How I treat gastrointestinal bleeding in congenital and acquired von Willebrand disease.

Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is distinctive of severe von Willebrand disease (VWD), generally arising in older patients; in most cases, blood transfusion and hospitalization are required. The presence of arteriovenous malformations is often described when endoscopic examinations are performed. Patients with congenital type 3, 2A, and 2B are those most frequently affected by this symptom, possibly due to the loss of high-molecular-weight multimers of von Willebrand factor (VWF). GI bleeding can also occur in patients affected by acquired von Willebrand syndrome. Endoscopic examination of the GI tract is necessary to exclude ulcers and polyps or cancer as possible causes of GI bleeding. In congenital VWD, prophylaxis with VWF/factor VIII concentrates is generally started after GI-bleeding events, but this therapy is not always successful. Iron supplementation must be prescribed to avoid chronic iron deficiency. Possible rescue therapies (high-dose statins, octreotide, thalidomide, lenalidomide, and tamoxifen) were described in a few case reports and series; however, surgery may be necessary in emergency situations or if medical treatment fails to stop bleeding. In this article, we present several clinical cases that highlight the clinical challenges of these patients and possible strategies for their long-term management.

Higher rates of bleeding and use of treatment products among young boys compared to girls with von Willebrand disease.

There are limited observational studies among children diagnosed with von Willebrand Disease (VWD). We analyzed differences in bleeding characteristics by sex and type of VWD using the largest reported surveillance database of children with VWD (n = 2712), ages 2 to 12 years old. We found that the mean ages of first bleed and diagnosis were lowest among children with type 3 VWD. It was even lower among boys than girls among all VWD types, with statistically significant difference among children with type 1 or type 3 VWD. Children with type 3 VWD also reported higher proportions of ever having a bleed compared to other VWD types, with statistically higher proportions of boys compared to girls reporting ever having a bleed with type 1 and type 2 VWD. A similar pattern was observed with the use of treatment product, showing higher usage among type 3 VWD, and among boys than girls with type 1 and type 2 VWD. While there were no differences in life quality or in well-being status by sex, children with type 3 VWD showed a greater need for mobility assistance compared to children with type 1 and type 2 VWD. In an adjusted analysis among children with type 1 VWD, boys showed a significant association of ever bleeding [hazard ratio 1.4; P-value <.001)] compared to girls. Understanding phenotypic bleeding characteristics, well-being status, treatment, and higher risk groups for bleeding among pre-adolescent children with VWD will aid physicians in efforts to educate families about bleeding symptoms.

Clinically relevant differences between assays for von Willebrand factor activity.

Essentials It is unclear whether there are differences between von Willebrand factor (VWF) activity assays. We compared the four most used VWF activity assays in 661 von Willebrand disease (VWD) patients. All assays correlated excellently, but a discrepant classification was seen in 20% of patients. Differences between VWF activity assays have a large impact on the classification of VWD. SUMMARY: Background Measuring the ability of von Willebrand factor (VWF) to bind to platelets is crucial for the diagnosis and classification of von Willebrand disease (VWD). Several assays that measure this VWF activity using different principles are available, but the clinical relevance of different assay principles is unclear. Objective To compare the four most widely used VWF activity assays in a large VWD patient population. Methods We measured VWF:RCo (ristocetin to activate VWF + whole platelets), VWF:GPIbR (ristocetin + platelet glycoprotein Ib receptor [GPIb] fragments), VWF:GPIbM (gain-of-function GPIb fragments that bind VWF spontaneously without ristocetin) and VWF:Ab (monoclonal antibody directed against the GPIb binding epitope of VWF to mimic platelets) in 661 VWD patients from the nationwide 'Willebrand in the Netherlands' (WiN) Study. Results All assays correlated excellently (Pearson r > 0.9), but discrepant results led to a different classification for up to one-fifth of VWD patients. VWF:RCo was not sensitive enough to classify 18% of patients and misclassified half of genotypic 2B VWD patients, especially those with p.Arg1306Trp. VWF:GPIbR was more sensitive, accurately classified the vast majority of patients, and was unaffected by the p.Asp1472His variant that causes artificially low VWF:RCo. VWF:GPIbM was the most precise assay but misclassified over a quarter of genotypic 2A, 2B and 3 patients. VWF:Ab, often not considered an actual VWF activity assay, performed at least equally to the other assays with regard to accurate VWD classification. Conclusion Although the different VWF activity assays are often considered similar, differences between assays have a large impact on the classification of VWD.

A comparative analysis of different automated von Willebrand factor glycoprotein Ib-binding activity assays in well typed von Willebrand disease patients.

Essentials Von Willebrand ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF:RCo) is not a completely reliable assay. Three automated VWF activity assays were compared within a von Willebrand disease (VWD) cohort. Raw values for all three assays were virtually the same. An overall problem within type 2A/IIE VWD using VWF:GPIb-binding activity/VWF:Ag was observed. SUMMARY: Background von Willebrand disease (VWD) is an inherited bleeding disorder caused by quantitative (type 1 and 3) or qualitative (type 2) von Willebrand factor (VWF) defect. VWD diagnosis and classification require numerous laboratory tests. VWF: glycoprotein Ib (GPIb)-binding activity assays are used to distinguish type 1 from type 2 VWD. Objectives Three different automated VWF:GPIb-binding activity assays were compared. Patients and methods BC-VWF:RCo (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics), HemosIL® VWF:RCo (Instrumentation Laboratory) and INNOVANCE® VWF:Ac (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics) were performed in a well typed VWD cohort (n = 142). Results Based on the three most used VWD parameters (FVIII:C, VWF:Ag and VWF:GPIb-binding activity) and using a cut-off of <0.70 for type 2 VWD revealed sensitivity and specificity of, respectively, 92% and 72.4% for VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag, 84% and 89.7% for VWF:GPIbR/VWF:Ag, and 92% and 85.1% for VWF:GPIbM/VWF:Ag, whereas a lowered cut-off of < 0.60 resulted in reduced sensitivity with increased specificity for all assays. Conclusion VWD classification based on FVIII:C, VWF:Ag and VWF:GPIb-binding activity revealed an overall problem with normal VWF:GPIb-binding activity/VWF:Ag within type 2, especially type 2A/IIE. Although all assays were practically identical, BC-VWF:RCo had higher %CV compared with both new assays but comparable lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) ~4 IU dL-1 . No clear improved distinction between type 1 and 2 VWD with new assays was seen. BC-VWF: RCo and HemosIL® are ristocetin dependent, whereas INNOVANCE® does not rely upon ristocetin and is not influenced by VWF polymorphisms increasing VWF:GPIb-binding activity levels. INNOVANCE® seems to be the best choice as a first-line VWF:GPIb-binding activity assay, providing the best balance between sensitivity and specificity for type 2 VWD.

Characterization of Von Willebrand Factor Multimer Structure in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis.

Acquired von Willebrand syndrome (AVWS) associated with severe aortic stenosis (AS) has been frequently subclassified into a subtype 2A based on the deficiency of high-molecular-weight (HMW) multimers as it is seen in inherited von Willebrand disease (VWD) type 2A. However, the multimeric phenotype of VWD type 2A does not only include an HMW deficiency but also a decrease in intermediate-molecular-weight (IMW) multimers and an abnormal inner triplet band pattern. These additional characteristics have not been evaluated in AVWS associated with severe AS. Therefore, we recruited N = 31 consecutive patients with severe AS and performed a high-resolution Western blot with densitometrical band quantification to characterize the von Willebrand factor (VWF) multimeric structure and reevaluate the AVWS subtype classification. Study patients showed an isolated HMW VWF multimer deficiency without additional abnormalities of the IMW portions and the inner triplet structure in 65%. In conclusion, the multimeric pattern of AVWS associated with severe AS does neither resemble that seen in AVWS type 2A nor that seen in inherited VWD type 2A. Therefore, a subclassification into a type 2A should not be used.

Genotype-phenotype correlation in a cohort of Portuguese patients comprising the entire spectrum of VWD types: impact of NGS.

The diagnosis of von Willebrand disease (VWD), the most common inherited bleeding disorder, is characterised by a variable bleeding tendency and heterogeneous laboratory phenotype. The sequencing of the entire VWF coding region has not yet become a routine practice in diagnostic laboratories owing to its high costs. Nevertheless, next-generation sequencing (NGS) has emerged as an alternative to overcome this limitation. We aimed to determine the correlation of genotype and phenotype in 92 Portuguese individuals from 60 unrelated families with VWD; therefore, we directly sequenced VWF. We compared the classical Sanger sequencing approach and NGS to assess the value-added effect on the analysis of the mutation distribution in different types of VWD. Sixty-two different VWF mutations were identified, 27 of which had not been previously described. NGS detected 26 additional mutations, contributing to a broad overview of the mutant alleles present in each VWD type. Twenty-nine probands (48.3 %) had two or more mutations; in addition, mutations with pleiotropic effects were detected, and NGS allowed an appropriate classification for seven of them. Furthermore, the differential diagnosis between VWD 2B and platelet type VWD (n = 1), Bernard-Soulier syndrome and VWD 2B (n = 1), and mild haemophilia A and VWD 2N (n = 2) was possible. NGS provided an efficient laboratory workflow for analysing VWF. These findings in our cohort of Portuguese patients support the proposal that improving VWD diagnosis strategies will enhance clinical and laboratory approaches, allowing to establish the most appropriate treatment for each patient.

Rapid discrimination of the phenotypic variants of von Willebrand disease.

Approximately 20% to 25% of patients with von Willebrand disease (VWD) have a qualitative defect of the von Willebrand factor (VWF) protein activities. Variant VWD typically is classified as type 1C, 2A, 2B, 2M, or 2N depending on the VWF activity defect. Traditionally, diagnosis has relied on multiple clinical laboratory assays to assign VWD phenotype. We developed an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to measure the various activities of VWF on a single plate and evaluated 160 patient samples enrolled in the Zimmerman Program for the Molecular and Clinical Biology of von Willebrand Disease with type 2 VWD. Using linear discriminate analysis (LDA), this assay was able to identify type 1C, 2A, 2B, 2M, or 2N VWD with an overall accuracy of 92.5% in the patient study cohort. LDA jackknife analysis, a statistical resampling technique, identified variant VWD with an overall accuracy of 88.1%, which predicts the assay's performance in the general population. In addition, this assay demonstrated correlation with traditional clinical laboratory VWF assays. The VWF multiplex activity assay may be useful as a same-day screening assay when considering the diagnosis of variant VWD in an individual patient.

Contribution of the collagen binding activity (VWF:CB) in the range of tests for the diagnosis and classification of von Willebrand disease.

Von willebrand disease (VWD) is a common inherited bleeding disorder. The diagnosis may need a large panel of tests that differ in term of sensibility and specificity, and because of the effect of multifactorial modifiers (genetic or environmental); there is difficulty in defining diagnostic limits. We performed a panel of tests on 19 patients suffering from recurrent bleeding, to diagnose and classify VWD subtypes, by introducing the von Willebrand factor (VWF) collagen binding test (VWF:CB), then comparing the results with the activity of VWF risticetin cofactor (VWF:RCo) and multimer pattern. We considered 30% limit rate of VWF, as described by many authors, to make the diagnosis of VWD. The diagnosis of type 1 of VWD has been confirmed in 7patients, subtype 2A in 2 patients, subtype 2M in 2 patients and type 3 in 2 patients. We also defined a new group of 6 patients named "uncertain type 1" that didn't fill into the type 1 diagnostic criterion. The comparison between VWF:CB and VWF:RCo showed good correlation for all types of VWD except for type 2 while comparison between VWF:CB and multimer pattern showed good concordance for all types of VWD diagnosed. In conclusion, VWF:CB can be a good alternative to VWF:RCo for the diagnosis of quantitative deficiencies of VWF. It can also replace the multimer pattern study. However, the introduction of VWF:CB didn't help in the diagnosis of the "uncertain type 1" group of patients and cannot be a replacement for qualitative defect.

[Von Willebrand disease. Molecular biology and diagnosis]. / Enfermedad de von Willebrand, biología molecular y diagnóstico.

BACKGROUND: Von Willebrand disease is the most common inherited disorder of the coagulation proteins in humans. There are three types: 1, 2A, 2B, 2N, 2M and 3. It is associated with mutations on chromosome 12 in the region p13.2, encoding the von Willebrand factor (VWF), which is synthesized in endothelial cells and megakaryocytes. DISCUSSION: The VWF gene has been characterised using molecular biology techniques, which have acquired an important role in diagnosis von Willebrand disease, as well as in the investigation of alterations in other genes, which may be involved in regulating the synthesis, processing, and secretion of VWF. However, there are still no strategies to integrate the molecular biology diagnostic tests available. Analysis of VWF multimers is a methodology that meets the characteristics for diagnosis, but it is not easy to standardise. Considering that even in tertiary centres in our country, von Willebrand patients do not have a definitive diagnosis, it is necessary to implement these methodologies to study and improve diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Von Willebrand disease is highly heterogeneous due to the molecular mechanisms that produce the various clinical and laboratory phenotypes. In Mexico there are few studies related to this disease; therefore it is essential to conduct a comprehensive study including clinical, basic, and special testing laboratory tests, in order to establish a correct diagnosis, develop new therapeutic approaches, and offer the appropriate medical care and genetic counselling.

VWF propeptide in defining VWD subtypes.

In this issue of Blood, Sanders and coworkers define the pathophysiology of types 1, 2, and 3 von Willebrand disease (VWD) in the Willebrand in the Netherlands (WiN) study by using the ratios of von Willebrand factor propeptide (VWFpp) or factor VIII activity to VWF antigen.

Laboratory diagnosis of von Willebrand disease.

Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is considered the most common inherited bleeding disorder and may also be the most difficult to diagnose. Clinical symptoms of VWD include predominantly mild mucosal bleeding; surgical bleeding may occur with specific challenges and joint bleeding can occur in the most severe forms. A family history either of diagnosed VWD or of bleeding symptoms is typically present. Laboratory diagnosis requires a series of assays of von Willebrand factor (VWF) quantity and function, and factor VIII activity, with no single straightforward diagnostic test available to either confirm or exclude the diagnosis. Newer assays of VWF function are becoming more available and useful in determining the laboratory diagnosis of VWD.

von Willebrand factor propeptide and the phenotypic classification of von Willebrand disease.

The ratios between von Willebrand factor propeptide (VWFpp) or factor VIII activity ( FVIII: C) and VWF antigen (VWF:Ag) reflect synthesis, secretion, and clearance of VWF. We aimed to define the pathophysiology of 658 patients with type 1, 2, or 3 von Willebrand disease (VWD) with VWF levels ≤30 U/dL from the Willebrand in The Netherlands (WiN) study using the VWFpp/VWF:Ag and FVIII: C/VWF:Ag ratios. We evaluated the use of VWFpp in the classification and diagnosis of VWD. On the basis of the ratios, reduced VWF synthesis was observed in 18% of type 1 and only 2% of type 2 patients. A significant proportion of type 3 patients had detectable VWFpp (41%). These patients had a lower bleeding score than type 3 patients who had a complete absence of VWF:Ag and VWFpp (14.0 vs 19.5; P = .025). The majority of these patients had missense mutations with rapid VWF clearance, whereas type 3 patients with no VWFpp were homozygous for null alleles. In conclusion, VWFpp identified severe type 1 VWD with very low VWF levels in patients who had previously been classified as type 3 VWD. This study underlines the clinical significance of the VWFpp assay in the diagnosis and classification of VWD.

Up to date concepts about Von Willebrand disease and the diagnose of this hemostatic disorder.

The authors review the current data in literature regarding the recent knowledge about hemostase, coagulation and clinical and laboratory diagnostic algorithms of hemostatic disorders. They also present the pathological classification of bleeding disorders - the basis to clinical approach of these diseases.

[Von Willebrand disease in the Netherlands: the WiN study]. / De ziekte van von Willebrand in Nederland: de WiN-studie.

Von Willebrand disease is the most common inherited bleeding disorder and is characterised by mucocutaneous bleeding. Von Willebrand disease is caused by reduced levels or reduced function of von Willebrand factor. Depending on the cause, von Willebrand disease is distinguished into various types with their own characteristics and treatment options. The frequency and severity of bleeding in patients with von Willebrand disease is strongly determined by von Willebrand factor levels, factor VIII levels and the type of von Willebrand disease. Eighty-five percent of all adult females with von Willebrand disease reports menorrhagia. A high percentage have postpartum excessive blood loss (37% of all deliveries). The quality of life is reduced in patients with von Willebrand disease. Patients with von Willebrand disease have a reduced risk of arterial thrombosis such as a myocardial or cerebral infarction.

[Von Willebrand factor and Von Willebrand disease]. / Von-willebrandfactor en de ziekte van von Willebrand.

Von Willebrand factor (VWF) is a multimeric adhesive protein that binds platelets to exposed subendothelium and carries factor VIII in the circulation. VWD is classified into three major subtypes, distinguished by a quantitative deficiency of VWF (type 1: partial deficiency; type 3: complete deficiency) or qualitative defects of VWF (type 2A, 2B, 2M and 2N). Its diagnosis is based on both clinical and laboratory criteria. The severity of bleeding varies considerably depending on the level of VWF and the FVIII reduction. Diagnosis is especially difficult in patients with a mild or dubious phenotype (type 1 and 2 VWD). Laboratory strategy includes screening tests: complete blood count, platelet morphology, prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and platelet function analysis. The next step is measurement of VWF antigen, VWF activity and FVIII activity, and calculating ratios between antigen and activity. Finally, multimers, the affinity of VWF for platelets or FVIII can be analysed.

Principles of care for the diagnosis and treatment of von Willebrand disease.

Von Willebrand disease is a common autosomal inherited bleeding disorder caused by quantitative or qualitative defects of von Willebrand factor, a multi-adhesive protein that binds platelets to exposed subendothelium and carries factor VIII in circulation. As a result of von Willebrand factor deficiency or abnormality, levels of factor VIII, the protein deficient in hemophilia A, may be variably reduced. Clinical manifestations are mainly represented by mucous membrane and of soft tissue bleeding. Their severity is variable depending on the degree of von Willebrand factor and factor VIII reduction. While a clear-cut diagnosis is easy in severe von Willebrand factor reductions, the advantage of pursuing a definite diagnosis in mild or dubious cases should be weighed against the risk of over-medicalization. The aim of treatment is to correct the dual defect of hemostasis caused by the abnormal/reduced von Willebrand factor and the concomitant deficiency of factor VIII. Desmopressin is the treatment of choice for type 1 von Willebrand disease patients with factor VIII and von Willebrand factor levels of 10 U/dL or over who have proved responsive to a test-infusion with the compound. Von Willebrand factor/factor VIII concentrates are needed when desmopressin is ineffective (mainly type 2 and 3 von Willebrand disease).