Determining magnitude of benefit from poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors in prostate cancer.

The treatment landscape for castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is undergoing significant advancements, particularly with the emergence of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors and their recent US FDA authorizations. The combination of olaparib with abiraterone and prednisone/prednisolone has gained approval for mCRPC patients harboring confirmed BRCA mutations. Subsequently, talazoparib in combination with enzalutamide was approved for patients with mutations in homologous recombination repair genes. Nevertheless, emerging evidence suggests that these treatments may confer benefits irrespective of specific biomarkers. While the understanding of biomarkers in therapy selection for mCRPC is expanding, further data are warranted to provide comprehensive elucidation for guiding clinical practice.

Association of frailty with chemotherapy toxicity in chemotherapy-naive older patients with cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to assess the relationship between chemotherapy toxicity and frailty as determined using the Edmonton Frail Scale (EFS). METHODS: Older adults (≥ 65 years old) newly diagnosed with cancer were evaluated for frailty with EFS prior to chemotherapy. Participants evaluated on 17 points were grouped as "No Frailty" (0-4), "Apparently Vulnerable" (5-6), "Mild Frailty" (7-8), "Moderate Frailty" (9-10), and "Severe Frailty" (11 or more). Before the second and third chemotherapy cycles, patients were reassessed for toxicity. RESULTS: Of the 44 participants, 12 (27.4%) were rated as "frail" (EFS score ≥ 7). The median Charlson Age-Comorbidity Index score was 3 (IQR: 1), and the median EFS score was 5 (IQR: 3). There was no significant difference between the "frail" and "robust" groups in terms of the toxicity. There was no correlation between age, gender, chemotherapy intent, chemotherapy dosing, ECOG performance score, or other parameters with grade 3 or higher toxicity development. CONCLUSION: The Edmonton Frail Scale is not successful in predicting the toxicity risk of chemotherapy. However, it may be used as a tool to determine the need for comprehensive geriatric assessment and it may lead to increased alertness to adverse events during treatment of frail patients.

Real-life analysis of treatment approaches and the role of inflammatory markers on survival in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Advanced-stage biliary tract cancers (BTC) are rare malignancies with poor prognosis. There are few prospective trials, but several retrospective studies regarding treatment options. In this study, we aimed to investigate the role of systemic inflammatory parameters (SIP) and other possible independent factors that may affect survival and treatment approaches and to determine the benefit of later-line treatments in these patients. METHODS: A total of 284 patients, initially diagnosed with advanced stage or progressed after curative treatment of BTC, from different oncology centers in Turkey were included in this retrospective study. The prognostic significance of clinicopathological factors, SIPs and treatment options was analyzed. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 13 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.1 months (95% CI:5.51-6.82), and the median overall survival (OS) time was 16.8 months (95% CI: 13.9-19.6). Treatment choice (p < .001 HR:0.70 CI95% 0.55-0.9), performance status (p < .001 HR:2.74 CI 95% 2.12-3.54) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (p = .02 HR:1.38 CI 95% 1.03-1.84) were independent prognostic factors for PFS. For OS, the independent prognostic indicators were determined as The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) (p < .001 HR:1.78 CI 95% 1.5-2.3), Systemic Immune-inflammation Index (SII) (p < .001 HR:0.51 CI95% 0.36-0.73) and stage at diagnosis (p = .002 HR:1.79 CI 95% 1.24-2.59). Furthermore, second and third line treatments significantly prolonged OS in advanced BTC (p < .001 HR:0.55 CI 95% 0.38-0.79; p = .007 HR:0.51 CI95% 0.31-0.83, respectively). CONCLUSION: SII and NLR are useful prognostic factors and may be helpful in making treatment decisions. Additionally, second and later-line treatments in advanced BTC have a significant impact on survival under real-life conditions.

Evaluation of cancer risk in patients with periodontal diseases

Background/aim: In this study, we aimed to assess the cancer risk among patients with periodontal disease. Materials and methods: Patients diagnosed with periodontal diseases at Hacettepe University between 2007 and 2012 were included and data on the diagnosis of any cancer after periodontal disease were collected from patient files. The age- and sex-standardized incidence rates (SIRs) were calculated using Turkish National Cancer Registry 2013 data. Results: A total of 5199 patients were included. Median follow-up was 7.2 years. Patients with periodontal diseases had 17% increased risk of cancer compared with the expected counts for the corresponding age and sex groups (SIR: 1.17; 95% CI: 1.04­1.3, P = 0.006). The increased cancer risk was statistically significant in women (SIR: 1.24; 95% CI: 1.05­1.45, P = 0.008) but not in men. Among women with periodontal disease, the risks of breast cancer (SIR: 2.19) and head and neck cancer (SIR: 4.71) were significantly increased. Among men, the risks of prostate cancer (SIR: 1.84), head and neck cancer (SIR: 3.55), and hematological cancers (SIR: 1.76) were significantly increased. Conclusion: This study showed that periodontal diseases were associated with increased risk of several cancers. Besides other well-known benefits for health, the provision of oral/dental health should be considered and employed as a cancer prevention measure.