Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 14 de 14
Filtrar
1.
J Urol ; 197(2S): S200-S207, 2017 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28012755

RESUMEN

To compare the efficacy of digital rectal examination and serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) in the early detection of prostate cancer, we conducted a prospective clinical trial at 6 university centers of 6,630 male volunteers 50 years old or older who underwent PSA determination (Hybritech Tandom-E or Tandem-R assays) and digital rectal examination. Quadrant biopsies were performed if the PSA level was greater than 4 µg./l. or digital rectal examination was suspicious, even if transrectal ultrasonography revealed no areas suspicious for cancer. The results showed that 15% of the men had a PSA level of greater than 4 µg./l., 15% had a suspicious digital rectal examination and 26% had suspicious findings on either or both tests. Of 1,167 biopsies performed cancer was detected in 264. PSA detected significantly more tumors (82%, 216 of 264 cancers) than digital rectal examination (55%, 146 of 264, p = 0.001). The cancer detection rate was 3.2% for digital rectal examination, 4.6% for PSA and 5.8% for the 2 methods combined. Positive predictive value was 32% for PSA and 21% for digital rectal examination. Of 160 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy and pathological staging 114 (71%) had organ confined cancer: PSA detected 85 (75%) and digital rectal examination detected 64 (56%, p = 0.003). Use of the 2 methods in combination increased detection of organ confined disease by 78% (50 of 64 cases) over digital rectal examination alone. If the performance of a biopsy would have required suspicious transrectal ultrasonography findings, nearly 40% of the tumors would have been missed. We conclude that the use of PSA in conjunction with digital rectal examination enhances early prostate cancer detection. Prostatic biopsy should be considered if either the PSA level is greater than 4 µg./l. or digital rectal examination is suspicious for cancer, even in the absence of abnormal transrectal ultrasonography findings.


Asunto(s)
Tacto Rectal , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biopsia , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/normas , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Próstata/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Ultrasonografía
2.
Prostate ; 73(3): 328-35, 2013 Feb 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22887343

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This study was conducted to investigate the effect of Se supplementation on prostate cancer incidence in men at high risk for prostate cancer. METHODS: A Phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted in 699 men at high risk for prostate cancer (prostate specific antigen (PSA) >4 ng/ml and/or suspicious digital rectal examination and/or PSA velocity >0.75 ng/ml/year), but with a negative prostate biopsy. Participants were randomized to receive daily oral placebo (N = 232), 200 µg selenium (N = 234), or 400 µg selenium (N = 233) as selenized yeast. They were followed every 6 months for up to 5 years. The time to diagnosis of prostate cancer was compared between treatment groups using the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULT: Compared to placebo, the hazard ratios [95% confidence intervals] for risk of developing prostate cancer in the selenium 200 µg/day or the selenium 400 µg/day group were 0.94 [0.52, 1.7] and 0.90 [0.48, 1.7], respectively. PSA velocity in the selenium arms was not significantly different from that observed in the placebo group (P = 0.18 and P = 0.17, respectively). CONCLUSION: Selenium supplementation appeared to have no effect on the incidence of prostate cancer in men at high risk. In conjunction with results of other studies, these data indicate that selenium supplementation may not have a role in prostate cancer chemoprevention.


Asunto(s)
Suplementos Dietéticos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/epidemiología , Selenio/administración & dosificación , Selenio/farmacología , Administración Oral , Anciano , Biopsia , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Método Doble Ciego , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Factores de Riesgo , Selenio/efectos adversos
3.
Cancer Prev Res (Phila) ; 5(2): 290-8, 2012 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22044694

RESUMEN

Compelling preclinical and pilot clinical data support the role of green tea polyphenols in prostate cancer prevention. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of polyphenon E (enriched green tea polyphenol extract) in men with prostate cancer scheduled to undergo radical prostatectomy. The study aimed to determine the bioavailability of green tea polyphenols in prostate tissue and to measure its effects on systemic and tissue biomarkers of prostate cancer carcinogenesis. Participants received either polyphenon E (containing 800 mg epigallocatechin gallate) or placebo daily for 3 to 6 weeks before surgery. Following the intervention, green tea polyphenol levels in the prostatectomy tissue were low to undetectable. Polyphenon E intervention resulted in favorable but not statistically significant changes in serum prostate-specific antigen, serum insulin-like growth factor axis, and oxidative DNA damage in blood leukocytes. Tissue biomarkers of cell proliferation, apoptosis, and angiogenesis in the prostatectomy tissue did not differ between the treatment arms. The proportion of subjects who had a decrease in Gleason score between biopsy and surgical specimens was greater in those on polyphenon E but was not statistically significant. The study's findings of low bioavailability and/or bioaccumulation of green tea polyphenols in prostate tissue and statistically insignificant changes in systemic and tissue biomarkers from 3 to 6 weeks of administration suggests that prostate cancer preventive activity of green tea polyphenols, if occurring, may be through indirect means and/or that the activity may need to be evaluated with longer intervention durations, repeated dosing, or in patients at earlier stages of the disease.


Asunto(s)
Catequina/análogos & derivados , Prostatectomía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/prevención & control , , Anciano , Disponibilidad Biológica , Biomarcadores de Tumor , Catequina/uso terapéutico , Método Doble Ciego , Humanos , Técnicas para Inmunoenzimas , Masculino , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pronóstico
4.
Am J Mens Health ; 5(3): 272-8, 2011 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21613377

RESUMEN

Significant number of prostate tumors are slow growing and could probably be left untreated. However, many are aggressive and can spread rapidly causing patient suffering and/or death. Current technology does not allow physicians to differentiate between slow growing and aggressive tumors at diagnosis. Hence, many patients are exposed to invasive treatment and its associated morbidities such as incontinence and impotence. Markers that enable differentiation between slow and fast progressing cancer will allow physicians to prevent unnecessary treatments on men who may not need them, and focus on the men with aggressive disease. A longitudinal study was conducted (N = 140) using mixed effects regression models to determine the association of obesity and smoking toward prostate cancer progression. These models account for correlation because of repeated measures over time, thus, using maximum amount of information provided by the subject. Estimates thus obtained are more robust and reliable than those obtained using data from a single time point. Rate of change of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) over time (PSA velocity) was used as a measure of prostate cancer progression. Results indicate that PSA velocity of overweight and obese subjects (0.59 and 1.05 ng/mL/year) was not significantly different as compared with normal weight subjects (p values .91 and .31, respectively). For men in the highest tertile of pack-years of smoking, PSA velocity was significantly higher as compared with never smokers 1.57 ng/mL/year (p = .04). Further studies with larger sample sizes and study designs specific to above exposures are needed before recommendations can be made to reduce weight or reduce/quit smoking.


Asunto(s)
Obesidad/complicaciones , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Fumar/efectos adversos , Anciano , Índice de Masa Corporal , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias de la Próstata/complicaciones
5.
Am J Med ; 123(8): 765-8, 2010 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20670733

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Literature indicates a relationship between selenium supplementation and risk of diabetes. However, because these data are inconclusive, we investigated the effect of selenium supplementation on serum glucose levels in men with prostate cancer enrolled in a clinical trial testing of the effect of selenium on prostate cancer progression. METHODS: Subjects were randomized to receive placebo (n=46), selenium 200 microg/day (n=47), and selenium 800 microg/day (n=47). Serum glucose levels were obtained every 6 months for up to 5 years. Longitudinal analysis was carried out to assess whether rate of change of serum glucose levels was significantly different in the selenium-supplemented groups as compared with placebo. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of findings. RESULTS: Changes in serum glucose levels during the course of the trial were not statistically significantly different as compared with placebo for the selenium 200 microg/day (P=.56) or selenium 800 microg/day (P=.91) treatment groups. CONCLUSION: These results do not support a relationship between selenium supplementation and changes in serum glucose levels. Recommendations about selenium supplementation and risk of diabetes will require more definitive studies.


Asunto(s)
Glucemia/análisis , Neoplasias de la Próstata/tratamiento farmacológico , Selenio/administración & dosificación , Oligoelementos/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Suplementos Dietéticos , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias de la Próstata/sangre
6.
Cancer Prev Res (Phila) ; 3(8): 1035-43, 2010 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20647337

RESUMEN

The Nutritional Prevention of Cancer trial showed a 52% lower incidence of prostate cancer in men supplemented with selenium. As a result, our study was designed to assess whether selenium supplementation attenuates the progression of prostate cancer. A phase 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted in men with localized nonmetastatic prostate cancer who had elected to forgo active treatment and be followed by active surveillance. A total of 140 men were randomized to placebo (n = 46), 200 microg/d (n = 47), or 800 microg/d (n = 47) selenium p.o. (as selenized yeast) and followed every 3 months for up to 5 years. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) velocity was used as a marker of prostate cancer progression and was estimated using mixed-effects regression. Adjusting for age, body mass index, baseline selenium, smoking, baseline PSA, race, PSA method, and Gleason score, PSA velocities for the 200 microg/d and 800 microg/d treatment groups were not statistically significantly different from placebo (P = 0.32 and P = 0.61, respectively). In the highest quartile of baseline selenium, men supplemented with 800 microg selenium showed statistically significantly higher PSA velocity as compared with placebo (P = 0.018). Selenium supplementation did not show a protective effect on PSA velocity in subjects with localized prostate cancer. On the contrary, supplementation with high-dose selenium was observed to be a risk factor for increased PSA velocity in men with high baseline plasma selenium concentrations.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma/prevención & control , Antígeno Prostático Específico/metabolismo , Neoplasias de la Próstata/prevención & control , Selenio/administración & dosificación , Administración Oral , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Algoritmos , Carcinoma/sangre , Carcinoma/metabolismo , Carcinoma/patología , Suplementos Dietéticos/efectos adversos , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Método Doble Ciego , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Placebos , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/metabolismo , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Selenio/efectos adversos
7.
Prostate ; 70(8): 883-8, 2010 Jun 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20135645

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Aspirin, other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and statins have been associated with lower risk of prostate cancer and its progression, though results have been inconsistent. METHODS: Data from 140 men with prostate cancer enrolled in a Phase 2 clinical trial of selenium to prevent prostate cancer progression were analyzed to determine association between aspirin, other NSAIDs, or statin use with baseline serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and PSA velocity (rate of PSA change over time) using repeated measures over an average follow-up time of 3.2 years. Multiple linear regression and mixed effects models were used to model the association of medication use with PSA at baseline and with PSA velocity, respectively. RESULTS: Baseline PSA levels were significantly lower in aspirin users compared to non-users (5.17 ng/ml vs. 7.58 ng/ml, P = 0.001). This association was statistically significant in never smokers (aspirin users vs. non-users: 4.19 ng/ml vs. 8.24 ng/ml, P = 0.004) but not in ever smokers (aspirin users vs. non-users: 5.52 ng/ml vs. 7.3 ng/ml, P = 0.101). Statin and other NSAID use was not associated with baseline PSA. Aspirin, statin, or other NSAID use at baseline demonstrated a non-significant negative association with PSA velocity. CONCLUSION: These findings support an effect of aspirin use on PSA, particularly among never smokers. However, they do not suggest a protective effect on the disease and support previous findings that aspirin use may mask accurate measurement of PSA warranting consideration of washout procedures prior to testing.


Asunto(s)
Aspirina/farmacología , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/farmacología , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/sangre , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/farmacología , Índice de Masa Corporal , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis de Regresión , Factores de Riesgo , Fumar , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
8.
J Clin Oncol ; 25(6): 669-74, 2007 Feb 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17308271

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To compare the safety and activity of DN-101, a new high-dose oral formulation of calcitriol designed for cancer therapy, and docetaxel with placebo and docetaxel. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with progressive metastatic androgen-independent prostate cancer and adequate organ function received weekly docetaxel 36 mg/m2 intravenously for 3 weeks of a 4-week cycle combined with either 45 microg DN-101 or placebo taken orally 1 day before docetaxel. The primary end point was prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response within 6 months of enrollment, defined as a 50% reduction confirmed at least 4 weeks later. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty patients were randomly assigned. Baseline characteristics were similar in both arms. Within 6 months, PSA responses were seen in 58% in DN-101 patients and 49% in placebo patients (P = .16). Overall, PSA response rates were 63% (DN-101) and 52% (placebo), P = .07. Patients in the DN-101 group had a hazard ratio for death of 0.67 (P = .04) in a multivariate analysis that included baseline hemoglobin and performance status. Median survival has not been reached for the DN-101 arm and is estimated to be 24.5 months using the hazard ratio, compared with 16.4 months for placebo. Grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 58% of DN-101 patients and in 70% of placebo-treated patients (P = .07). Most common grade 3/4 toxicities for DN-101 versus placebo were neutropenia (10% v 8%), fatigue (8% v 16%), infection (8% v 13%), and hyperglycemia (6% v 12%). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that DN-101 treatment was associated with improved survival, but this will require confirmation because survival was not a primary end point. The addition of weekly DN-101 did not increase the toxicity of weekly docetaxel.


Asunto(s)
Andrógenos/metabolismo , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Calcitriol/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias de la Próstata/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/mortalidad , Taxoides/administración & dosificación , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Biopsia con Aguja , Calcitriol/efectos adversos , Docetaxel , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Método Doble Ciego , Esquema de Medicación , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Placebos/administración & dosificación , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Medición de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia , Taxoides/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
J Clin Oncol ; 25(6): 675-81, 2007 Feb 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17308272

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Pertuzumab represents a new class of targeted anticancer agents, human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) dimerization inhibitors. The aim of this single-arm phase II clinical study was to assess the efficacy and safety of single-agent pertuzumab in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) patients who had experienced progression after prior chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received pertuzumab every 3 weeks. All castration-resistant patients had experienced progression after at least one taxane-based regimen. Patients received a loading dose of 840 mg pertuzumab (cycle 1) followed by 420 mg for subsequent cycles. The primary end point was overall response and safety. A separate retrospective analysis of actual survival time versus predicted survival time for a patient population with comparable prognostic features was performed. RESULTS: Patients were enrolled (N = 42) and treated (n = 41). No patients had complete or partial response (as defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Group or 50% decline in prostate-specific antigen). Of 30 efficacy-assessable patients, five had stable disease (SD) for at least 23 weeks; one of five had SD for 36 weeks. Pertuzumab was well tolerated; diarrhea was the most common adverse effect (61.0%, grades 1 to 3). Retrospective analysis of survival using a validated nomogram suggested that survival was prolonged with pertuzumab treatment, compared with historic controls with similar baseline prognostic features. CONCLUSION: Pertuzumab was well tolerated and resulted in no objective responses, but several patients had SD more than 23 weeks from a heavily pretreated population. Retrospective analysis suggested prolonged median survival time with pertuzumab compared with historical controls. Thus, inhibition of HER dimerization may have clinical utility in CRPC patients.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/administración & dosificación , Hidrocarburos Aromáticos con Puentes/uso terapéutico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/tratamiento farmacológico , Receptor ErbB-2/antagonistas & inhibidores , Taxoides/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Hidrocarburos Aromáticos con Puentes/efectos adversos , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Esquema de Medicación , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Orquiectomía , Probabilidad , Pronóstico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Receptor ErbB-2/administración & dosificación , Medición de Riesgo , Método Simple Ciego , Análisis de Supervivencia , Taxoides/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento
10.
Cancer ; 95(10): 2136-44, 2002 Nov 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12412167

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Men with prostate carcinoma who are treated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) are reported to be at an increased risk of bone loss and weight changes due to the sudden disruption of hormonal levels. In the current case-control study, the authors examined the prevalence and magnitude of low bone density and obesity among men with prostate carcinoma who were treated with ADT. METHODS: Sixty-two men with prostate carcinoma who had been receiving ADT for 1-5 years were included as cases. Healthy men (n = 47) with a prostate specific antigen level < 4.0 ng/mL were recruited as controls. Body composition and bone mineral density (BMD) were measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. The average age was 74.3 years for the cases and 72.8 years for the controls. RESULTS: The results of the current study demonstrate that prostate carcinoma cases had significantly higher body weight (86.5 kg vs. 80.6 kg), a higher percentage of body fat (30% vs. 26%), and a lower total body BMD (1.12 mg/cm(2) vs. 1.17mg/ cm(2)) compared with controls (P < 0.05). Cases were more likely to be obese (27.4% vs 43%) and have low BMD at trochanter (32.3% vs. 10.6%), intertrochanter (48.4% vs. 29.8%), and total hip measurements (50.0% vs. 25.3%). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study indicate that men with prostate carcinoma who are treated with ADT have a significantly increased risk of low bone density and obesity.


Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de Andrógenos/efectos adversos , Densidad Ósea/efectos de los fármacos , Obesidad/etiología , Orquiectomía/efectos adversos , Osteoporosis/etiología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/terapia , Absorciometría de Fotón , Anciano , Antagonistas de Andrógenos/farmacología , Antagonistas de Andrógenos/uso terapéutico , Composición Corporal , Índice de Masa Corporal , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Humanos , Masculino , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre
11.
J Urol ; 152(6 Pt 1): 2037-42, 1994 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7525995

RESUMEN

A prospective clinical trial of prostate cancer screening was conducted at 6 university centers including 6,630 men 50 years old or older who underwent a serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) determination and digital rectal examination. Biopsies were performed if the PSA level was greater than 4.0 ng./ml. (Hybritech Tandem assay) or digital rectal examination was suspicious for cancer. We evaluated the effect on biopsy rate and cancer detection if the cutoff value was shifted from 4.0 to age-specific reference ranges recommended in the literature. In men 50 to 59 years old with normal digital rectal examination findings a decrease from 4.0 to 3.5 ng./ml. would have resulted in a 45% increase in the number of biopsies (39 of 87) and a projected 15% increase in cancer detection. An increase from 4.0 to 4.5 ng./ml. in men 60 to 69 years old would result in 15% fewer biopsies (35 of 238) and would miss 8% of the organ confined tumors (2 of 25). Increasing the cutoff to 6.5 ng./ml. in men 70 years old or older would result in 44% fewer biopsies (70 of 159) and would miss 47% of the organ confined cancers (7 of 15). The number of biopsies performed for each cancer detected with a PSA level of greater than 4.0 ng./ml. remains constant across age groupings, which suggests that the cutoff of 4.0 ng./ml. does not need to be altered in the older men, since it is apparently unaffected by the simultaneously increasing prevalence of benign prostatic hyperplasia and cancer with age. We conclude that a serum PSA concentration of 4.0 ng./ml. should be used as a general guideline for biopsy in all age groups.


Asunto(s)
Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Distribución por Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biopsia , Humanos , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos , Curva ROC , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Factores de Tiempo
12.
J Urol ; 152(5 Pt 1): 1506-9, 1994 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7523707

RESUMEN

Not all prostate cancers are sonographically hypoechoic or palpable on digital rectal examination, and suspicious areas on transrectal prostatic ultrasonography or digital rectal examination often are not cancer. We present quadrant biopsy results from a multicenter prostate cancer screening study in which men were evaluated with prostate specific antigen (PSA) and digital rectal examination. If the PSA level was elevated (greater than 4.0 ng./ml., Hybritech Tandem assay) or digital rectal examination was suspicious quadrant biopsies were performed. Biopsy specimens were labeled separately, and histological findings were correlated by quadrant with the findings on ultrasonography and digital rectal examination. Of the 6,630 subjects enrolled into the study 16% were biopsied. Of 1,002 quadrants that were suspicious on digital rectal examination 110 (11%) had cancer, while 308 of 418 quadrants containing cancer (74%) were not suspicious on digital rectal examination. Of 855 quadrants that were sonographically suspicious 153 (18%) had cancer, while 282 of 435 quadrants containing cancer (65%) were not sonographically suspicious. Of 225 patients with cancer 137 (61%) would have been missed if only the exact site of the palpable induration had been biopsied. Of 251 patients with cancer 131 (52%) would have been missed if only the exact site of the hypoechoic lesion had been biopsied. We conclude that digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography have limited accuracy in identifying and localizing prostate cancer. Our study emphasizes the importance of obtaining systematic biopsies if the PSA level is elevated, even in the absence of digital rectal examination or ultrasound anomalies.


Asunto(s)
Palpación , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biopsia , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Antígeno Prostático Específico/análisis , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Ultrasonografía
13.
J Urol ; 151(5): 1283-90, 1994 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7512659

RESUMEN

To compare the efficacy of digital rectal examination and serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) in the early detection of prostate cancer, we conducted a prospective clinical trial at 6 university centers of 6,630 male volunteers 50 years old or older who underwent PSA determination (Hybritech Tandem-E or Tandem-R assays) and digital rectal examination. Quadrant biopsies were performed if the PSA level was greater than 4 micrograms/l or digital rectal examination was suspicious, even if transrectal ultrasonography revealed no areas suspicious for cancer. The results showed that 15% of the men had a PSA level of greater than 4 micrograms/l, 15% had a suspicious digital rectal examination and 26% had suspicious findings on either or both tests. Of 1,167 biopsies performed cancer was detected in 264. PSA detected significantly more tumors (82%, 216 of 264 cancers) than digital rectal examination (55%, 146 of 264, p = 0.001). The cancer detection rate was 3.2% for digital rectal examination, 4.6% for PSA and 5.8% for the 2 methods combined. Positive predictive value was 32% for PSA and 21% for digital rectal examination. Of 160 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy and pathological staging 114 (71%) had organ confined cancer: PSA detected 85 (75%) and digital rectal examination detected 64 (56%, p = 0.003). Use of the 2 methods in combination increased detection of organ confined disease by 78% (50 of 64 cases) over digital rectal examination alone. If the performance of a biopsy would have required suspicious transrectal ultrasonography findings, nearly 40% of the tumors would have been missed. We conclude that the use of PSA in conjunction with digital rectal examination enhances early prostate cancer detection. Prostatic biopsy should be considered if either the PSA level is greater than 4 micrograms/l or digital rectal examination is suspicious for cancer, even in the absence of abnormal transrectal ultrasonography findings.


Asunto(s)
Palpación , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biopsia , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos
14.
Urology ; 42(4): 365-74, 1993 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7692657

RESUMEN

This study was designed to determine the effects of age by decade on the efficacy of digital rectal examination (DRE) and serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) for early detection of prostate cancer in men aged fifty and over. A prospective multicenter clinical trial was conducted at six university centers. All 6,630 male volunteers underwent a serum PSA (Hybritech, Tandem) determination and DRE. Quadrant biopsies of the prostate were performed if PSA was > 4 ng/mL or DRE suspicious. A total of 1,167 biopsies were performed, and 264 cancers were detected. The cancer detection rate increased from 3 percent in men aged fifty to fifty-nine to 14 percent in men eighty years or older (p < 0.0001). PSA detected significantly more of the total cancers than DRE at all age ranges (p < 0.05). The positive predictive values (PPV) for PSA were 32 percent (50-59 years), 30 percent (60-69 years), 34 percent (70-79 years), and 38 percent (80+ years). The corresponding PPVs for DRE were 17 percent, 21 percent, 25 percent, and 38 percent. Eighteen percent of the cancers were detected solely by DRE, whereas 45 percent of cancers were detected solely by PSA. Thus, the use of both tests in combination provided the highest rate of detection in all age groups. One hundred-sixty patients underwent radical prostatectomy and pathologic staging. Cancer was organ-confined in 74 percent (25/34) of men aged fifty to fifty-nine, 76 percent (65/86) of men aged sixty to sixty-nine, and 60 percent (24/40) of men aged seventy or over (chi 2, < 70 vs. > or = 70, p < 0.05). Early detection programs yield a lower, yet still substantial, cancer detection rate in younger men, and there is a greater likelihood for detection of organ-confined disease in this age range. Younger men have the longest projected life expectancy and, therefore, the most to gain from early prostate cancer detection.


Asunto(s)
Palpación , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Palpación/métodos , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos , Prostatectomía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Recto , Factores de Tiempo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...