Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 1.502
Filter
1.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 10494, 2024 05 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38714660

ABSTRACT

Binocular visual plasticity can be initiated via either bottom-up or top-down mechanisms, but it is unknown if these two forms of adult plasticity can be independently combined. In seven participants with normal binocular vision, sensory eye dominance was assessed using a binocular rivalry task, before and after a period of monocular deprivation and with and without selective attention directed towards one eye. On each trial, participants reported the dominant monocular target and the inter-ocular contrast difference between the stimuli was systematically altered to obtain estimates of ocular dominance. We found that both monocular light- and pattern-deprivation shifted dominance in favour of the deprived eye. However, this shift was completely counteracted if the non-deprived eye's stimulus was selectively attended. These results reveal that shifts in ocular dominance, driven by bottom-up and top-down selection, appear to act independently to regulate the relative contrast gain between the two eyes.


Subject(s)
Dominance, Ocular , Vision, Binocular , Humans , Vision, Binocular/physiology , Dominance, Ocular/physiology , Adult , Male , Female , Young Adult , Neuronal Plasticity/physiology , Photic Stimulation , Vision, Monocular/physiology , Visual Perception/physiology , Attention/physiology
2.
J Vis ; 24(5): 4, 2024 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38722274

ABSTRACT

Image differences between the eyes can cause interocular discrepancies in the speed of visual processing. Millisecond-scale differences in visual processing speed can cause dramatic misperceptions of the depth and three-dimensional direction of moving objects. Here, we develop a monocular and binocular continuous target-tracking psychophysics paradigm that can quantify such tiny differences in visual processing speed. Human observers continuously tracked a target undergoing Brownian motion with a range of luminance levels in each eye. Suitable analyses recover the time course of the visuomotor response in each condition, the dependence of visual processing speed on luminance level, and the temporal evolution of processing differences between the eyes. Importantly, using a direct within-observer comparison, we show that continuous target-tracking and traditional forced-choice psychophysical methods provide estimates of interocular delays that agree on average to within a fraction of a millisecond. Thus, visual processing delays are preserved in the movement dynamics of the hand. Finally, we show analytically, and partially confirm experimentally, that differences between the temporal impulse response functions in the two eyes predict how lateral target motion causes misperceptions of motion in depth and associated tracking responses. Because continuous target tracking can accurately recover millisecond-scale differences in visual processing speed and has multiple advantages over traditional psychophysics, it should facilitate the study of temporal processing in the future.


Subject(s)
Motion Perception , Psychophysics , Vision, Binocular , Humans , Motion Perception/physiology , Psychophysics/methods , Vision, Binocular/physiology , Photic Stimulation/methods , Adult , Depth Perception/physiology , Male , Vision, Monocular/physiology , Female , Young Adult , Reaction Time/physiology
4.
Jpn J Ophthalmol ; 68(3): 183-191, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38598144

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To assess the impact of glaucoma on perceiving three-dimensional (3D) shapes based on monocular depth cues. STUDY DESIGN: Clinical observational study. METHODS: Twenty glaucoma patients, subjected to binocular visual-field sensitivity (binocular-VFS) tests using a Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer, and 20 age-matched healthy volunteers, underwent two tasks: identifying the nearest vertex of a 3D shape using monocular shading (3D-SfS), texture (3D-SfT), or motion (3D-SfM) cues, and distinguishing elementary one-dimensional (1D) features of these cues. The association of the visual-field index (VFI) of binocular-VFS with 3D shape perception in glaucoma patients was also examined. RESULTS: Glaucoma patients demonstrated reduced accuracy in distinguishing 1D luminance brightness and a larger "error-in-depth" between the perceived and actual depths for 3D-SfM and 3D-SfS compared to healthy volunteers. Six glaucoma patients with a 100% VFI for binocular-VFS exhibited a similar error-in-depth to the other fourteen glaucoma patients; they had a larger error-in-depth for 3D-SfM compared to healthy volunteers. No correlation between the error-in-depth values and the VFI values of binocular-VFS was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The 3D shape perception in glaucoma patients varies based on the depth cue's characteristics. Impaired 1D discrimination and larger thresholds for 3D-SfM in glaucoma patients with a 100% VFI for binocular-VFS indicate more pronounced perceptual deficits of lower-level elementary features for 3D-SfS and higher-level visual processing of 3D shapes for 3D-SfM. The effects of the location and degree of binocular visual-field defects on 3D shape perception remain to be elucidated. Our research provides insights into the 3D shape extraction mechanism in glaucoma.


Subject(s)
Cues , Depth Perception , Glaucoma , Vision, Binocular , Vision, Monocular , Visual Fields , Humans , Male , Female , Depth Perception/physiology , Vision, Binocular/physiology , Visual Fields/physiology , Middle Aged , Aged , Glaucoma/physiopathology , Glaucoma/diagnosis , Vision, Monocular/physiology , Visual Field Tests , Intraocular Pressure/physiology , Form Perception/physiology , Adult
5.
Vision Res ; 219: 108396, 2024 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38640684

ABSTRACT

Recent studies suggest that binocular adding S+ and differencing S- channels play an important role in binocular vision. To test for such a role in the context of binocular contrast detection and binocular summation, we employed a surround masking paradigm consisting of a central target disk surrounded by a mask annulus. All stimuli were horizontally oriented 0.5c/d sinusoidal gratings. Correlated stimuli were identical in interocular spatial phase while anticorrelated stimuli were opposite in interocular spatial phase. There were four target conditions: monocular left eye, monocular right eye, binocular correlated and binocular anticorrelated, and three surround mask conditions: no surround, binocularly correlated and binocularly anticorrelated. We observed consistent elevation of detection thresholds for monocular and binocular targets across the two binocular surround mask conditions. In addition, we found an interaction between the type of surround and the type of binocular target: both detection and summation were relatively enhanced by surround masks and targets with opposite interocular phase relationships and reduced by surround masks and targets with the same interocular phase relationships. The data were reasonably well accounted for by a model of binocular combination termed MAX (S+S-), in which the decision variable is the probability summation of modeled S+ and S- channel responses, with a free parameter determining the relative gains of the two channels. Our results support the existence of two channels involved in binocular combination, S+ and S-, whose relative gains are adjustable by surround context.


Subject(s)
Contrast Sensitivity , Perceptual Masking , Photic Stimulation , Sensory Thresholds , Vision, Binocular , Humans , Vision, Binocular/physiology , Perceptual Masking/physiology , Contrast Sensitivity/physiology , Sensory Thresholds/physiology , Photic Stimulation/methods , Psychophysics , Vision, Monocular/physiology , Adult
6.
Strabismus ; 32(2): 108-114, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38516834

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: To study the rare and unusual causes of monocular elevation deficit. METHODS: Five patients presenting to us with diplopia and elevation deficit were thoroughly examined and were found to have monocular elevation deficit due to rare causes. OBSERVATIONS: All five were found to have different underlying etiologies - iatrogenic, sphenoid wing meningioma, cysticercosis, sarcoidosis and mid brain infarct, and were managed appropriately. DISCUSSION: Monocular Elevation Deficit can occur due to a variety of causes. Having a high index of suspicion for the more serious etiologies is of utmost importance. Thorough clinical examination and imaging help clinch the diagnosis.


Subject(s)
Diplopia , Meningioma , Humans , Female , Meningioma/complications , Male , Middle Aged , Diplopia/etiology , Diplopia/physiopathology , Diplopia/diagnosis , Adult , Meningeal Neoplasms/complications , Sarcoidosis/complications , Sarcoidosis/diagnosis , Sarcoidosis/physiopathology , Cysticercosis/complications , Cysticercosis/diagnosis , Cysticercosis/physiopathology , Iatrogenic Disease , Brain Infarction/complications , Brain Infarction/diagnostic imaging , Brain Infarction/physiopathology , Aged , Oculomotor Muscles/physiopathology , Ocular Motility Disorders/physiopathology , Ocular Motility Disorders/etiology , Ocular Motility Disorders/diagnosis , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Vision, Monocular/physiology , Sphenoid Bone
7.
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt ; 44(3): 564-575, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38317572

ABSTRACT

Short-term monocular deprivation (MD) shifts sensory eye balance in favour of the previously deprived eye. The effect of MD on eye balance is significant but brief in adult humans. Recently, researchers and clinicians have attempted to implement MD in clinical settings for adults with impaired binocular vision. Although the effect of MD has been studied in detail in single-session protocols, what is not known is whether the effect of MD on eye balance deteriorates after repeated periods of MD (termed 'perceptual deterioration'). An answer to this question is relevant for two reasons. Firstly, the effect of MD (i.e., dose-response) should not decrease with repeated use if MD is to be used therapeutically (e.g., daily for weeks). Second, it bears upon the question of whether the neural basis of the effects of MD and contrast adaptation, a closely related phenomenon, is the same. The sensory change from contrast adaptation depends on recent experience. If the observer has recently experienced the same adaptation multiple times for consecutive days, then the adaptation effect will be smaller because contrast adaptation exhibits perceptual deterioration, so it is of interest to know if the effects of MD follow suit. This study measured the effect of 2-h MD for seven consecutive days on binocular balance of 15 normally sighted adults. We found that the shift in eye balance from MD stayed consistent, showing no signs of deterioration after subjects experienced multiple periods of MD. This finding shows no loss of effectiveness of repeated daily doses of MD if used therapeutically to rebalance binocular vision in otherwise normal individuals. Furthermore, ocular dominance plasticity, which is the basis of the effects of short-term MD, does not seem to share the property of 'perceptual deterioration' with contrast adaptation, suggesting different neural bases for these two related phenomena.


Subject(s)
Visual Cortex , Adult , Humans , Visual Cortex/physiology , Sensory Deprivation/physiology , Vision, Ocular , Vision, Binocular/physiology , Dominance, Ocular , Vision, Monocular/physiology
9.
J Mot Behav ; 56(4): 407-416, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38275206

ABSTRACT

Previous literature suggests that correcting ongoing movements is more effective when using the dominant limb and seeing with the dominant eye. Specifically, individuals are more effective at adjusting their movement to account for an imperceptibly perturbed or changed target location (i.e., online movement correction), when vision is available to the dominant eye. However, less is known if visual-motor functions based on monocular information can undergo short-term neuroplastic changes after a bout of practice, to improve online correction processes. Participants (n = 12) performed pointing movements monocularly and their ability to correct their movement towards an imperceptibly displaced target was assessed. On the first day, the eye associated with smaller correction amplitudes was exclusively trained during acquisition. While correction amplitude was assessed again with both eyes monocularly, only the eye with smaller correction amplitudes in the pre-test showed significant improvement in delayed retention. These results indicate that monocular visuomotor pathways can undergo short-term neuroplastic changes.


Subject(s)
Psychomotor Performance , Vision, Monocular , Humans , Psychomotor Performance/physiology , Male , Female , Vision, Monocular/physiology , Adult , Young Adult , Neuronal Plasticity/physiology , Movement/physiology , Visual Perception/physiology
10.
Curr Biol ; 33(20): R1038-R1040, 2023 10 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37875073

ABSTRACT

Primary visual cortex (V1) retains a form of plasticity in adult humans: a brief period of monocular deprivation induces an enhanced response to the deprived eye, which can stabilize into a consolidated plastic change1,2 despite unaltered thalamic input3. This form of homeostatic plasticity in adults is thought to act through neuronal competition between the representations of the two eyes, which are still separate in primary visual cortex4,5. During monocular occlusion, neurons of the deprived eye are thought to increase response gain given the absence of visual input, leading to the post-deprivation enhancement. If the decrease of reliability of the monocular response is crucial to establish homeostatic plasticity, this could be induced in several different ways. There is increasing evidence that V1 processing is affected by voluntary action, allowing it to take into account the visual effects of self-motion6, important for efficient active vision7. Here we asked whether ocular dominance homeostatic plasticity could be elicited without degrading the quality of monocular visual images but simply by altering their role in visuomotor control by introducing a visual delay in one eye while participants actively performed a visuomotor task; this causes a discrepancy between what the subject sees and what he/she expects to see. Our results show that homeostatic plasticity is gated by the consistency between the monocular visual inputs and a person's actions, suggesting that action not only shapes visual processing but may also be essential for plasticity in adults.


Subject(s)
Dominance, Ocular , Visual Cortex , Female , Humans , Adult , Reproducibility of Results , Vision, Monocular/physiology , Visual Cortex/physiology , Neuronal Plasticity/physiology , Sensory Deprivation/physiology
11.
Vision Res ; 209: 108261, 2023 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37300947

ABSTRACT

Adaptation to contrast has been known and studied for 50 years, and the functional importance of dynamic gain control mechanisms is widely recognized. Understanding of binocular combination and binocular fusion has also advanced in the last 20 years, but aside from interocular transfer (IOT), we still know little about binocular properties of contrast adaptation. Our observers adapted to a high contrast 3.6 c/deg grating, and we assessed contrast detection and discrimination across a wide range of test contrasts (plotted as threshold vs contrast [TvC] functions). For each combination of adapt/test eye(s), the adapted TvC data followed a 'dipper' curve similar to the unadapted data, but displaced obliquely to higher contrasts. Adaptation had effectively re-scaled all contrasts by a common factor Cs that varied with the combination of adapt and test eye(s). Cs was well described by a simple 2-parameter model that had separate monocular and binocular gain controls, sited before and after binocular summation respectively. When these two levels of adaptation were inserted into an existing model for contrast discrimination, the extended 2-stage model gave a good account of the TvC functions, their shape invariance with adaptation, and the contrast scaling factors. The underlying contrast-response function is of almost constant shape, and adaptation shifts it to higher contrasts by the factor log10(Cs) - a 'pure contrast gain control'. Evidence of partial IOT in cat V1 cells supports the 2-stage scheme, but is not consistent with a classic (single-stage) model.


Subject(s)
Contrast Sensitivity , Vision, Binocular , Humans , Vision, Binocular/physiology , Sensory Thresholds/physiology , Vision, Ocular , Vision, Monocular/physiology
12.
J Comp Neurol ; 531(12): 1244-1260, 2023 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37139534

ABSTRACT

During a critical period of postnatal life, monocular deprivation (MD) by eyelid closure reduces the size of neurons in layers of the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (dLGN) connected to the deprived eye and shifts cortical ocular dominance in favor of the non-deprived eye. Temporary inactivation of the non-deprived eye can promote superior recovery from the effects of long-term MD compared to conventional occlusion therapy. In the current study, we assessed the modification of neuron size in the dLGN as a means of measuring the impact of a brief period of monocular inactivation (MI) imposed at different postnatal ages. The biggest impact of MI was observed when it occurred at the peak of the critical period. Unlike the effect of MD, structural plasticity following MI was observed in both the binocular and monocular segments of the dLGN. With increasing age, the capacity for inactivation to alter postsynaptic cell size diminished but was still significant beyond the critical period. In comparison to MD, inactivation produced effects that were about double in magnitude and exhibited efficacy at older ages. Notwithstanding the large neural alterations precipitated by MI, its effects were remediated with a short period of binocular experience, and vision through the previously inactivated eye fully recovered. These results demonstrate that MI is a potent means of modifying the visual pathway and does so at ages when occlusion is ineffective. The efficacy and longevity of inactivation to elicit plasticity highlight its potential to ameliorate disorders of the visual system such as amblyopia.


Subject(s)
Geniculate Bodies , Vision, Ocular , Neurons , Dominance, Ocular , Sensory Deprivation/physiology , Vision, Monocular/physiology
13.
Sci Rep ; 13(1): 6666, 2023 04 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37095131

ABSTRACT

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the occipital lobe may modulate visual cortex neuroplasticity. We assessed the acute effect of visual cortex anodal (a-)tDCS on ocular dominance plasticity induced by short-term monocular deprivation (MD), a well-established technique for inducing homeostatic plasticity in the visual system. In Experiment 1, active or sham visual cortex tDCS was applied during the last 20 min of 2-h MD following a within-subjects design (n = 17). Ocular dominance was measured using two computerized tests. The magnitude of ocular dominance plasticity was unaffected by a-tDCS. In Experiment 2 (n = 9), we investigated whether a ceiling effect of MD was masking the effect of active tDCS. We replicated Experiment 1 but used only 30 min of MD. The magnitude of ocular dominance plasticity was decreased with the shorter intervention, but there was still no effect of active a-tDCS. Within the constraints of our experimental design and a-tDCS parameters, visual cortex a-tDCS did not modulate the homeostatic mechanisms that drive ocular dominance plasticity in participants with normal binocular vision.


Subject(s)
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation , Visual Cortex , Humans , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/methods , Dominance, Ocular , Visual Cortex/physiology , Vision, Binocular/physiology , Neuronal Plasticity/physiology , Vision, Monocular/physiology
14.
Neuroimage ; 274: 120141, 2023 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37120043

ABSTRACT

A brief period of monocular deprivation (MD) induces short-term plasticity of the adult visual system. Whether MD elicits neural changes beyond visual processing is yet unclear. Here, we assessed the specific impact of MD on neural correlates of multisensory processes. Neural oscillations associated with visual and audio-visual processing were measured for both the deprived and the non-deprived eye. Results revealed that MD changed neural activities associated with visual and multisensory processes in an eye-specific manner. Selectively for the deprived eye, alpha synchronization was reduced within the first 150 ms of visual processing. Conversely, gamma activity was enhanced in response to audio-visual events only for the non-deprived eye within 100-300 ms after stimulus onset. The analysis of gamma responses to unisensory auditory events revealed that MD elicited a crossmodal upweight for the non-deprived eye. Distributed source modeling suggested that the right parietal cortex played a major role in neural effects induced by MD. Finally, visual and audio-visual processing alterations emerged for the induced component of the neural oscillations, indicating a prominent role of feedback connectivity. Results reveal the causal impact of MD on both unisensory (visual and auditory) and multisensory (audio-visual) processes and, their frequency-specific profiles. These findings support a model in which MD increases excitability to visual events for the deprived eye and audio-visual and auditory input for the non-deprived eye.


Subject(s)
Visual Cortex , Adult , Humans , Visual Cortex/physiology , Visual Perception , Sensory Deprivation/physiology , Neuronal Plasticity/physiology , Vision, Monocular/physiology
15.
Cereb Cortex ; 33(9): 5636-5645, 2023 04 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36396729

ABSTRACT

Neural dynamics are altered in the primary visual cortex (V1) during critical period monocular deprivation (MD). Synchronization of neural oscillations is pertinent to physiological functioning of the brain. Previous studies have reported chronic disruption of V1 functional properties such as ocular dominance, spatial acuity, and binocular matching after long-term monocular deprivation (LTMD). However, the possible neuromodulation and neural synchrony has been less explored. Here, we investigated the difference between juvenile and adult experience-dependent plasticity in mice from intracellular calcium signals with fluorescent indicators. We also studied alterations in local field potentials power bands and phase-amplitude coupling (PAC) of specific brain oscillations. Our results showed that LTMD in juveniles causes higher neuromodulatory changes as seen by high-intensity fluorescent signals from the non-deprived eye (NDE). Meanwhile, adult mice showed a greater response from the deprived eye (DE). LTMD in juvenile mice triggered alterations in the power of delta, theta, and gamma oscillations, followed by enhancement of delta-gamma PAC in the NDE. However, LTMD in adult mice caused alterations in the power of delta oscillations and enhancement of delta-gamma PAC in the DE. These markers are intrinsic to cortical neuronal processing during LTMD and apply to a wide range of nested oscillatory markers.


Subject(s)
Vision, Monocular , Visual Cortex , Animals , Mice , Vision, Monocular/physiology , Sensory Deprivation/physiology , Visual Cortex/physiology , Dominance, Ocular , Neurons/physiology , Neuronal Plasticity/physiology
16.
J Neural Eng ; 19(6)2022 12 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36583387

ABSTRACT

Objective:recently, pupil oscillations synchronized with steady visual stimuli were used as input for an interface. The proposed system, inspired by a brain-computer interface based on steady-state visual evoked potentials, does not require contact with the participant. However, the pupil oscillation mechanism limits the stimulus frequency to 2.5 Hz or less, making it hard to enhance the information transfer rate (ITR).Approach:here, we compared multiple conditions for stimulation to increase the ITR of the pupil vibration-based interface, which were called monocular-single, monocular-superposed, and binocular-independent conditions. The binocular-independent condition stimulates each eye at different frequencies respectively and mixes them by using the visual stereoscopic perception of users. The monocular-superposed condition stimulates both eyes by a mixed signal of two different frequencies. We selected the shape of the stimulation signal, evaluated the amount of spectral leakage in the monocular-superposed and binocular-independent conditions, and compared the power spectrum density at the stimulation frequency. Moreover, 5, 10, and 15 patterns of stimuli were classified in each condition.Main results:a square wave, which causes an efficient pupil response, was used as the stimulus. Spectral leakage at the beat frequency was higher in the monocular-superposed condition than in the binocular-independent one. The power spectral density of stimulus frequencies was greatest in the monocular-single condition. Finally, we could classify the 15-stimulus pattern, with ITRs of 14.4 (binocular-independent, using five frequencies), 14.5 (monocular-superimposed, using five frequencies), and 23.7 bits min-1(monocular-single, using 15 frequencies). There were no significant differences for the binocular-independent and monocular-superposed conditions.Significance:this paper shows a way to increase the number of stimuli that can be simultaneously displayed without decreasing ITR, even when only a small number of frequencies are available. This could lead to the provision of an interface based on pupil oscillation to a wider range of users.


Subject(s)
Pupil , Vision, Binocular , Humans , Pupil/physiology , Vision, Binocular/physiology , Evoked Potentials, Visual , Vision, Monocular/physiology , Reflex , Photic Stimulation
17.
J Vis ; 22(10): 14, 2022 09 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36107124

ABSTRACT

Short-term deprivation of one eye by monocular patching causes a temporary increase in the contribution of that eye to binocular vision when the eye patch is removed. This effect, known as ocular dominance plasticity, provides a model of neuroplasticity within the human binocular visual system. We investigated whether physical exercise and the non-invasive brain stimulation technique transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS), two interventions that may increase visual cortex neuroplasticity, enhance ocular dominance plasticity when delivered individually or in combination. Ocular dominance was measured using a grating rivalry test and a dichoptic letter contrast polarity judgment test. We observed robust ocular dominance changes for both outcome measures following 2-hour monocular deprivation; however, the magnitude of the effect was not influenced by exercise or tRNS. Ocular dominance plasticity may already be maximal after 2 hours of monocular deprivation in those with normal vision and therefore cannot be augmented by interventions designed to enhance neuroplasticity.


Subject(s)
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation , Visual Cortex , Adult , Dominance, Ocular , Exercise , Humans , Vision, Monocular/physiology , Visual Cortex/physiology
18.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 2470, 2022 02 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35169203

ABSTRACT

To investigate the long-term effect of unilateral idiopathic epiretinal membrane (uiERM) removal on monocular and binocular visual function, and on vision-related quality of life (VR-QoL). Prospective, single-center study. The following data were collected before and after surgery: distance monocular and binocular best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), horizontal and vertical metamorphopsia, horizontal and vertical aniseikonia, stereoacuity and National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 item (NEI VFQ-25). Forty-two patients (mean age: 72.7 ± 7.4 years; 24 men) were included. At 6 months postoperatively, distance monocular BCVA (p < 0.001), horizontal metamorphopsia (p = 0.001) and the composite score of NEI VFQ-25 (p < 0.001) significantly improved, in comparison to baseline. At 2 years postoperatively, distance monocular (p < 0.001) and binocular (p = 0.01) BCVA, horizontal (p < 0.001) and vertical (p = 0.02) metamorphopsia, vertical aniseikonia (p = 0.01), stereoacuity (p < 0.001) and 3 subscales scores of the NEI VFQ-25 (p < 0.05) ("general vision", "mental health", "driving") significantly improved in comparison to baseline. Removal of uiERM improves VR-QoL and achieves good visual outcomes on both monocular and binocular visual parameters over long-term. Visual symptoms induced by macular contraction have different improvement kinetics after surgery. Stereopsis, the highest level of binocular vision, can be improved in some cases.


Subject(s)
Epiretinal Membrane/physiopathology , Epiretinal Membrane/surgery , Quality of Life , Vision, Binocular/physiology , Vision, Monocular/physiology , Visual Acuity/physiology , Vitrectomy , Aged , Epiretinal Membrane/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
19.
Atten Percept Psychophys ; 84(2): 490-508, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34426931

ABSTRACT

In the present study, we investigated the difference between monocular augmented reality (AR) and binocular AR in terms of perception and cognition by using a task that combines the flanker task with the oddball task. A right- or left-facing arrowhead was presented as a central stimulus at the central vision, and participants were instructed to press a key only when the direction in which the arrowhead faced was a target. In a small number of trials, arrowheads that were facing in the same or opposite direction (flanker stimuli) were presented beside the central stimulus binocularly or monocularly as an AR image. In the binocular condition, the flanker stimuli were presented to both eyes, and, in the monocular condition, only to the dominant eye. The results revealed that participants could respond faster in the binocular condition than in the monocular one; however, only when the flanker stimuli were in the opposite direction was the response faster in the monocular condition. Moreover, the results of event-related brain potentials (ERPs) showed that all stimuli were processed in both the monocular and the binocular conditions in the perceptual stage; however, the influence of the flanker stimuli was attenuated in the monocular condition in the cognitive stage. The influence of flanker stimuli might be more unstable in the monocular condition than in the binocular condition, but more precise examination should be conducted in a future study.


Subject(s)
Augmented Reality , Cognition , Humans , Photic Stimulation/methods , Vision, Binocular/physiology , Vision, Monocular/physiology
20.
PLoS One ; 16(11): e0258678, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34748569

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Many people experience unilateral degraded vision, usually owing to a developmental or age-related disorder. There are unresolved questions regarding the extent to which such unilateral visual deficits impact on sensorimotor performance; an important issue as sensorimotor limitations can constrain quality of life by restricting 'activities of daily living'. Examination of the relationship between visual deficit and sensorimotor performance is essential for determining the functional implications of ophthalmic conditions. This study attempts to explore the effect of unilaterally degraded vision on sensorimotor performance. METHODS: In Experiment 1 we simulated visual deficits in 30 participants using unilateral and bilateral Bangerter filters to explore whether motor performance was affected in water pouring, peg placing, and aiming tasks. Experiment 2 (n = 74) tested the hypothesis that kinematic measures are associated with visuomotor deficits by measuring the impact of small visual sensitivity decrements created by monocular viewing on sensorimotor interactions with targets presented on a planar surface in aiming, tracking and steering tasks. RESULTS: In Experiment 1, the filters caused decreased task performance-confirming that unilateral (and bilateral) visual loss has functional implications. In Experiment 2, kinematic measures were affected by monocular viewing in two of three tasks requiring rapid online visual feedback (aiming and steering). CONCLUSIONS: Unilateral visual loss has a measurable impact on sensorimotor performance. The benefits of binocular vision may be particularly important for some groups (e.g. older adults) where an inability to complete sensorimotor tasks may necessitate assisted living. There is an urgent need to develop rigorous kinematic approaches to the quantification of the functional impact of unilaterally degraded vision and of the benefits associated with treatments for unilateral ophthalmic conditions to enable informed decisions around treatment.


Subject(s)
Psychomotor Performance/physiology , Vision Disorders/physiopathology , Vision, Binocular/physiology , Vision, Monocular/physiology , Activities of Daily Living , Adolescent , Biomechanical Phenomena , Eye/physiopathology , Female , Humans , Male , Quality of Life , Task Performance and Analysis , Vision Disorders/diagnostic imaging , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...