Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 1.105
Filter
1.
Acad Emerg Med ; 31(5): 425-455, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38747203

ABSTRACT

The fourth Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) Guidelines for Reasonable and Appropriate Care in the Emergency Department (GRACE-4) is on the topic of the emergency department (ED) management of nonopioid use disorders and focuses on alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS), alcohol use disorder (AUD), and cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome (CHS). The SAEM GRACE-4 Writing Team, composed of emergency physicians and experts in addiction medicine and patients with lived experience, applied the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to assess the certainty of evidence and strength of recommendations regarding six priority questions for adult ED patients with AWS, AUD, and CHS. The SAEM GRACE-4 Writing Team reached the following recommendations: (1) in adult ED patients (over the age of 18) with moderate to severe AWS who are being admitted to hospital, we suggest using phenobarbital in addition to benzodiazepines compared to using benzodiazepines alone [low to very low certainty of evidence]; (2) in adult ED patients (over the age of 18) with AUD who desire alcohol cessation, we suggest a prescription for one anticraving medication [very low certainty of evidence]; (2a) in adult ED patients (over the age of 18) with AUD, we suggest naltrexone (compared to no prescription) to prevent return to heavy drinking [low certainty of evidence]; (2b) in adult ED patients (over the age of 18) with AUD and contraindications to naltrexone, we suggest acamprosate (compared to no prescription) to prevent return to heavy drinking and/or to reduce heavy drinking [low certainty of evidence]; (2c) in adult ED patients (over the age of 18) with AUD, we suggest gabapentin (compared to no prescription) for the management of AUD to reduce heavy drinking days and improve alcohol withdrawal symptoms [very low certainty of evidence]; (3a) in adult ED patients (over the age of 18) presenting to the ED with CHS we suggest the use of haloperidol or droperidol (in addition to usual care/serotonin antagonists, e.g., ondansetron) to help with symptom management [very low certainty of evidence]; and (3b) in adult ED patients (over the age of 18) presenting to the ED with CHS, we also suggest offering the use of topical capsaicin (in addition to usual care/serotonin antagonists, e.g., ondansetron) to help with symptom management [very low certainty of evidence].


Subject(s)
Alcoholism , Emergency Service, Hospital , Humans , Alcoholism/complications , Vomiting/drug therapy , Vomiting/chemically induced , Vomiting/therapy , Adult , Substance Withdrawal Syndrome/drug therapy , Cannabinoids/therapeutic use , Cannabinoids/adverse effects , Benzodiazepines/therapeutic use , Syndrome , Marijuana Abuse/complications , Male , Female , Cannabinoid Hyperemesis Syndrome
2.
J Tradit Chin Med ; 44(3): 581-585, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38767643

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of Neiguan (PC6) acupoint acustimulation in preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV), especially for patients with guideline-inconsistent CINV prophylaxis (GICP) due to personal reasons METHODS: From January 2021 to December 2021, 373 patients suffered from solid malignancy were recruited according to the inclusion criteria. Complete response (no emesis and no rescue medication use) rate during the overall phase (0-120 h of each chemo-cycle) was the primary assessment of CINV control. The Functional Living Index-Emesis (FLIE) questionnaire was investigated among these patients as a secondary 'quality of life' objective to assess the impact of CINV on patients' daily life by recording score of nausea and vomiting. RESULTS: With acustimulation of Neiguan (PC6) acupuncture point through a portable, noninvasive and user-friendly device, in terms of complete response rate and scores in nausea/vomiting by FLIE questionnaire, patients achieve a better outcome in highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) induced CINV, especially GICP subgroup. Meanwhile, analysis also demonstrated this tendency existed in other patients with HEC/GCCP (guideline consistent CINV prophylaxis) and moderate emetogenic chemotherapy, although the difference was not significant. CONCLUSION: Considering advantages of Neiguan (PC6) acustimulation such as noninvasive, covered by medical insurance and few side effects, we believe it would be an ideal auxiliary tool in CINV control, especially in patients who receive highly emetogenic chemo-protocol and are reluctant to GCCP for economic reasons.


Subject(s)
Acupuncture Points , Acupuncture Therapy , Antineoplastic Agents , Nausea , Vomiting , Humans , Vomiting/prevention & control , Vomiting/chemically induced , Vomiting/therapy , Vomiting/drug therapy , Nausea/prevention & control , Nausea/therapy , Nausea/chemically induced , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Adult , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Aged , Quality of Life , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Cost-Benefit Analysis
3.
Zhongguo Zhen Jiu ; 44(5): 526-30, 2024 May 12.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38764102

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To observe the clinical efficacy and safety of fire dragon cupping in prevention and treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in breast cancer. METHODS: Sixty breast cancer patients receiving medium-high emetogenic chemotherapy regimen were randomly divided into an observation group (30 cases, 3 cases dropped out) and a control group (30 cases, 3 cases dropped out). In both groups, 5 mg tropisetron hydrochloride was given intravenously on the day of chemotherapy and 1st to 3rd days after chemotherapy. In the observation group, fire dragon cupping on the abdomen was applied on 1st, 3rd and 5th days after chemotherapy. The incidence of nausea, vomiting, loss of appetite, abdominal pain, abdominal distension, the severity of nausea, vomiting on 1st to 6th days after chemotherapy, and the duration of nausea, vomiting, loss of appetite were observed in the two groups. The self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) score, general comfort questionnaire scale (GCQ) score before and after treatment and remedy antiemetic medication were observed in the two groups, and the safety was evaluated. RESULTS: On 2nd to 6th days after chemotherapy, the number of patients with nausea, loss of appetite and abdominal distension and nausea scores in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). On 1st to 3rd days after chemotherapy, the number of patients with vomiting and vomiting scores in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). The duration of nausea, vomiting and loss of appetite in the observation group were shorter than those in the control group (P<0.05). In the observation group, there was no significant difference in SAS and GCQ scores before and after treatment (P>0.05). After treatment, the GCQ score in the control group was decreased compared with that before treatment (P<0.05). After treatment, there was no significant difference in SAS and GCQ scores between the two groups (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the number of patients using remedy medication between the two groups (P>0.05). No adverse reaction occurred during treatment in both groups. CONCLUSION: Fire dragon cupping can effectively reduce the incidence of nausea, vomiting, loss of appetite and the severity of nausea, vomiting related to chemotherapy in breast cancer, and improve patient comfort, and have good safety.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Nausea , Vomiting , Humans , Female , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Middle Aged , Nausea/therapy , Nausea/prevention & control , Nausea/etiology , Nausea/chemically induced , Vomiting/therapy , Vomiting/chemically induced , Vomiting/prevention & control , Adult , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Aged
4.
Zhongguo Zhen Jiu ; 44(5): 531-6, 2024 May 12.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38764103

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical efficacy of heat-sensitive moxibustion combined with tropisetron hydrochloride and tropisetron hydrochloride alone in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). METHODS: Sixty CINV patients were randomly divided into an observation group and a control group, 30 cases in each group.The control group was treated with tropisetron hydrochloride. On the basis of the treatment in the control group, heat-sensitive acupoints were explored at Zhongwan (CV 12), Shenque (CV 8), Qihai (CV 6), Guanyuan (CV 4), Shangwan (CV 13), Xiawan (CV 10), Jianli (CV 11) and bilateral Zusanli (ST 36), Neiguan (PC 6), Tianshu (ST 25), Liangmen (ST 21) areas in the observation group,and heat-sensitive moxibustion was applied at heat-sensitive acupoints. The treatment started from the day of chemotherapy in both groups, once a day for 7 days. The occurrence and severity of nausea and vomiting after chemotherapy were recorded after each treatment on the 1st to 7th days of chemotherapy in the two groups, the complete remission rate was evaluated. The KPS score, quality of life scale score before and after treatment and incidence of myelosuppression were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: On the 2nd to 4th days of chemotherapy, the incidence and severity of nausea and vomiting in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05), the complete remission rates of nausea and vomiting were higher than those in the control group (P<0.05). After treatment, the KPS score in the observation group was higher than those before treatment and in the control group (P<0.05). After treatment, the scores of emotional function and overall health status in the observation group were higher than those before treatment and in the control group (P<0.05), the scores of fatigue, pain, insomnia, loss of appetite and diarrhea were lower than those before treatment and in the control group (P<0.05). The incidence of myelosuppression in the observation group was 20.0% (6/30), which was lower than 46.7% (14/30) in the control group (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Heat-sensitive moxibustion combined with tropisetron hydrochloride can effectively reduce nausea and vomiting after chemotherapy in patients with malignant tumor, improve the quality of life, relieve the myelosuppression caused by chemotherapy drugs.


Subject(s)
Acupuncture Points , Antineoplastic Agents , Moxibustion , Nausea , Tropisetron , Vomiting , Humans , Vomiting/therapy , Vomiting/chemically induced , Vomiting/drug therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Female , Nausea/therapy , Nausea/etiology , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Combined Modality Therapy , Indoles/adverse effects , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoplasms/therapy , Young Adult , Treatment Outcome
5.
Rev Prat ; 74(4): 411-419, 2024 Apr.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38814038

ABSTRACT

NAUSEA AND VOMITING IN PREGNANCY. Nausea and vomiting during pregnancy are common symptoms experienced by pregnant women. In more severe cases, known as hyperemesis gravidarum, these symptoms can become a pathological condition that can lead to significant complications in both the short and long term. Short-term complications include hydro-electrolyte imbalances, pregnancy termination, and growth retardation. Long-term complications may include anxiety disorders, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder. Mild cases can often be alleviated through lifestyle and dietary adjustments or non-pharmacological treatments like ginger, acupuncture, or acupressure. However, moderate to severe cases require specific psychological support, anti-emetic treatments, and sometimes hospitalization with intravenous treatment and parenteral rehydration. Managing these cases is complex and challenging because it does not guarantee the complete disappearance of symptoms, which can pose difficulties for caregivers.


NAUSÉES ET VOMISSEMENTS GRAVIDIQUES. Les nausées et vomissements de la grossesse sont un symptôme classique chez la femme enceinte. Le plus souvent sans gravité, les formes modérées à sévères, appelées hyperémèse gravidique, constituent une pathologie qui peut être invalidante, source de complications de la grossesse à court terme (troubles hydroélectrolytiques, arrêt de grossesse, retard de croissance) mais aussi à long terme (troubles anxiodépressifs, état de stress post-traumatique). Les formes minimes peuvent être atténuées par des règles hygiénodiététiques ou des traitements non médicamenteux (gingembre, acupuncture, acupression). Les formes modérées à sévères nécessitent un accompagnement psychologique spécifique, des traitements antiémétiques et, parfois, une hospitalisation avec traitement par voie intraveineuse et réhydratation parentérale. Leur prise en charge est complexe et difficile car elle ne permet pas toujours une disparition des symptômes, ce qui peut mettre en difficulté les soignants.


Subject(s)
Hyperemesis Gravidarum , Vomiting , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Vomiting/therapy , Vomiting/etiology , Hyperemesis Gravidarum/therapy , Hyperemesis Gravidarum/diagnosis , Pregnancy Complications/therapy , Pregnancy Complications/diagnosis , Nausea/therapy , Nausea/etiology , Antiemetics/therapeutic use
6.
Am Fam Physician ; 109(5): 417-425, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38804756

ABSTRACT

Nausea and vomiting are common symptoms that can reduce quality of life and indicate life-threatening illness. Acute nausea and vomiting last up to 7 days. In the absence of alarm symptoms, they are typically treated symptomatically and without an extensive evaluation. Typical causes include gastroenteritis or other viral syndromes, foodborne illness, acute migraine headaches, vestibular disturbances, early pregnancy, and adverse effects of medication. Chronic nausea and vomiting last 4 weeks or longer and have a broad differential diagnosis. Causes can be gastrointestinal, infectious, metabolic, neurologic, psychiatric, or related to medications and toxins. A careful history of related factors is essential to guide the initial evaluation and narrow the differential diagnosis. These factors include associated symptoms, timing of onset and duration of symptoms, exacerbating or relieving factors, alarm symptoms, medication and substance use, relationship with recent food ingestion, and comorbidities. Nonpharmacologic management options include fluid and electrolyte replacement; small, frequent meals; and avoidance of trigger foods. Antiemetic drugs effectively reduce symptoms of acute nausea and vomiting, but chronic symptoms are often more challenging to treat. When a specific etiology is not identified, a serotonin antagonist or dopamine antagonist can be used. However, medications may also target the suspected cause of symptoms and the neurotransmitters involved in central and peripheral pathways of nausea and vomiting. Pharmacologic therapy should be used for the shortest time necessary to control symptoms.


Subject(s)
Antiemetics , Nausea , Vomiting , Humans , Nausea/therapy , Nausea/etiology , Vomiting/therapy , Vomiting/etiology , Vomiting/diagnosis , Antiemetics/therapeutic use , Adult , Diagnosis, Differential , Female
7.
Andes Pediatr ; 95(1): 24-33, 2024 Feb.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38587341

ABSTRACT

Gastrointestinal symptoms and problems (GI- SP) frequently cause discomfort and suffering in pediatric patients with life-threatening and/or life-limiting illnesses (LTI/LLI). Pediatric palliative care (PPC) professionals should be aware of them and perform a comprehensive approach. OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of GI- SP in patients treated in PPC units and to describe the pharmacological and non-pharmacological measures prescribed. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Observational, prospective, multicenter, prospective study in patients with LTI/LLI, seen by PPC teams in Uruguay. The variables analyzed included age, sex, origin, type of LTI/LLI, presence of mucositis, vomiting, swallowing disorders, abdominal pain, constipation, diarrhea, digestive bleeding, problems with digestive prosthesis, and prescribed pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment. RESULTS: 10 out of 16 PPC teams participated. 96 out of 436 patients seen presented GI- SP (22%). Median age was 4.2 years (1 month-18 years). LTI/LLI: 65% neurological and 7% oncological. The 96 patients had 114 consultations; 50% had 2 or more GI- SP per consultation. GI- SP observed: swallowing disorders (57%), constipation (53%), nausea and/or vomiting (24%), gastrostomy problems (17%), abdominal pain (10%), digestive bleeding (3%), and diarrhea (2%). There were variable prescriptions of pharmacological and non-pharmacological measures; only 50% of those with swallowing disorder received speech and hearing therapy. CONCLUSIONS: GI- SP motivated consultations in all PPC settings, frequently due to 2 or more GI- SP. Swallowing disorders and gastrostomy complications are frequent but not very visible problems in PPC. According to the comprehensive approach, pharmacological and non-pharmacological measures were implemented.


Subject(s)
Deglutition Disorders , Gastrointestinal Diseases , Child , Child, Preschool , Humans , Abdominal Pain/epidemiology , Abdominal Pain/etiology , Abdominal Pain/therapy , Constipation , Deglutition Disorders/epidemiology , Deglutition Disorders/etiology , Deglutition Disorders/therapy , Diarrhea/epidemiology , Diarrhea/therapy , Gastrointestinal Diseases/epidemiology , Gastrointestinal Diseases/therapy , Palliative Care , Prospective Studies , Vomiting/epidemiology , Vomiting/etiology , Vomiting/therapy , Male , Female , Infant , Adolescent
8.
BMC Complement Med Ther ; 24(1): 163, 2024 Apr 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38641782

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is a common adverse events in cancer patients and can negatively affect their quality of life (QoL). This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of an electric massage chair (EMC) for the treatment of CINV. METHODS: A randomized phase II cross-over trial was conducted on solid cancer patients who received moderate (MEC) to high emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC). The participants were randomly assigned to receive their first chemotherapy either on a standard bed (Group A) or in an EMC (Group B) during the infusion. The patients were then crossed over to the next cycle. CINV and QoL questionnaires were collected from the participants. RESULTS: A total of 59 patients completed the trial protocol and were included in the analysis, with 29 and 30 patients in Groups A and B, respectively. The mean INVR (Index of Nausea, Vomiting, and Retching) score in the 2nd day of the first cycle was higher in Group B (3.63 ± 5.35) than Group A (2.76 ± 4.78), but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.5367). The complete response rate showed little difference between the groups. Among the high-emetic risk subgroups, patients who received HEC (p = 0.04595), younger patients (p = 0.0108), and non-colorectal cancer patients (p = 0.0495) presented significantly lower CINV scores when EMC was applied. CONCLUSION: Overall, there was no significant difference in INVR scores between standard care and EMC. Applying EMC at the first chemotherapy infusion may help preserve QoL and reduce CINV in high-risk patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: KCT0008200, 17/02/2023, Retrospectively registered.


Subject(s)
Antiemetics , Antineoplastic Agents , Neoplasms , Humans , Quality of Life , Antiemetics/therapeutic use , Antiemetics/adverse effects , Cross-Over Studies , Vomiting/therapy , Vomiting/drug therapy , Nausea/therapy , Nausea/drug therapy , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects
9.
Complement Ther Clin Pract ; 55: 101847, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38498964

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pregnancy induces physiological changes, commonly marked by nausea and vomiting in the first trimester, posing risks for both mother and baby. This study evaluates the effects of auriculotherapy on nausea and vomiting during the first trimester of pregnancy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized clinical trial was conducted in two primary health care centers with 56 Brazilian pregnant women who reported nausea or vomiting in the first trimester. The participants were divided into an intervention group (auriculotherapy with seeds) and a placebo group (sham auriculotherapy). The intervention was divided into three moments: pre-intervention with assessment of nausea and vomiting and application of questionnaires, and two follow-ups conducted on the fourth and seventh day of the intervention, with reassessment of nausea and vomiting. RESULTS: Both groups experienced a decrease in nausea and vomiting over time, with no statistically significant differences between groups in the within-group analyses at various time points. The intervention group had a greater reduction in symptoms. Within the intervention group, symptoms were more common among ferrous sulfate users and those without reported dietary disturbances. In addition, a higher incidence of nausea and vomiting was associated with the use of analgesics, morning snacks, and low intake of protein, vegetables, and fruits. CONCLUSIONS: The intervention did not affect the between-group differences in the incidence of nausea and vomiting and vomiting effort in the first trimester of pregnancy. However, a greater reduction was observed in the intervention group.


Subject(s)
Auriculotherapy , Pregnancy Complications , Female , Pregnancy , Humans , Pregnant Women , Treatment Outcome , Vomiting/therapy , Nausea/therapy , Pregnancy Complications/therapy
10.
Gastroenterology ; 166(5): 930-934.e1, 2024 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38456869

ABSTRACT

DESCRIPTION: The purpose of this American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Institute Clinical Practice Update (CPU) is to review the available evidence and provide expert advice regarding diagnosis and management of cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome. METHODS: This CPU was commissioned and approved by the AGA Institute Clinical Practice Updates Committee (CPUC) and the AGA Governing Board to provide timely guidance on a topic of high clinical importance to the AGA membership and underwent internal peer review by the CPUC and external peer review through standard procedures of Gastroenterology. This expert commentary incorporates important as well as recently published studies in this field, and it reflects the experiences of the authors.


Subject(s)
Cannabinoids , Vomiting , Humans , Vomiting/chemically induced , Vomiting/therapy , Vomiting/diagnosis , Cannabinoids/adverse effects , Syndrome , Gastroenterology/standards , Antiemetics/therapeutic use , Societies, Medical/standards , Consensus , Cannabinoid Hyperemesis Syndrome
11.
Complement Ther Clin Pract ; 55: 101838, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38330531

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: and purpose: Aromatherapy offers a low-risk solution for effectively managing common nausea and vomiting in cancer patients. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess its impact on these symptoms to facilitate practical guidelines establishment. METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Embase were searched for articles published until April 30, 2023. Inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the effect of aromatherapy on nausea and vomiting in patients with cancer (age ≥18 years). The effect size was calculated using standardized mean differences (SMDs) with a random effects model. Subgroup analyses, meta-analysis of variance, and meta-regression were performed using the "meta" package in R version 4.0.2. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistics. Sensitivity and publication bias analyses were performed; two reviewers independently assessed risk of bias using Cochrane's risk-of-bias tool 2.0. RESULTS: Twenty-five RCTs across 10 articles revealed that aromatherapy reduced overall nausea and vomiting in patients with cancer with significant efficacy (SMD = -0.81, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: -1.11 to -0.52). Furthermore, aromatherapy reduced nausea (SMD = -0.85, 95 % CI: -1.23 to -0.46) and combined nausea and vomiting (SMD = -1.08, 95 % CI: -1.68 to -0.47), but not vomiting alone (SMD = -0.24, 95 % CI: -1.03 to 0.55). Inhalation and massage yielded positive results, especially in chemotherapy-induced cases; peppermint oil was particularly successful. CONCLUSION: Our findings underscore aromatherapy's value in managing cancer treatment-associated nausea and vomiting. Conclusive evidence on aromatherapy-led nausea reduction is lacking due to limited RCTs; research is warranted for robust conclusions.


Subject(s)
Aromatherapy , Neoplasms , Humans , Adolescent , Aromatherapy/methods , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Vomiting/therapy , Vomiting/chemically induced , Nausea/therapy , Nausea/chemically induced , Neoplasms/complications , Neoplasms/therapy
13.
Explore (NY) ; 20(1): 17-26, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37544832

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Many women experience nausea and vomiting in early pregnancy. Regardless of the disease severity, it affects the work and life of pregnant women. However, drug treatment may potentially impact the foetus; thus, alternative safe and effective measures are essential. We aimed to evaluate the effect of acupressure, a non-drug treatment for nausea and vomiting, during pregnancy. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, Web of Science, CNKI, CBM, VIP, and Wanfang databases were searched using 'pregnancy', 'nausea', 'vomiting', and 'acupressure' as keywords. The search period was from database inception to 30 November 2022. Two researchers independently screened articles, extracted data, and used RevMan 5.4 software for statistical analysis. RESULTS: We included 33 trials and 3 390 patients in this meta-analysis. Acupressure was effective for women with nausea and vomiting during pregnancy (odds ratio (OR)= 4.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) [3.47, 6.68]; p<0.0001); it significantly reduced the nausea score of the Rhodes index (mean square deviation (MD): -3.21, 95% CI [-4.85, -1.57], Z = 3.83, p = 0.0001), modified Pregnancy Unique Quantification of Emesis and Nausea score (MD: -2.18, 95% CI [-3.21, -1.15], Z = 4.15, p<0.0001), and hospital stay (OR=-3.27, 95% CI [-6.18, -0.36]; p = 0.03) and improved quality of life (MD: -14.06,95% CI [- 17.31, -10.18], Z = 8.48, p<0.00001). However, no significant difference was observed in nursing satisfaction and anxiety scores (OR=4.13, 95% CI [0.89, 19.15]; p = 0.07) (MD: -13.26,95% CI [-32.04,5.53], Z = 1.38, p = 0.17). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis provides evidence of a non-drug intervention for women with nausea and vomiting during pregnancy; acupressure effectively reduces nausea and vomiting during pregnancy.


Subject(s)
Acupressure , Acupuncture Therapy , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Quality of Life , Nausea/therapy , Vomiting/therapy
14.
J Investig Med ; 72(2): 171-177, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37997432

ABSTRACT

As more states legalize cannabinoid products for recreational use and medicinal purposes, the prevalence of cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome has become increasingly common. Yet, it remains unrecognized to many healthcare providers along with the most efficacious treatments. Cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome most often presents with episodic vomiting secondary to chronic daily cannabis use over several months to years. Patients often complain of nausea and abdominal pain that is improved by taking hot showers or baths. Symptoms are alleviated with the cessation of cannabis use over a period of 6-12 months. Treatment for acute attacks often consists of parenteral benzodiazepines in the inpatient setting. Long-term management and prevention of further attacks are aided by tricyclic antidepressants such as amitriptyline with a dose range of 50-200 mg/d. Once a patient is in remission, amitriptyline can be tapered slowly. As cannabis becomes more widely available and accepted in the continental United States, so must education on the diagnosis of cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome and treatment strategies.


Subject(s)
Cannabinoid Hyperemesis Syndrome , Cannabis , Humans , Cannabis/adverse effects , Prevalence , Amitriptyline , Vomiting/chemically induced , Vomiting/epidemiology , Vomiting/therapy
15.
Altern Ther Health Med ; 30(1): 386-390, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37793338

ABSTRACT

Background: Acute gastroenteritis is a frequently encountered diarrheal illness in children, often self-limiting but occasionally linked to substantial mortality and morbidity, demanding effective approaches for assessment and intervention. While the utilization of the Pediatric Early Warning Score (PEWS) and the Situation-Background-Assessment-Recommendation system (SBAR) in pediatric patient management is recognized as effective, research in this area remains limited. Objective: Our study aimed to investigate the potential impact of PEWS and SBAR systems on the outcomes of pediatric patients with acute gastroenteritis. Methods: We conducted a randomized controlled trial at our hospital, enrolling 124 children aged 3 to 12 years diagnosed with acute gastroenteritis. These participants were randomly assigned to either a control group (62 cases) or an intervention group (62 cases). Different outcomes were assessed, including the frequency and duration of diarrhea and vomiting, the Modified Vesikari Scale (MVS), the Clinical Dehydration Scale (CDS), and follow-up physician visits. We utilized a two-group independent sample t test to compare outcomes between the two groups. Results: Our study resulted in statistically significant findings favoring the intervention group regarding the frequency and duration of diarrhea and vomiting, the MVS, the CDS, and the need for repeat healthcare visits. Conclusions: The integration of PEWS with SBAR appears to offer improved outcomes for children afflicted with acute gastroenteritis.


Subject(s)
Early Warning Score , Gastroenteritis , Child , Humans , Diarrhea/diagnosis , Diarrhea/therapy , Gastroenteritis/diagnosis , Gastroenteritis/therapy , Vomiting/therapy , Child, Preschool
17.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 309(4): 1237-1248, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38104041

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of acupressure on nausea and vomiting during pregnancy. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Springer, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched for all randomized controlled trials (RCT) of treating nausea and vomiting during pregnancy by acupressure from the inception date of database to July 31st, 2023. Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were conducted independently by researchers. The methodological quality of included studies was evaluated by the Cochrane Collaboration's bias risk assessment tool, meta-analysis by Stata 17.0 software, and publication bias by Begg's test. RESULTS: A total of 11 RCTs involving 1378 pregnant women were included in this review, which was assessed to be moderate quality. 10 RCTs involving 1298 pregnant women were assessed for the meta-analysis. The results revealed that acupressure showed significant difference on improvement in symptom score compared with sham acupressure (pooled MD, - 1.33; 95%CI [- 2.06, - 0.61]; P < 0.001) or control group (pooled MD, - 0.73; 95%CI [- 1.08, - 0.39]; P < 0.001), and incidence of effective rate compared with sham acupressure group (pooled RR, 1.78; 95%CI [1.03, 3.07]; P = 0.039). However, no statistical significance was found between acupressure and control group (pooled RR, 4.53; 95%CI [0.67, 30.48]; P = 0.120) on effective rate. On comparing acupressure with sham acupressure, there was no beneficial effect on preventing nausea and vomiting during pregnancy (pooled RR, 0.83; 95%CI [0.50, 1.38]; P = 0.476), shortening the duration of hospital stay (pooled MD, - 0.78; 95%CI [- 1.98, 0.41]; P = 0.199) and improving patient satisfaction (pooled RR, 1.36; 95%CI [0.47, 3.91]; P = 0.570). Begg's test did not reveal any publication bias. Only one RCT reported minimal acupressure-related adverse events. CONCLUSION: Acupressure may have potential favorable or encouraging effect on treating nausea and vomiting during pregnancy, but strong supportive data are not yet available. Well-designed and large-scale RCTs should be conducted for assessing and confirming the efficacy and safety of acupressure in nausea and vomiting during pregnancy.


Subject(s)
Acupressure , Female , Pregnancy , Humans , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Vomiting/therapy , Nausea/therapy
18.
Rev Esc Enferm USP ; 57: e20230191, 2023.
Article in English, Portuguese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37930237

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of acupuncture and auriculotherapy protocol in relieving chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in cancer patients compared to the antiemetic protocol. METHOD: Pilot study of a pragmatic two-arm clinical trial: an acupuncture group received systemic acupuncture, auriculotherapy, and antiemetic protocol; a control group used antiemetic protocol. The sample consisted of 42 patients with cancer of the gastrointestinal system or multiple myeloma. The outcome was assessed using the Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting Assessment Tool and the patient's diary. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between groups according to the assessment of the patient's diary and the Assessment Tool of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. The patients were 60 years old on average and the groups were homogeneous, except for marital status. In the diary, there was no statistical difference between groups and sessions for days of nausea (p = 0.873) and vomiting episodes (p = 0.993). CONCLUSION: The protocol of acupuncture and auriculotherapy as a complementary treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting was ineffective, considering the limitations of the study.


Subject(s)
Acupuncture Therapy , Antiemetics , Antineoplastic Agents , Auriculotherapy , Neoplasms , Humans , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Vomiting/chemically induced , Vomiting/therapy , Nausea/chemically induced , Nausea/therapy , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects
19.
J Investig Med High Impact Case Rep ; 11: 23247096231201214, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37731269

ABSTRACT

Nausea and vomiting are cardinal symptoms affecting many patients with delayed or normal gastric emptying. The current therapies are very limited and less than optimal. Therefore, gastrointestinal symptoms persist despite using all the standard approaches for gastroparesis, functional dyspepsia, or unexplained nausea and vomiting. It is well established that gastric electrical stimulation (GES) is effective in reducing nausea and vomiting in gastroparesis, but there are essentially no data available that detail the efficacy of GES in symptomatic patients without gastroparesis. We present a unique case of a female patient diagnosed with functional dyspepsia, whose nausea and vomiting which were refractory to all standard therapies were successfully addressed with the implantation of a GES system.


Subject(s)
Dyspepsia , Electric Stimulation Therapy , Gastroparesis , Humans , Female , Gastric Emptying/physiology , Gastroparesis/therapy , Dyspepsia/therapy , Vomiting/etiology , Vomiting/therapy , Vomiting/diagnosis , Nausea/etiology , Nausea/therapy , Electric Stimulation
20.
J Vis Exp ; (198)2023 08 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37677019

ABSTRACT

Nausea and vomiting in pregnancy (NVP) are common symptoms that often complicate early pregnancy for many women. While clinical treatments such as fasting, fluid infusion, and nutritional support are conventionally applied to manage NVP, their effectiveness varies. However, traditional ear plaster therapy offers a promising alternative that effectively relieves symptoms and poses no known risk to the development of embryos or fetuses. This therapy is known for its ease of application, cost-effectiveness, and favorable outcomes. Previous studies have demonstrated the efficacy of combining ear plaster therapy with conventional treatments in alleviating symptoms of nausea and vomiting in pregnant women, surpassing the results achieved with conventional treatment alone. The protocol presented herein describes a method to relieve NVP using round, smooth, and hard cowherb seeds applied to specific ear points. These seeds are gently rubbed onto the surface of the ear, utilizing the principles of acupressure. By stimulating the designated ear points, this procedure aims to regulate the body's energy flow and restore balance, thereby reducing the severity and frequency of NVP. The application of cowherb seeds on specific ear points is a straightforward technique that healthcare professionals can easily implement or self-administered by pregnant women under appropriate guidance. Overall, ear plaster therapy presents a safe, effective, and economical approach for managing gestational vomiting, offering women a potential solution to alleviate their discomfort during pregnancy.


Subject(s)
Nausea , Vomiting , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Treatment Outcome , Vomiting/therapy , Nausea/therapy , Fasting , Fetus
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...