Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 1.383
Filter
1.
Am Surg ; 90(6): 1427-1433, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38520302

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The United States has one of the highest rates of gun violence and mass shootings. Timely medical attention in such events is critical. The objective of this study was to assess geographic disparities in mass shootings and access to trauma centers. METHODS: Data for all Level I and II trauma centers were extracted from the American College of Surgeons and the Trauma Center Association of America registries. Mass shooting event data (4+ individuals shot at a single event) were taken from the Gun Violence Archive between 2014 and 2018. RESULTS: A total of 564 trauma centers and 1672 mass shootings were included. Ratios of the number of mass shootings vs trauma centers per state ranged from 0 to 11.0 mass shootings per trauma center. States with the greatest disparity (highest ratio) included Louisiana and New Mexico. CONCLUSION: States in the southern regions of the US experience the greatest disparity due to a high burden of mass shootings with less access to trauma centers. Interventions are needed to increase access to trauma care and reduce mass shootings in these medically underserved areas.


Subject(s)
Health Services Accessibility , Mass Casualty Incidents , Trauma Centers , Wounds, Gunshot , Humans , United States , Trauma Centers/statistics & numerical data , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Wounds, Gunshot/epidemiology , Wounds, Gunshot/therapy , Mass Casualty Incidents/statistics & numerical data , Healthcare Disparities/statistics & numerical data , Gun Violence/statistics & numerical data , Registries , Mass Shooting Events
2.
Am Surg ; 90(6): 1365-1374, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38290493

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although firearms are implicated in the majority of law enforcement intervention (LEI)-related deaths, scientific research is lacking. The present study sought to characterize clinical and financial outcomes between injured suspects and other gunshot wound (GSW) patients. STUDY DESIGN: The 2016-2020 National Inpatient Sample was queried for patients ≥16 years old admitted following GSW. Patients were categorized as injured suspects (ISs) if they were injured in LEI and non-IS otherwise. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality with complications, hospitalization duration (LOS), and costs secondarily considered. Multivariable regression models were used to adjust for patient characteristics, injury burden using the Trauma Mortality Prediction Model (TMPM), and hospital factors. RESULTS: Of 143,125 hospitalizations, 1575 (1.10%) were IS. Compared to non-IS, ISs were less frequently Black (24.4% vs 54.3%) but had a higher proportion of psychiatric conditions (19.4% vs 6.4%) (P < .05). Although having a similar requirement for major operations and TMPM score, ISs more frequently underwent thoracic (11.4% vs 4.1%) and gastrointestinal operations (33.0% vs 25.7%) (P < .05). After adjustment, IS was associated with similar odds of mortality but was associated with greater odds of cardiac complications, respiratory failure, and need for intensive care. While LOS was similar, IS was associated with greater costs (ß: +$14,300, 95% CI: 6,200-22,400). CONCLUSIONS: Suspects injured during law enforcement intervention have similar in-hospital mortality but greater complication rates and costs. Through the quantification of the clinical and financial burden of IS, our findings may help inform further policy discussions regarding use of potentially lethal force in law enforcement intervention.


Subject(s)
Hospital Mortality , Hospitalization , Law Enforcement , Wounds, Gunshot , Humans , Wounds, Gunshot/mortality , Wounds, Gunshot/economics , Wounds, Gunshot/therapy , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Hospitalization/economics , United States/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult , Aged , Adolescent
3.
Prehosp Emerg Care ; 28(3): 438-447, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37578901

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Prehospital traumatic cardiac arrest (TCA) is associated with a poor prognosis and requires urgent interventions to address its potentially reversible causes. Resuscitative efforts of TCA in the prehospital setting may entail significant resource allocation and impose added tolls on caregivers. The Israel Defense Forces Medical Corps (IDF-MC) instructs clinicians to perform a set protocol in the case of TCA, providing prompt oxygenation, chest decompression and volume resuscitation. This study investigates the settings, interventions, and outcomes of TCA resuscitation by IDF-MC teams over 25 years in both combat and civilian settings. METHODS: Retrospective study of the IDF-MC Trauma Registry between 1997-2022. Search criteria were applied to identify cases where the TCA protocol was initiated. A manual review of cases matching the search criteria was performed by two curators to determine the indications, interventions, and outcomes of casualties with prehospital TCA. Patients for whom interventions were performed outside of the TCA protocol, such as with measurable vital signs, were excluded. The primary outcome was survival to hospital admission, with the secondary outcome being return of vital signs in the prehospital setting. RESULTS: Following case review, 149 patients with prehospital TCA were included, with a median age of 21 (interquartile range 19-27). Eighty-four (56.4%) presented with TCA in military or combat settings, with gunshot wounds and blast injuries being the most common mechanisms in this group. For 56 casualties (37.8%), all components of the protocol were performed (oxygenation, chest decompression, and volume resuscitation). Five (3.4%) casualties had return of vital signs in the prehospital setting, but none survived to hospital admission. CONCLUSION: The prognosis of prehospital TCA is poor, and efforts to address its potentially reversible causes may often be futile. These notions may be further emphasized in military settings, where resources are limited, and extensive penetrating injuries are more common.


Subject(s)
Emergency Medical Services , Heart Arrest , Wounds, Gunshot , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Israel , Wounds, Gunshot/complications , Wounds, Gunshot/therapy , Emergency Medical Services/methods , Registries
4.
Neurosurgery ; 94(2): 229-239, 2024 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37878414

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Firearm-related traumatic brain injury (TBI) has emerged as a significant public health issue in the United States, coinciding with a rapid increase in gun-related deaths. This scoping review aims to update our understanding of firearm-related TBI in adult populations. METHODS: A comprehensive search of 6 online databases yielded 22 studies that met the inclusion criteria. The reviewed studies predominantly focused on young adult men who were victims of assault, although other vulnerable populations were also affected. RESULTS: Key factors in evaluating patients with firearm-related TBI included low Glasgow Coma Scale scores, central nervous system involvement, hypotension, and coagulopathies at presentation. Poor outcomes in firearm-related TBIs were influenced by various factors, including the location and trajectory of the gunshot wound, hypercoagulability, hemodynamic instability, insurance status, and specific clinical findings at hospital admission. CONCLUSION: Proposed interventions aimed to reduce the incidence and mortality of penetrating TBIs, including medical interventions such as coagulopathy reversal and changes to prehospital stabilization procedures. However, further research is needed to demonstrate the effectiveness of these interventions. The findings of this scoping review hope to inform future policy research, advocacy efforts, and the training of neurosurgeons and other treating clinicians in the management of firearm-related TBI.


Subject(s)
Brain Injuries, Traumatic , Firearms , Wounds, Gunshot , Male , Young Adult , Humans , United States , Wounds, Gunshot/epidemiology , Wounds, Gunshot/therapy , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/epidemiology , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/therapy , Glasgow Coma Scale , Hospitalization
5.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 100: 208-214, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37914070

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Traumatic vascular injuries of the lower extremity in the pediatric population are uncommon but can result in significant morbidity. The objective of this study is to demonstrate our experience with these injuries by describing patterns of traumatic vascular injury, the initial management, and data regarding early outcomes. METHODS: In total, 506 patients presented with lower extremity vascular injury between January 1, 2009 and January 1, 2021 to Grady Memorial Hospital, an urban, adult Level I trauma center in Atlanta, Georgia. Thirty-two of the 506 patients were aged less than 18 years and were evaluated for a total of 47 lower extremity vascular injuries. To fully elucidate the injury patterns and clinical course in this population, we examined patient demographics, mechanism of injury, type of vessel injured, surgical repair performed, and early outcomes and complications. RESULTS: The median (interquartile range) age was 16 (2) years (range, 3-17 years), and the majority were male (n = 29, 90.6%). Of the vascular injuries identified, 28 were arterial and 19 were venous. Of these injuries, 14 patients had combined arterial-venous injuries. The majority of injuries were the result of a penetrating injury (n = 28, 87.5%), and of these, all but 2 were attributed to gunshot wounds. Twenty-seven vascular interventions were performed by nonpediatric surgeons: 11 by trauma surgeons, 13 by vascular surgeons, 2 by orthopedic surgeons, and 1 by an interventional radiologist. Two patients required amputation: 1 during the index admission and 1 delayed at 3 months. Overall survival was 96.9%. CONCLUSIONS: Vascular injuries as the result of trauma at any age often require early intervention, and we believe that these injuries in the pediatric population can be safely managed in adult trauma centers with a multidisciplinary team composed of trauma, vascular, and orthopedic surgeons with the potential to decrease associated morbidity and mortality from these injuries.


Subject(s)
Vascular System Injuries , Wounds, Gunshot , Adult , Humans , Child , Male , Female , Child, Preschool , Adolescent , Vascular System Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Vascular System Injuries/surgery , Trauma Centers , Vascular Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Wounds, Gunshot/therapy , Wounds, Gunshot/complications , Treatment Outcome , Lower Extremity/blood supply , Retrospective Studies
6.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 96(4): 589-595, 2024 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37994476

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Gunshot wounds (GSWs) remain a significant source of mortality in the United States. Timely delivery of trauma care is known to be critical for survival. We sought to understand the relationship of predicted transport time and death after GSW. Given large racial disparities in firearm violence, we also sought to understand disparities in transport times and death by victim race, an unstudied phenomenon. METHODS: Firearm mortality data were obtained from the Boston Police Department 2005 to 2023. Firearm incidents were mapped using ArcGIS. Predicted transport times for each incident to the closest trauma center were calculated in ArcGIS. Spatial autoregressive models were used to understand the relationship between victim race, transport time to a trauma center, and mortality associated with the shooting incidents. RESULTS: There were 4,545 shooting victims with 758 deaths. Among those who lived, the median transport time was 9.4 minutes (interquartile range, 5.8-13.8) and 10.5 minutes (interquartile range, 6.4-14.6; p = 0.003) for those who died. In the multivariable logistic regression, increased transport time to the nearest trauma center (odds ratio, 1.024; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.04) and age (odds ratio, 1.016; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.02) were associated with mortality. There was a modest difference in median transport time to the nearest trauma center by race with non-Hispanic Black at 10.1 minutes, Black Hispanic 9.2 minutes, White Hispanic 8.5 minutes, and non-Hispanic White 8.3 minutes ( p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our results highlight the relationship of transport time to a trauma center and death after a GSW. Non-White individuals had significantly longer transport times to a trauma center and predicted mortality would have been lower with White victim transport times. These data underscore the importance of timely trauma care for GSW victims and can be used to direct more equitable trauma systems. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic/Epidemiological; Level III.


Subject(s)
Firearms , Wounds, Gunshot , Humans , United States/epidemiology , Wounds, Gunshot/therapy , Violence , Trauma Centers , Ethnicity , Retrospective Studies
7.
Pediatrics ; 153(1)2024 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38098435

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Despite the high incidence of firearm injuries, little is known about health care utilization after nonfatal childhood firearm injuries. This study aimed to describe health care utilization and costs after a nonfatal firearm injury among Medicaid and commercially insured youth using a propensity score matched analysis. METHODS: We conducted a propensity score matched cohort analysis using 2015 to 2018 Medicaid and Commercial Marketscan data comparing utilization in the 12-months post firearm injury for youth aged 0 to 17. We matched youth with a nonfatal firearm injury 1:1 to comparison noninjured youth on demographic and preindex variables. Outcomes included inpatient hospitalizations, emergency department (ED) visits, and outpatient visits as well as health care costs. Following propensity score matching, regression models estimated relative risks of the health care utilization outcomes, adjusting for demographic and clinical covariates. RESULTS: We identified 2110 youth with nonfatal firearm injury. Compared with matched noninjured youth, firearm injured youth had a 5.31-fold increased risk of inpatient hospitalization (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.93-7.20), 1.49-fold increased risk of ED visit (95% CI 1.37-1.62), and 1.06-fold increased risk of outpatient visit (95% CI 1.03-1.10) 12-months postinjury. Adjusted 12-month postindex costs were $7581 (95% CI $7581-$8092) for injured youth compared with $1990 (95% CI $1862-2127) for comparison noninjured youth. CONCLUSIONS: Youth who suffer nonfatal firearm injury have a significantly increased risk of hospitalizations, ED visits, outpatient visits, and costs in the 12 months after injury when compared with matched youth. Applied to the 11 258 US youth with nonfatal firearm injuries in 2020, estimates represent potential population health care savings of $62.9 million.


Subject(s)
Firearms , Wounds, Gunshot , Adolescent , United States/epidemiology , Humans , Child , Wounds, Gunshot/epidemiology , Wounds, Gunshot/therapy , Health Care Costs , Hospitalization , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Emergency Service, Hospital
8.
J Spec Oper Med ; 23(4): 81-86, 2023 Dec 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38064650

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hemorrhagic shock requires timely administration of blood products and resuscitative adjuncts through multiple access sites. Intraosseous (IO) devices offer an alternative to intravenous (IV) access as recommended by the massive hemorrhage, A-airway, R-respiratory, C-circulation, and H-hypothermia (MARCH) algorithm of Tactical Combat Casualty Care (TCCC). However, venous injuries proximal to the site of IO access may complicate resuscitative attempts. Sternal IO access represents an alternative pioneered by military personnel. However, its effectiveness in patients with shock is supported by limited evidence. We conducted a pilot study of two sternal-IO devices to investigate the efficacy of sternal-IO access in civilian trauma care. METHODS: A retrospective review (October 2020 to June 2021) involving injured patients receiving either a TALON® or a FAST1® sternal-IO device was performed at a large urban quaternary academic medical center. Baseline demographics, injury characteristics, vascular access sites, blood products and medications administered, and outcomes were analyzed. The primary outcome was a successful sternal-IO attempt. RESULTS: Nine males with gunshot wounds transported to the hospital by police were included in this study. Eight patients were pulseless on arrival, and one became pulseless shortly thereafter. Seven (78%) sternal-IO placements were successful, including six TALON devices and one of the three FAST1 devices, as FAST1 placement required attention to Operator positioning following resuscitative thoracotomy. Three patients achieved return of spontaneous circulation, two proceeded to the operating room, but none survived to discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Sternal-IO access was successful in nearly 80% of attempts. The indications for sternal-IO placement among civilians require further evaluation compared with IV and extremity IO access.


Subject(s)
Emergency Medical Services , Shock, Hemorrhagic , Wounds, Gunshot , Male , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Pilot Projects , Wounds, Gunshot/therapy , Shock, Hemorrhagic/etiology , Shock, Hemorrhagic/therapy , Infusions, Intraosseous
9.
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med ; 31(1): 45, 2023 Sep 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37684674

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Sweden is facing a surge of gun violence that mandates optimized prehospital transport approaches, and a survey of current practice is fundamental for such optimization. Management of severe, penetrating trauma is time sensitive, and there may be a survival benefit in limiting prehospital interventions. An important aspect is unregulated transportation by police or private vehicles to the hospital, which may decrease time but may also be associated with adverse outcomes. It is not known whether transport of patients with penetrating trauma occurs outside the emergency medical services (EMS) in Sweden and whether it affects outcome. METHOD: This was a retrospective, descriptive nationwide study of all patients with penetrating trauma and injury severity scores (ISSs) ≥ 15 registered in the Swedish national trauma registry (SweTrau) between June 13, 2011, and December 31, 2019. We hypothesized that transport by police and private vehicles occurred and that it affected mortality. RESULT: A total of 657 patients were included. EMS transported 612 patients (93.2%), police 10 patients (1.5%), and private vehicles 27 patients (4.1%). Gunshot wounds (GSWs) were more common in police transport, 80% (n = 8), compared with private vehicles, 59% (n = 16), and EMS, 32% (n = 198). The Glasgow coma scale score (GCS) in the emergency department (ED) was lower for patients transported by police, 11.5 (interquartile range [IQR] 3, 15), in relation to EMS, 15 (IQR 14, 15) and private vehicles 15 (IQR 12.5, 15). The 30-day mortality for EMS was 30% (n = 184), 50% (n = 5) for police transport, and 22% (n = 6) for private vehicles. Transport by private vehicle, odds ratio (OR) 0.65, (confidence interval [CI] 0.24, 1.55, p = 0.4) and police OR 2.28 (CI 0.63, 8.3, p = 0.2) were not associated with increased mortality in relation to EMS. CONCLUSION: Non-EMS transports did occur, however with a low incidence and did not affect mortality. GSWs were more common in police transport, and victims had lower GCS scorescores when arriving at the ED, which warrants further investigations of the operational management of shooting victims in Sweden.


Subject(s)
Emergency Medical Services , Wounds, Gunshot , Wounds, Penetrating , Humans , Wounds, Gunshot/epidemiology , Wounds, Gunshot/therapy , Sweden/epidemiology , Police , Retrospective Studies
10.
World J Surg ; 47(11): 2635-2643, 2023 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37530783

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Combat-related gunshot wounds (GSW) may differ from those found in civilian trauma centers. Missile velocity, resources, logistics, and body armor may affect injury patterns and management strategies. This study compares injury patterns, management, and outcomes in isolated abdominal GSW between military (MIL) and civilian (CIV) populations. METHODS: The Department of Defense Trauma Registry (DoDTR) and TQIP databases were queried for patients with isolated abdominal GSW from 2013 to 2016. MIL patients were propensity score matched 1:3 based on age, sex, and extraabdominal AIS. Injury patterns and in-hospital outcomes were compared. Initial operative management strategies, including selective nonoperative management (SNOM) for isolated solid organ injuries, were also compared. RESULTS: Of the 6435 patients with isolated abdominal GSW, 183 (3%) MIL were identified and matched with 549 CIV patients. The MIL group had more hollow viscus injuries (84% vs. 66%) while the CIV group had more vascular injuries (10% vs. 21%) (p < .05 for both). Operative strategy differed, with more MIL patients undergoing exploratory laparotomy (95% vs. 82%) and colectomy (72% vs. 52%) (p < .05 for both). However, no difference in ostomy creation was appreciated. More SNOM for isolated solid organ injuries was performed in the CIV group (34.1% vs. 12.5%; p < 0.05). In-hospital outcomes, including mortality, were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: MIL abdominal GSW lead to higher rates of hollow viscus injuries compared to CIV GSW. MIL GSW are more frequently treated with resection but with similar ostomy creation compared to civilian GSW. SNOM of solid organ injuries is infrequently performed following MIL GSW.


Subject(s)
Abdominal Injuries , Military Personnel , Trauma Centers , Wounds, Gunshot , Humans , Abdominal Injuries/diagnosis , Abdominal Injuries/surgery , Abdominal Injuries/therapy , Injury Severity Score , Military Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Trauma Centers/statistics & numerical data , Wounds, Gunshot/diagnosis , Wounds, Gunshot/epidemiology , Wounds, Gunshot/surgery , Wounds, Gunshot/therapy , Registries/statistics & numerical data , Databases, Factual/statistics & numerical data , United States/epidemiology , United States Department of Defense/statistics & numerical data , Quality Improvement/statistics & numerical data , Military Medicine/statistics & numerical data
11.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 81(11): 1383-1390, 2023 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37572693

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In firearm injuries (FI), rapid transportation is important for survival. Information regarding different methods of transportation for head and neck FI is limited. PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to measure the association between method of transportation and the need for tracheostomy and/or intensive care unit (ICU). STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, SAMPLE: This retrospective cross-sectional study reviewed patients in Trauma Registry at Grady Memorial Hospital (GMH) in Atlanta, Georgia, from January 2016 to June 2021. Patients ≥18 years old who sustained FI to the head and neck and were transported via ground emergency medical services (GEMS) or helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) were included. Patients who arrived at the hospital by foot, private vehicle, or transported from a different hospital were excluded. PREDICTOR/EXPOSURE/INDEPENDENT VARIABLE: The primary predictor variable was method of transportation (GEMS: ambulance transportation to GMH vs HEMS: helicopter transportation to GMH helipad). MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLE(S): The primary outcome variables were tracheostomy (yes/no) and ICU admission (yes/no). COVARIATES: Patient, injury, and hospital-related covariates were collected. ANALYSES: Univariate analysis, χ2 test for categorical variables, and independent t test for continuous variables were calculated. Statistical significance was P < .05. RESULTS: Of total, 609 patients met the inclusion criteria. There were 560 patients (483 males) with a mean age of 33.6 years old (range, 18 to 90) transported by GEMS. There were 49 patients (40 males) with a mean age of 44 years old (range, 18 to 82) transported by HEMS. Patients transported by HEMS were statistically more likely to have longer transportation time in minutes [13.2 (range, 5 to 132) versus 24.2 (range, 9 to 46), P= <.001], lower Glasgow Coma Scale score [9.9 (range, 3 to 15) versus 6.3 (range, 3 to 15); P= <.001], higher Injury Severity Score [19.3 (range, 3.7 to 98) versus 24.2 (range, 10.3 to 98); P = .007], require transfusion [195 (34.8%); versus 26 (53.1%); P = .013], tracheostomy [46(8.2%) versus 13 (26.5%); P = <.001], and/or admitted to ICU [169, 30.2% versus 24 (49%); P = .007]. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: HEMS was positively associated with more tracheostomy and/or ICU admission. Additionally, patients transported by HEMS experienced longer transportation time and severe injuries. HEMS triage criteria specific for FI to the head and neck should be developed.


Subject(s)
Air Ambulances , Emergency Medical Services , Firearms , Wounds and Injuries , Wounds, Gunshot , Male , Humans , Adult , Adolescent , Transportation of Patients/methods , Retrospective Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Wounds, Gunshot/therapy , Emergency Medical Services/methods , Injury Severity Score
12.
World Neurosurg ; 178: 101-113, 2023 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37479026

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Gunshot wounds to the head (GSWH) are a cause of severe penetrating traumatic brain injury (TBI). Although multimodal neuromonitoring has been increasingly used in blunt pediatric TBI, its role in the pediatric population with GSWH is not known. We report on 3 patients who received multimodal neuromonitoring as part of clinical management at our institution and review the existing literature on pediatric GSWH. METHODS: We identified 3 patients ≤18 years of age who were admitted to a quaternary children's hospital from 2005 to 2021 with GSWH and received invasive intracranial pressure (ICP) and Pbto2 (brain tissue oxygenation) monitoring with or without noninvasive near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS). We analyzed clinical and demographic characteristics, imaging findings, and ICP, Pbto2, cerebral perfusion pressure, and rSo2 (regional cerebral oxygen saturation) NIRS trends. RESULTS: All patients were male with an average admission Glasgow Coma Scale score of 4. One patient received additional NIRS monitoring. Episodes of intracranial hypertension (ICP ≥20 mm Hg) and brain tissue hypoxia (Pbto2 <15 mm Hg) or hyperemia (Pbto2 >35 mm Hg) frequently occurred independently of each other, requiring unique targeted treatments. rSo2 did not consistently mirror Pbto2. All children survived, with favorable Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended score at 6 months after injury. CONCLUSIONS: Use of ICP and Pbto2 multimodality neuromonitoring enabled specific management for intracranial hypertension or brain tissue hypoxia episodes that occurred independently of one another. Multimodality neuromonitoring has not been studied extensively in pediatric GSWH; however, its use may provide a more complete picture of patient injury and prognosis without significant added procedural risk.


Subject(s)
Brain Injuries, Traumatic , Head Injuries, Penetrating , Hypoxia, Brain , Intracranial Hypertension , Wounds, Gunshot , Humans , Child , Male , Female , Oxygen , Wounds, Gunshot/diagnostic imaging , Wounds, Gunshot/therapy , Intracranial Pressure , Brain/diagnostic imaging , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/diagnostic imaging , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/therapy , Intracranial Hypertension/diagnosis , Intracranial Hypertension/etiology , Intracranial Hypertension/therapy , Head Injuries, Penetrating/diagnostic imaging , Head Injuries, Penetrating/therapy
13.
Adv Pediatr ; 70(1): 17-44, 2023 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37422294

ABSTRACT

The SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic and implementation of stay-at-home orders led to changes in the daily lives of children. Subsequently, there have been reports of increases in pediatric violent traumatic injuries. This review summarizes the existing literature regarding pediatric violent injury temporally related to the COVID-19 pandemic, including demographic, injury, and hospital characteristics in addition to associated factors. Key findings include an increase in fatal and nonfatal firearm injuries, particularly in minority and socioeconomically disadvantaged populations. However, more comprehensive and long-term data are needed specific to pediatric violent injuries to fully understand how the COVID-19 pandemic impacted trends.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Firearms , Suicide , Wounds, Gunshot , Child , Humans , Homicide , Pandemics , Cause of Death , Violence , Wounds, Gunshot/epidemiology , Wounds, Gunshot/therapy , COVID-19/epidemiology , Population Surveillance , SARS-CoV-2
14.
Pediatrics ; 152(1)2023 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37271760

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To examine how timing of the first outpatient mental health (MH) visit after a pediatric firearm injury varies by sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. METHODS: We retrospectively studied children aged 5 to 17 years with a nonfatal firearm injury from 2010 to 2018 using the IBM Watson MarketScan Medicaid database. Logistic regression estimated the odds of MH service use in the 6 months after injury, adjusted for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. Cox proportional hazard models, stratified by previous MH service use, evaluated variation in timing of the first outpatient MH visit by sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: After a firearm injury, 958 of 2613 (36.7%) children used MH services within 6 months; of these, 378 of 958 (39.5%) had no previous MH service use. The adjusted odds of MH service use after injury were higher among children with previous MH service use (adjusted odds ratio, 10.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 8.45-12.82) and among non-Hispanic white compared with non-Hispanic Black children (adjusted odds ratio, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.02-1.63). The first outpatient MH visit after injury occurred sooner among children with previous MH service use (adjusted hazard ratio, 6.32; 95% CI, 5.45-7.32). For children without previous MH service use, the first MH outpatient visit occurred sooner among children with an MH diagnosis made during the injury encounter (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.72; 95% CI, 2.04-3.65). CONCLUSIONS: More than 3 in 5 children do not receive MH services after firearm injury. Previous engagement with MH services and new detection of MH diagnoses during firearm injury encounters may facilitate timelier connection to MH services after injury.


Subject(s)
Firearms , Mental Health Services , Wounds, Gunshot , United States/epidemiology , Humans , Child , Retrospective Studies , Wounds, Gunshot/epidemiology , Wounds, Gunshot/therapy , Mental Health
15.
JAMA Health Forum ; 4(6): e232201, 2023 06 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37261834

ABSTRACT

This JAMA Forum discusses policies that reduce access to guns, reengineering to improve firearm safety, and hyperlocal community-led responses in marginalized communities.


Subject(s)
Firearms , Wounds, Gunshot , Humans , Wounds, Gunshot/epidemiology , Wounds, Gunshot/therapy , Public Health
16.
Injury ; 54(7): 110763, 2023 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37183087

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION AND DEFINITIONS: Civilian gunshot violence is a growing public health issue on a global scale. Treatment of patients with gunshot injuries is based on algorithms derived from military studies, but the distinct differences in weaponry, energy of injury, timing and type of care, and environment translate to a gap in knowledge. With a focus on non-accidental gunshot trauma and excluding suicide etiologies, we propose to build a collaborative research group to address important questions focused on best practices for gunshot injury patients. PRE-HOSPITAL CARE: There are important differences in the care of gunshot victims across the globe; some countries provide advanced interventions in the field and others deliver basic support until transport to a higher level of care in hospital. Some simple interventions include the use of extremity tourniquets and intravenous fluid support; others to consider are tranexamic acid, whole blood, and hemostatic agents. ACUTE TREATMENT: Control of exsanguinating hemorrhage is a key priority for gunshot injuries. Military doctrine has evolved to prioritize exsanguination over airway or breathing as the critical first step. The X-ABC protocol focuses on exsanguinating hemorrhage, then standard evaluation of Airway, Breathing and Circulation (ABCs) to enhance survival in trauma patients. The timing of bony stabilization, in terms of damage-control vs definitive care, needs further study in this population, as does use of antibiotics for bony extremity injuries. Finally, recognition of the mental health effects of gun trauma, including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety disorders, substance abuse and depression is important in advocating for prevention such as implementation of social support and specific interventions. DEFINITIVE CARE: The need for abdominal closure after exploratory laparotomy, definitive fracture treatment, and other treatment all contribute to length of stay for gunshot injured patients. Optimizing stabilization allows earlier mobilization and decreases nosocomial complications. Nerve injuries are often a source of long-term disability and their evaluation and treatment require further investigation. RESOURCES AND ETHICS: There are growing numbers of mass-casualty gunshot events, which require consideration of how to organize and use resources for treatment, including staff, operating room access, blood products, and order of treatment. Drills and planning for incident command hierarchy and communication are key to optimizing resource utilization. The ethics of choosing treatment priorities and resources are important considerations as well.


Subject(s)
Fractures, Bone , Gun Violence , Wounds, Gunshot , Humans , Exsanguination , Wounds, Gunshot/epidemiology , Wounds, Gunshot/therapy , Wounds, Gunshot/complications , Fractures, Bone/complications , Violence
17.
Surgery ; 174(2): 356-362, 2023 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37211510

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Community-level factors can profoundly impact children's health, including the risk of violent injury. This study's objective was to understand the relationship between the Childhood Opportunity Index and pediatric firearm injury owing to interpersonal violence compared with a motor vehicle crash. METHODS: All pediatric patients (<18 years) who presented with an initial encounter with a firearm injury or motor vehicle crash between 2016 to 2021 were identified from 35 children's hospitals included in the Pediatric Health Information System database. The child-specific community-level vulnerability was determined by the Childhood Opportunity Index, a composite score of neighborhood opportunity level data specific to pediatric populations. RESULTS: We identified 67,407 patients treated for injuries related to motor vehicle crashes (n = 61,527) or firearms (n = 5,880). The overall cohort had a mean age of 9.3 (standard deviation 5.4) years; 50.0% were male patients, 44.0% non-Hispanic Black, and were 60.8% publicly insured. Compared with motor vehicle crash injuries, patients with firearm-related injuries were older (12.2 vs 9.0 years), more likely to be male patients (77.7% vs 47.4%), non-Hispanic Black (63.5% vs 42.1%), and had public insurance (76.4 vs 59.3%; all P < .001). In multivariable analysis, children living in communities with lower Childhood Opportunity Index levels were more likely to present with firearm injury than those living in communities with a very high Childhood Opportunity Index. The odds increased as the Childhood Opportunity Index level decreased (odds ratio 1.33, 1.60, 1.73, 2.00 for high, moderate, low, and very low Childhood Opportunity Index, respectively; all P ≤ .001). CONCLUSION: Children from lower-Childhood Opportunity Index communities are disproportionately impacted by firearm violence, and these findings have important implications for both clinical care and public health policy.


Subject(s)
Firearms , Wounds, Gunshot , Child , Humans , Male , Female , Accidents, Traffic , Wounds, Gunshot/epidemiology , Wounds, Gunshot/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Hospitalization , Motor Vehicles
18.
Prehosp Disaster Med ; 38(2): 168-173, 2023 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36872570

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: After officer-involved shootings (OIS), rapid delivery of emergency medical care is critical but may be delayed due to scene safety concerns. The purpose of this study was to describe medical care rendered by law enforcement officers (LEOs) after lethal force incidents. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of open-source video footage of OIS occurring from February 15, 2013 through December 31, 2020. Frequency and nature of care provided, time until LEO and Emergency Medical Services (EMS) care, and mortality outcomes were evaluated. The study was deemed exempt by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board. RESULTS: Three hundred forty-two (342) videos were included in the final analysis; LEOs rendered care in 172 (50.3%) incidents. Average elapsed time from time-of-injury (TOI) to LEO-provided care was 155.8 (SD = 198.8) seconds. Hemorrhage control was the most common intervention performed. An average of 214.2 seconds elapsed between LEO care and EMS arrival. No mortality difference was identified between LEO versus EMS care (P = .1631). Subjects with truncal wounds were more likely to die than those with extremity wounds (P < .00001). CONCLUSIONS: It was found that LEOs rendered medical care in one-half of all OIS incidents, initiating care on average 3.5 minutes prior to EMS arrival. Although no significant mortality difference was noted for LEO versus EMS care, this finding must be interpreted cautiously, as specific interventions, such as extremity hemorrhage control, may have impacted select patients. Future studies are needed to determine optimal LEO care for these patients.


Subject(s)
First Aid , Police , Wounds, Gunshot , Wounds, Gunshot/therapy , Humans , Retrospective Studies
19.
Prehosp Emerg Care ; 27(5): 618-622, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36975606

ABSTRACT

Prehospital blood administration programs have demonstrated success both on the battlefield and throughout civilian emergency medical services programs. While previous research often discusses the use of prehospital blood administration for adult trauma and medical patients, few studies have reported the benefits of prehospital blood administration for pediatric patients. This case report describes treatment received by a 7-year-old female gunshot victim who was successfully treated by a prehospital blood administration program in the southern United States.


Subject(s)
Emergency Medical Services , Wounds, Gunshot , Adult , Female , Humans , Child , United States , Pain Management , Wounds, Gunshot/therapy , Retrospective Studies
20.
West J Emerg Med ; 24(2): 363-367, 2023 Feb 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36976600

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: There are more than 80,000 emergency department (ED) visits for non-fatal bullet-related injuries (BRI) per year in the United States. Approximately half of these patients are discharged home from the ED. Our objective in this study was to characterize the discharge instructions, prescriptions, and follow-up plans provided to patients discharged from the ED after BRI. METHODS: This was a single-center, cross-sectional study of the first 100 consecutive patients who presented to an urban, academic, Level I trauma center ED with an acute BRI beginning on January 1, 2020. We queried the electronic health record for patient demographics, insurance status, cause of injury, hospital arrival and discharge timestamps, discharge prescriptions, and documented instructions regarding wound care, pain management, and follow-up plans. We analyzed data using descriptive statistics and chi-square tests. RESULTS: During the study period, 100 patients presented to the ED with an acute firearm injury. Patients were predominantly young (median age 29, interquartile range 23-38 years), male (86%), Black (85%), non-Hispanic (98%), and uninsured (70%). We found that 12% of patients did not receive any type of written wound care instruction, while 37% received discharge paperwork that included instructions to take both an NSAID and acetaminophen. Fifty-one percent of patients received an opioid prescription, with a range from 3-42 tablets (median 10 tablets). The proportion of patients receiving an opioid prescription was significantly higher among White patients (77%) than among Black patients (47%). CONCLUSION: There is variability in prescriptions and instructions provided to survivors of bullet injuries upon ED discharge at our institution. Our data indicates that standardized discharge protocols could improve quality of care and equity in the treatment of patients who have survived a BRI. Current variable quality in discharge planning is an entry point for structural racism and disparity.


Subject(s)
Firearms , Wounds, Gunshot , Humans , Male , United States , Young Adult , Adult , Patient Discharge , Analgesics, Opioid , Cross-Sectional Studies , Wounds, Gunshot/therapy , Emergency Service, Hospital , Prescriptions
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...