Relationship of serum inducible and endothelial nitric oxide synthase with exercise in healthy adult males and patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

OBJECTIVE: The importance of physical activities in the control of diabetes mellitus disorder is well known but its correlation with endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) in diabetic patients needs to be assessed. The aim of the study is to examine inducible and endothelial nitric oxide synthase in healthy adult male patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in relation to exercise. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study that has been performed in the Department of Physiology, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Subjects were divided into Group 1: control (n=79), and Group 2: T2DM (n=85). Each group was subdivided into three subcategories: sedentary, moderate activity, and active subjects. Serum nitric oxide (NO), iNOS, eNOS, high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), nitrates, and nitrites, were compared between different groups. RESULTS: We observed significant differences in iNOS in diabetic patients compared to the control [29.1 (2.8) vs. 22.4 (1.4), p=0.050] with a significant decrease in eNOS when compared to the control group [79.5 (4.8) vs. 101.8 (5.7), p=0.003]. In the control group, eNOS showed significant differences (increase) between subgroups; sedentary, moderate, and active control subjects [77.4 (9.2), 114.7 (9.3), and 105.6 (9.5), p=0.026]. It also showed insignificant differences between subgroups in iNOS [23.4 (2.5), 24.2 (2.2), and 20.4 (2.4), p=0.520]. In addition, hsCRP showed a decrease with exercise but with no statistically significant difference between the groups [4.0 (0.5), 3.3 (0.3), and 2.9 (0.4), p=0.271]. In the diabetic patients' group, a significant difference (decrease) between subgroups in iNOS [43.5 (4.8), 20.8 (3.9), and 19.8 (4.6), p<0.001] and hsCRP [5.7 (0.5), 3.8 (0.4), and 3.6 (0.5), p=0.006] was detected. In addition, eNOS showed a decrease with exercise but with no statistically significant difference between groups [82.9 (7.8), 74.6 (7.9), and 81.7 (10.2), p=0.741]. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with T2DM have shown significantly low eNOS and high iNOS levels. Furthermore, regular exercise can significantly decrease iNOS in patients with T2DM. Therefore, the importance of exercise for diabetic patients has to be emphasized to prevent long-term complications related to diabetes mellitus.

Predictive value of arm circumference (AC) and arm muscle circumference (AMC) with cardiovascular risk in healthy and diabetic males.

OBJECTIVE: The predictive value of body simplified indices needs to be evaluated properly for cardiovascular risk. This study aimed to assess and compare the relative relationship of arm circumference (AC), arm muscle circumference (AMC), body mass index (BMI), and waist-hip ratio (WHR) with Ultra-Sensitive C-Reactive Protein (US-CRP) in healthy male subjects and with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed the study at the department of Physiology, College of Medicine & King Khalid University Hospital, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. It was a cross-sectional study with 93 healthy male subjects and 112 type 2 diabetic male patients who underwent body composition analysis by BIA and fasting venous blood samples were collected. US-CRP and body composition were determined for all subjects. RESULTS: US-CRP is correlated positively with AC (0.378) and BMI (0.394) more than AMC (0.282) and WHR (0.253) which have lower correlation both in control and DM group. BCM has the lowest correlation with US-CRP (0.105). The association between US-CRP and AC, AMC, Body Fat Percent (BFP), and body fat mass (BFM) are statistically significant except for BFP in DM group. In control group, AC is noticed to be a better predictor for US-CRP, with area under curve (AUC) 64.2% (p=0.019), WHR with AUC 72.6% (p<0.001), and BMI with AUC 65.4% (p=0.011) but AMC is not a good predictor in control group with AUC 57.5% (p=0.213). In DM group, AC is noticed to be a better predictor for US-CRP, with AUC 71.5% (p<0.001), WHR with AUC 67.4% (p=0.004), BMI with AUC 70.9% (p=0.001), and AMC with AUC 65.2% (p=0.011). CONCLUSIONS: Simplified muscle mass body indices like AC and AMC have significant predictive value for assessing cardiovascular risk in both healthy population and patients with T2DM. Therefore, AC could be used as a future predictor for cardiovascular disease in healthy and DM patients. Further investigations are needed to confirm its applicability.