Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 14 de 14
Filtrar
1.
J Fr Ophtalmol ; 47(8): 104264, 2024 Aug 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39111095

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To review cases of optic neuritis after COVID-19 vaccination and add similar cases to the literature. METHODS: Thorough PubMed and Scopus searches were conducted, and data from studies describing optic neuritis after COVID-19 vaccination were extracted, tabulated, pooled, and reviewed. RESULTS: We present 6 cases of optic neuritis following COVID-19 vaccination. Our literature search yielded 48 similar cases. All 54 cases were divided into 3 groups with respect to their serostatus: (1) double-seronegative or unknown serostatus optic neuritis cases, (2) myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)-associated optic neuritis cases, and (3) aquaporin-4-associated optic neuritis cases. Data from each group were separately pooled and reviewed. While the most frequent vaccine among the anti-AQP4+ subgroup was BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) (2/3), recombinant vaccines, e.g., AZD122 and Ad26.Cov2.s were mostly injected in the other subgroups (23/51). No significant gender inclination was seen among different subgroups. The mean interval from vaccination to symptom onset was less than one month in all subgroups; symptom manifestations mainly occurred after the first dose (28/54). Almost all cases showed improvement after steroid therapy±plasma exchange (52/54). CONCLUSION: Despite having rare side effects such as optic neuritis, vaccination remains our most helpful protection against SARS-CoV-2. Nevertheless, larger studies are needed to ascertain the pathophysiology of such adverse effects. Likewise, the association between COVID-19 vaccination and optic neuritis warrants further investigation.

2.
J Fr Ophtalmol ; 47(1): 104021, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37951744

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To identify all reported cases of retinal artery occlusion (RAO) associated with patent foramen ovale (PFO) in the literature and present a similar case of CRAO from our clinic. METHODS: PubMed database was searched for studies reporting RAO in individuals with PFO. Relevant data were tabulated and reviewed. We estimated each case's Risk of Paradoxical Embolism (RoPE) score. RESULTS: 23 cases of CRAO (n=10; including ours), BRAO (n=10), and CILRAO (n=3) were reviewed. Most cases were under 50 years of age (78.3%). The reported predisposing factors were: hypertension (26.1%), migraine (17.3%), smoking (13.0%), recent immobilization (13.0%), strenuous exertion (8.7%), pregnancy (8.7%), and diabetes (4.3%). A high RoPE score (≥7; suggestive of paradoxical embolism via PFO) was estimated for 71.4% of patients. In most cases, the neurological and cardiovascular examinations, laboratory studies, and imaging were unremarkable, except for the PFO±atrial septal aneurysm (present in 21.7%). In only 28.6% of cases, transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) (± saline contrast) could visualize the PFO; transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) was necessary to detect the PFO in 71.4%. Approximately one-half of the patients underwent percutaneous closure of the PFO; no complications or subsequent acute ischemic events ensued. The visual prognosis was poorer for CRAO than for BRAO or CILRAO. CONCLUSION: Timely diagnosis, acute management, and ensuring urgent initiation of stroke workup in cases with RAO or transient monocular vision loss are crucial. Clues to a possible paradoxical embolism as the cause include the absence of known cardiovascular risk factors, young age, migraine, recent immobility, vigorous exercise, and pregnancy.


Asunto(s)
Embolia Paradójica , Foramen Oval Permeable , Trastornos Migrañosos , Oclusión de la Arteria Retiniana , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Embolia Paradójica/diagnóstico , Embolia Paradójica/epidemiología , Embolia Paradójica/etiología , Foramen Oval Permeable/complicaciones , Foramen Oval Permeable/diagnóstico , Foramen Oval Permeable/epidemiología , Trastornos Migrañosos/diagnóstico , Trastornos Migrañosos/epidemiología , Trastornos Migrañosos/etiología , Oclusión de la Arteria Retiniana/diagnóstico , Oclusión de la Arteria Retiniana/epidemiología , Oclusión de la Arteria Retiniana/etiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/complicaciones , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto
3.
J Fr Ophtalmol ; 2023 Aug 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37620196

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Suboptimal response to conventional treatments in refractory diabetic macular edema (rDME) encourages efforts to identify new therapeutic options. PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of three monthly intravitreal injections of a Rho-associated protein kinase (ROCK) inhibitor (Fasudil, Asahi Kasei Pharma Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) in eyes with rDME. METHODS: Ten eyes of 10 patients with DME unresponsive to at least six previous intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) injections were recruited and underwent 3 consecutive monthly intravitreal injection of 0.025mg/0.05mL Fasudil. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) were evaluated as functional and anatomical response indicators, respectively. RESULTS: The mean age was 60.1±5.1 years (range, 53-68). Five cases responded to treatment, two with both anatomical and functional responses (reduction of CMT from 521 to 395 and from 390 to 301 microns and improvement of BCVA from 0.3 to 0.1 LogMAR and 0.6 to 0.4 LogMAR, respectively) and three with only functional improvement (0.7 to 0.4; 0.7 to 0.4; and 0.3 to 0.1 LogMAR). Of note, cases with no significant change in CMT showed morphologic improvement of the retinal microstructure to some extent. No adverse event was observed during the study period. CONCLUSION: Monotherapy with intravitreal injection of ROCK inhibitors appears to have moderate visual benefits in eyes with DME refractory to IVB. Such effects may be functionally significant without obvious anatomical improvement.

4.
J Fr Ophtalmol ; 2023 Jul 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37481454

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate the short-term structural and visual outcomes and side effects associated with intravitreal dexamethasone (IVD) combined with bevacizumab (IVB) in treating patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) and an inadequate response to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents. METHODS: In this prospective interventional case series, a total of 81 eyes of 81 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and refractory DME were included and assigned to one of two groups: I) those receiving three monthly intravitreal injections of combined bevacizumab and dexamethasone (IVB+IVD) and II) those receiving three monthly intravitreal injections of bevacizumab alone (IVB). The primary outcome was the inter-group difference in central macular thickness (CMT); secondary outcomes included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), baseline optical coherence tomography (OCT) biomarkers, and intraocular pressure (IOP) one month after the last injection. RESULTS: Reduction in CMT and improvement in BCVA were significantly greater in the IVB+IVD group than the IVB group (109.88±156.25 vs. 43±113.67, respectively, P=0.03; and -0.13±0.23 vs. -0.01±0.17, respectively, P=0.008). Presence of neurosensory retinal detachment (NSD) (P<0.001) and complete inner segment/outer segment junction (IS-OS) disruption (P=0.049) on baseline OCT scans were associated with further CMT reductions in response to IVD. Conversely, identifiable epiretinal membrane (ERM) (P=0.002) and multiple hyperreflective foci (>20) (P=0.049) were associated with smaller reductions in CMT. Vitreomacular traction correlated with worse visual outcomes in the IVB+IVD group (P=0.003). The intergroup IOP difference was not clinically significant. CONCLUSION: In patients with refractory DME, addition of IVD to the standard IVB regimen can improve visual and structural outcomes without increasing the risk of endophthalmitis, IOP rise, or intraocular inflammation. Patients with NSD are more likely to respond well to IVD. The presence of ERM may predict poor treatment response.

5.
J Fr Ophtalmol ; 46(5): 461-467, 2023 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36890074

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To describe cases of endogenous fungal endophthalmitis (EFE) post-recovery from or hospitalization for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: This prospective audit involved patients with suspected endophthalmitis referred to a tertiary eye care center over a one-year period. Comprehensive ocular examinations, laboratory studies, and imaging were performed. Confirmed cases of EFE with a recent history of COVID-19 hospitalization±intensive care unit admission were identified, documented, managed, followed up, and described. RESULTS: Seven eyes of six patients were reported; 5/6 were male, and the mean age was 55. The mean duration of hospitalization for COVID-19 was approximately 28 days (14-45); the mean time from discharge to onset of visual symptoms was 22 days (0-35). All patients had underlying conditions (5/6 hypertension; 3/6 diabetes mellitus; 2/6 asthma) and had received dexamethasone and remdesivir during their COVID-related hospitalization. All presented with decreased vision, and 4/6 complained of floaters. Baseline visual acuity ranged from light perception (LP) to counting fingers (CF). The fundus was not visible in 3 out of 7 eyes; the other 4 had "creamy-white fluffy lesions" at the posterior pole as well as significant vitritis. Vitreous taps were positive for Candida species in six and Aspergillus species in one eye. Anti-fungal treatment included intravenous amphotericin B followed by oral voriconazole and intravitreal amphotericin B. Three eyes underwent vitrectomy; the systemic health of two patients precluded surgery. One patient (with aspergillosis) died; the others were followed for 7-10 months - the final visual outcome improved from CF to 20/200-20/50 in 4 eyes and worsened (hand motion to LP) or did not change (LP), in two others. CONCLUSION: Ophthalmologists should maintain a high index of clinical suspicion for EFE in cases with visual symptoms and a history of recent COVID-19 hospitalization and/or systemic corticosteroid use - even without other well-known risk factors.


Asunto(s)
Anfotericina B , COVID-19 , Endoftalmitis , Infecciones Fúngicas del Ojo , Vitrectomía , Voriconazol , Infecciones Fúngicas del Ojo/diagnóstico , Infecciones Fúngicas del Ojo/epidemiología , Infecciones Fúngicas del Ojo/terapia , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/epidemiología , Endoftalmitis/diagnóstico , Endoftalmitis/epidemiología , Endoftalmitis/etiología , Humanos , Hospitalización , Anfotericina B/uso terapéutico , Voriconazol/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios Prospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad
6.
J Fr Ophtalmol ; 46(4): 322-326, 2023 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36739258

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To determine and compare the efficacy of intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) and oral acetazolamide (OA) combination therapy versus IVB monotherapy in patients with macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO). METHODS: This randomized clinical trial included 54 eyes of 52 patients with RVO central macular thickness (CMT) of more than 300µm, and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) between 20/400 and 20/40. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to two groups: (I) IVB and OA (250mg twice daily) combination therapy or (II) IVB monotherapy. Ocular injections were repeated monthly for up to three months; BCVA and CMT were measured monthly. RESULTS: Both regimens resulted in significant reduction in CMT (534±150µm to 352±90µm in the IVB+OA group, P<0.001; and 580±175µm to 362±90µm in the IVB group, P<0.001); neither showed superiority in this regard. Likewise, BCVA showed significant improvement in both groups (0.87±0.56 to 0.53±0.28 LogMAR in the IVB+OA group, P=0.001; and 0.85±0.62 to 0.46±0.4 LogMAR in the IVB group, P<0.001), with no intergroup difference. CONCLUSION: Addition of oral acetazolamide to IVB in eyes with macular edema secondary to RVO may not result in additional short-term benefits regarding functional and anatomical outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05290948, registered on March 22, 2022. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05290948.


Asunto(s)
Mácula Lútea , Edema Macular , Oclusión de la Vena Retiniana , Humanos , Bevacizumab , Edema Macular/tratamiento farmacológico , Edema Macular/etiología , Acetazolamida , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis , Oclusión de la Vena Retiniana/complicaciones , Oclusión de la Vena Retiniana/tratamiento farmacológico , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular , Resultado del Tratamiento , Inyecciones Intravítreas , Agudeza Visual , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica/métodos
7.
J Fr Ophtalmol ; 46(1): 72-82, 2023 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36496293

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To review cases of acute macular neuroretinopathy (AMN) after COVID-19 vaccination and add a similar case to the literature. METHODS: A thorough PubMed search was conducted, and data from studies describing AMN after COVID-19 vaccination were extracted, tabulated, pooled, and reviewed. RESULTS: We present a case of AMN in a young woman 5 days after immunization with the BBIBP-CorV (Sinopharm) COVID-19 vaccine. Data from 21 cases were pooled and reviewed. The most frequent vaccines among the cases were recombinant ones (13/21), followed by mRNA-based (6/21) and inactivated vaccines (2/21). Only one patient (5%) was male. Seventeen over twenty-one (81%) were young women, ages 18-33. Most cases (14/21; 67%) reported recent/concurrent use of contraceptive medication. In 90% of cases (19/21), symptoms appeared within 8 days of vaccination. A confined wedge-/oval-shaped lesion morphology was more frequent than a diffuse, semilunar one. Resolution of symptoms took 4 to over 15 weeks. CONCLUSION: Attention should be paid to the history of vaccination and contraceptive use in patients with sudden-onset visual symptoms. Optical coherence tomography is integral to the detection of AMN-related abnormalities.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Síndromes de Puntos Blancos , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto Joven , Enfermedad Aguda , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Vacunación/efectos adversos
11.
J Fr Ophtalmol ; 42(8): 913-924, 2019 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30981544

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To provide a systematic review on ophthalmologic presentations of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) in conjunction with a case report of primary orbital involvement by this tumor. METHODS: A thorough electronic search on PubMed, Medline, Scopus, EMBASE and web of science databases was performed. All available data from reported cases along with our described case were extracted and analyzed. RESULTS: We describe a 66-year-old male with primary orbital DFSP who was managed by total excision of the tumor without recurrence after 18 months of follow-up. In the literature, 14 studies reporting 15 cases were identified and reviewed. Our review topics included epidemiology, clinical presentations, pathologic features, differential diagnosis, imaging, treatment and prognosis. CONCLUSION: Rarely, but crucially, ophthalmologists may encounter DFSP in the orbital or periorbital area. They should be familiar with the pathologic nature and treatment options for this tumor. This diagnosis should be kept in mind when approaching a case with a non-tender, nodular, firm, mass or more rarely an indenting orbital mass.


Asunto(s)
Dermatofibrosarcoma/patología , Neoplasias Orbitales/secundario , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Anciano , Dermatofibrosarcoma/diagnóstico , Dermatofibrosarcoma/cirugía , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Oftalmológico , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias Orbitales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Orbitales/cirugía , Enfermedades Raras , Neoplasias Cutáneas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Cutáneas/cirugía
12.
Acta Neurol Scand ; 134(4): 292-9, 2016 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27592843

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Few epidemiological studies have explored the effects of soil pollution on multiple sclerosis (MS) risk in Asia. METHOD: Based on catchment areas, Isfahan province is divided into five regions (Central, North, East, West, and South), and Soil sampling performed in catchment area with the highest range of MS prevalence and incidence. Samples were analyzed for cobalt (Co), lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd), copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), and absorbable forms of Pb, Cd, and Co. Linear regression is used to examine the association of soil heavy metals with prevalence of MS in central part of Isfahan province. RESULT: Multiple sclerosis prevalence ranged from 5.62 to 156.65 in different townships. Based on regression analysis, in case of considering fixed amounts for the rest of elements, a one (SD) increase of absorbable Pb and absorbable Cd are associated with 0.385 (SD) (P < 0.0001) increase and 0.209 (SD) (P < 0.007) decrease in MS prevalence, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study documented a significant association between exposure to absorbable Pb and Cd in soil with prevalence of MS in Isfahan. Further work is warranted to confirm this association and if validated, to understand the mechanisms behind the association.


Asunto(s)
Metales Pesados/análisis , Esclerosis Múltiple/epidemiología , Contaminantes del Suelo/análisis , Adulto , Edad de Inicio , Cadmio/análisis , Cadmio/toxicidad , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Irán/epidemiología , Plomo/análisis , Plomo/toxicidad , Modelos Lineales , Masculino , Metales Pesados/toxicidad , Prevalencia , Población Rural , Contaminantes del Suelo/toxicidad , Población Urbana , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA