Long-term versus short-term clopidogrel therapy in patients undergoing coronary stenting (from the Randomized Argentine Clopidogrel Stent [RACS] trial).

The optimal duration of treatment with clopidogrel after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stent placement remains controversial. The Randomized Argentine Clopidogrel Stent (RACS) trial was a prospective, randomized, nonblinded study of 1,004 patients undergoing PCI who were randomized after successful bare metal stent placement to 30 versus 180 days of clopidogrel; all patients also received aspirin. Patients were eligible regardless of whether they had presented with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (MI), acute coronary syndrome, or stable angina. The primary end point was a composite of death, MI, and stroke at 180 days. Baseline clinical characteristics showed no differences between groups in terms of age, gender, history, risk factors, or incidence of diabetes; 72% presented with an acute coronary syndrome and 15% had MI as the indication for PCI. At hospital discharge and 30 days, when the 2 groups received the same treatment, there were no significant differences between groups in frequency of death, MI, or stroke. However, from 30 days to 6 months, patients assigned to 6 months of clopidogrel reached the primary end point of death, MI, and stroke less frequently (4.99% vs 1.74%, p = 0.010, relative risk decrease 65%). No significant between-group differences were found in frequency of total bleeding (0.64% vs 1.52%, p = 0.34) for the control and study groups. In conclusion, after successful placement of a bare metal stent in a coronary artery, patients treated with 6 months of clopidogrel showed a trend toward fewer adverse events compared with those treated for 30 days.

Pilot study of oral rapamycin to prevent restenosis in patients undergoing coronary stent therapy: Argentina Single-Center Study (ORAR Trial).

Rapamycin-coated stents are associated with low restenosis rates, but the ability of oral rapamycin to prevent restenosis is unknown. From December 2001 through February 2002, thirty-four patients with 49 lesions were treated with oral rapamycin for 1 month following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with bare stents. Patients received a loading dose of 6 mg rapamycin followed by a daily dose of 2 mg. Rapamycin blood levels were measured in all patients during the third week of treatment. Cholesterol and triglycerides were evaluated before and 1 month after treatment. A 6-month follow-up angiogram was performed in all patients. Angiographic binary restenosis (> 50%), target lesion revascularization (TLR), late loss, treatment compliance and major adverse cardiac events were analyzed independent of rapamycin levels. Baseline characteristics included a history of diabetes in 35% of patients and the presence of in-stent restenosis in 24.5% of lesions (12/49). The rapamycin was well tolerated and only 1 patient discontinued the therapy due to mild side effects. Angiographic restenosis and TLR at 6 months was present in 26.5% of lesions (13/49). Restenosis in de novo lesions was 18.9% (7/37) compared to 50% of in-stent restenotic lesions (6/12; p = 0.08). Restenosis in de novo lesions in patients with rapamycin levels > 8 ng/ml was 0% (0/12), whereas it was 24% (6/25) when the rapamycin levels were < 8 ng/ml (p = 0.07). Late loss was significantly lower when rapamycin levels were > 8 ng/ml (0.3 mm versus 0.9 mm, respectively; p = 0.04). Thus, in this observational study, oral rapamycin administered for 1 month after PCI with bare stenting was safe and well tolerated. Higher therapeutic rapamycin blood levels were associated with a lower late loss and a trend toward a lower restenosis rate in de novo lesions.