Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 47
Filter
2.
J Forensic Leg Med ; 29: 36-42, 2015 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25572084

ABSTRACT

The aim of this is to review deaths associated with the use of Riot Control Agents (RCAs) and to assess how the presenting pathologies is such cases may better inform cause of death conclusions upon autopsy. We also sought to present which additional steps should be added to the Minnesota protocol and the European harmonization of medico-legal autopsy rules in suspected cases of deaths associated with the use of RCAs. We included 10 lethal cases in our study. In three cases, RCAs were found to be the sole cause of death, in three cases RCAs were ruled a secondary cause of death due asphyxia or asthma subsequent to exposure to RCAs and in four cases RCAs were contributory factors to death. In three cases the responsible agents were identified as Chloroacetophenone (CN), Chlorobenzylidene malononitrile (CS) and Oleoresin capsicum (OC) and in the remaining 7 cases, the agent was OC alone. As there are no specific findings in suspected cases of death associated with RCA use, establishing cause of death and whether RCAs are the sole cause or only a contributory factor will be based on the elimination of other possible causes of death. For this reason, a specifically structured autopsy is essential. This specifically structured autopsy should contain basic principles of the Minnesota Protocol and the European harmonization of medico-legal autopsy rules with the following additional steps taken: examination of clothing, eyes, and skin; examination of pharyngeal, tracheobronchial, and eusophegeal mucosas; and a thorough recording of the steps taken by the party conducting the arrest, including other possible causes of in-custody death, as well as a detailed medical history of the deceased.


Subject(s)
Forensic Pathology/methods , Riot Control Agents, Chemical/adverse effects , Riot Control Agents, Chemical/poisoning , Adult , Asphyxia/chemically induced , Asthma/chemically induced , Forensic Toxicology , Humans , Male , Medical History Taking , Middle Aged , Myocardium/pathology , Plant Extracts/adverse effects , Plant Extracts/poisoning , Respiratory Mucosa/pathology , Respiratory System/pathology , o-Chlorobenzylidenemalonitrile/adverse effects , o-Chlorobenzylidenemalonitrile/poisoning , omega-Chloroacetophenone/adverse effects , omega-Chloroacetophenone/poisoning
3.
Mil Med ; 179(7): 793-8, 2014 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25003867

ABSTRACT

Acute respiratory illnesses (ARIs) are among the leading causes for hospital visits in U.S. military training populations and historically peak during U.S. Army Basic Combat Training (BCT) following mandatory exposure to the riot control agent o-chlorobenzylidene malononitrile (CS). This observational prospective cohort studied the association between CS exposures and ARI-related health outcomes in 6,723 U.S. Army recruits attending BCT at Fort Jackson, South Carolina from August 1 to September 25, 2012 by capturing and linking the incidence of ARI before and after the mask confidence chamber to CS exposure data. Recruits had a significantly higher risk (risk ratio = 2.44; 95% confidence interval = 1.74, 3.43) of being diagnosed with ARI following exposure to CS compared to the period of training preceding exposure, and incidence of ARI after CS exposure was dependent on the CS exposure concentration (p = 0.03). There was a significant pre-/postexposure ARI difference across all CS concentration levels (p < 0.01), however, no significant differences were detected among these rate ratios (p = 0.72). As CS exposure is positively associated with ARI health outcomes in this population, interventions designed to reduce respiratory exposures could result in decreased hospital burden and lost training time in the U.S. Army BCT population.


Subject(s)
Military Personnel/education , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Respiratory Tract Diseases/chemically induced , o-Chlorobenzylidenemalonitrile/adverse effects , Acute Disease , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Incidence , Prospective Studies , Respiratory Tract Diseases/epidemiology , Riot Control Agents, Chemical/adverse effects , Risk Factors , United States/epidemiology
4.
Arch. med. interna (Montevideo) ; 36(2): 75-78, jul. 2014. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-754152

ABSTRACT

El gas CS (o-clorobenzolideno malononitrilo) se incluye dentro del grupo de los gases lacrimógenos. La exposición a dicho gas ocurre durante su empleo como gas de defensa o antidisturbios, así como durante el entrenamiento rutinario de las fuerzas de choque especializadas. Su acción tóxica es ejercida a través de un efecto irritante sobre piel y mucosas, así como por mecanismos inmunoalérgicos. Presentamos el caso de un paciente de 24 años, perteneciente a una fuerza de choque, que consultó por lesiones cutáneas luego de una exposición a humo y dispersión de polvo de una granada de gas CS durante ejercicios de entrenamiento. Clínicamente se presentó características peculiares, referidas a sus manifestaciones cutáneas, localización y severidad de las mismas. Se analiza la etiopatogenia de las lesiones y los posibles mecanismos involucrados, diagnósticos diferenciales, así como los pilares del tratamiento frente a una exposición a gas CS...


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Tear Gases/adverse effects , Tear Gases/toxicity , Skin , o-Chlorobenzylidenemalonitrile/adverse effects , Erythema , Flushing , Pruritus/etiology , Pruritus/chemically induced
5.
Forensic Sci Med Pathol ; 10(1): 62-8, 2014 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24213923

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: In the United Kingdom (UK) police restraint and control of detainees is undertaken by assorted means. Two types of incapacitant spray (IS) are approved by the UK Home Office for use: CS (o-chlorobenzylidine malononitrile, dissolved in an organic solvent--methyl iso-butyl ketone and pelargonic acid vanillyamide (PAVA). The aim of this study was to document the effects of incapacitant sprays, by symptom assessment and medical examination, within a few hours of deployment. METHODS: A detailed proforma was produced to explore the nature of the arrest, the nature of exposure to the incapacitant spray, the type of incapacitant spray, the symptoms experienced and the medical findings. RESULTS: 99 proformas were completed. 74 % were completed by detainees and 26 % were completed by police officers. 88 % were exposed to CS spray, the remainder to PAVA spray. The mean time of assessment after exposure was 2.8 ± 2.33 h (mean ± SD). The most frequent sites of IS contact were the face and scalp (n = 78), and exposure to the left and right eyes (n = 32). The most common symptoms were: painful eyes (n = 68); red eyes (n = 58); runny nose (n = 59); lacrimation (n = 55); nasal discomfort (n = 52); skin irritation (n = 49); and skin burning (n = 45). The most common medical findings were: conjunctival erythema (n = 34); skin erythema (n = 21); and rhinorrhea (n = 20). CONCLUSIONS: Symptoms and signs of exposure to IS lasted longer than was expected (a mean of 2.8 h). Approximately 30 % of those exposed had ocular effects and 20 % had skin effects. The findings of this study will enable the guidelines on the expected effects and duration of symptoms resulting from exposure to incapacitant sprays to be reviewed and suggestions for their management to be refined.


Subject(s)
Benzylamines/adverse effects , Crime , Fatty Acids/adverse effects , Irritants/adverse effects , Law Enforcement , Police , Restraint, Physical , o-Chlorobenzylidenemalonitrile/adverse effects , Adolescent , Adult , Aerosols , Eye/drug effects , Eye Diseases/chemically induced , Eye Diseases/diagnosis , Female , Humans , London , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Skin/drug effects , Skin Diseases/chemically induced , Skin Diseases/diagnosis , Time Factors , Young Adult
6.
J Environ Health ; 74(3): 18-21, 2011 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22010329

ABSTRACT

All soldiers in the U.S. Army are required to complete mask confidence training with o-chlorobenzylidene malononitrile (CS). To instill confidence in the protective capability of the military protective mask, CS is thermally dispersed in a room where soldiers wearing military protective masks are required to conduct various physical exercises, break the seal of their mask, speak, and remove their mask. Soldiers immediately feel the irritating effects of CS when the seal of the mask is broken, which reinforces the mask's ability to shield the soldier from airborne chemical hazards. In the study described in this article, the authors examined the CS concentration inside a mask confidence chamber operated in accordance with U.S. Army training guidelines. The daily average CS concentrations ranged from 2.33-3.29 mg/m3 and exceeded the threshold limit value ceiling, the recommended exposure limit ceiling, and the concentration deemed immediately dangerous to life and health. The minimum and maximum CS concentration used during mask confidence training should be evaluated.


Subject(s)
Military Personnel , Occupational Exposure/analysis , Respiratory Protective Devices , Riot Control Agents, Chemical/analysis , o-Chlorobenzylidenemalonitrile/analysis , Analysis of Variance , Environmental Monitoring , Eye Injuries/prevention & control , Humans , Irritants/analysis , Maryland , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Respiratory Protective Devices/standards , Respiratory System/injuries , Riot Control Agents, Chemical/adverse effects , Threshold Limit Values , United States , o-Chlorobenzylidenemalonitrile/adverse effects
8.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 266(2): 301-4, 2009 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18365225

ABSTRACT

CS gas (o-chlorobenzylidenemalononitrile) is one of the most commonly used riot agents. It can create excessive tearing, conjunctivitis, uncontrolled blinking (blepharospasm) and a sensation of burning and pain at initial exposure. Pulmonary edema (ARDS) and/or diffuse airway lesions on human would be lethal after CS inhalation. We report a case with acute laryngeal and bronchial obstruction due to vocal cord edema and extensive crusting at glottic level, trachea and bronchi. The CS gas was sprayed in a 6 x 6 m(2) closed room, and she was exposed to increased concentration of the gas for 10 s. Surprisingly, her initial symptoms were raised 21 days after CS spray exposure.


Subject(s)
Airway Obstruction/chemically induced , Laryngeal Edema/chemically induced , Riot Control Agents, Chemical/adverse effects , o-Chlorobenzylidenemalonitrile/adverse effects , Acute Disease , Administration, Inhalation , Adolescent , Airway Obstruction/physiopathology , Airway Obstruction/therapy , Bronchoscopy , Combined Modality Therapy , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Laryngeal Edema/diagnosis , Laryngeal Edema/therapy , Laryngoscopy , Riot Control Agents, Chemical/administration & dosage , Risk Assessment , Severity of Illness Index , Tracheostomy/methods , o-Chlorobenzylidenemalonitrile/chemistry
9.
Contact Dermatitis ; 53(1): 9-13, 2005 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15982225

ABSTRACT

CS spray (2-chlorobenzylidene malononitrile 5% w/v in methyl isobutyl ketone) has been used by the police force in the UK as an incapacitant for nearly a decade. It causes a number of well-recognized cutaneous reactions, which are generally regarded as short-lived. These include skin burning, erythema and blistering. However, a range of unpredictable cutaneous reactions to CS spray may also occur. We have found contact allergy, leukoderma, initiation or exacerbation of seborrhoeic dermatitis, and aggravation of rosacea following CS spray exposure in 6 police officers and 1 doorman. These skin reactions have required long-term changes in working practice for the affected individuals. Police officers may have repeated exposure to CS spray during their training and in their work, and designated police officers carry CS spray canisters daily in the line of duty. They may therefore be at greater risk of exposure to CS spray and its unintended effects than many assailants.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Dermatitis, Occupational/etiology , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Police , Riot Control Agents, Chemical/adverse effects , o-Chlorobenzylidenemalonitrile/adverse effects , Adult , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/prevention & control , Dermatitis, Occupational/prevention & control , Dermatitis, Seborrheic/chemically induced , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Riot Control Agents, Chemical/administration & dosage , Rosacea/chemically induced , Workplace , o-Chlorobenzylidenemalonitrile/administration & dosage
10.
Am J Emerg Med ; 21(3): 199-204, 2003 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12811712

ABSTRACT

Hazardous materials (hazmat) events pose a health threat not only for those individuals in the immediate vicinity of the release (ie, members of the general public, on-site first responders, employees), but also for ED personnel (ie, physicians and nurses) treating the chemically contaminated victims arriving at the hospital. Secondary contamination injuries to ED personnel result when exposed victims enter the ED without being properly decontaminated. Data from the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry's Hazardous Substances Emergency Events Surveillance System were used to conduct a retrospective analysis on hazmat events occurring in 16 states from 1995 through 2001 that involved secondary injury to ED personnel. Six events were identified in which 15 ED personnel were secondarily injured while treating contaminated victims. The predominant injuries sustained were respiratory and eye irritation. Proper victim decontamination procedures, good field-to-hospital communication, and appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) use can help prevent ED personnel injuries and contamination of the ED.


Subject(s)
Emergency Medical Services/statistics & numerical data , Hazardous Substances/adverse effects , Occupational Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Child , Chlorine/adverse effects , Humans , Hydrofluoric Acid/adverse effects , Illicit Drugs/adverse effects , Illicit Drugs/chemical synthesis , Insecticides/adverse effects , Malathion/adverse effects , Methamphetamine/adverse effects , Methamphetamine/chemical synthesis , Population Surveillance , Riot Control Agents, Chemical/adverse effects , United States/epidemiology , o-Chlorobenzylidenemalonitrile/adverse effects
11.
Med Sci Law ; 43(2): 98-104, 2003 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12741651

ABSTRACT

The physical effects of CS spray are well documented. However, less is known about the impact of its use by the police on the psychological health of those exposed. In this study we explored the psychiatric morbidity of a group of 30 individuals who experienced the same trauma, a significant part of which was exposure to CS spray. Just over a quarter suffered post-traumatic stress disorder. It is proposed that more attention needs to be paid to the psychological effects of the use of CS spray by the police. Consistent with other studies, a past psychiatric history and a more external locus of control was associated with post-traumatic morbidity. The latter finding may have implications for psychological interventions after exposure to trauma.


Subject(s)
Forensic Psychiatry/legislation & jurisprudence , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/psychology , o-Chlorobenzylidenemalonitrile/adverse effects , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Police/legislation & jurisprudence , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/metabolism , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors , United Kingdom/epidemiology , Violence
12.
J R Soc Med ; 96(4): 172-4, 2003 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12668703

ABSTRACT

CS gas (2-chlorobenzylidene malonitrile) is widely used in an incapacitant spray that causes intense lacrimation, blepharospasm and burning sensations in the throat and nose. Questions have been raised about its safety. We obtained information on short-term and long-term symptoms, and performed ear, nose and throat examinations and respirometry at 8-10 months, in 34 young adults who had been exposed to CS spray in a confined space during a confrontation with police. The group was subdivided into those who had been sprayed directly on the face (n=10) and those exposed indirectly. At one hour, all but 2 individuals still had symptoms; respiratory and oral symptoms were significantly more prevalent in the directly exposed group. At one month, only oral symptoms were significantly more prevalent. At 8-10 months, symptoms were still reported but there were no differences between the groups and clinical examinations revealed no specific abnormalities. There was no convincing evidence of long-term physical sequelae from exposure to CS spray.


Subject(s)
Riot Control Agents, Chemical/adverse effects , o-Chlorobenzylidenemalonitrile/adverse effects , Adult , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Mouth Diseases/chemically induced , Respiration Disorders/chemically induced , Riot Control Agents, Chemical/administration & dosage , o-Chlorobenzylidenemalonitrile/administration & dosage
13.
Soc Sci Med ; 56(6): 1269-78, 2003 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12600364

ABSTRACT

Recent years have seen the introduction of a wide range of weapons for police forces around the world intended to minimise injuries incurred in officer-public encounters. In 1996, police forces in England and Wales began trials of CS incapacitant sprays. This article reviews the claims and counterclaims surrounding the medical implications of the sprays with a view to asking how the uncertainties associated with them have been handled in the regulation process. This analysis casts considerable doubt on the robustness of the precautions taken and demonstrates a continuing failure for relevant government agencies to respond and learn from problems identified. Drawing on wider literature regarding the health implications of risky technologies, it further asks what policy lessons the case of the CS sprays holds for the regulation of weaponry at an international level.


Subject(s)
Aerosols , Law Enforcement/methods , Police , Safety , Security Measures , o-Chlorobenzylidenemalonitrile/adverse effects , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Organizational Case Studies , Police/standards , Public Health , Research , United Kingdom , o-Chlorobenzylidenemalonitrile/standards
16.
Mil Med ; 167(2): 136-9, 2002 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11873536

ABSTRACT

o-Chlorobenzylidenemalonitrile, more commonly called CS, is grouped with several other irritant agents referred to as "tear gas." It is a riot-control agent used frequently in military settings to test the ability and speed of personnel in donning their military gas masks. When personnel are exposed to CS without proper personal protective equipment, it has potent irritant effects. We report a unique cluster of hospitalizations of nine U.S. Marines who developed a transient pulmonary syndrome. All nine patients had symptoms of cough and shortness of breath. Five of the nine presented with hemoptysis, and four presented with hypoxia. Symptoms were associated with strenuous physical exercise from 36 to 84 hours after heavy exposure of CS in a field training setting. Four of the nine Marines required intensive care observation as a result of profound hypoxia. All signs and symptoms resolved within 72 hours of hospital admission. One week after CS exposure, all nine Marines demonstrated normal lung function during spirometry before and after exercise challenge using cycle ergometry.


Subject(s)
Environmental Exposure/adverse effects , Lung Diseases/chemically induced , Military Personnel , o-Chlorobenzylidenemalonitrile/adverse effects , Adolescent , Adult , Humans , Male , United States
17.
Clin Exp Dermatol ; 26(3): 248-50, 2001 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11422166

ABSTRACT

Tear gas is used throughout the World for control of riots and civil disobedience. CS gas as used by the UK police force is issued as a 'spray' and is 5% CS in methylisobutylketone (MIBK), a potent irritant. Assaults on police officers in forces issued with CS spray have fallen significantly over the past 3 years, whilst having risen in areas without it. Thus, CS gas appears to be an effective deterrent. However, significant cutaneous reactions can occur as a result of exposure. We report a severe contact dermatitis to CS gas to highlight the clinical features. The nature of CS gas and potential cutaneous adverse reactions are discussed.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Contact/etiology , Facial Dermatoses/chemically induced , o-Chlorobenzylidenemalonitrile/adverse effects , Adult , Humans , Male , Police
18.
Med Sci Law ; 41(1): 74-7, 2001 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11219129

ABSTRACT

A case of a superficial burn following exposure to CS incapacitant spray is reported. This is followed by a summary of the properties and effects of CS and the other agents which occur in the incapacitant spray. CS is relatively safe, but it does have unwanted effects, especially on skin exposure. Possible contributing factors to the production of a skin burn are discussed.


Subject(s)
Burns, Chemical/etiology , o-Chlorobenzylidenemalonitrile/adverse effects , Adult , Eye/drug effects , Humans , Male , Police , Safety , Skin/drug effects , o-Chlorobenzylidenemalonitrile/chemistry , o-Chlorobenzylidenemalonitrile/pharmacology
19.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 79(4): 234-40, 2000 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10941352

ABSTRACT

A 30-year-old incarcerated man was sprayed with the "tear gas" ortho-chlorobenzylidene malononitrile (CS). He was hospitalized 8 days later with erythroderma, wheezing, pneumonitis with hypoxemia, hepatitis with jaundice, and hypereosinophilia. During the subsequent months he continued to suffer from generalized dermatitis, recurrent cough and wheezing consistent with reactive airways dysfunction syndrome, and eosinophilia. These abnormalities responded to brief courses of systemic corticosteroid but recurred off therapy. The dermatitis resolved gradually over 6-7 months, but the patient still had asthma-like symptoms a year following exposure. Patch testing confirmed sensitization to CS. The mechanism of the patient's prolonged reaction is unknown but may involve cell-mediated hypersensitivity, perhaps to adducts of CS (or a metabolite) and tissue proteins. This is the first documented case in which CS apparently caused a severe, multisystem illness by hypersensitivity rather than direct tissue toxicity. Both the ethics and safety of CS use remain controversial, in part because of the difficulty documenting sporadic injuries received in the field, and also because the charged circumstances surrounding CS use may lead to both underreporting and exaggerated claims of medical harm. The medical literature on CS focuses mainly on its immediate irritant effects and on transient dermal and ocular injuries, with only 2 prior case reports of acute lung injury related to CS exposure. Given the paucity of documented lasting effects despite its widespread use for more than 3 decades, CS appears to be safe when deployed (outdoors) in a controlled manner, but it can cause important injuries if misused or if applied to a sensitized individual.


Subject(s)
Drug Hypersensitivity/immunology , Tear Gases/adverse effects , o-Chlorobenzylidenemalonitrile/adverse effects , Adult , Drug Hypersensitivity/physiopathology , Humans , Male , Prisoners , o-Chlorobenzylidenemalonitrile/immunology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...