Interactions with parents and friends among chronically ill children: examining social networks.

OBJECTIVE: Children with medical conditions often experience a combination of positive and negative social interactions with parents and friends. Adult research examining cross-domain buffering effects has documented that supportive social ties can make up for shortcomings in other social relationships. This study examined whether negative effects of strained relationships with loved ones can be buffered when children feel supported by individuals in different support networks (i.e., cross-domain buffering effects). METHOD: Children with Type I diabetes (n = 56), chronic asthma (n = 54), and cystic fibrosis (n = 17) completed questionnaires during an outpatient hospital visit that assessed perceptions of support and strain from parents and friends, quality of life, self-concept, and emotional/behavioral difficulties. Parental strain was conceptualized as parental overprotection and parental rejection. RESULTS: Hierarchical regression analyses showed that friend support buffered the adverse effects of parental strain on child quality of life, self-concept, and emotional/behavioral difficulties. Interestingly, parental support did not buffer the negative effects of experiencing strained relationships with friends; only main effects on outcome were found. These findings partially support our hypotheses of cross-domain buffering. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, friendships were a protective factor for children who experienced strained relationships with parents. In contrast, although parent support had a direct impact on child outcome, it did not make up for feeling rejected by friends. Because close relationships are often strained during medical stressors, findings underscore the importance of promoting social connectedness in chronically ill children to maximize opportunities for experiencing positive social relationships.

The pediatric asthma intervention: a comprehensive cost-effective approach to asthma management in a disadvantaged inner-city community.

OBJECTIVE: To compare three pediatric asthma interventions for their impact on improving the health status of inner-city asthmatic children and in achieving cost savings. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 212 children 1 to 16 years of age were randomized into three groups: group 1 (n = 74) received one individualized asthma education session; group 2 (n = 68) received reinforced asthma education; group 3 (n = 70) received reinforced asthma education plus case management. Asthma-related health resource utilization and cost were primary outcomes. The cost-benefit analysis sought to estimate the expected cost savings to the Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services (Medicaid administrator) associated with the intervention. RESULTS: Participants in all three groups used significantly fewer emergency health care services in the follow-up year. Averaged across all three groups, the magnitudes of declines were substantial: 81% for hospitalizations, 69% for hospital days, 64% for emergency department visits, and 58% for clinic visits. Although there were no statistically significant differences between study groups for three of the four main outcome measures, group 3 participants consistently improved to the greatest degree. All three interventions were associated with considerable cost savings ranging from $4,021/child/year for group 1 to $4,503/child/year for group 3. CONCLUSION: Asthma education with or without case management services enhances the health of children with asthma thereby reducing associated costs.