Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 13 de 13
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Eye Contact Lens ; 38(2): 93-101, 2012 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22297841

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a new multipurpose disinfecting solution (MPDS) containing a diblock copolymer, poly(oxyethylene)-poly(oxybutylene), designed to improve the wetting properties of silicone-hydrogel lenses. METHODS: This 90-day, randomized, concurrently controlled, double-masked, multisite study involved 573 subjects at 30 investigational sites in the United states. Existing lens wearers were randomly assigned to either regimen 1 (OPTI-FREE PureMoist, a newly developed formulation, Alcon Laboratories Inc., Fort Worth, TX) or regimen 2 (renu fresh, Bausch and Lomb Inc., Rochester, NY). At baseline, days 7, 30, 60, and 90, the subjects recorded subjective evaluations relating to lens acceptability and comfort, wearing time, and rewetting drop frequency, whereas investigators assessed slitlamp findings (including corneal fluorescein staining), lens deposits (modified Rudko), visual acuity, and adverse events. Group IV lenses were collected for ex vivo measurement of lysozyme deposits. RESULTS: Differences favoring regimen 1 were noted on day 90 for subjective evaluations of lens comfort (insertion, removal, overall); lens moisture and freshness; gentle on eye; clear vision; and lens handling (all P<0.004). Corneal fluorescein staining severity and area and lysozyme deposits (group IV lenses) were lower with regimen 1 (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This 90-day study shows that the new MPDS designed for silicone-hydrogel lenses is safe and effective when used by both silicone-hydrogel and traditional soft lens wearers. By improving comfort and decreasing lysozyme deposits and corneal fluorescein staining, the new MPDS enhances patients' wearing experience and helps maintain optimal lens performance.


Subject(s)
Contact Lens Solutions/therapeutic use , Contact Lenses, Hydrophilic , Hydrogel, Polyethylene Glycol Dimethacrylate , Silicone Elastomers , Wetting Agents/therapeutic use , Adult , Contact Lens Solutions/adverse effects , Cornea/drug effects , Cornea/pathology , Double-Blind Method , Dry Eye Syndromes/prevention & control , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Satisfaction , United States , Wetting Agents/adverse effects , Young Adult
3.
J Clin Dent ; 8(5): 145-9, 1997.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9487836

ABSTRACT

The objective of this 60-day single-blind, parallel trial, using 150 subjects, was to evaluate the effect of a 20% sodium bicarbonate dentifrice, a 1.5% hydrogen peroxide solution and a mouth moisturizer on oral tissues and microflora. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of five groups. The treatments were: 1) Sage dentifrice (sodium bicarbonate). Toothette Plus containing baking soda saturated with the hydrogen peroxide solution and use of a mouth moisturizer, 2) Crest dentifrice, Toothette Plus containing baking soda saturated with the hydrogen peroxide solution and use of a mouth moisturizer, 3) Crest dentifrice, Toothette Plus containing baking soda with a control solution and no mouth moisturizer, 4) Crest dentifrice, Toothette (without baking soda), saturated with a control solution and no mouth moisturizer, and 5) Crest dentifrice, Toothette saturated with 1.5% flavored H2O2 and no mouth moisturizer. From a subgroup of 35 patients (seven from each group) buccal smears for exfoliative cytology were taken as were supragingival microbiological samples from the mesial aspect of first molars (pooled). Buccal smears were evaluated for signs of histopathological changes. Microbiological samples from supra- and subgingival plaque for P. gingivalis, P. intermedia, A. actinomycetemcomitans. A viscosus, F. nucleatum, F. sanguis and C. albicans were evaluated. Clinical parameters measured were a stain index (SI), the modified gingival index (MGI), and a plaque index (PI). There were no adverse changes in the oral microflora and no anaplastic or other pathological changes in any subjects. Clinical parameters showed a statistically significant reduction in the MGI ranging from 26.7-29.9% with no significant differences among the groups (p > 0.05). The PI showed small reductions in all groups except group 2, but the differences were not statistically significant from each other or baseline (p > 0.05). The SI revealed slight increases in all groups and no differences among the groups. It can be concluded that use of Sage dentifrice, Toothette Plus saturated with Perox-A-Mint and Sage Mouth Moisturizer are safe to oral tissues. Using these components did not result in clinically noticeable stain formation, promote plaque formation, or produce any significant adverse changes in the oral microflora.


Subject(s)
Dentifrices/therapeutic use , Hydrogen Peroxide/therapeutic use , Mouthwashes/therapeutic use , Oral Health , Sodium Bicarbonate/therapeutic use , Wetting Agents/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Dental Plaque Index , Dentifrices/adverse effects , Humans , Hydrogen Peroxide/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Mouth/drug effects , Mouth/microbiology , Mouthwashes/adverse effects , Oral Hygiene/instrumentation , Periodontal Index , Single-Blind Method , Sodium Bicarbonate/adverse effects , Wetting Agents/adverse effects
5.
Am J Otolaryngol ; 16(1): 12-8, 1995.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7717466

ABSTRACT

Pharmacological agents with the most notable effects on voice exert their influences on the vocal tract through the autonomic nervous system. These agents do not have a profound effect on laryngeal function. Their effects are subtle, but they are important in certain groups of patients, such as professional voice users. It is essential to take a thorough history of medications being used, both by prescription and nonprescription, when evaluating patients with voice disorders. It is also important to keep in mind that idiosyncratic variations may occur in response to medications, and careful monitoring is essential when patients with voice disorders are under treatment. The importance of adequate water intake should be emphasized for general hydration and for vocal tract lubrication. Understanding the autonomic nervous system and how it is influenced by pharmacological agents makes evaluating the effect of medicines on the vocal tract simpler.


Subject(s)
Antihypertensive Agents/pharmacology , Antitussive Agents/pharmacology , Cholinergic Antagonists/pharmacology , Histamine H1 Antagonists/pharmacology , Hormones/pharmacology , Psychotropic Drugs/pharmacology , Sympathomimetics/pharmacology , Vitamins/pharmacology , Voice/drug effects , Wetting Agents/pharmacology , Antihypertensive Agents/adverse effects , Antitussive Agents/adverse effects , Cholinergic Antagonists/adverse effects , Gastroesophageal Reflux/drug therapy , Histamine H1 Antagonists/adverse effects , Hormones/adverse effects , Humans , Psychotropic Drugs/adverse effects , Sympathomimetics/adverse effects , Vitamins/adverse effects , Wetting Agents/adverse effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...