Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 670
Filter
1.
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech ; 91(2): 109-119, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38801667

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: Hip osteoarthritis (OA) has a prevalence of around 6.4% and is the second most commonly affected joint. This review aims to assess the clinical outcomes of intra-articular high molecular weight hyaluronic acid (HMWHA) in the management of hip osteoarthritis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive search across PubMed, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library for randomised trials investigating the effectiveness of high molecular weight hyaluronic acid (HMWHA) in the treatment of hip osteoarthritis. Quality and risk of bias assessments were performed using the Cochrane RoB2 tool. To synthesise the data, we utilised the Standardised Mean Difference (SMD) for assessing pain relief through the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the Lequesne index (LI) for evaluating functional outcomes. Risk Ratio (RR) was calculated to assess the occurrence of complications. RESULTS: A total of four studies involving HMWHA and control groups were included. The standardised mean difference (SMD) for the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (SMD -0.056; 95% CI; -0.351, 0.239; p = 0.709) and the Lequesne index (SMD -0.114; 95% CI; -0.524, 0.296; p = 0.585) were not statistically significant. Analysis for complications demonstrated an overall relative risk ratio (RR) of 0.879 (95% CI; 0.527, 1.466; p = 0.622), and was not statistically significant. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Intra-articular HMWHA in hip OA can significantly reduce pain and improve functional recovery when compared with the condition before treatment. However, there is no significant difference between HMWHA, or saline, or other therapeutic treatments. Currently, available evidence indicates that intra-articular HMWHA in hip OA would not increase the risk of adverse events. KEY WORDS: hip osteoarthritis, hyaluronic acid, intra-articular, molecular weight, viscosupplementation.


Subject(s)
Hyaluronic Acid , Osteoarthritis, Hip , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Viscosupplementation , Viscosupplements , Humans , Hyaluronic Acid/therapeutic use , Hyaluronic Acid/adverse effects , Osteoarthritis, Hip/drug therapy , Osteoarthritis, Hip/complications , Viscosupplementation/methods , Viscosupplements/administration & dosage , Viscosupplements/therapeutic use , Injections, Intra-Articular , Pain Measurement , Molecular Weight , Treatment Outcome
2.
Indian J Ophthalmol ; 72(6): 916-918, 2024 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38767550

ABSTRACT

Phacoemulsification in hard cataracts is a challenge. The use of dispersive ophthalmic viscosurgical devices (OVDs) to protect the endothelium is a routine step in such scenarios. However, as OVD is transparent, it is difficult to spot within the anterior chamber. Therefore, surgeons may not be aware when the OVD coating of the endothelium disappears during surgery. Consequently, there may be too frequent OVD injections, resulting in a waste of resources. On the contrary, the surgeon may fail to inject OVD at an appropriate time, leading to greater endothelial damage. We propose a novel technique of using an air bubble as a guide that helps in identifying the time when OVD disappears from the anterior chamber, thereby suggesting the surgeon to reinject before proceeding further.


Subject(s)
Air , Phacoemulsification , Viscosupplements , Humans , Phacoemulsification/methods , Viscosupplements/administration & dosage , Hyaluronic Acid/administration & dosage , Endothelium, Corneal/pathology , Anterior Chamber
3.
Int Ophthalmol ; 44(1): 211, 2024 May 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38696090

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of sodium hyaluronate drops on dry eye parameters and corneal epithelial thickness following cataract surgery. METHODS: The study included 84 patients who underwent uncomplicated phacoemulsification. In Group A, 0.15% sodium hyaluronate drops were added to the postoperative antibiotic/anti-inflammatory treatment. In Group B, only antibiotic/anti-inflammatory treatment was applied. Preoperatively and at 1 week and 1 month postoperatively, all the patients were evaluated in respect of tear break-up time (TBUT), the Schirmer test under anesthesia, the corneal fluorescein staining (CFS) score, mean central corneal thickness (CCT) and mean central corneal epithelial thickness (CCET), and the two groups were compared. RESULTS: A statistically significant difference was determined between the two groups at postoperative 1 month in respect of TBUT, Schirmer test, CFS score, and CCET (p < 0.01). In Group A, a statistically significant increase was determined in the TBUT and Schirmer values at 1 month postoperatively (p < 0.01, p = 0.01, respectively) and in Group B, these values were decreased compared to preoperatively (p < 0.01). The CCET was determined to be significantly thinner in Group B 1 month postoperatively (p < 0.01). A significant increase in CCT was observed in both groups at postoperative 1 week (p < 0.01) and preoperative values were reached at 1 month postoperatively. CONCLUSION: In the patient group using sodium hyaluronate, significant differences were determined in all dry eye parameters and CCET. The use of hyaluronate sodium drops after cataract surgery was seen to improve dry eye parameters and contribute to a healthy ocular surface by ensuring continuity of the corneal epithelium.


Subject(s)
Dry Eye Syndromes , Epithelium, Corneal , Hyaluronic Acid , Ophthalmic Solutions , Phacoemulsification , Humans , Hyaluronic Acid/administration & dosage , Dry Eye Syndromes/drug therapy , Dry Eye Syndromes/diagnosis , Female , Male , Aged , Epithelium, Corneal/drug effects , Epithelium, Corneal/pathology , Middle Aged , Ophthalmic Solutions/administration & dosage , Phacoemulsification/methods , Viscosupplements/administration & dosage , Prospective Studies , Tears/metabolism , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Cataract Extraction/methods
4.
Ter Arkh ; 95(12): 1192-1196, 2024 Jan 31.
Article in Russian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38785060

ABSTRACT

The article discusses the issue and our own experience of local therapy for osteoarthritis of the ankle joint with injections of linear hyaluronic acid under ultrasound navigation. Since the ankle joint is difficult in terms of surgical treatment in general and endoprosthetics in particular, a course of intra-articular injection of 1% Flexotron® Forte hyaluronate, especially in the early stages of dystrophic changes in cartilage, is a promising method for relieving pain, chondroprotection and preserving the biomechanics of the joint, and ultrasound navigation when performing manipulation, it ensures the most accurate introduction of the drug into the joint cavity.


Subject(s)
Ankle Joint , Hyaluronic Acid , Osteoarthritis , Humans , Ankle Joint/diagnostic imaging , Hyaluronic Acid/administration & dosage , Injections, Intra-Articular/methods , Osteoarthritis/drug therapy , Treatment Outcome , Ultrasonography, Interventional/methods , Viscosupplements/administration & dosage
5.
Bone Joint J ; 106-B(6): 532-539, 2024 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38821500

ABSTRACT

Aims: Intra-articular (IA) injection may be used when treating hip osteoarthritis (OA). Common injections include steroids, hyaluronic acid (HA), local anaesthetic, and platelet-rich plasma (PRP). Network meta-analysis allows for comparisons between two or more treatment groups and uses direct and indirect comparisons between interventions. This network meta-analysis aims to compare the efficacy of various IA injections used in the management of hip OA with a follow-up of up to six months. Methods: This systematic review and network meta-analysis used a Bayesian random-effects model to evaluate the direct and indirect comparisons among all treatment options. PubMed, Web of Science, Clinicaltrial.gov, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to February 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which evaluate the efficacy of HA, PRP, local anaesthetic, steroid, steroid+anaesthetic, HA+PRP, and physiological saline injection as a placebo, for patients with hip OA were included. Results: In this meta-analysis of 16 RCTs with a total of 1,735 participants, steroid injection was found to be significantly more effective than placebo injection on reported pain at three months, but no significant difference was observed at six months. Furthermore, steroid injection was considerably more effective than placebo injection for functional outcomes at three months, while the combination of HA+PRP injection was substantially more effective at six months. Conclusion: Evidence suggests that steroid injection is more effective than saline injection for the treatment of hip joint pain, and restoration of functional outcomes.


Subject(s)
Hyaluronic Acid , Osteoarthritis, Hip , Platelet-Rich Plasma , Humans , Injections, Intra-Articular , Osteoarthritis, Hip/drug therapy , Hyaluronic Acid/administration & dosage , Hyaluronic Acid/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Viscosupplements/administration & dosage , Network Meta-Analysis , Pain Measurement
6.
Int Ophthalmol ; 44(1): 193, 2024 Apr 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38653918

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the tear film stability in patients with symptoms of dry eye after installation of dual polymer hydroxypropyl guar/sodium hyaluronate (DPHG/SH) vs single polymer SH. METHODS: Patients with recently diagnosed mild to moderate dry eye disease (OSDI score 23-32 points) were included. For each patient, the right eye was randomized to receive DPHG/SH or 0.15% SH. Just after the administration of the drop to the right eye, the fellow eye received the other eye drop. The first non-invasive Keratograph first break-up time (NIKBUT), average NIKBUT and tear meniscus height (TMH) were measured before administration of the eye drops, at 1-min, 15 min, 30 min, 60 min, 90 min, and 120 min after instillation. RESULTS: A total of 29 patients aged 22.8 ± 2.2 years participated in the study (21 women). No differences between the eye receiving DPHG/SH and single polymer SH were observed for the first NIKBUT (p = 0.45) and average NIKBUT (p = 0.24) variables at any time point. Both DPHG/SH and single polymer SH increased the TMH (p of time effect < 0.001), but with no difference between groups (p = 0.95). CONCLUSION: Both DPHG/SH and single polymer SH solutions provide lubrication of the eye surface, however, with no difference in NIKBUT and TMH evaluations for up to two hours following administration.


Subject(s)
Dry Eye Syndromes , Hyaluronic Acid , Ophthalmic Solutions , Tears , Humans , Dry Eye Syndromes/drug therapy , Dry Eye Syndromes/diagnosis , Female , Hyaluronic Acid/administration & dosage , Male , Ophthalmic Solutions/administration & dosage , Young Adult , Adult , Polysaccharides/administration & dosage , Polymers , Viscosupplements/administration & dosage , Prospective Studies
7.
Int J Pharm ; 656: 124088, 2024 May 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38582102

ABSTRACT

Viscosupplementation consists of hyaluronic acid (HA) intra-articular injections, commonly applied for osteoarthritis treatment while non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely administered for pain relief. Here, HA and a NSAID (celecoxib) were combined in a formulation based on a low transition temperature mixture (LTTM) of glycerol:sorbitol, reported to increase celecoxib's solubility, thus rendering a potential alternative viscosupplement envisioning enhanced therapeutic efficiency. The inclusion of glucosamine, a cartilage precursor, was also studied. The developed formulations were assessed in terms of rheological properties, crucial for viscosupplementation: the parameters of crossover frequency, storage (G') and loss (G'') moduli, zero-shear-rate viscosity, stable viscosity across temperatures, and shear thinning behaviour, support viscoelastic properties suitable for viscosupplementation. Additionally, the gels biocompatibility was confirmed in chondrogenic cells (ATDC5). Regarding drug release studies, high and low clearance scenarios demonstrated an increased celecoxib (CEX) release from the gel (6 to 73-fold), compared to dissolution in PBS. The low clearance setup presented the highest and most sustained CEX release, highlighting the importance of the gel structure in CEX delivery. NMR stability studies over time demonstrated the LTTM+HA+CEX (GHA+CEX) gel as viable candidate for further in vivo evaluation. In sum, the features of GHA+CEX support its potential use as alternative viscosupplement.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal , Celecoxib , Drug Liberation , Hyaluronic Acid , Osteoarthritis , Viscosupplementation , Celecoxib/administration & dosage , Celecoxib/chemistry , Hyaluronic Acid/chemistry , Hyaluronic Acid/administration & dosage , Osteoarthritis/drug therapy , Viscosupplementation/methods , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/administration & dosage , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/chemistry , Viscosity , Transition Temperature , Rheology , Animals , Cell Line , Mice , Solubility , Glycerol/chemistry , Glucosamine/chemistry , Glucosamine/administration & dosage , Viscosupplements/administration & dosage , Viscosupplements/chemistry , Injections, Intra-Articular
8.
Knee ; 47: 102-111, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38359676

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The utilization of subjective questionnaires for assessing conservative treatment in knee osteoarthritis may present challenges in identifying differences due to inadequate statistical power. Objective tools, such as three-dimensional (3D) kinematic analysis, are accurate and reproducible methods. However, no high-quality studies assessing the effects of intra-articular viscosupplementation (VS) have been published. Therefore, the objective of the study was to evaluate gait kinematics of patients with advanced knee osteoarthritis after VS. METHODS: Forty-two patients were randomized to receive either VS or saline injection (placebo). They underwent 3D kinematic gait analysis before and at 1, 6, and 12 weeks after treatment and knee angles during stance phase were determined. Patients and the healthcare team responsible for data collection, processing, and analysis were blinded to group allocation. Between-group comparisons were conducted using linear mixed models. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, the VS increased the maximum knee extension (3.2° (0.7-5.7)) and decreased the maximum knee flexion (-3.6° (-6.1 to -1.2)) on the sagittal plane at 1 week. At 6 weeks, the VS group sustained a reduced maximum knee flexion (-2.6° (-5.2 to 0.0)). On the axial plane, the VS group demonstrated an increase in maximum internal rotation at 12 weeks (3.9° (0.3 to 7.7)). The VS group exhibited reduced single-leg stance time at 1 week and increased total stance time at 12 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: VS led to short- and long-term kinematic improvements in the sagittal and axial planes, leading to a gait pattern closer to that observed in individuals with less severe osteoarthritic knees.


Subject(s)
Gait , Osteoarthritis, Knee , Range of Motion, Articular , Viscosupplementation , Humans , Osteoarthritis, Knee/physiopathology , Osteoarthritis, Knee/drug therapy , Female , Male , Double-Blind Method , Middle Aged , Injections, Intra-Articular , Biomechanical Phenomena , Viscosupplementation/methods , Gait/physiology , Aged , Knee Joint/physiopathology , Viscosupplements/administration & dosage , Viscosupplements/therapeutic use
9.
Arthroscopy ; 40(5): 1623-1636.e1, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38331363

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of common intra-articular injections used in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis, including corticosteroid (CS), hyaluronic acid (HA), platelet-rich plasma (PRP), and bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC), with a minimum follow-up of 6-months. METHODS: A literature search was conducted using the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines in August 2022 in the following databases: PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane Database of Controlled Trials, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Level I to II randomized clinical trials with a minimum follow-up of 6 months that investigated the treatments of interest were included. Patient-reported outcome scores for pain and function at baseline and at latest follow-up were extracted, and the change in scores was converted to uniform 0 to 100 scales. Arm-based Bayesian network meta-analysis using a random-effects model was created to compare the treatment arms in pain and function. RESULTS: Forty-eight studies comprising a total of 9,338 knees were included. The most studied intra-articular injection was HA (40.9%), followed by placebo (26.2%), PRP (21.5%), CS (8.8%), and then BMAC (2.5%). HA and PRP both led to a significant improvement in pain compared with placebo. HA, PRP, and BMAC all led to a significant improvement in function scores when compared with placebo. Surface under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRAs) of the interventions revealed that PRP, BMAC, and HA were the treatments with the highest likelihood of improvement in both pain and function, with overall SUCRA scores of 91.54, 76.46, and 53.12, respectively. The overall SUCRA scores for CS and placebo were 15.18 and 13.70, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: At a minimum 6-month follow-up, PRP demonstrated significantly improved pain and function for patients with knee osteoarthritis compared with placebo. Additionally, PRP exhibited the highest SUCRA values for these outcomes when compared with BMAC, HA, and CS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, meta-analysis of Level I to II studies.


Subject(s)
Adrenal Cortex Hormones , Hyaluronic Acid , Network Meta-Analysis , Osteoarthritis, Knee , Platelet-Rich Plasma , Humans , Osteoarthritis, Knee/drug therapy , Hyaluronic Acid/administration & dosage , Hyaluronic Acid/therapeutic use , Injections, Intra-Articular , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/administration & dosage , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Pain Measurement , Viscosupplements/administration & dosage , Viscosupplements/therapeutic use , Bone Marrow Transplantation , Treatment Outcome
10.
Curr Rheumatol Rev ; 20(4): 379-387, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38243964

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is conflicting evidence regarding the efficacy of viscosupplementation with intra-articular hyaluronic acid injections in knee osteoarthritis. One possible explanation for the inconsistent findings on its efficacy is that only certain subpopulations of patients benefit from this therapy. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this narrative review is to succinctly summarize the existing data on the predictive factors of clinical response to intra-articular hyaluronic acid to identify the patient profile most likely to benefit from this therapy. METHODS: For this narrative review, a PubMed search was conducted in January 2023, with no date limits, to identify publications reporting predictive factors of response to viscosupplementation using the following terms: hyaluronic acid OR viscosupplem* AND osteoarthritis AND knee AND predict*. Searches were limited to randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews and meta- analyses, or observational studies written in English. Other relevant references were identified by searching the references of retrieved articles. RESULTS: The disease severity was found to reliably predict response to intra-articular hyaluronic acid injections; patients with less severe disease consistently had a more robust therapeutic response than those with more severe disease. Other clinical variables such as level of baseline pain did not reliably predict response. Body mass index, and possibly age, may also be independent predictors of the response. CONCLUSION: A review of the existing literature suggests that patients with less severe clinical symptoms and radiological findings, who are younger, and with a lower or normal body mass index are the best candidates for intra-articular hyaluronic acid therapy.


Subject(s)
Hyaluronic Acid , Osteoarthritis, Knee , Viscosupplements , Humans , Osteoarthritis, Knee/drug therapy , Hyaluronic Acid/administration & dosage , Hyaluronic Acid/therapeutic use , Injections, Intra-Articular , Viscosupplements/administration & dosage , Viscosupplements/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome , Viscosupplementation/methods
11.
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil ; 37(3): 629-639, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38160332

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Many formulations and dosing regimens are available for hyaluronic acid (HA). OBJECTIVE: To compare different doses of linear, high-molecular weight (HMW) HA injections among patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: Hundred patients were included in this randomized, single-blinded trial and randomly divided into three HA injection groups. The first group received five weekly 20 mg HA injections, the second group received three weekly 32 mg HA injections, and the third group received a single 48 mg HA injection. Patients were evaluated at baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months after the last injection for pain, stiffness, and function using the visual analog scale (VAS) and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) questionnaire. Quality of life, patient's global assessment, and Timed Up and Go (TUG) test scores were also evaluated. RESULTS: There was significant improvement in the WOMAC, VAS-pain, quality of life, patient's global assessment, and TUG test mean scores at all follow-up time points (p< 0.001). However, the groups showed no significant differences in WOMAC, VAS-activity pain, and patient global scores at any follow-up point. CONCLUSION: Intra-articular injections of different doses of linear HMW HA can improve pain, stiffness, function, and quality of life in patients suffering from knee OA over a six-month period.


Subject(s)
Hyaluronic Acid , Osteoarthritis, Knee , Quality of Life , Humans , Hyaluronic Acid/administration & dosage , Hyaluronic Acid/therapeutic use , Osteoarthritis, Knee/drug therapy , Single-Blind Method , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Injections, Intra-Articular , Prospective Studies , Aged , Treatment Outcome , Pain Measurement , Viscosupplements/administration & dosage , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
12.
Arch. Soc. Esp. Oftalmol ; 98(7): 410-412, jul. 2023. ilus
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-222988

ABSTRACT

Mujer de 57 años sin premorbilidades que acude por pérdida de visión súbita e indolora en el ojo derecho (OD). La agudeza visual mejor corregida fue de contar dedos a 10cm. En el OD se observó un defecto pupilar aferente relativo. El examen de fondo de ojo en el OD fue sugestivo de oclusión central de la arteria retiniana. La evaluación sistémica fue normal. Lo más interesante en este caso es que un edema hemorrágico en la región glabelar derecha fue la base de la sospecha diagnóstica. La paciente reconoció la pérdida de visión a las 24horas de la inyección de ácido hialurónico como tratamiento de rejuvenecimiento facial (AU)


A 57-year-old woman with no premorbidities presented with symptoms of sudden painless vision loss in the right eye (RE). Best-corrected visual acuity in the RE was counting fingers to 10cm. A relative afferent pupillary defect was observed in the RE. Ocular fundus examination of RE was suggestive of central retinal artery occlusion. Systemic evaluation was normal. The most interesting fact in this case is that a hemorrhagic edema in the right glabellar region was the basis for the diagnostic suspicion. The patient recognized the loss of vision 24hours after hyaluronic acid injection as a facial rejuvenation treatment (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Hyaluronic Acid/administration & dosage , Hyaluronic Acid/adverse effects , Viscosupplements/administration & dosage , Viscosupplements/adverse effects , Retinal Artery Occlusion/chemically induced , Blindness/chemically induced , Visual Acuity , Injections
13.
Actas dermo-sifiliogr. (Ed. impr.) ; 114(2): 114-124, feb. 2023. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-215414

ABSTRACT

El envejecimiento cutáneo está influido por factores intrínsecos y extrínsecos y múltiples mecanismos patogénicos están involucrados. Los tratamientos utilizados en la actualidad son sobre todo tópicos o son procedimientos mínimamente invasivos. La evidencia sobre la utilidad de la terapia sistémica es limitada: los estudios son en su mayoría de pequeño tamaño, de reducida duración, incluyen a mujeres de manera mayoritaria, la metodología de evaluación es heterogénea y no hay parámetros consensuados de respuesta clínica relevante. Además, los suplementos o fármacos sistémicos no están exentos de efectos adversos. El colágeno hidrolizado oral y el ácido hialurónico oral son bien tolerados y múltiples ensayos clínicos muestran que pueden mitigar algunos signos de envejecimiento cutáneo. La isotretinoína oral en dosis bajas es otra alternativa, pero con un mayor potencial de efectos adversos. Múltiples suplementos, como vitaminas, flavonoides, diversos extractos de plantas y oligoelementos, presentan escasa evidencia clínica. El futuro del manejo del envejecimiento cutáneo parece ser el tratamiento con agentes senolíticos o senomórficos dirigidos específicamente contra células cutáneas senescentes. (AU)


Skin aging is influenced by intrinsic and extrinsic factors and involves multiple pathogenic mechanisms. The most widely used treatments are topical products and minimally invasive procedures. Evidence on the benefits of systemic therapy is limited for several reasons: Reliance on mostly small and predominantly female samples, short study durations, methodologic heterogeneity, and a lack of consensus on which outcome measures are clinically relevant. Furthermore, systemic drugs and oral supplements are not without adverse effects. Oral hydrolyzed collagen and oral hyaluronic acid are well tolerated, and numerous clinical trials show they can mitigate some signs of skin aging. Low-dose oral isotretinoin is another option, but it has a higher risk of adverse effects. Evidence is lacking on the effects of the many dietary supplements on offer, such as vitamins, flavonoids, plant extracts, and trace elements. The future of skin aging management would appear to lie in the use of senolytic and senomorphic agents targeting senescent cells in the skin. (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Dietary Supplements , Dermatologic Agents/administration & dosage , Skin Aging/drug effects , Antioxidants/administration & dosage , Hyaluronic Acid/administration & dosage , Tranexamic Acid/administration & dosage , Viscosupplements/administration & dosage , Isotretinoin/administration & dosage , Collagen/administration & dosage
14.
Actas dermo-sifiliogr. (Ed. impr.) ; 114(2): t114-t124, feb. 2023. ilus, tab
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-215415

ABSTRACT

Skin aging is influenced by intrinsic and extrinsic factors and involves multiple pathogenic mechanisms. The most widely used treatments are topical products and minimally invasive procedures. Evidence on the benefits of systemic therapy is limited for several reasons: reliance on mostly small and predominantly female samples, short study durations, methodologic heterogeneity, and a lack of consensus on which outcome measures are clinically relevant. Furthermore, systemic drugs and oral supplements are not without adverse effects. Oral hydrolyzed collagen and oral hyaluronic acid are well tolerated, and numerous clinical trials show they can mitigate some signs of skin aging. Low-dose oral isotretinoin is another option, but it has a higher risk of adverse effects. Evidence is lacking on the effects of the many dietary supplements on offer, such as vitamins, flavonoids, plant extracts, and trace elements. The future of skin aging management would appear to lie in the use of senolytic and senomorphic agents targeting senescent cells in the skin. (AU)


El envejecimiento cutáneo está influido por factores intrínsecos y extrínsecos y múltiples mecanismos patogénicos están involucrados. Los tratamientos utilizados en la actualidad son sobre todo tópicos o son procedimientos mínimamente invasivos. La evidencia sobre la utilidad de la terapia sistémica es limitada: los estudios son en su mayoría de pequeño tamaño, de reducida duración, incluyen a mujeres de manera mayoritaria, la metodología de evaluación es heterogénea y no hay parámetros consensuados de respuesta clínica relevante. Además, los suplementos o fármacos sistémicos no están exentos de efectos adversos. El colágeno hidrolizado oral y el ácido hialurónico oral son bien tolerados y múltiples ensayos clínicos muestran que pueden mitigar algunos signos de envejecimiento cutáneo. La isotretinoína oral en dosis bajas es otra alternativa, pero con un mayor potencial de efectos adversos. Múltiples suplementos, como vitaminas, flavonoides, diversos extractos de plantas y oligoelementos presentan escasa evidencia clínica. El futuro del manejo del envejecimiento cutáneo parece ser el tratamiento con agentes senolíticos o senomórficos dirigidos específicamente contra células cutáneas senescentes. (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Dietary Supplements , Dermatologic Agents/administration & dosage , Skin Aging/drug effects , Antioxidants/administration & dosage , Hyaluronic Acid/administration & dosage , Tranexamic Acid/administration & dosage , Viscosupplements/administration & dosage , Isotretinoin/administration & dosage , Collagen/administration & dosage
15.
Farm. comunitarios (Internet) ; 15(1): 56-63, ene. 2023. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-215168

ABSTRACT

Introducción: la enfermedad de ojo seco (EOS) es una patología común y un motivo de consulta frecuente en farmacia comunitaria. Esta tiene un gran impacto en la calidad de vida (QoL) de los pacientes; por ello, un tratamiento adecuado debería mejorarla. Las lágrimas artificiales constituyen la base para el manejo de la EOS y el principal tratamiento de indicación farmacéutica.Objetivo: estudiar el efecto de unas gotas oculares a base de ácido hialurónico, Centella asiática y Aloe vera en la QoL de pacientes con EOS. Paralelamente, la adherencia al tratamiento, la tolerancia y seguridad del producto, fueron evaluados.Metodología: estudio clínico posautorización, abierto, prospectivo y multicéntrico. Los pacientes recibieron el tratamiento durante 60 días. Para estudiar el efecto sobre la QoL, los pacientes cumplimentaron el cuestionario OSDI© antes de iniciar el tratamiento y a los 30 y 60 días de tratamiento. La adherencia se evaluó mediante la reconciliación de los envases y la seguridad mediante un seguimiento de los eventos adversos. Resultados: los pacientes tratados con las gotas oculares, población por intención de tratar (ITT, n=44), obtuvieron mejoras clínicamente importantes en la QoL, sintomatología y función visual, pues la puntuación OSDI© disminuyó de 32,80 (DE=23,00) (basal, EOS severo) a 12.64 (DE=15,32) (estado normal, p<0,001), y a 9.22 (DE=10,37) (estado normal, p<0,001), a los 30 y 60 días, respectivamente. Más del 70 % de los pacientes se adhirieron al tratamiento. El perfil de seguridad fue favorable. Se observaron 4 efectos adversos oculares de intensidad leve. No se plantearon problemas de seguridad. Conclusiones: Las gotas oculares objeto de estudio podrían ser una opción de tratamiento efectiva y segura para mejorar la QoL de pacientes con EOS.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Xerophthalmia/drug therapy , Xerophthalmia/psychology , Hyaluronic Acid/administration & dosage , Viscosupplements/administration & dosage , Aloe/chemistry , Centella/chemistry , Quality of Life , Community Pharmacy Services , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Drug Combinations
16.
Gerokomos (Madr., Ed. impr.) ; 33(3): 198-200, sept. 2022. ilus
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-219842

ABSTRACT

Las curas tópicas con apósitos que contienen ácido hialurónico y carnosina pueden convertirse en un tratamiento conservador para lesiones tróficas isquémicas, y pueden resultar una posible alternativa eficaz en casos seleccionados. Presentamos el caso clínico de un paciente citado para realizar la amputación de un dedo del pie que, tras desbridamiento quirúrgico y un procedimiento seriado de curas con Tulgrasum®, un apósito comercial con base de ácido hialurónico y carnosina, fue dado de alta (AU)


Topical cures with dressings containing hyaluronic acid and carnosine may become a conservative treatment for ischemic trophic lesions, and may be a possible alternativee ffective in selected cases. We present the clinical case of apatient summoned to perform the amputation of a toe that, after surgical debridement and a serial dressing procedure with Tulgrasum®, a commercial dressing based on hyaluronic acid and carnosine, was discharged (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Aged , Occlusive Dressings , Hyaluronic Acid/administration & dosage , Viscosupplements/administration & dosage , Carnosine/administration & dosage , Ischemia/therapy , Skin Diseases, Vascular/therapy
17.
PLoS One ; 17(2): e0263971, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35171954

ABSTRACT

This study is a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded trial performed to investigate the effects of a dietary supplement containing a mixture of Boswellia serrata Roxb., chlorophyll, green tea extract, glucosamine, chondroitin sulfate, hyaluronic acid, and further in the manuscript: non-hydrolised type II collagen in dogs with osteoarthritis (OA). A total of 40 dogs were enrolled in the study, they were randomly divided in control (CTR) and treatment (TRT) groups. The TRT group received the dietary supplement for 60 days. The CTR group received a placebo for the same number of days. All the subjects had veterinary evaluations during the trial and owners were requested to fill in questionnaires on chronic pain using the Helsinki Chronic Pain Index. The product was easy to administer and no side effects were reported. Combining results from veterinarian and owner evaluations, the tested product proved to be significantly beneficial in alleviating pain and in reducing the clinical signs in dogs with OA.


Subject(s)
Chondroitin Sulfates/administration & dosage , Dietary Supplements , Glucosamine/administration & dosage , Hyaluronic Acid/administration & dosage , Osteoarthritis, Knee/diet therapy , Animals , Dogs , Double-Blind Method , Male , Treatment Outcome , Viscosupplements/administration & dosage
18.
PLoS One ; 16(10): e0256770, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34634053

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Lubrication and free radical scavenging are key features of biomaterials used for viscosupplementation (VS) of joints affected by osteoarthritis (OA). The objective of this study was to describe the non-clinical performance characterization of KiOmedine® CM-Chitosan, a non-animal carboxymethyl chitosan, in order to assess its intended action in VS and to compare it to existing viscosupplements based on crosslinked hyaluronan (HA) formulations. METHOD: The lubrication capacity of the tested viscosupplements (VS) was evaluated in-vitro and ex-vivo. In-vitro, the coefficient of friction (COF) was measured using a novel tribological system. Meanwhile, an ex-vivo biomechanical model in ovine hindlimbs was developed to assess the recovery of join mobility after an intra-articular (IA) injection. Free radical scavenging capacity of HA and KiOmedine® CM-Chitosan formulations was evaluated using the Trolox Equivalent Antioxidant Capacity (TEAC) assay. RESULTS: In the in-vitro tribological model, KiOmedine® CM-Chitosan showed high lubrication capacity with a significant COF reduction than crosslinked HA formulations. In the ex-vivo model, the lubrication effect of KiOmedine® CM-Chitosan following an IA injection in the injured knee was proven again by a COF reduction. The recovery of joint motion was optimal with an IA injection of 3 ml of KiOmedine® CM-Chitosan, which was significantly better than the crosslinked HA formulation at the same volume. In the in-vitro TEAC assay, KiOmedine® CM-Chitosan showed a significantly higher free radical scavenging capacity than HA formulations. CONCLUSION: Overall, the results provide a first insight into the mechanism of action in terms of lubrication and free radical scavenging for the use of KiOmedine® CM-Chitosan as a VS treatment of OA. KiOmedine® CM-Chitosan demonstrated a higher capacity to scavenge free radicals, and it showed a higher recovery of mobility after a knee lesion than crosslinked HA formulations. This difference could be explained by the difference in chemical structure between KiOmedine® CM-Chitosan and HA and their formulations.


Subject(s)
Chitosan/analogs & derivatives , Free Radical Scavengers/pharmacology , Viscosupplements/pharmacology , Animals , Biocompatible Materials/administration & dosage , Biocompatible Materials/pharmacology , Chitosan/administration & dosage , Chitosan/pharmacology , Free Radical Scavengers/administration & dosage , Injections, Intra-Articular , Knee Joint/drug effects , Sheep , Viscosupplementation , Viscosupplements/administration & dosage
19.
Cornea ; 40(9): 1215-1217, 2021 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34351875

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to describe a novel technique for descemetorhexis that combines the advantages of stable anterior chamber (AC) associated with ophthalmic viscosurgical devices and optimal surgical visualization seen with air to overcome the issues of poor Descemet membrane (DM) visibility or AC instability when each is used alone. METHODS: This study is a description of a new surgical approach. RESULTS: We describe a new technique for performing descemetorhexis. The simultaneous presence of cohesive ophthalmic viscosurgical device and air in the AC offers optimal DM visualization and guarantees a stable AC during this surgical step. It does not require an additional incision for an AC maintainer. CONCLUSIONS: The described technique may facilitate the surgical step of descemetorhexis, offering improved AC stability and better visualization of the DM. It may reduce early postoperative graft detachment due to the presence of residues of the recipient's diseased DM.


Subject(s)
Air , Descemet Membrane/surgery , Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty/methods , Hyaluronic Acid/administration & dosage , Viscosupplements/administration & dosage , Anterior Chamber/drug effects , Humans
20.
Dermatol Online J ; 27(7)2021 Jul 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34391337

ABSTRACT

Occlusive vasculopathy may rarely occur after intra-articular injection with hyaluronic acid. The associated histological changes are not well described. Herein, we would like to present representative histology of this phenomenon.


Subject(s)
Hyaluronic Acid/adverse effects , Osteoarthritis/therapy , Vascular Diseases/pathology , Viscosupplements/adverse effects , Humans , Hyaluronic Acid/administration & dosage , Iatrogenic Disease , Injections, Intra-Articular , Viscosupplements/administration & dosage
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...