Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros











Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Tob Induc Dis ; 222024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38628555

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Smoking cessation is the best strategy for reducing tobacco-related morbimortality. The goal of this randomized controlled trial was to test whether using the genetically favorable markers to choose a smoking cessation drug treatment (precision medicine) was superior to using the most effective drug (varenicline) in terms of abstinence rates. Additionally, combination therapy was tested when monotherapy failed. METHODS: This partially blind, single-center study randomized (1:1) 361 participants into two major groups. In the genetic group (n=184), CYP2B6 rs2279343 (genotype AA) participants started treatment with bupropion, and CHRNA4 rs1044396 (genotype CT or TT) participants started treatment with varenicline; when genetic favorable to both, participants started treatment with bupropion, and when favorable to neither, on both drugs. In the control group (n=177), participants started treatment with varenicline, regardless of genetic markers. Drug treatment lasted 12 weeks. Efficacy endpoints were abstinence rates at Weeks 4, and Weeks 8-12, biochemically validated by carbon monoxide in exhaled air. Participants who did not achieve complete abstinence at Week 4, regardless of group, were given the choice to receive combination therapy. RESULTS: Abstinence rates were 42.9% (95% CI: 36-64) in the control group versus 30.4% (95% CI: 23-37) in the genetic group at Week 4 (p=0.01); and 74% (95% CI: 67-80) versus 52% (95% CI: 49-64) at Week 12 (p<0.001), respectively. The strategy of combining drugs after Week 4 increased abstinence rates in both groups and the significant difference between genetic and control groups was maintained. CONCLUSIONS: Results show that using these selected genetic markers was inferior to starting treatment with varenicline (control group), which is currently the most effective smoking cessation drug; moreover, the addition of bupropion in cases of varenicline monotherapy failure improves the efficacy rate until the end of treatment. CLINICAL TRIAL IDENTIFIER: NCT03362099.

2.
Tob Control ; 26(6): 656-662, 2017 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27794066

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Smoking restriction laws have spread worldwide during the last decade. Previous studies have shown a decline in the community rates of myocardial infarction after enactment of these laws. However, data are scarce about the Latin American population. In the first phase of this study, we reported the successful implementation of the law in São Paulo city, with a decrease in carbon monoxide rates in hospitality venues. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the 2009 implementation of a comprehensive smoking ban law in São Paulo city was associated with a reduction in rates of mortality and hospital admissions for myocardial infarction. METHODS: We performed a time-series study of monthly rates of mortality and hospital admissions for acute myocardial infarction from January 2005 to December 2010. The data were derived from DATASUS, the primary public health information system available in Brazil and from Mortality Information System (SIM). Adjustments and analyses were performed using the Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average with exogenous variables (ARIMAX) method modelled by environmental variables and atmospheric pollutants to evaluate the effect of smoking ban law in mortality and hospital admission rate. We also used Interrupted Time Series Analysis (ITSA) to make a comparison between the period pre and post smoking ban law. RESULTS: We observed a reduction in mortality rate (-11.9% in the first 17 months after the law) and in hospital admission rate (-5.4% in the first 3 months after the law) for myocardial infarction after the implementation of the smoking ban law. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital admissions and mortality rate for myocardial infarction were reduced in the first months after the comprehensive smoking ban law was implemented.


Asunto(s)
Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Infarto del Miocardio/mortalidad , Política para Fumadores/legislación & jurisprudencia , Contaminantes Atmosféricos/análisis , Brasil/epidemiología , Humanos , Modelos Estadísticos
3.
Tob Control ; 20(2): 156-62, 2011 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21109684

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Studies have shown that there is no safe level of secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure and there is a close link between SHS and the risk of coronary heart disease and stroke. Carbon monoxide (CO) is one of the most important components present in SHS. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of the smoking ban law in the city of Sao Paulo, Brazil, on the CO concentration in restaurants, bars, night clubs and similar venues and in their workers. METHODS: In the present study we measured CO concentration in 585 hospitality venues. CO concentration was measured in different environments (indoor, semi-open and open areas) from visited venues, as well as, in the exhaled air from approximately 627 workers of such venues. Measurements were performed twice, before and 12 weeks after the law implementation. In addition, the quality of the air in the city during the same period of our study was verified. RESULTS The CO concentration pre-ban and pot-ban in hospitality venues was indoor area 4.57 (3.70) ppm vs 1.35 (1.66) ppm (p<0.0001); semi-open 3.79 (2.49) ppm vs 1.16 (1.14) ppm (p<0.0001); open area 3.31(2.2) ppm vs 1.31 (1.39) ppm (p<0.0001); smoking employees 15.78 (9.76) ppm vs 11.50 (7.53) ppm (p<0.0001) and non-smoking employees 6.88 (5.32) ppm vs 3.50 (2.21) ppm (p<0.0001). The average CO concentration measured in the city was lower than 1 ppm during both pre-ban and post-ban periods. CONCLUSION: São Paulo's smoking-free legislation reduced significantly the CO concentration in hospitality venues and in their workers, whether they smoke or not.


Asunto(s)
Monóxido de Carbono/análisis , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Restaurantes/legislación & jurisprudencia , Fumar/legislación & jurisprudencia , Contaminación por Humo de Tabaco/legislación & jurisprudencia , Lugar de Trabajo/legislación & jurisprudencia , Adulto , Carga Corporal (Radioterapia) , Brasil , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Exposición Profesional/legislación & jurisprudencia , Prevención del Hábito de Fumar , Adulto Joven
4.
s.l; s.n; 2011. 156-162 p. tab, graf.
No convencional en Inglés | Sec. Est. Saúde SP, SESSP-ACVSES | ID: biblio-1086678

RESUMEN

Background Studies have shown that there is no safelevel of secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure and there isa close link between SHS and the risk of coronary heartdisease and stroke. Carbon monoxide (CO) is one of themost important components present in SHS.Objective To evaluate the impact of the smoking banlaw in the city of Sao Paulo, Brazil, on the COconcentration in restaurants, bars, night clubs and similarvenues and in their workers.Methods In the present study we measured COconcentration in 585 hospitality venues. COconcentration was measured in different environments(indoor, semi-open and open areas) from visited venues,as well as, in the exhaled air from approximately 627workers of such venues. Measurements were performedtwice, before and 12 weeks after the lawimplementation. In addition, the quality of the air in thecity during the same period of our study was verified.Results The CO concentration pre-ban and pot-ban inhospitality venues was indoor...


Asunto(s)
Humo , Hospitales , Nicotiana
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA