 12 but failed. Transcatheter closure was conducted using a 24-mm double-umbrella occluder on day 28. The patient was weaned from IABP on day 31 and underwent secondary PCI for LAD lesions on day 35. The patient was discharged on day 41. Upon the last follow-up 6 years later, CAG and TTE revealed no in-stent restenosis, no left-to-right shunt, and 51% left ventricular ejection fraction. CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged implementation of IABP can be a viable option to allow deferred closure of VSR in AMI patients, and transcatheter closure may be considered as a second choice for the selected senior and vulnerable patients, but the risk is still high.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Catheterization , Inferior Wall Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumping/adverse effects , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Shock, Cardiogenic/therapy , Ventricular Septal Rupture/therapy , Aged , Drug-Eluting Stents , Humans , Inferior Wall Myocardial Infarction/complications , Inferior Wall Myocardial Infarction/diagnostic imaging , Inferior Wall Myocardial Infarction/physiopathology , Male , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/instrumentation , Recovery of Function , Shock, Cardiogenic/diagnosis , Shock, Cardiogenic/etiology , Shock, Cardiogenic/physiopathology , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Ventricular Septal Rupture/diagnostic imaging , Ventricular Septal Rupture/etiology , Ventricular Septal Rupture/physiopathology
3.
Rev. méd. Maule ; 36(2): 49-59, dic. 2021. ilus
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1378504

ABSTRACT

Rupture of the ventricular septum with the appearance of an interventricular communication is an infrequent and life-threatening mechanical complication after acute myocardial infarction. The advent of coronary reperfusion therapies has reduced the incidence of this complication, but mortality remains high. The clinical presentation varies from mild compromise with exertional dyspnea to severe compromise with cardiogenic shock. In this pathology, early diagnosis is fundamental and surgical repair is the treatment of choice. In this article we report an interesting clinical case about a 77-year-old woman who was belatedly referred to our hospital and diagnosed with postinfarction rupture of the ventricular septum with an unfortunately fatal evolution. Relevance of this case lies in its atypical clinical presentation which led to a delay in diagnosis and a missed opportunity for early reperfusion therapy. An updated literature review about rupture of the ventricular septum complicating acute myocardial infarction was carried out.


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Aged , Ventricular Septal Rupture/physiopathology , Ventricular Septal Rupture/epidemiology , Shock, Cardiogenic , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Echocardiography , Risk Factors , Ventricular Septal Rupture/diagnosis , Ventricular Septal Rupture/therapy , Myocardial Infarction/complications
4.
Tex Heart Inst J ; 48(3)2021 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34383957

ABSTRACT

During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandmic, more patients are presenting with complications late after acute myocardial infarction. We report the case of a 71-year-old man who delayed seeking medical care for 2 weeks, despite progressive shortness of breath, cough, and tactile fever, for fear of contracting COVID-19 in the hospital. Clinical and echocardiographic evaluation revealed a ventricular septal rupture secondary to acute myocardial infarction. The patient underwent urgent cardiac catheterization, followed by successful saphenous vein grafting to the left anterior descending coronary artery and open surgical repair of the ventricular septal rupture with a bovine pericardial patch. This case highlights a potential long-lasting negative effect that the COVID-19 pandemic will have on the care-seeking behavior and health of patients with acute cardiovascular disease.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cardiac Catheterization/methods , Coronary Artery Bypass/methods , Fear , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction , Ventricular Septal Rupture , Aged , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/psychology , Coronary Angiography/methods , Echocardiography/methods , Electrocardiography/methods , Humans , Male , SARS-CoV-2 , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/complications , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/physiopathology , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/surgery , Time-to-Treatment/trends , Treatment Outcome , Ventricular Septal Rupture/diagnosis , Ventricular Septal Rupture/etiology , Ventricular Septal Rupture/physiopathology , Ventricular Septal Rupture/surgery
7.
Int Heart J ; 61(4): 831-837, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32728002

ABSTRACT

Ventricular septal rupture (VSR) is one of the fatal complications of myocardial infarction in the percutaneous coronary intervention era. A rapid diagnosis, medical and mechanical support, and surgical intervention are required for recovery and survival. In such a situation, the risk of complications associated with surgery is very high, especially in very elderly patients, in which any therapeutic strategy should be carefully discussed by the heart team. Herein, we describe two cases of VSRs after recent myocardial infarction (RMI) in very elderly patients that required debate regarding whether to perform surgery. The patients included a 93-year-old man and 89-year-old man, both of which were not highly frail before the RMI occurred. In the former case, a conservative strategy was adopted because the risk of surgery was considered, but he did not survive. On the other hand, the latter patient underwent surgery and his life was ultimately saved. Based on these two cases, we concluded that even if the patients are very old, if possible, surgical intervention should be fully considered.


Subject(s)
Conservative Treatment/methods , Myocardial Infarction/complications , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Ventricular Septal Rupture/etiology , Ventricular Septal Rupture/surgery , Aged, 80 and over , Echocardiography/methods , Electrocardiography/methods , Fatal Outcome , Frail Elderly , Humans , Treatment Outcome , Ventricular Septal Rupture/diagnostic imaging , Ventricular Septal Rupture/physiopathology
8.
Heart ; 106(12): 878-884, 2020 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32111641

ABSTRACT

Postinfarct ventricular septal defects (VSDs) are a mechanical complication of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with a very poor prognosis. They are estimated to occur in 0.2% of patients presenting with AMI, with 1-month survival of 6% without intervention. Guidelines recommend surgical repair, but recent advances in transcatheter technology, and bespoke device development, mean it is increasingly viable as a closure option. Surgical mortality is between 30% and 50% for all-comers, while in series of transcatheter closure, mortality was 32%. Transcatheter closure appears durable, with no evidence of late leaks and low long-term mortality in series with up to 5-year follow-up. Guidelines recommend early closure, which is likely to provide most benefit for patients regardless of the closure method. Multimodality cardiac imaging including echocardiography, CT and cardiac MRI can define size, shape, location of defects and their relationship to other cardiac structures, assisting with treatment decisions. Brief delay to allow stabilisation of the patient is appropriate, but untreated patients risk rapid deterioration. Mechanical circulatory support may be helpful, although the preferred modality is unclear. Transcatheter closure involves large bore venous access and the formation of an arteriovenous loop (under fluoroscopic and trans-oesophageal echocardiographic guidance) in order to facilitate deployment of the device in the defect and close the postinfarct VSD. Guidelines suggest transcatheter closure as an alternative to surgical repair in centres where appropriate expertise exists, but decisions for all patients with postinfarct VSD should be led by the multidisciplinary heart team.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Catheterization , Aged , Cardiac Catheterization/adverse effects , Cardiac Catheterization/mortality , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Care Team , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Ventricular Septal Rupture/diagnostic imaging , Ventricular Septal Rupture/etiology , Ventricular Septal Rupture/mortality , Ventricular Septal Rupture/physiopathology
9.
Ann Card Anaesth ; 23(1): 106-108, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31929262

ABSTRACT

The associated mortality and morbidity of posterior ventricular septal rupture (VSR) is quite high increasing to almost 80% due to severe right ventricle dysfunction and pulmonary artery hypertension. Herein, we present a case of posterior VSR due to inferior wall myocardial infarction who underwent surgery. Premature removal of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) led to hemodynamic deterioration and he was salvaged with prolonged and prompt re-institution of IABP. This case also highlights the importance of IABP in right ventricle failure.


Subject(s)
Hemodynamics/physiology , Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumping/methods , Ventricular Dysfunction, Right/complications , Ventricular Dysfunction, Right/therapy , Ventricular Septal Rupture/complications , Ventricular Septal Rupture/therapy , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Ventricular Dysfunction, Right/physiopathology , Ventricular Septal Rupture/physiopathology
13.
PLoS One ; 14(2): e0209502, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30794547

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The study aims to assess characteristics and outcomes of patients suffering a mechanical complication (MC) after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in a contemporary cohort of patients in the percutaneous coronary intervention era. METHODS AND RESULTS: This retrospective single-center cohort study encompasses 2508 patients admitted with STEMI between March 9, 2009 and June 30, 2014. A total of 26 patients (1.1%) suffered a mechanical complication: ventricular septal rupture (VSR) in 17, ventricular free wall rupture (VFWR) in 2, a combination of VSD and VFWR in 2, and papillary muscle rupture (PMR) in 5 patients. Older age (74.5 ± 10.4 years versus 63.9 ± 13.1 years, p < 0.001), female sex (42.3% versus 23.3%, p = 0.034), and a longer latency period between symptom onset and angiography (> 24h: 42.3% versus 16.2%, p = 0.002) were more frequent among patients with MC as compared to patients without MC. The majority of MC patients had multivessel disease (77%) and presented in cardiogenic shock (Killip class IV: 73.1%). Nine patients (7 VSR, 2 VFWR & VSR) were treated conservatively and died. Out of the remaining 10 VSR patients, four underwent surgery, three underwent implantation of an occluder device, and another three patients had surgical repair following occluder device implantation. All patients with isolated VFWR and PMR underwent emergency surgery. At 30 days, mortality for VSR, VFWR, VFWR & VSR and PMR amounted to 71%, 50%, 100% and 0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Despite advances in the management of STEMI patients, mortality of mechanical complications stays considerable in this contemporary cohort. Older age, female sex, and a prolonged latency period between symptom onset and angiography are associated with the occurrence of these complications.


Subject(s)
Biomechanical Phenomena/physiology , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/physiopathology , Rupture, Spontaneous/etiology , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/surgery , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Heart Rupture/epidemiology , Heart Rupture/etiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mortality , Papillary Muscles/pathology , Papillary Muscles/physiopathology , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/methods , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/mortality , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/statistics & numerical data , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Rupture, Spontaneous/epidemiology , Rupture, Spontaneous/physiopathology , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/epidemiology , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/physiopathology , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/rehabilitation , Ventricular Septal Rupture/epidemiology , Ventricular Septal Rupture/etiology , Ventricular Septal Rupture/physiopathology
16.
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann ; 26(8): 628-631, 2018 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27913737

ABSTRACT

Postinfarction ventricular septal rupture is a life-threatening complication of acute myocardial infarction. Although some novel techniques of ventricular septal rupture closure have been introduced, they involve ventriculotomy, a procedure that can cause a degree of impairment of the incised ventricle. We describe a case in which we closed a ventricular septal rupture through the tricuspid valve, without ventriculotomy.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Surgical Procedures/methods , Ventricular Septal Rupture/surgery , Wound Closure Techniques , Coronary Angiography , Echocardiography, Doppler, Color , Echocardiography, Transesophageal , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome , Ventricular Septal Rupture/diagnostic imaging , Ventricular Septal Rupture/physiopathology
17.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv ; 10(24): 2577-2579, 2017 12 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29198460
18.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv ; 10(12): 1233-1243, 2017 06 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28641844

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to define the dynamic in vivo morphology of post-infarct ventricular septal defect (PIVSD), which has not been previously described in living patients. BACKGROUND: PIVSD is a devastating complication of acute myocardial infarction. METHODS: The anatomic features of PIVSD, as demonstrated by computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging, were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Thirty-two PIVSDs were assessed, 16 left coronary artery and 16 right coronary artery PIVSDs. PIVSDs were large (mean maximum dimension 26.5 ± 11.5 mm, mean area 5.2 ± 4.2 cm2) and oval (mean eccentricity index 1.7 ± 0.5), with thin margins (diastolic mean thickness 5 mm from the edge of the PIVSD 6.4 ± 3.0mm), and only 22% of PIVSDs were entirely confined to the septum. The defects could be larger in diastole or systole. The stem of the largest available Amplatzer occluder stem (St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, Minnesota) filled only 50% of defects. Patients with small defects may survive without closure. Without closure, those with large defects die. If accepted for closure, PIVSD size and coronary territory did not predict survival >1 year (overall 60%). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first detailed anatomic description of PIVSD in living patients. Defects may be larger in systole or diastole, meaning that single-phase measurement is unsuitable. Its complex nature means that the most commonly available occluder device is frequently unsuitable. Successful closure leads to prolonged survival and should be attempted where possible. This study may lead to improved patient selection, closure techniques, and device design.


Subject(s)
Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Ventricular Septal Rupture/diagnostic imaging , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cardiac Catheterization/instrumentation , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Prosthesis Design , Retrospective Studies , Septal Occluder Device , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Ventricular Septal Rupture/mortality , Ventricular Septal Rupture/physiopathology , Ventricular Septal Rupture/therapy
19.
Eur J Heart Fail ; 19 Suppl 2: 97-103, 2017 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28470920

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Ventricular septal rupture (VSR) became a rare mechanical complication of myocardial infarction in the era of percutaneous coronary interventions but is associated with extreme mortality in patients who present with cardiogenic shock (CS). Promising outcomes have been reported with the use of circulatory support allowing haemodynamic stabilization, followed by delayed repair. Therefore, we analysed our experience with an early use of Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (V-A ECMO) for postinfarction VSR. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a retrospective search of institutional database for patients presenting with postinfarction VSR from January 2007 to June 2016. Data from 31 consecutive patients (mean age 69.5 ± 9.1 years) who were admitted to hospital were analysed. Seven out of 31 patients with VSR who were in refractory CS received V-A ECMO support preoperatively. ECMO improved end-organ perfusion with decreased lactate levels 24 hours after implantation (7.9 mmol/L vs. 1.6 mmol/L, p = 0.01), normalized arterial pH (7.25 vs. 7.40, p < 0.04), improved mean arterial pressure (64 mmHg vs. 83 mmHg, p < 0.01) and lowered heart rate (115/min vs. 68/min, p < 0.01). Mean duration of ECMO support was 12 days, 5 out of 7 patients underwent surgical repair, 4 were weaned from ECMO, 3 survived 30 days and 2 survived more than 1 year. The most frequent complication (5 patients) and the cause of death (3 patients) was bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience suggests that early V-A ECMO in patients with VSR and refractory CS might prevent irreversible multiorgan failure by improved end-organ perfusion. Bleeding complications remain an important limitation of this approach.


Subject(s)
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/methods , Shock, Cardiogenic/therapy , Ventricular Septal Rupture/complications , Aged , Angiography , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hemodynamics/physiology , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Shock, Cardiogenic/etiology , Shock, Cardiogenic/physiopathology , Treatment Outcome , Ventricular Septal Rupture/diagnosis , Ventricular Septal Rupture/physiopathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...