Cost-Effectiveness of Limited Vitrectomy for Vision-Degrading Myodesopsia.

PURPOSE: Patients afflicted with clinically significant vitreous floaters suffer from vision-degrading myodesopsia, characterized by impairment in contrast sensitivity function (CSF) and decreased quality of life. This study determined the cost-effectiveness of limited vitrectomy for this condition. DESIGN: Retrospective, interventional case series and third-party insurer cost-utility analysis. METHODS: Sixty-seven patients suffering from unilateral vitreous floaters (20 non-myopic patients with posterior vitreous detachment [PVD]; 17 myopic patients [>-2 diopters] without PVD; 30 myopic patients with PVD) completed the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-39) and were tested with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and CSF measurements before and after limited vitrectomy. A reference case cost-utility analysis was performed. RESULTS: The mean VFQ-39 increased 19% (P < 0.00001) after surgery, with general vision improving 27% for the entire group and 37% for non-myopic PVD (P < 0.00001 for each). VFQ-39 correlations with time tradeoff utilities indicated a 14.4% improvement in quality of life. Mean BCVA improved 13.5% postoperatively (P < 0.00001) and CSF improved 53% (P < 0.00001). The incremental patient value gain conferred by limited vitrectomy was 2.38 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and the average cost-utility ratio in 2018 U.S. real dollars was $1,574/QALY. CONCLUSIONS: Limited vitrectomy for vision-degrading myodesopsia is clinically effective, in that it improves BCVA, CSF, and patient well-being. It is also highly cost-effective ($1,574/QALY), with an average cost-utility ratio vs. no therapy that is superior to cataract surgery ($2,262/QALY), amblyopia therapy ($2,710/QALY), and retinal detachment repair ($45,304/QALY). Myopic patients without PVD had the lowest cost-utility ratio of all ($1,338/QALY).

Budget impact analysis of ocriplasmin for the treatment of symptomatic vitreomacular adhesion in the USA.

BACKGROUND: Vitreomacular traction (VMT) treatment options include watchful waiting, vitrectomy and intravitreal ocriplasmin injection (Jetrea®). This analysis used results from the recently completed OASIS randomized clinical trial to evaluate the 2-year budget impact of ocriplasmin injection availability for treatment of Stage I or II VMT without epiretinal membrane formation in a modeled US health plan. MATERIALS & METHODS: VMT prevalence, treatment patterns and disease resolution rates were from literature, a US retinal-specialist survey and the OASIS trial. Medicare payment rates were applied and a national scenario analysis was conducted. RESULTS: With ocriplasmin available, vitrectomy use and complications-related costs decreased. Budget impact of ocriplasmin to the health plan was US$143,599 over 2 years or US$0.0060 per-member per-month. CONCLUSION: Ocriplasmin was projected to be minimally cost-additive at US$0.0060 per-member per-month over 2 years.

Cost-Utility of Evaluation for Posterior Vitreous Detachment and Prophylaxis of Retinal Detachment.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the costs and cost-utility of examination for posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) and treatment of associated pathology, and of managing various other peripheral retinal disorders to prevent retinal detachment (RD). DESIGN: A decision analysis model of cost-utility. PARTICIPANTS: There were no participants. METHODS: Published retrospective data on the natural course of PVD, retinal tears, and lattice degeneration were used to quantitate the visual benefits of examination and treatment. Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services data were used to calculate associated modeled costs in a hospital/facility-based and nonfacility/ambulatory surgical center (ASC)-based setting. Published standards of utility for a given level of visual acuity were used to derive costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cost of evaluation and treatment, utility of defined health states, QALY, and cost per QALY. RESULTS: The modeled cost of evaluation of a patient with PVD and treatment of associated pathology in the facility/hospital (nonfacility/ASC)-based setting was $65 to $190 ($25-$71) depending on whether a single or 2-examination protocol was used. The cost per QALY saved was $255 to $638/QALY ($100-$239/QALY). Treatment of a symptomatic horseshoe tear resulted in a net cost savings of $1749 ($1314) and improved utility, whereas treatment of an asymptomatic horseshoe tear resulted in $2981/QALY ($1436/QALY). Treatment of asymptomatic lattice degeneration in an eye in which the fellow eye had a history of RD resulted in $4414/QALY ($2187/QALY). CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation and management of incident acute PVD (and symptomatic horseshoe tears) offer a low cost and a favorable cost-utility (low $/QALY) as a result of the minimization of the cost and morbidity associated with the development of RD, thus justifying current practice standards.

Vitreopapillary traction: cost-effective diagnosis by optical coherence tomography.

CASE REPORTS: A prospective, noncomparative, observational case series. Three patients, aged 76 to 81, all referred to subspecialty services for evaluation of optic disc elevation, and all were found to have optic disc (vitreopapillary) traction as verified by optical coherence tomography. COMMENTS: Vitreopapillary traction is a recently recognized syndrome characterized by incomplete posterior vitreous detachment. The use of optical coherence tomography is helpful in the diagnosis of this syndrome, preventing many costly, unwarranted evaluations.