Effects of Combined Application of Percutaneous Vertebroplasty and Zoledronic Acid on Bone Mineral Density, Bone Metabolism, NPY and PGE2 in Elderly Patients with Osteoporotic Lumbar Vertebral Compression Fracture.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of the combined application of percutaneous vertebroplasty and zoledronic acid on bone mineral density (BMD), bone metabolism, neuropeptide Y (NPY) and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) in elderly patients with osteoporotic lumbar vertebral compression fracture (OVCF). METHODS: The medical records of 118 elderly patients with OVCF who received treatment at our hospital from March 2018 to March 2020 were collected and analyzed retrospectively. Vertebral body height, spinal function, pain degree, and lumbar BMD were compared between the two groups upon admission and three years after the operation. Additionally, the levels of bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BALP), 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-(OH)D), beta collagen degradation fragments (ß-CTx), neuropeptide Y (NPY), and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) in the two groups were measured at admission and three years after the operation. Furthermore, complications in the two groups within three years after the operation were documented. RESULTS: After three years post-operation, the combination group showed a significantly greater improvement in vertebral body height compared to the control group (P<0.05). Moreover, the combination group exhibited a significantly lower Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score compared to the control group (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: In elderly patients with OVCF, the combined use of zoledronic acid and percutaneous vertebroplasty is effective in improving lumbar function, BMD, and bone metabolism indices, while reducing pain and the levels of NPY and PGE2.

An acute phase reaction from zoledronate mimicking symptoms seen in opioid withdrawal: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Zoledronate, a bisphosphonate, is a potent first-line treatment for osteoporosis. It is also a preferred treatment for hypercalcemia especially when unresponsive to intravenous fluids. Bisphosphonates can cause acute phase reactions that mimic opioid withdrawal symptoms, which can confound provider decision-making. Our case highlights cognitive bias involving a patient with opioid use disorder who received zoledronate for hypercalcemia secondary to immobilization and significant bone infection. CASE PRESENTATION: A 41-year-old male is admitted with a past medical history of active intravenous opioid use complicated by group A streptococcal bacteremia with L5-S1 discitis and osteomyelitis, L2-L3 osteomyelitis, and left ankle abscess/septic arthritis status post left ankle washout. His pain was well-controlled by acute pain service with ketamine infusion (discontinued earlier), opioids, acetaminophen, buprenorphine-naloxone, cyclobenzaprine, gabapentin, and naproxen. Intravenous opioids were discontinued, slightly decreasing the opioid regimen. A day later, the patient reported tachycardia, diaphoresis, myalgias, and chills, which the primary team reconsulted acute pain service for opioid withdrawal. However, the patient received a zoledronate infusion for hypercalcemia, on the same day intravenous opioids were discontinued. He had no other medications known to cause withdrawal-like symptoms per chart review. Therefore, it was suspected that an acute phase reaction occurred, commonly seen within a few days of bisphosphonate use. CONCLUSION: Zoledronate, well known for causing acute phase reactions, was likely the cause of withdrawal-like symptoms. Acute phase reactions with bisphosphonates mostly occur in the first infusion, and the incidence decreases with subsequent infusions. Symptoms typically occur 24-72 h post-infusion, and last at most for 72 h. Cognitive bias led the primary team to be concerned with opioid withdrawal rather than investigating other causes for the patient's presentation. Therefore, providers should thoroughly investigate potential etiologies and rule them out accordingly to provide the best care. Health care providers should also be aware of the implicit biases that potentially impact the quality of care they provide to patients.

Cinobufotalin Capsule Combined with Zoledronic Acid in the Treatment of Pain Symptoms and Clinical Efficacy in Prostate Cancer Patients with Bone Metastases: A Retrospective Study.

OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively analyse the effects of cinobufotalin capsule combined with zoledronic acid on pain symptoms and clinical efficacy of prostate cancer patients with bone metastases. METHODS: Patients with prostate cancer with bone metastasis admitted to our hospital from January 2021 to December 2022 were selected as study subjects. They were divided into the control group (treated with zoledronic acid) and the combined group (cinobufotalin capsules were added on the control group basis) according to different recorded treatment methods. The efficacies of the two groups after matching, lumbar L1-4 bone mineral density (BMD), serum calcium, serum phosphorus, visual analogue scale (VAS) score and Karnofsky performance status (KPS) score before and after treatment were compared, and adverse reactions were statistically analysed. RESULTS: A total of 102 patients were included in the study, encompassing 52 patients in the combined group and 50 patients in the control group. After 1:1 preference score matching, 64 patients were included in the two groups. No significant difference in baseline data was found between the two groups (p > 0.05). The total effective rate of the combination group was higher than that of the control group (p < 0.05). No significant differences in L1-4 bone mineral density, serum calcium and phosphorus, VAS score and KPS score were observed between the two groups prior to treatment (p > 0.05). After treatment, the L1-4 bone mineral density (BMD) and KPS score of the combined group decreased to less than those of the control group, the VAS score was lower than that of the control group, and the serum calcium and phosphorus level increased but less than that of the control group (p < 0.05). No significant difference in adverse reactions was found between the two groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Cinobufotalin capsule combined with zoledronic acid had ideal efficacy in the treatment of prostate cancer in patients with bone metastasis. This approach could improve their bone density and quality of life, improve their calcium and phosphorus metabolism, reduce their pain symptoms and provide increased safety. It may have an important guiding role in formulating future clinical treatment plans for patients with prostate cancer and bone metastasis.

Antibody-Drug Conjugate Made of Zoledronic Acid and the Anti-CD30 Brentuximab-Vedotin Exert Anti-Lymphoma and Immunostimulating Effects.

Relevant advances have been made in the management of relapsed/refractory (r/r) Hodgkin Lymphomas (HL) with the use of the anti-CD30 antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) brentuximab-vedotin (Bre-Ved). Unfortunately, most patients eventually progress despite the excellent response rates and tolerability. In this report, we describe an ADC composed of the aminobisphosphonate zoledronic acid (ZA) conjugated to Bre-Ved by binding the free amino groups of this antibody with the phosphoric group of ZA. Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry, and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-mass spectrometry analyses confirmed the covalent linkage between the antibody and ZA. The novel ADC has been tested for its reactivity with the HL/CD30+ lymphoblastoid cell lines (KMH2, L428, L540, HS445, and RPMI6666), showing a better titration than native Bre-Ved. Once the HL-cells are entered, the ADC co-localizes with the lysosomal LAMP1 in the intracellular vesicles. Also, this ADC exerted a stronger anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic (about one log fold) effect on HL-cell proliferation compared to the native antibody Bre-Ved. Eventually, Bre-Ved-ZA ADC, in contrast with the native antibody, can trigger the proliferation and activation of cytolytic activity of effector-memory Vδ2 T-lymphocytes against HL-cell lines. These findings may support the potential use of this ADC in the management of r/r HL.

Payload-delivering engineered γδ T cells display enhanced cytotoxicity, persistence, and efficacy in preclinical models of osteosarcoma.

T cell-based cancer immunotherapy has typically relied on membrane-bound cytotoxicity enhancers such as chimeric antigen receptors expressed in autologous αß T cells. These approaches are limited by tonic signaling of synthetic constructs and costs associated with manufacturing. γδ T cells are an emerging alternative for cellular therapy, having innate antitumor activity, potent antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, and minimal alloreactivity. We present an immunotherapeutic platform technology built around the innate properties of the Vγ9Vδ2 T cell, harnessing specific characteristics of this cell type and offering an allocompatible cellular therapy that recruits bystander immunity. We engineered γδ T cells to secrete synthetic tumor-targeting opsonins in the form of an scFv-Fc fusion protein and a mitogenic IL-15Rα-IL-15 fusion protein (stIL15). Using GD2 as a model antigen, we show that GD2-specific opsonin-secreting Vγ9Vδ2 T cells (stIL15-OPS-γδ T cells) have enhanced cytotoxicity and promote bystander activity of other lymphoid and myeloid cells. Secretion of stIL-15 abrogated the need for exogenous cytokine supplementation and further mediated activation of bystander natural killer cells. Compared with unmodified γδ T cells, stIL15-OPS-γδ T cells exhibited superior in vivo control of subcutaneous tumors and persistence in the blood. Moreover, stIL15-OPS-γδ T cells were efficacious against patient-derived osteosarcomas in animal models and in vitro, where efficacy could be boosted with the addition of zoledronic acid. Together, the data identify stIL15-OPS-γδ T cells as a candidate allogeneic cell therapy platform combining direct cytolysis with bystander activation to promote tumor control.

Effect of Acridine Orange and Zoledronic Acid on Bone Metastasis in Renal Cell Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The increasing incidence of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and its associated bone metastasis pose challenges in surgical interventions, warranting the exploration of novel therapeutic approaches. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the impact of hematogenously administering acridine orange (AO) alone and in combination with zoledronic acid (ZA) on bone metastasis in RCC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: RENCA cells (1.0×106 cells/10 µl) were directly injected into the right femur of male BALB/c mice. The mice were categorized into four groups based on the applied therapeutic intervention and were euthanized after five weeks. Micro-computed tomography was performed to quantify the extent of periosteal reaction, indicative of bone metastasis, along the entire length of the femur. Tumor weight and volume were measured at euthanization. Hematoxylin and eosin staining was used to examine the extent of tumor development in the bone. Apoptotic cell, osteoclast, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-positive cell counts were assessed using TdT-mediated dUTP-biotin nick end labeling, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase staining, and VEGF staining, respectively. RESULTS: The periosteal reaction was significantly reduced in the intervention groups compared to the control group (p<0.05). The apoptotic cell numbers in the intervention groups surpassed that in the control group (p<0.05), whereas those of osteoclasts and VEGF-positive cells in the intervention groups were lower than those in the control group (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: AO hinders bone metastasis progression in RCC, and combination therapy with ZA may be more effective than AO administration alone.

Photodynamic therapy repairs medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw by reducing NF-kB protein in rats.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) repairs bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ) modulated by the reduction of NF-kB protein in a murine model. METHODOLOGY: Male Wistar rats (N=30) were divided into the following groups (n=6/group): negative control (NC); experimental osteonecrosis (ONE); ONE + photosensitizer (PS); ONE + photobiomodulation (PBM); and ONE + aPDT. Over 8 weeks, ONE was induced by zoledronic acid 250 µg/kg injections, except in the NC group, which received sterile 0.9% saline, followed by extraction of the lower left first molar. Red light laser irradiation (wavelength ~660 nm, power 50 mW, energy of 2 J, energy dose of 66.67 J/cm2 for 40 s) was performed once a week for 4 weeks. Methylene blue 0.3% was used as PS. The animals were euthanized and examined macroscopically for the presence of exposed bone and epithelial repair and microscopically by histochemical (hematoxylin-eosin and Masson's trichrome staining) and immunohistochemical (anti-NF-kB) methods. Macroscopic and histomorphometric data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post-test (p<0.05). RESULTS: Mucosal repair, viable osteocytes, and NF-kB immunostaining were observed in the NC, ONE+PS, ONE+PBM, and ONE+aPDT groups. The ONE group showed no mucosal repair, showing empty lacunae and multifocal immunostaining for NF-kB. The ONE+PBM and ONE+aPDT groups had greater deposition of extracellular matrix and less necrotic bone tissue (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: PBM and aPDT treatments for BRONJ were effective for bone and epithelial repair, in addition to reducing inflammation mediated by the decrease of NF-kB protein in the irradiated regions.

Photobiomodulation Can Prevent Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw Formation in Tooth Extraction Site of Rat Model.

Objective: This study aims to explore the preventive potential of photobiomodulation (PBM) in bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ) using a rat model. Methods: An experimental rat model was established, exposing rats to zoledronic acid (ZA), a primary risk factor for BRONJ. An 810 nm diode laser was applied with parameters of 0.33 W/cm2 power density and 10 J/cm2 energy density for 30 sec. PBM was initiated 1 day pre-extraction and continued for 2 weeks. The impact of PBM on wound healing in both soft and hard tissues was evaluated post tooth extraction. Results: ZA exposure hindered wound healing in both soft and hard tissues after tooth extraction. PBM intervention effectively mitigated the adverse effects of ZA, promoting healing processes in both tissue types. This suggests the potential of PBM as a preventive strategy for BRONJ in patients on long-term bisphosphonate treatment. Moreover, PBM exhibited enhanced wound healing in normal rats, indicating its broader applicability beyond BRONJ cases. Conclusions: PBM shows promise in preventing and improving wound healing in BRONJ and normal cases. These findings underscore the significance of optimizing PBM parameters and suggest its potential clinical relevance as a preventive intervention for BRONJ and a promoter of wound healing.

Polysacharide of Agaricus blazei gel mitigates bone necrosis in model of the jaws related to bisphosphonate via Wnt signaling.

To investigate de effect of PAb gel on the bone tissue of rats submitted to Bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (BRONJ). Initially, 54 animals were submitted to BRONJ model by Zoledronic Acid (ZA) (0.1 mg/kg 3x/wk for 9 wk, ip), followed by the 1st upper left molar extraction at the 8th wk. After tooth removal, the animals were divided into 3 groups, ZA that received placebo gel or PAb gel that received 1% PAb gel, inside the dental alveolus. The control Group (CONTROL) received 0.1 mg/kg of 0.9% saline and then placebo gel. Three weeks after tooth extraction, the animals were euthanized, and maxillae were colleted for macroscopic, radiographic, histological and Raman spectomery assays. Additionally, GSK3b, beta-catenin, and Runx2 mRNA expressions were determined. Blood samples were collected for the analysis of Bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BALP) levels. PAb gel improved mucosal healing, increased the number of viable osteocytes, while it reduced the number of empty lacunae, as well as the amount of bone sequestration. Furthermore, PAb gel positively influenced the number and functionality of osteoblasts by stimulating Wnt signaling, thereby inducing bone remodeling. Additionally, PAb gel contributed to improved bone quality, as evidenced by an increase in bone mineral content, a decrease in bone solubility, and an enhancement in the quality of collagen, particularly type I collagen. PAb gel mitigated bone necrosis by stimulating of bone remodeling through Wnt signaling and concurrently improved bone quality. PAb gel emerges as a promising pharmacological tool for aiding in BRONJ therapy or potentially preventing the development of BRONJ.

Prolonged bone health benefits for breast cancer patients following adjuvant bisphosphonate therapy: the BoHFAB study.

Adjuvant bisphosphonates are often recommended in postmenopausal women with early breast cancer at intermediate-to-high risk of disease recurrence, but the magnitude and duration of their effects on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers (BTMs) are not well described. We evaluated the impact of adjuvant zoledronate on areal BMD and BTMs in a sub-group of patients who had completed the large 5-yr randomized Adjuvant Zoledronic Acid to Reduce Recurrence (AZURE) trial. About 224 women (recurrence free) who had completed the AZURE trial within the previous 3 mo were recruited from 20 UK AZURE trial sites. One hundred twenty had previously been randomized to zoledronate (19 doses of 4 mg over 5 yr) and 104 to the control arm. BMD and BTMs were assessed at sub-study entry, 6 (BTMs only), 12, 24, and 60 mo following the completion of AZURE. As expected, mean BMD, T-scores, and Z-scores at sub-study entry were higher in the zoledronate vs the control arm. At the lumbar spine, the mean (SD) standardized BMD (sBMD) was 1123 (201) and 985 (182) mg/cm2 in the zoledronate and control arms, respectively (P < .0001). The baseline differences in sBMD persisted at all assessed skeletal sites and throughout the 5-yr follow-up period. In patients completing zoledronate treatment, BTMs were significantly lower than those in the control arm (α- and ß-urinary C-telopeptide of type-I collagen, both P < .00001; serum intact pro-collagen I N-propeptide, P < .00001 and serum tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b, P = .0001). Some offset of bone turnover inhibition occurred in the 12 mo following the completion of zoledronate treatment. Thereafter, during the 60 mo of follow-up, all BTMs remained suppressed in the zoledronate arm relative to the control arm. In conclusion, in addition to the known anti-cancer benefits of adjuvant zoledronate, there are likely to be positive, lasting benefits in BMD and bone turnover.

Bone loss after discontinuation of denosumab: the devil is in the details.

A 47-year-old postmenopausal woman with osteoporosis was treated with denosumab, which was discontinued due to side effects. She was therefore transitioned to a yearly intravenous infusion of zoledronic acid. An increase in bone turnover markers together with bone loss at the lumbar spine was observed before the second infusion, suggesting an overshooting of bone resorption due to denosumab discontinuation. On physical examination, the patient was restless and reported having lost about 10 kg since the last visit. A solitary left inferior thyroid nodule was noted on neck palpation. Circulating thyroid hormone levels were elevated, with suppressed thyroid-stimulating hormone. A thyroid scan showed increased uptake in the left inferior nodule with suppression of the remainder of the thyroid gland. A diagnosis of hyperthyroidism due to toxic adenoma was made. The patient was treated with radioactive iodine ablation, with consequent complete normalization of thyroid function. She continued yearly treatment with zoledronic acid. She remained clinically well with no further fractures. Bone turnover markers were appropriately suppressed and bone mineral density increased in the spine and hip. This case illustrates how the overshooting phenomenon following denosumab discontinuation may be compounded by the development of secondary conditions, which can result in suboptimal response to antiresorptive osteoporosis medications.

The Dutch multidisciplinary guideline osteoporosis and fracture prevention, taking a local guideline to the international arena.

BACKGROUND: In 2018, a grant was provided for an evidence-based guideline on osteoporosis and fracture prevention based on 10 clinically relevant questions. METHODS: A multidisciplinary working group was formed with delegates from Dutch scientific and professional societies, including representatives from the patient's organization and the Dutch Institute for Medical Knowledge. The purpose was to obtain a broad consensus among all participating societies to facilitate the implementation of the updated guideline. RESULTS: Novel recommendations in our guideline are as follows: - In patients with an indication for DXA of the lumbar spine and hips, there is also an indication for VFA. - Directly starting with anabolic drugs (teriparatide or romosozumab) in patients with a very high fracture risk; - Directly starting with zoledronic acid in patients 75 years and over with a hip fracture (independent of DXA); - Directly starting with parenteral drugs (denosumab, teriparatide, zoledronic acid) in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis with very high fracture risk; - A lifelong fracture risk management, including lifestyle, is indicated from the start of the first treatment. CONCLUSION: In our new multidisciplinary guideline osteoporosis and fracture prevention, we developed 5 "relatively new statements" that are all a crucial step forward in the optimization of diagnosis and treatment for fracture prevention. We also developed 5 flowcharts, and we suppose that this may be helpful for individual doctors and their patients in daily practice and may facilitate implementation.

Bisphosphonate alternative regimens for the prevention of osteoporotic fragility fractures: BLAST-OFF, a mixed-methods study.

Background: Bisphosphonates are a class of medication commonly used to treat osteoporosis. Alendronate is recommended as the first-line treatment; however, long-term adherence (both treatment compliance and persistence) is poor. Alternative bisphosphonates are available, which can be given intravenously and have been shown to improve long-term adherence. However, the most clinically effective and cost-effective alternative bisphosphonate regimen remains unclear. What is the most cost-effective bisphosphonate in clinical trials may not be the most cost-effective or acceptable to patients in everyday clinical practice. Objectives: 1. Explore patient, clinician and stakeholder views, experiences and preferences of alendronate compared to alternative bisphosphonates. 2. Update and refine the 2016 systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis of bisphosphonates, and estimate the value of further research into their benefits. 3. Undertake stakeholder/consensus engagement to identify important research questions and further rank research priorities. Methods: The study was conducted in two stages, stages 1A and 1B in parallel, followed by stage 2: • Stage 1A - we elicited patient and healthcare experiences to understand their preferences of bisphosphonates for the treatment of osteoporosis. This was undertaken by performing a systematic review and framework synthesis of qualitative studies, followed by semistructured qualitative interviews with participants. • Stage 1B - we updated and expanded the existing Health Technology Assessment systematic review and clinical and cost-effectiveness model, incorporating a more comprehensive review of treatment efficacy, safety, side effects, compliance and long-term persistence. • Stage 2 - we identified and ranked further research questions that need to be answered about the effectiveness and acceptability of bisphosphonates. Results: Patients and healthcare professionals identified a number of challenges in adhering to bisphosphonate medication, balancing the potential for long-term risk reduction against the work involved in adhering to oral alendronate. Intravenous zoledronate treatment was generally more acceptable, with such regimens perceived to be more straightforward to engage in, although a portion of patients taking alendronate were satisfied with their current treatment. Intravenous zoledronate was found to be the most effective, with higher adherence rates compared to the other bisphosphonates, for reducing the risk of fragility fracture. However, oral bisphosphonates are more cost-effective than intravenous zoledronate due to the high cost of zoledronate administration in hospital. The importance of including patients and healthcare professionals when setting research priorities is recognised. Important areas for research were related to patient factors influencing treatment selection and effectiveness, how to optimise long-term care and the cost-effectiveness of delivering zoledronate in an alternative, non-hospital setting. Conclusions: Intravenous zoledronate treatment was generally more acceptable to patients and found to be the most effective bisphosphonate and with greater adherence; however, the cost-effectiveness relative to oral alendronate is limited by its higher zoledronate hospital administration costs. Future work: Further research is needed to support people to make decisions influencing treatment selection, effectiveness and optimal long-term care, together with the clinical and cost-effectiveness of intravenous zoledronate administered in a non-hospital (community) setting. Limitations: Lack of clarity and limitations in the many studies included in the systematic review may have under-interpreted some of the findings relating to effects of bisphosphonates. Trial registration: This trial is registered as ISRCTN10491361. Funding: This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR127550) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 21. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

Bisphosphonates are drug treatments commonly used to treat osteoporosis. Alendronate is the most used and is taken by mouth, weekly at a specific time of the week, which can be challenging. Less than one in four people continue this treatment beyond 2 years. Alternative bisphosphonates are available, which vary in frequency and how they are administered. The most acceptable and best value-for-money regimen is unclear. Our aim was to determine how effective alternative bisphosphonates are compared to alendronate at preventing fractures and whether reduction in fracture risk was achieved at a reasonable financial cost, but acceptable to patients. The study was conducted in two stages, stages 1A and 1B in parallel, followed by stage 2: Stage 1A: a review of the published evidence on patients' and doctors' views, experiences and preferences regarding different bisphosphonate treatment regimens, followed by interviews with patients and healthcare professionals. Stage 1B: an update of an existing study on how effective bisphosphonates are in preventing fragility fractures caused by osteoporosis and whether they are good value for money. Stage 2: identification of questions that need to be answered about the effectiveness and acceptability of bisphosphonate treatments. Taking bisphosphonate medication often involves quite a lot of effort by patients, particularly when taking alendronate tablets. A yearly infusion of zoledronate treatment was more acceptable, easier to engage with and the most effective treatment compared to alendronate. However, the cost of administering zoledronate in hospital made alendronate better value for money. Bisphosphonates are effective in reducing the risk of fracture, but 'continuing with treatment', particularly alendronate tablets, remains a challenge. A yearly infusion of zoledronate offers an acceptable and effective treatment, but further research is needed to support patients and healthcare professionals in making decisions about the various treatments, benefits and cost savings of administering zoledronate outside of hospital and in the community.

The potential role of SNHG16/ miRNA-146a/ TRAF6 signaling pathway in the protective effect of zoledronate against colorectal cancer and associated osteoporosis in mouse model.

Bone fracture as a consequence of colorectal cancer (CRC) and associated osteoporosis (OP) is considered a risk factor for increasing the mortality rate among CRC patients. SNHG16/ miRNA-146a/ TRAF6 signaling pathway is a substantial contributor to neoplastic evolution, progression, and metastasis. Here, we investigated the effect of zoledronate (ZOL) on the growth of CRC and associated OP in a mouse model. Thirty Balb/c mice were divided into Naïve, azoxymethane (AOM)/dextran sodium sulfate (DSS), and ZOL groups. Body weight and small nucleolar RNA host gene 16 (SNHG16) expression, microRNA-146a, and TRAF6 in bone, colon, and stool were investigated. Samples of colon and bone were collected and processed for light microscopic, immunohistochemical staining for cytokeratin 20 (CK20), nuclear protein Ki67 (pKi-67), and caudal type homeobox transcription factor 2 (CDx2) in colon and receptor activator of nuclear factor kB (RANK) and osteoprotegerin (OPG) in bone. A computerized tomography (CT) scan of the femur and tibia was studied. ZOL produced a significant decrease in the expression of SNHG16 and TRAF6 and an increase in miRNA-146a in the colon and bone. ZOL administration improved the histopathological changes in the colon, produced a significant decrease in CK20 and Ki-67, and increased CDx2 expressions. In bone, ZOL prevented osteoporotic changes and tumour cell invasion produced a significant decrease in RANK and an increase in OPG expressions, alongside improved bone mineral density in CT scans. ZOL could be a promising preventive therapy against colitis-induced cancer and associated OP via modulation expression of SNHG16, miRNA-146a, and TRAF6.

Current Concepts in the Treatment of Giant Cell Tumor of Bone: An Update.

Curettage is recommended for the treatment of Campanacci stages 1-2 giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) in the extremities, pelvis, sacrum, and spine, without preoperative denosumab treatment. In the distal femur, bone chips and plate fixation are utilized to reduce damage to the subchondral bone and prevent pathological fracture, respectively. For local recurrence, re-curettage may be utilized when feasible. En bloc resection is an option for very aggressive Campanacci stage 3 GCTB in the extremities, pelvis, sacrum, and spine, combined with 1-3 doses of preoperative denosumab treatment. Denosumab monotherapy once every 3 months is currently the standard strategy for inoperable patients and those with metastatic GCTB. However, in case of tumor growth, a possible malignant transformation should be considered. Zoledronic acid appears to be as effective as denosumab; nevertheless, it is a more cost-effective option. Therefore, zoledronic acid may be an alternative treatment option, particularly in developing countries. Surgery is the mainstay treatment for malignant GCTB.

Ex vivo expansion and activation of Vγ9Vδ2 T cells by CELMoDs in combination with zoledronic acid.

As multiple myeloma (MM) progresses, immune effector cells decrease in number and function and become exhausted. This remains an insurmountable clinical issue that must be addressed by development of novel modalities to revitalize anti-MM immunity. Human Vγ9Vδ2 T (Vδ2+ γδ T) cells serve as the first line of defense against pathogens as well as tumors and can be expanded ex vivo from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) upon treatment with amino-bisphosphonates in combination with IL-2. Here, we demonstrated that next-generation immunomodulators called cereblon E3 ligase modulators (CELMoDs), as well as lenalidomide and pomalidomide, expanded Th1-like Vδ2+ γδ T cells from PBMCs in the presence of zoledronic acid (ZA). However, the expansion of Th1-like Vδ2+ γδ T cells by these immunomodulatory drugs was abolished under IL-2 blockade, although IL-2 production was induced in PBMCs. BTN3A1 triggers phosphoantigen presentation to γδ T-cell receptors and is required for γδ T-cell expansion and activation. ZA but not these immunomodulatory drugs upregulated BTN3A1 in monocytes. These results suggest that immunomodulatory drugs and ZA have cooperative roles in expansion of Th1-like Vδ2+ γδ T cells, and provide the important knowledge for clinical application of human Vδ2+ γδ T cells as effector cells.

Duration of fracture prevention after zoledronate treatment in women with osteopenia: observational follow-up of a 6-year randomised controlled trial to 10 years.

BACKGROUND: We previously identified that zoledronate administered at 18-month intervals reduced fragility fractures by a third in a 6-year trial of women older than 65 years with osteopenia. This extension aims to identify the persistence of these effects. METHODS: Of the 2000 ambulant, community dwelling, postmenopausal women older than 65 years recruited in Auckland, New Zealand, with T-scores at the total hip or femoral neck in the range -1·0 to -2·5, we invited participants who received four doses of intravenous zoledronate, completed follow-up to year 6 of the core trial, did not have metabolic bone disease (other than osteoporosis), and were not using bone-active drugs into this 4-year observational study extension, during which further treatment was at the discretion of their own doctors. Participants were asked to notify study staff of any new fractures and were telephoned at 7·5 years and 9·0 years to update their health status. Participants were then invited to an onsite visit at 10·0 years. Fractures and other health events were documented at each contact and analysed in all women who entered the extension, and bone mineral density (BMD; analysed in participants without notable use of bone-active medications who attended an onsite visit at 10 years) and turnover markers (measured from fasting morning blood in a random subset of 50 participants) were measured at year 10. FINDINGS: Of the 1000 women randomly assigned to receive zoledronate in the core trial, 796 participants were eligible for the extension, of whom 762 (96%) entered the extension between Sept 24, 2015, and Dec 13, 2017. Mean follow-up duration was 4·24 years (SD 0·57, range 0·61-6·55; final follow-up on May 25, 2022). 727 (91%) of participants were assessed at 10 years. 25 women died during the extension, six withdrew for medical reasons, and four were lost to follow-up. 92 women suffered 114 non-vertebral fractures during the extension. Non-vertebral fracture rates increased from a nadir of 15 fractures per 1000 woman-years (95% CI 10-21) in the last 2 years of the core trial to 24 fractures (17-33) in years 6-8 and 42 fractures (32-53) in years 8-10, similar to that in the placebo group in the last 2 years of the core trial. Total hip BMD (relative risk per 0·1 g/cm2 0·73, 95% CI 0·57-0·93; p=0·011) and a previous history of non-vertebral fracture (1·74, 1·12-2·69; p=0·013) at year 6 predicted incident fractures but change in total hip BMD did not. Total hip BMD decreased from 4·2% above study baseline to 0·8% above baseline (p<0·0001) during the extension. Turnover markers were not useful for predicting BMD loss in individuals. Osteonecrosis of the jaw or atypical femoral fractures did not occur in any participants. INTERPRETATION: The reduced fracture rates following zoledronate in the core trial were substantially maintained for 1·5-3·5 years after the last zoledronate infusion, but not thereafter. FUNDING: Health Research Council of New Zealand.