Awareness and Uptake of COVID-19 Vaccines Among the Residents of Bisha in Saudi Arabia.

OBJECTIVE:  Even though COVID-19 is no longer in an acute pandemic phase, sustaining awareness and promoting the uptake of COVID-19 vaccines are crucial for preventing future outbreaks and protecting public health. This study explores the awareness and uptake of COVID-19 vaccines among residents of Bisha, Asir province. It examines sources of information, healthcare providers' influence, and community engagement initiatives. The findings can inform future public health policies and strategies, supporting efforts to control the spread of the pandemic and enhance community resilience. METHODS:  The cross-sectional study was administered to the adult population in Bisha. The study involved a total of 220 respondents. Data were collected using a questionnaire and analyzed using SPSS version 27 to obtain essential insights. RESULTS: Most respondents (n = 204, 92.73%) reported receiving information about COVID-19 vaccines from healthcare professionals, other people, and family members. The study also revealed that only 46 (20.9%) individuals had exposure to COVID-19, with 36 (78.26%) reporting infection before vaccination and only 10 (21.74%) reporting infection after vaccination. Regarding COVID-19 vaccine first-dose uptake, less than half (27.73%) of the respondents had received the first dose. Among those who took the first dose, 29 (47.54%) took the second dose, while 32 (52.46%) did not. It also shows a statistically significant difference in COVID-19 vaccine uptake based on the participant's age, gender, education level, comorbidity, smoking status, and place of residence (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: There was a significantly high level of awareness about the vaccine, with significant proportions of respondents indicating their willingness to take preventive measures even after vaccination. However, vaccine uptake remains below optimal levels, with various reasons cited for non-vaccination, including concerns about vaccine availability, efficacy, and side effects. Healthcare professionals should intensify public education efforts and ensure the availability of vaccines in various forms at hospitals to address this issue.

Lumbar pedicular agenesis: Case report and a review of the literature.

Lumbar pedicular agenesis is a rare clinical and radiological finding. Therefore, it is commonly misdiagnosed, particularly in trauma cases, with the first case being reported by Hadley in 1946. Pedicle agenesis has specific radiographic features: a falsely appearing enlarged neural foramen; a dysplastic, dorsally displaced ipsilateral articular pillar and lamina; and a dysplastic ipsilateral transverse process. Computed tomography (CT) is the preferred diagnostic modality for pedicle agenesis and it is important to note that pedicle agenesis is a stable congenital anomaly. Typically, these patients do not exhibit neurological deficits and are managed conservatively or receive no treatment. In this case report, we will be reporting a case involving the absence of L5 left pedicle.

Permanent unilateral visual loss and orbital compartment syndrome following unilateral frontal craniotomy: illustrative case.

BACKGROUND: Vision loss following supine craniotomy is an unexpected and devastating complication for the patient and the operating team. Postoperative vision loss (POVL) is commonly associated with cardiac, spinal, neck, and prone head surgeries, as they share common risk factors, such as a prone position, intraoperative hypotension, a longer anesthesia duration, and the use of vasopressors. Herein, the authors report a case of irreversible vision loss following a frontal craniotomy in the supine position together with a review of the literature. All published cases in the literature since the first reported case in 1970 are summarized. Possible etiologies and proposed preventive measures are discussed. OBSERVATIONS: Different pathologies, such as vascular, intra-axial, and extra-axial lesions, are associated with POVL and have similar clinical courses and nonrecovery rates, which raises the question of whether POVL begins during the exposure part of these surgeries. LESSONS: Preventive measures could include avoiding direct ocular pressure during flap reflection, the use of elastic bands or fishhooks to avoid stretching the orbital contents and impairing venous outflow, and a careful review of the venous drainage of frontal tumors, which could help avoid unnecessary large venous thrombi or waxing. The role of intraoperative visual neurophysiological monitoring in predicting POVL requires further exploration. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE2434.

A case report of hepatic fetus-in-fetu: Approach to diagnosis.

Multiple theories have been proposed about the pathophysiology of Fetus-in-fetu (FIF). The most widely accepted theory is abnormal embryogenesis in diamniotic monochorionic pregnancies, in which a malformed parasitic fetus is found within the body of a twin host. Hepatic FIF has been reported in almost 1% of FIF cases, with only 2 case reports being published in the literature. This article presents the third case report of intrahepatic FIF. Additionally, we review the role of radiology in diagnosing these cases and guiding their proper management. This case report supports the monozygotic twin theory of FIF and the diagnostic dilemma of FIF vs. teratoma can be solved through collaborative work between radiologists and pathologists.

Awareness and Attitude Regarding Contact Lens Use Among Female Students at the University of Bisha: A Cross-Sectional Study.

INTRODUCTION: Given the growing popularity of contact lenses among female students in Saudi Arabia for various reasons including vision correction as well as aesthetic and therapeutic purposes, it is essential to understand the knowledge about them, their uses, and how to handle them, given their significance in healthcare. METHODS: A cross-sectional study design was utilized in this research, employing data from a sample of 413 female students at the University of Bisha. The participants completed a self-administered questionnaire and were ensured anonymity. RESULTS: The study results showed that 52.9% (n=218) had a good knowledge level while 47.1% (n=195) had poor knowledge about contact lenses use. The results established a statistically significant association between region, faculty, and study year (p<0.005) with p-values of 0.002, 0.001, and 0.005, respectively, and level of knowledge about contact lens use. There was no statistically significant association between the age of the participants and the level of knowledge about contact lens use. CONCLUSION: Although there was a generally good level of awareness about contact lens use among female students, there is still insufficiency in knowledge with regard to particular aspects such as cleaning the contact lenses and contact lens cover. The study finds the need for more ocular educational sessions with ophthalmologists to increase awareness about contact lenses.

Taxonomy development for term standardization in activity resulting from medication review processes: a Delphi study.

BACKGROUND: Medication review (MR) is the systematic assessment of a patient's medications for safety and effectiveness by a healthcare professional. The language used to describe MR activity, such as stopped medicine and increased dose, should be consistent across studies to assist researchers compare how different services operate and identify their mechanism of impact. AIM: To develop an international taxonomy of standardized terms and activity definitions related to medication reviews. METHOD: This was a three-stage Delphi-based consensus study with international medication review experts. A systematic review provided MR activity terms for the survey. Experts rated their consensus on each activity term and its definition on a Likert scale and provided written feedback. The consensus was 75% panel agreement. At each stage, consensus elements were retained, and feedback was used to revise definitions. RESULTS: Seven experts were recruited for the study (response rate 15.2%) from four countries: the United Kingdom (n = 4), New Zealand (n = 1), Australia (n = 1), and Malaysia (n = 1). The following terms achieved consensus: the term Medication as a descriptor for MR terms; discontinue medication, start medication, dose increase, dose decrease, dosage form change, and medication safety and efficacy monitor to describe MR activity; Educate to describe the delivery of healthcare professionals and patients/carers education. CONCLUSION: Standardized medication review activity terms and definitions have been selected for universal adoption in all future MR research to facilitate a meaningful comparison of process evaluations within different settings.

Retraction: Hemichorea: A Rare Neurological Complication of Diabetes Mellitus.

[This retracts the article DOI: 10.7759/cureus.21131.].

The State of Cardiac Rehabilitation in Saudi Arabia: Barriers, Facilitators, and Policy Implications.

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a critical public health issue in Saudi Arabia, where it is the leading cause of death. The economic burden of CVD in the country is expected to triple by 2035, reaching $9.8 billion. This paper provides an overview of CVD in Saudi Arabia and its risk factors, impact on healthcare, and effects on patients' quality of life. The review emphasizes the potential of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programs in addressing the CVD epidemic. CR programs have been shown to reduce morbidity, mortality, and hospital readmissions while improving patients' cardiovascular health and overall well-being. However, these programs are underutilized and inaccessible in Saudi Arabia. The paper highlights the urgent need for CR programs in the country and suggests key strategies for implementation. These include increasing patient referrals, tailoring programs to individual needs, enhancing patient education, and making CR accessible through home-based options. Fostering multidisciplinary collaboration and developing tailored guidelines for Arab countries can further enhance the impact of CR programs. In conclusion, this review underscores the vital importance of comprehensive CR programs in Saudi Arabia to combat the rising CVD burden, improve patient quality of life, and align with the goals of the Saudi 2030 Vision for a healthier society.

Assessing the Level of Awareness About Breath-Holding Spells Among the General Population in the Makkah Region, Saudi Arabia.

Background and objective Breath-holding spell (BHS) is a serious condition that affects healthy and normal children. It is a paroxysmal non-epileptic disorder and usually occurs after the child gets angry, annoyed, or aroused. In such a scenario, an episode of crying and silent expiration associated with color changes, either cyanosis or pallor, leads to loss of consciousness in the child. In Saudi Arabia, studies assessing the awareness among parents about BHS have been scarce. In light of this, this study aimed to evaluate the awareness of BHS among parents in Makkah, Saudi Arabia, in 2023. Methodology This was a cross-sectional study conducted between June and October 2023 by using Google Forms to collect data about awareness of risk factors of BHS among the general population in Makkah. We employed a validated and self-generated survey that was distributed through social media platforms. Results The study included 602 participants; 138 (22.9%) of them had witnessed BHS episodes. Of note, 407 (67.6%) thought that there was a connection between BHS and iron deficiency anemia. A significant majority (n=565, 93.9%) mentioned that spells can lead to passing out and seizures, and 542 (90%) thought that spells are dangerous. The majority (n=479, 79.6%) reported that the actions required during spells involve laying the child on the floor, keeping the child away from anything sharp, staying with the child, and calling 911 if the child remains blue or is not breathing for longer than a minute. The most common source of information for the participants was the Ministry of Health (n=182, 30.2%). Conclusions This study found a generally low level of awareness among parents regarding several aspects of BHS. Hence, we recommend conducting educational campaigns to ensure parents have accurate information about BHS so that they can respond appropriately to its occurrence in children.

Outcomes of Open Versus Laparoscopic Technique in Primary Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Retrospective Study.

Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most common surgical procedures worldwide. In clinical practice, there are two different routes to repair inguinal hernias: laparoscopic mesh repair and open. Reducing the hernia and preventing recurrence remains the mainstay treatment option of both procedures. This study aims to compare postoperative outcomes and recurrence rates for patients who had primary, non-recurrent, laparoscopic, or open hernia repair in a single tertiary hospital. A retrospective cohort study was done on 468 patients. The study was conducted at King Abdulaziz University Hospital (KAUH) between 2013 and 2022. The distribution of our study population was divided into open hernia repair 378 participants (80.8%) while the rest did laparoscopic hernia repair 90 (19.2%). Operation duration in minutes was 107.158 ± 41.402 in the open hernia repair group and was noted to be significantly higher in the laparoscopic hernia repair group, with 142.811 ± 52.102 minutes p-value (0.000). The hospital length of stay was shown to be shorter in laparoscopic hernia repair (1.58 ±1.27) compared to open hernia repair (2.05±5.33). The most common postoperative complication was scrotal swelling, commonly associated with laparoscopic (5.55%) compared to 2.11% in open hernia repair. Open repair showed a risk of scrotal hematoma with a percentage of 0.52% compared to 0% in the laparoscopic method with a p-value (0.033). Hernia recurrence was non-related with any specific group, although noted to be higher in the laparoscopic group (7.77%), while in the open group (3.4%) with a p-value (0.081). The study conducted showed no alarming percentages for recurrence in either technique, open or laparoscopic, yet the open approach had a better outcome when it comes to scrotal pain and swelling post-operatively, chronic groin pain, and readmission rate as compared to laparoscopic technique, despite having a longer hospital stay. Future larger studies should be conducted to provide equal population inclusivity.