Lactic acid levels are associated with morbidity, length of stay, and total treatment costs in urban trauma patients with lower extremity long bone fractures.

INTRODUCTION: Lactic acid is well studied in the trauma population and is frequently used as a laboratory indicator that correlates with resuscitation status and has thus been associated with patient outcomes. There is limited literature that assesses the association of initial lactic acid with post-operative morbidity and hospitalization costs in the orthopedic literature. The purpose of this study was to assess the association of lactic acid levels and alcohol levels post-operative morbidity, length of stay and admission costs in a cohort of operative lower extremity long bone fractures, and to compare these effects in the ballistic and blunt trauma sub-population. METHODS: Patients presenting as trauma activations who underwent tibial and/or femoral fixation at a single institution from May 2018 to August 2020 were divided based on initial lactate level into normal, (< 2.5) intermediate (2.5-4.0), and high (> 4.0). Mechanism of trauma (blunt vs. ballistic) was also stratified for analysis. Data on other injuries, surgical timing, level of care, direct hospitalization costs, length of stay, and discharge disposition were collected from the electronic medical record. The primary outcome assessed was post-operative morbidity defined as in-hospital mortality or unanticipated escalation of care. Secondary outcomes included hospital costs, lengths of stay, and discharge disposition. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and multivariate regression. RESULTS: A total of 401 patients met inclusions criteria. Average age was 34.1 ± 13.0 years old, with patients remaining hospitalized for 8.8 ± 9.5 days, and 35.2% requiring ICU care during their hospitalization. Patients in the ballistic cohort were younger, had fewer other injuries and had higher lactate levels (4.0 ± 2.4) than in the blunt trauma cohort (3.4 ± 1.9) (p = 0.004). On multivariate regression, higher lactate was associated with post-operative morbidity (p = 0.015), as was age (p < 0.001) and BMI (p = 0.033). ISS, ballistic versus blunt injury mechanism, and other included laboratory markers were not. Lactate was also associated with longer lengths of stay, and higher associated direct hospitalization cost (p < 0.001) and lower rates of home disposition (p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: High initial lactate levels are independently associated with post-operative morbidity as well as higher direct hospitalization costs and longer lengths of stay in orthopedic trauma patients who underwent fixation for fractures of the lower extremity long bones. Ballistic trauma patients had significantly higher lactate levels compared to the blunt cohort, and lactate was not independently associated with increased rates of post-operative morbidity in the ballistic cohort alone. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Penetrating Spinal Cord Injury in civilians: analysis of a national database.

BACKGROUND: Spinal trauma is common in polytrauma; spinal cord injury (SCI) is present in a subset of these patients. Penetrating SCI has been studied in the military; however, civilian SCI is less studied. Civilian injury pathophysiology varies given the generally lower velocity of the projectiles. We sought to investigate civilian penetrating SCI in the United States. METHODS: We queried the National Inpatient Sample for data regarding penetrating spinal cord injury from the past 10 years (2006-2015). The National Inpatient Sample includes data of 20% of discharged patients from U.S. hospitals. We analyzed trends of penetrating SCI regarding its diagnosis, demographics, surgical management, length of stay, and hospital costs. RESULTS: In the past 10 years the incidence of penetrating SCI in all SCI patients has remained stable with a mean of 5.5% (range 4.3%-6.6%). Of the patients with penetrating SCI, only 17% of them underwent a surgical procedure, compared with 55% for nonpenetrating SCI. Patients with penetrating SCI had a longer length of stay (average 23 days) compared with nonpenetrating SCI (15 days). Hospital charges were higher for penetrating SCI: $230,186 compared with $192,022 for closed SCI. Males patients were more affected by penetrating SCI, as well as black and Hispanic populations compared with whites. CONCLUSIONS: Penetrating SCI represents 5.5% of all SCI patients. Men, blacks, and Hispanics are disproportionally more affected by penetrating SCI. Patients with penetrating SCI have fewer surgical interventions, but their overall length of stay and hospital costs are greater compared with nonpenetrating SCI.

Does Abdominal Seat Belt Sign Warrant Admission After a Negative CT Scan? A Cost-Utility Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Rapid deceleration against a seat belt during a motor vehicle collision (MVC) may result in an abdominal seat belt sign (ASBS), which is associated with a higher risk of hollow viscus injury (HVI). After a negative abdominal CT scan, management of patients with ASBS is variable, but recent evidence suggests emergency department (ED) discharge may be safe. Therefore, we hypothesized that discharge from the ED is cost-effective compared with 23-h observation or hospital admission for patients with ASBS and a negative CT. METHODS: A cost-utility model was developed for an evaluable patient with ASBS and negative CT scan using TreeAge software. ED discharge was compared with 23-h observation and admission. Analysis was from a health care-based third-party payer perspective. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were based on 3-y expected outcomes. Probability and costs were estimated from published literature and the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. RESULTS: In our base case, ED discharge was the most cost-effective strategy, yielding a cost of $706 with 2.86 QALYs. The average costs of 23-h observation and hospital admission were $2600 and $8,827, respectively, with 2.87 QALYs gained each. The strategy of ED observation becomes cost-effective when the rate of HVI after ED discharge exceeds 2.3%. In a Monte Carlo simulation, ED discharge was the optimal strategy in 91% of 1000 trials of the model. CONCLUSIONS: ED discharge is a cost-effective strategy for evaluable patients with ASBS and a negative abdominal CT and remains so when the risk of HVI after ED discharge is higher than currently assumed.

Cervical spine evaluation in pediatric trauma: A cost-effectiveness analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The emergent evaluation of children with suspected traumatic cervical spine injuries (CSI) remains a challenge. Pediatric clinical pathways have been developed to stratify the risk of CSI and guide computed tomography (CT) utilization. The cost-effectiveness of their application has not been evaluated. Our objective was to examine the cost-effectiveness of three common strategies for the evaluation of children with suspected CSI after blunt injury. METHODS: We developed a decision analytic model comparing these strategies to estimate clinical outcomes and costs for a hypothetical population of 0-17 year old patients with blunt neck trauma. Strategies included: 1) clinical pathway to stratify risk using NEXUS criteria and determine need for diagnostic testing; 2) screening radiographs as a first diagnostic; and 3) immediate CT scanning for all patients. We measured effectiveness with quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and costs with 2018 U.S. dollars. Costs and effectiveness were discounted at 3% per year. RESULTS: The use of the clinical pathway results in a gain of 0.04 QALYs and a cost saving of $2800 compared with immediate CT scanning of all patients. Use of the clinical pathway was less costly and more effective than immediate CT scan as long as the sensitivity of the clinical prediction rule was greater than 87% and when the sensitivity of x-ray was greater than 84%. CONCLUSION: A strategy using a clinical pathway to first stratify risk before further diagnostic testing was less costly and more effective than either performing CT scanning or screening cervical radiographs on all patients.

Blunt versus penetrating trauma: Is there a resource intensity discrepancy?

BACKGROUND: The rising cost of healthcare requires responsible allocation of resources. Not all trauma centers see the same types of patients. We hypothesized that patients with blunt injuries require more resources than patients with penetrating injuries. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of all highest-level activation trauma patients at our busy urban Level I Trauma Center over five years. Data included demographics, injuries, hospital charges, and resources used. A p value < 0.05 was significant. RESULTS: 4578 patients were included (2037 blunt and 2541 penetrating). Blunt patients were more severely injured, more often admitted, required more radiographic studies, had longer hospital, intensive care unit, and mechanical ventilation days, and therefore, higher hospital charges. CONCLUSIONS: Within one center, patients with blunt injuries required more resources than those with penetrating injuries. Understanding this pattern will allow trauma systems to better allocate limited resources based on each center's mechanism of injury distribution.

Hospital factors associated with higher costs in pediatric blunt abdominal trauma: A national study.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Our objective was to evaluate hospital factors, including children's hospital status, associated with higher costs for blunt solid organ pediatric abdominal trauma. METHODS: We queried the 2012 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Kid's Inpatient Database (KID) for patients 18 years or younger with low-grade and high-grade blunt abdominal trauma. We calculated total hospital costs and adjusted cost ratios (CR) controlling for patient and hospital-level characteristics. RESULTS: The 2012 KID included 882 low-grade and 222 high-grade pediatric abdominal trauma patients. Median (interquartile range) per hospitalization costs were similar at children's and nonchildren's hospitals for both low-grade (children's = $6575 [$4333-$10,862], nonchildren's $7027 [$4230-$12,219] p = 0.47) and high-grade (children's = $10,984 [$6211- $20,007] nonchildren's $10,156 [$5439-$18,404] p = 0.55) groups. Adjusted cost ratios demonstrated higher costs in the West and among investor owned hospitals for low-grade and high-grade injuries, respectively. Costs at rural hospitals were higher in both groups (low-grade CR = 2.35 95% CI 2.02, 2.74, high-grade CR = 2.78 95% CI 2.13, 3.63) compared to urban teaching hospitals. Cost ratios did not differ based on children's hospital status. CONCLUSION: Hospital costs were similar for children's and nonchildren's hospitals caring for pediatric abdominal trauma. Costs at rural hospitals are higher and may suggest financial instability or nonstandardized care of pediatric trauma patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Pediatric trauma center verification improves quality of care and reduces resource utilization in blunt splenic injury.

PURPOSE: We sought to evaluate value impact of transition from an adult trauma center treating children (ATC) to a verified pediatric trauma center (PTC) in children with blunt splenic injury (BSI). METHODS: Children with BSI from FY 2005 to FY 2017 were extracted from the hospital trauma registry. February 2009 distinguished "ATC" treated children from "PTC" treated children. Cohorts were subcategorized into "isolated injury" and "multisystem injury". Quality and financial characteristics were statistically compared. Analysis of covariance was used to evaluate changes in quality and financial trends over the transition period. A multiple linear regression was performed to identify variables independently predictive of hospital and professional charges. RESULTS: 126 children with BSI were identified (ATC, n = 56; PTC, n = 70). Splenic procedure rates and hospital charges decreased. Quality and cost metrics for isolated BSI remained unchanged while multisystem BSI children experienced improvements. PTC designation, ISS, splenic procedure, isolated BSI, average hospital LOS, and mortality were all independently predictive of hospital and professional charges. CONCLUSIONS: PTC verification improves the value of BSI management, but the associated decrease in operative rate is only partially responsible. Multisystem injury children experience the greatest value benefit from PTC verification. TYPE OF STUDY: Treatment and cost-effectiveness study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Cost Analysis of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Compared with Warfarin in Patients with Blunt Traumatic Intracranial Hemorrhages.

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are rapidly gaining popularity as alternatives to warfarin in the prevention of stroke or systemic embolic events because of the simplicity of their dosing and lack of monitoring requirement. Many physicians feared that these novel agents would be cost-prohibitive not only in their administration but also in their sequelae of bleeding, given the few reversal agents available. Whereas the medication itself is more expensive than traditional warfarin, the total cost of a hospital admission has not been compared between patients on DOACs and warfarin who have sustained a blunt traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). We conducted a retrospective review of our hospital's trauma database from June 2011 through September 2015 at our Level II trauma center of patients who suffered from an ICH who were anticoagulated at the time of their trauma. Patients who died during their hospital admission or were exclusively on antiplatelet agents were excluded. Of the 136 patients studied, 79 were on warfarin and 57 were on a DOAC at the time of their presentation for a traumatic ICH. The average charged cost for the hospital stay of a patient with an ICH was significantly higher for patients on warfarin compared with DOACs [$70,384.08 vs $49,226.66 (P = 0.02)]. The average reimbursement rate for the hospital was also significantly higher for those patients on warfarin as compared with those on DOACs [$23,922.93 vs $14,705.77 (P = 0.02)]. DOACs are associated with a significant cost benefit in patients admitted for blunt traumatic ICHs when compared with those on warfarin.

Cost-effectiveness of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Cervical Spine Clearance of Neurologically Intact Patients With Blunt Trauma.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for cervical clearance after a negative cervical computed tomography (CT) scan result in alert patients with blunt trauma who are neurologically intact is not infrequent, despite poor evidence in regard to its utility. The objective of this study is to evaluate the utility and cost-effectiveness of using MRI versus no follow-up in this patient population. METHODS: A modeling-based decision analysis was performed during the lifetime of a 40-year-old individual from a societal perspective. The 2 strategies compared were no follow-up and MRI. A Markov model with a 3% discount rate was used with parameters from the literature. Base cases and probabilistic and sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the cost-effectiveness of the strategies. RESULTS: The cost of MRI follow-up was $11,477, with a health benefit of 24.03 quality-adjusted life-years; the cost of no follow-up was $6,432, with a health benefit of 24.08 quality-adjusted life-years. No follow-up was the dominant strategy, with a lower cost and a higher utility. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed no follow-up to be the better strategy in all 10,000 iterations. No follow-up was the better strategy irrespective of the negative predictive value of initial CT result, and it remained the better strategy when the incidence of missed unstable injury resulting in permanent neurologic deficits was less than 64.2% and the incidence of patients immobilized with a hard collar who still received cord injury was greater than 19.7%. Multiple 3-way sensitivity analyses were performed. CONCLUSION: MRI is not cost-effective for further evaluation of unstable injury in neurologically intact patients with blunt trauma after a negative cervical spine CT result.

Minimizing variance in Care of Pediatric Blunt Solid Organ Injury through Utilization of a hemodynamic-driven protocol: a multi-institution study.

BACKGROUND: An expedited recovery protocol for management of pediatric blunt solid organ injury (spleen, liver, and kidney) was instituted across two Level 1 Trauma Centers, managed by nine pediatric surgeons within three hospital systems. METHODS: Data were collected for 18months on consecutive patients after protocol implementation. Patient demographics (including grade of injury), surgeon compliance, National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) complications, direct hospital cost, length of stay, time in the ICU, phlebotomy, and re-admission were compared to an 18-month control period immediately preceding study initiation. RESULTS: A total of 106 patients were treated (control=55, protocol=51). Demographics were similar among groups, and compliance was 78%. Hospital stay (4.6 vs. 3.5days, p=0.04), ICU stay (1.9 vs. 1.0days, p=0.02), and total phlebotomy (7.7 vs. 5.3 draws, p=0.007) were significantly less in the protocol group. A decrease in direct hospital costs was also observed ($11,965 vs. $8795, p=0.09). Complication rates (1.8% vs. 3.9%, p=0.86, no deaths) were similar. CONCLUSIONS: An expedited, hemodynamic-driven, pediatric solid organ injury protocol is achievable across hospital systems and surgeons. Through implementation we maintained quality while impacting length of stay, ICU utilization, phlebotomy, and cost. Future protocols should work to further limit resource utilization. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective cohort study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Outcomes of an accelerated care pathway for pediatric blunt solid organ injuries in a public healthcare system.

PURPOSE: An accelerated clinical care pathway for solid organ abdominal injuries was implemented at a level one pediatric trauma center. The impact on resource utilization and demonstration of protocol safety was assessed. METHODS: Data were collected retrospectively on patients admitted with blunt abdominal solid organ injuries from 2012 to 2015. Patients were subdivided into pre- and post-protocol groups. Length of hospital stay (LOS) and failure of non-operative treatment were the primary outcomes of interest. RESULTS: 138 patients with solid organ injury were studied: 73 pre- (2012-2014) and 65 post-protocol (2014-2015). There were no significant differences in age, gender, injury severity score (ISS), injury grade, or mechanism (p>0.05). LOS was shorter post-protocol (mean 5.6 vs. 3.4days; median 5 .0 vs. 3.0days; p=0.0002), resulting in average savings of $5966 per patient. Patients in the protocol group mobilized faster (p<0.0001) and experienced fewer blood draws (p=0.02). On multivariate analysis, protocol group (p<0.001) and ISS (p<0.001) were independently associated with LOS. There were no differences between groups in the need for operation, embolization, or transfusion. CONCLUSION: An accelerated care pathway is safe and effective in the management of pediatric solid organ injuries with early mobilization, less blood draws, and decreased LOS without significant morbidity and mortality. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, cost effectiveness, level III.

Introduction of a pan-scan protocol for blunt trauma activations: what are the consequences?

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to determine if the introduction of a pan-scan protocol during the initial assessment for blunt trauma activations would affect missed injuries, incidental findings, treatment times, radiation exposure, and cost. METHODS: A 6-month prospective study was performed on patients with blunt trauma at a level 1 trauma center. During the last 3 months of the study, a pan-scan protocol was introduced to the trauma assessment. Categorical data were analyzed by Fisher exact test and continuous data were analyzed by Mann-Whitney nonparametric test. RESULTS: There were a total of 220 patients in the pre-pan-scan period and 206 patients during the pan-scan period. There was no significant difference in injury severity or mortality between the groups. Introduction of the pan-scan protocol substantially reduced the incidence of missed injuries from 3.2% to 0.5%, the length of stay in the emergency department by 68.2 minutes (95% confidence interval [CI], -134.4 to -2.1), and the mean time to the first operating room visit by 1465 minutes (95% CI, -2519 to -411). In contrast, fixed computed tomographic scan cost increased by $48.1 (95% CI, 32-64.1) per patient; however, total radiology cost per patient decreased by $50 (95% CI, -271.1 to 171.4). In addition, the rate of incidental findings increased by 14.4% and the average radiation exposure per patient was 8.2 mSv (95% CI, 5.0-11.3) greater during the pan-scan period. CONCLUSION: Although there are advantages to whole-body computed tomography, elucidation of the appropriate blunt trauma patient population is warranted when implementing a pan-scan protocol.

Cost-effectiveness of cervical spine clearance interventions with litigation and long-term-care implications in obtunded adult patients following blunt injury.

BACKGROUND: Recent guidelines from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma conditionally recommend cervical collar removal after a negative cervical computed tomography in obtunded adult blunt trauma patients. Although the rates of missed injury are extremely low, the impact of chronic care costs and litigation upon decision making remains unclear. We hypothesize that the cost-effectiveness of strategies that include additional imaging may contradict current guidelines. METHODS: A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed for a base-case 40-year-old, obtunded man with a negative computed tomography. Strategies compared included adjunct imaging with cervical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), collar maintenance for 6 weeks, or removal. Data on the probability for long-term collar complications, spine injury, imaging costs, complications associated with MRI, acute and chronic care, and litigation were obtained from published and Medicare data. Outcomes were expressed as 2014 US dollars and quality-adjusted life-years. RESULTS: Collar removal was more effective and less costly than collar use or MRI (19.99 vs. 19.35 vs. 18.70 quality-adjusted life-years; $675,359 vs. $685,546 vs. $685,848) in the base-case analysis. When the probability of missed cervical injury was greater than 0.04 adjunct imaging with MRI dominated, however, collar removal remained cost-effective until the probability of missed injury exceeded 0.113 at which point collar removal exceeded the $50,000 threshold. Collar removal remained the most cost-effective approach until the probability of complications from collar use was reduced to less than 0.009, at which point collar maintenance became the most cost-effective strategy. Early collar removal dominates all strategies until the risk of complications from MRI positioning is reduced to 0.03 and remained cost-effective even when the probability of complication was reduced to 0. CONCLUSION: Early collar removal in obtunded adult blunt trauma patients appears to be the most effective and least costly strategy for cervical clearance based on the current literature available. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic evaluation, level III; therapeutic study, level IV.

Carotid artery dissection and motor vehicle trauma: patient demographics, associated injuries and impact of treatment on cost and length of stay.

BACKGROUND: Blunt carotid arterial injury (BCI) is a rare injury associated with motor vehicle collision (MVC). There are few population based analyses evaluating carotid injury associated with blunt trauma and their associated injuries as well as outcomes. METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) 2003-2010 data was queried to identify patients after MVC who had documented BCI during their hospitalizations utilizing ICD-9-CM codes. Demographics, associated injuries, interventions performed, length of stay, and cost were evaluated. RESULTS: 1,686,867 patients were estimated having sustained MVC; 1,168 BCI were estimated. No patients with BCI had open repair, 4.24 % had a carotid artery stent (CAS), and 95.76 % of patients had no operative intervention. Age groups associated with BCI were: 18-24 (27.8 %), 47-60 (22.3 %), 35-46 (20.6 %), 25-34 (19.1 %), >61 (10.2 %). Associated injuries included long bone fractures (28.5 %), stroke and intracranial hemorrhage (28.5 %), cranial injuries (25.6 %), thoracic injuries (23.6 %), cervical fractures (21.8 %), facial fractures (19.9 %), skull fractures (18.8 %), pelvic fractures (18.5 %), hepatic (13.3 %) and splenic (9.2 %) injuries. Complications included respiratory (44.2 %), bleeding (16.1 %), urinary tract infections (8.9 %), and sepsis (4.9 %). Overall mortality was 14.1 % without differences with regard to intervention (18.5 % vs. 13.9 %; P = 0.36). Stroke and intracranial hemorrhage was associated with a 2.7 times greater risk of mortality. Mean length of stay for patients with BCI undergoing stenting compared to no intervention were similar (13.1 days vs. 15.9 days) but had a greater mean cost ($83,030 vs. $63,200, p = 0.3). CONCLUSION: BCI is a rare injury associated with MVC, most frequently reported in younger patients. Frequently associated injuries were long bone fractures, stroke and intracranial hemorrhage, thoracic injuries, and pelvic fractures which are likely associated with the force/mechanism of injury. The majority of patients were treated without intervention, but when CAS was utilized, it did not impact mortality and trended toward increased costs.

Observation for isolated traumatic skull fractures in the pediatric population: unnecessary and costly.

BACKGROUND: Blunt head trauma accounts for a majority of pediatric trauma admissions. There is a growing subset of these patients with isolated skull fractures, but little evidence guiding their management. We hypothesized that inpatient neurological observation for pediatric patients with isolated skull fractures and normal neurological examinations is unnecessary and costly. METHODS: We performed a single center 10year retrospective review of all head traumas with isolated traumatic skull fractures and normal neurological examination. Exclusion criteria included: penetrating head trauma, depressed fractures, intracranial hemorrhage, skull base fracture, pneumocephalus, and poly-trauma. In each patient, we analyzed: age, fracture location, loss of consciousness, injury mechanism, Emergency Department (ED) disposition, need for repeat imaging, hospital costs, intracranial hemorrhage, and surgical intervention. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients presented to our ED with acute isolated skull fractures, 56% were male and 44% were female. Their ages ranged from 1week to 12.4years old. The minority (22.5%) of patients were discharged from the ED following evaluation, whereas 77.5% were admitted for neurological observation. None of the patients required neurosurgical intervention. Age was not associated with repeat imaging or inpatient observation (p=0.7474, p=0.9670). No patients underwent repeat head imaging during their index admission. Repeat imaging was obtained in three previously admitted patients who returned to the ED. Cost analysis revealed a significant difference in total hospital costs between the groups, with an average increase in charges of $4,291.50 for admitted patients (p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Pediatric isolated skull fractures are low risk conditions with a low likelihood of complications. Further studies are necessary to change clinical practice, but our research indicates that these patients can be discharged safely from the ED without inpatient observation. This change in practice, additionally, would allow for huge health care dollar savings.

Using a new evidence-based trauma protocol to improve detection and reduce costs in patients with blunt cardiac injury.

INTRODUCTION: Management of blunt cardiac injury is often discussed in trauma literature due to the lack of a "gold standard" for early identification and cost-effective care. The effectiveness of an evidence-based trauma protocol was assessed by comparing patients treated with the new protocol to those managed with prior practice. METHODS: The data of 80 patients prospectively managed using the new trauma protocol were compared with the medical records of 80 former patients treated according to existing practice. RESULTS: Implementing the new protocol improved detection of abnormal troponin I levels and resulted in cost savings. The length of time inpatients required continuous electrocardiographic monitoring decreased by 4.23 days and echocardiography use dropped by 70%. CONCLUSION: Implementation of the evidence-based trauma protocol at our facility improved the early identification of patients with blunt cardiac injury and reduced the number of laboratory and diagnostic tests.

[COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE TACTICS OF SURGICAL FIXATION WITH THE CLOSED INJURY OF THE CHEST: THE VIEW OF THE RESUSCITATOR, ECONOMIC ASPECTS].

The closed injury of chest with the breaks of edges is the vital problem of traumatology, anesthesiology and resuscitation For the change to conservative treatment with the aid of mechanical ventilation of lungs today come the methods of surgical fixation with the closed injury of chest. The conducted investigation showed the clinical and economic expediency of introducing the method of active surgical tactics.

Clinical and economic effects of selective radiological evaluation of high-energy trauma patients: a prospective experience of a level 1 busy trauma centre.

INTRODUCTION: Cervical spine, thoracic and pelvic fractures are the main causes of devastation in patients who have suffered blunt trauma. Radiographic imaging plays an important role in diagnosing such injuries. Nevertheless, the present dominant approach, the routine use of X-ray studies, seems to have no cost-benefit justification for healthcare systems. METHODS: This prospective cross-sectional study was performed over a 3-month period. During the determined time frame, all haemodynamically stable, high-energy blunt trauma patients were included. Based on the predefined criteria, selective radiographic images of the neck, chest and pelvis were obtained. Patients were followed during their hospital stay and for a 2-week period after discharge. RESULTS: 1002 cases were included in the final survey. 247/1002 (24.6%) cervical radiographic images, 500/1002 (49.9%) CXRs and 171/1002 (17%) pelvic radiographic images of the patients were taken on the first day of hospital admission. New X-ray images required during the patients' hospital stay resulted in 5/1002 (0.4%) cervical, 4/1002 (0.3%) chest and 8/1002 (0.7%) pelvic radiographies. In the 2-week period after discharge, 4/1002 cases (0.3%) needed to repeat neck radiography. Overall, 697.44 mSv X-ray radiation was potentially prevented and US$426,450 were potentially saved. CONCLUSIONS: Selective radiographic imaging of the neck, chest and pelvis together with a precise history-taking and physical examination in cases of high-energy blunt trauma could eliminate unnecessary costs to patients and healthcare systems, and significantly save resources.

Diagnostic yields, charges, and radiation dose of chest imaging in blunt trauma evaluations.

BACKGROUND: Chest radiography (CXR) is the most common imaging in adult blunt trauma patient evaluation. Knowledge of the yields, attendant costs, and radiation doses delivered may guide effective chest imaging utilization. OBJECTIVES: The objectives were to determine the diagnostic yields of blunt trauma chest imaging (CXR and chest computed tomography [CT]), to estimate charges and radiation exposure per injury identified, and to delineate assessment points in blunt trauma evaluation at which decision instruments for selective chest imaging would have the greatest effect. METHODS: From December 2009 to January 2012, we enrolled patients older than 14 years who received CXR during blunt trauma evaluations at nine U.S. Level I trauma centers in this prospective, observational study. Thoracic injury seen on chest imaging and clinical significance of the injury were defined by a trauma expert panel. Yields of imaging were calculated, as well as mean charges and effective radiation dose (ERD) per injury. RESULTS: Of 9,905 enrolled patients, 55.4% had CXR alone, 42.0% had both CXR and CT, and 2.6% had CT alone. The yields for detecting thoracic injury were CXR 8.4% (95% confidence intervals [CIs]) = 7.8% to 8.9%), chest CT 28.8% (95% CI = 27.5% to 30.2%), and chest CT after normal CXR 15.0% (95% CI = 13.9% to 16.2%). The mean charges and ERD (millisievert [mSv]) per injury diagnosis of CXR, chest CT, and chest CT after normal CXR were $3,845 (0.24 mSv), $10,597 (30.9 mSv), and $20,347 (59.3 mSv), respectively. The mean charges and ERD per clinically major thoracic injury diagnosis on chest CT after normal CXR were $203,467 and 593 mSv. CONCLUSIONS: Despite greater diagnostic yield, chest CT entails substantially higher charges and radiation dose per injury diagnosed, especially when performed after a normal CXR. Selective chest imaging decision instruments should identify patients who require no chest imaging and patients who may benefit from chest CT after a normal CXR.

Extremity injuries as predictors of emergency care resource needs among blunt trauma patients in Japan.

This study aimed to exhaustively examine associations between prehospital variables and emergency care resource needs among blunt trauma patients. The study included blunt trauma patients aged 15 years or older who were admitted to a tertiary care medical center in Osaka, Japan, from January 2005 to December 2009. The primary end point was a composite measure of overall emergency care resource needs. Predictive variables were easily detectable upper and lower extremity injuries. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to identify associations between the predictive variables and the end point; this model included other covariates known to be associated with emergency care resource needs (demographic characteristics, mechanism of injury, and physiological parameters). Of 982 blunt trauma patients, 81 died, and 573 required overall emergency care resources. Upper extremity injury (odds ratio [OR], 2.60) and lower extremity injury (OR, 4.50) were significantly associated with overall emergency care resource needs after controlling for other covariates. The results of this study suggest that easily detectable extremity injuries may be useful predictors of the emergency care resource needs of trauma patients. Further studies are needed to validate the predictive values of these injuries and to determine ways to use information about extremity injuries to improve triage decisions.