How do the amblyopic and fellow eyes differ in adults?

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the differences between the amblyopic eye and the fellow eye in adults with anisometropic amblyopia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Measurements of the central macular thickness [CMT], subfoveal choroidal thickness [SFCT], and retinal nerve fiber layer [RNFL] in patients with anisometropic amblyopia were obtained using optical coherence tomography [OCT]. Axial length [AL], anterior chamber depth [ACD], and central corneal thickness [CCT] were measured with optical biometry. All 12 parameters were compared between the amblyopic eye [Group 1] and the fellow eye [Group 2]. RESULTS: A total of 110 eyes of 55 patients [9 myopic, 46 hypermetropic] were analyzed retrospectively. The ages of the patients ranged from 17 to 55 years, with a mean of 30.8±10.7 years. 56.4% [n=31] of the patients were female, and 43.6% [n=24] were male. The mean spherical equivalent [SE] was 1.96±3.79 in Group 1 and 1.28±2.45 in Group 2. SFCT was 312.00±53.03 in Group 1 and 283.47±51.91 in Group 2. AL was 22.53±1.40 in Group 1 and 22.79±1.18 in Group 2. SE, SFCT, and AL were statistically significantly different between the two groups. There was no difference between the two groups in terms of CMT, RNFL, ACD and CCT values. CONCLUSION: In adults with anisometric amblyopia, the SFCT of the amblyopic eye is greater than that of the fellow eye. The choroid plays an important role in the nutrition of the retinal layers, the development of ocular function and refractive error, and its development may be affected by the refractive error. Since the majority of our patients were hyperopic, the AL was found to be shorter in the amblyopic eye. CMT, RNFL, ACD and CCT values were the similar in both groups. There was no clinically significant relationship between biometric parameters and OCT parameters.

Photoscreener results with and without cycloplegia and their reliability according to biometric parameters.

PURPOSE: Our goal in this study is to compare the results of a photoscreener (Plusoptix A12C) with and without cycloplegia and to investigate its reliability as a function of biometric parameters. METHODS: In total, 250 eyes of 125 children with a mean age of 6.77±1.59years were included in the study. The results of cycloplegic and noncycloplegic Plusoptix A12C measurements and autorefractometer with cycloplegia (CA) were compared. The spherical equivalent (SE) differences between CA and noncycloplegic Plusoptix A12C measurements (NPO) with CA and cycloplegic Plusoptix A12C measurements (CPO) were compared with axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), corneal radius of curvature (CR), mean keratometry (meanK) and axial length/corneal radius of curvature ratio (AL/CR) values. The relationships between these were examined. RESULTS: According to amblyopia risk factors (ARFs) based on the criteria in the 2013 AAPOS guidelines, 33 eyes (13%) in the NPO results and 34 eyes (13.6%) in the CPO results were found to be at risk for amblyopia. According to the CA results, the NPO had 67.3% sensitivity and 94.5% specificity, and the CPO 69.4% sensitivity and 89.1% specificity in detecting the values of refractive amblyopia factors determined by the AAPOS. In regard to refraction values determined by the AAPOS for amblyopia, according to CA results, the NPO had 71.4% sensitivity and 88.4% specificity in detecting myopia; 33.3% sensitivity and 93.6% specificity in detecting hyperopia; and 79.4% specificity and 71.2% sensitivity in detecting astigmatism. With regard to refraction values determined by the AAPOS for amblyopia, according to CA results, the CPO had 80.9% sensitivity and 90% specificity in detecting myopia; 13.3% sensitivity and 89.2% specificity in detecting hyperopia; and 44.9% sensitivity and 30.8% specificity in detecting astigmatism. When the SE differences between the CA and NPO values were compared with biometric parameters, a negative correlation was observed with ACD, AL, and especially AL/CR ratio. CONCLUSION: Both the NPO and CPO showed moderate sensitivity and high specificity in detecting ARFs based on the criteria in the 2013 AAPOS guidelines. Sensitivity for detecting hyperopic risk factors was lower than for myopia and astigmatism. The CPO has no additional clinical advantage. A negative correlation was found between biometric parameters and NPO results. Thus, the NPO is more reliable in myopic children with higher axial lengths, deeper anterior chambers, and increased AL/CR ratios.