Stone Burden Measurement by 3D Reconstruction on Noncontrast Computed Tomography Is Not a More Accurate Predictor of Stone-Free Rate After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Than 2D Stone Burden Measurements.

Purpose: Stone burden has been reported as an independent predictor of stone-free rate after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL); however no consensus exists on a standardized method for measuring stone burden. Recently, stone volume has been advocated as the most accurate means of measuring stone burden. We aimed to compare different measuring methods of stone burden and to identify the predictive value of each for outcomes after PCNL. Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective review of a prospective database of patients who underwent PCNL between 2006 and 2013. A preoperative CT and postoperative imaging at discharge were necessary for eligibility. Stone burden was assessed through four different ways on CT images: (1) cumulative stone diameter; (2) estimated SA (surface area) calculated as longest × orthogonal diameter × π/4; (3) manual outline of stone and computer SA calculation; and (4) automated 3D volume calculation using specific software. Primary outcome was stone-free status (SFS) at discharge. Secondary outcomes included operative time and the need for an ancillary procedure. Regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis were used to evaluate the predictive value of each method. Results: Of 313 included patients, 69.6% were stone free at discharge. All measures of stone burden were independent predictors of SFS [OR and 95% CI of 1.027 (1.014, 1.040), 1.481 (1.180, 1.858), 1.736 (1.266, 2.380), and 1.311 (1.127, 1.526), respectively] and demonstrated similar predictive accuracy (area under the curve = 0.630, 0.630, 0.627, and 0.638, respectively). Stone burden by any measure was an independent predictor of operative time and secondary procedure. Conclusions: We demonstrated that measuring stone burden by manual outline or automated 3D volume on reformatted CT images had no added value compared with orthogonal measurement for predicting outcomes after PCNL.

Multicenter External Validation and Comparison of Stone Scoring Systems in Predicting Outcomes After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Several scoring systems have recently emerged to predict stone-free rate (SFR) and complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). We aimed to compare the most commonly used scoring systems (Guy's stone score, S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry, and CROES nomogram), assess their predictive accuracy for SFR and other postoperative variables, and develop a risk group stratification based on these scoring systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients who have had a PCNL at four academic institutions between 2006 and 2013. Primary outcome was SFR within 3 weeks of the surgery and secondary outcomes were operative time (OT), complications, and length of stay (LOS). We performed chi-squared, t-test, logistic, linear, and Poisson regressions, as well as receiver operating characteristics curve with area under the curve (AUC) calculation. RESULTS: We identified 586 patients eligible for analysis. Of these, 67.4% were stone free. Guy's, S.T.O.N.E., and CROES score were predictive of SFR on multivariable logistic regression (odds ratio [OR]: 1.398, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.056, 1.852, p = 0.019; OR: 1.417, 85% CI: 1.231, 1.631, p < 0.001; OR: 0.993, 95% CI: 0.988, 0.998, p = 0.004) and have similar predictive accuracy with AUCs of 0.629, 0.671, and 0.646, respectively. On multivariable linear regression, only S.T.O.N.E. was an independent predictor of longer OT (ß = 14.556, 95% CI: 12.453, 16.660, p < 0.001). None of the scores were independent predictors of postoperative complications or a longer LOS. Poisson regression allowed for risk group stratification and showed the S.T.O.N.E. score and CROES nomogram to have the most distinct risk groups. CONCLUSIONS: The three evaluated scoring systems have similar predictive accuracy of SFR. S.T.O.N.E. has additional value in predicting OT. Risk group stratification can be used for patient counseling. Further research is needed to identify whether or not any is superior to the others with regard to clinical usefulness and predictive accuracy.

Combining Mean and Standard Deviation of Hounsfield Unit Measurements from Preoperative CT Allows More Accurate Prediction of Urinary Stone Composition Than Mean Hounsfield Units Alone.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The mineral composition of a urinary stone may influence its surgical and medical treatment. Previous attempts at identifying stone composition based on mean Hounsfield Units (HUm) have had varied success. We aimed to evaluate the additional use of standard deviation of HU (HUsd) to more accurately predict stone composition. METHODS: We identified patients from two centers who had undergone urinary stone treatment between 2006 and 2013 and had mineral stone analysis and a computed tomography (CT) available. HUm and HUsd of the stones were compared with ANOVA. Receiver operative characteristic analysis with area under the curve (AUC), Youden index, and likelihood ratio calculations were performed. RESULTS: Data were available for 466 patients. The major components were calcium oxalate monohydrate (COM), uric acid, hydroxyapatite, struvite, brushite, cystine, and CO dihydrate (COD) in 41.4%, 19.3%, 12.4%, 7.5%, 5.8%, 5.4%, and 4.7% of patients, respectively. The HUm of UA and Br was significantly lower and higher than the HUm of any other stone type, respectively. HUm and HUsd were most accurate in predicting uric acid with an AUC of 0.969 and 0.851, respectively. The combined use of HUm and HUsd resulted in increased positive predictive value and higher likelihood ratios for identifying a stone's mineral composition for all stone types but COM. CONCLUSIONS: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of CT data aiding in the prediction of brushite stone composition. Both HUm and HUsd can help predict stone composition and their combined use results in higher likelihood ratios influencing probability.

Non-invasive assessment of functionally relevant coronary artery stenoses with quantitative CT perfusion: preliminary clinical experiences.

OBJECTIVES: We developed a quantitative Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced CT (DCE-CT) technique for measuring Myocardial Perfusion Reserve (MPR) and Volume Reserve (MVR) and studied their relationship with coronary stenosis. METHODS: Twenty-six patients with Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) were recruited. Degree of stenosis in each coronary artery was classified from catheter-based angiograms as Non-Stenosed (NS, angiographically normal or mildly irregular), Moderately Stenosed (MS, 50-80% reduction in luminal diameter), Severely Stenosed (SS, >80%) and SS with Collaterals (SSC). DCE-CT at rest and after dipyridamole infusion was performed using 64-slice CT. Mid-diastolic heart images were corrected for beam hardening and analyzed using proprietary software to calculate Myocardial Blood Flow (MBF, in mL∙min(-1)∙100 g(-1)) and Blood Volume (MBV, in mL∙100 g(-1)) parametric maps. MPR and MVR in each coronary territory were calculated by dividing MBF and MBV after pharmacological stress by their respective baseline values. RESULTS: MPR and MVR in MS and SS territories were significantly lower than those of NS territories (p < 0.05 for all). Logistic regression analysis identified MPR∙MVR as the best predictor of ≥50% coronary lesion than MPR or MVR alone. CONCLUSIONS: DCE-CT imaging with quantitative CT perfusion analysis could be useful for detecting coronary stenoses that are functionally significant.

Refining perforator selection for DIEP breast reconstruction using transit time flow volume measurements.

Transit time flow volume has been used in cardiac surgery to assess small vessel flow characteristics. This study examines the usefulness of transit time flow volume (TTFV) in assessing perforator vessels in deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap harvesting. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the correlation among computed tomographic angiography (CTA), intraoperative TTFV measurements, and hand-held Doppler signals in identifying perforators. Ten consecutive free DIEP breast reconstructions were prospectively evaluated using CTA to identify abdominal wall perforators. Intraoperatively, perforating vessels >1 mm in diameter were evaluated with a conventional hand-held 8-MHz Doppler and a TTFV measurement device. Vessel location was correlated with preoperative CTA . Waveform patterns and TTFV measurements were recorded for each vessel and correlated with both CTA and hand-held Doppler signals. Of the 54 perforators identified, TTFV showed arterial flow waveforms in 15 of 16 perforators identified by CTA and in 2 of the remaining 38 vessels. The sensitivity and specificity of TTFV in identifying arterial perforators were 94 and 95%, respectively. In contradistinction, hand-held Doppler was misleading in 70% of vessels. TTFV distinguishes arterial from venous waveforms in vessels that appear arterial by hand-held Doppler signals. CTA and TTFV are highly correlated, and the use of TTFV may prevent poor perfusion seen in some DIEP flaps.

Repeat prostate biopsy accuracy: simulator-based comparison of two- and three-dimensional transrectal US modalities.

PURPOSE: To compare the accuracy of biopsy with two-dimensional (2D) transrectal ultrasonography (US) with that of biopsy with conventional three-dimensional (3D) transrectal US and biopsy with guided 3D transrectal US in the guidance of repeat prostate biopsy procedures in a prostate biopsy simulator. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The institutional review board approved this retrospective study. Five residents and five experts performed repeat biopsies with a biopsy simulator that contained the transrectal US prostate images of 10 patients who had undergone biopsy. Simulated repeat biopsies were performed with 2D transrectal US, conventional 3D transrectal US, and guided 3D transrectal US (an extension of 3D transrectal US that enables active display of biopsy targets). The modalities were compared on the basis of time per biopsy and how accurately simulated repeat biopsies could be guided to specific targets. The probability for successful biopsy of a repeat target was calculated for each modality. RESULTS: Guided 3D transrectal US was significantly (P < .01) more accurate for simulated biopsy of repeat targets than was 2D or 3D transrectal US, with a biopsy accuracy of 0.86 mm +/- 0.47 (standard deviation), 3.68 mm +/- 2.60, and 3.60 mm +/- 2.57, respectively. Experts had a 70% probability of sampling a prior biopsy target volume of 0.5 cm(3) with 2D transrectal US; however, the probability approached 100% with guided 3D transrectal US. Biopsy accuracy was not significantly different between experts and residents for any modality; however, experts were significantly (P < .05) faster than residents with each modality. CONCLUSION: Repeat biopsy of the prostate with 2D transrectal US has limited accuracy. Compared with 2D transrectal US, the biopsy accuracy of both experts and residents improved with guided 3D transrectal US but did not improve with conventional 3D transrectal US.

Fractured penis: diagnosis and management.

INTRODUCTION: Penile fracture is a well-recognized clinical entity. It is relatively uncommon and is considered a urological emergency. Its management has been a subject of controversy. AIM: In this article, we will review contemporary knowledge of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, evaluation, and evolving management strategies of penile fracture. METHODS: A case report was discussed followed by an English-language Medline review. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Review of the available literature to establish best-practice management. RESULTS: The injury is defined as the traumatic rupture of the corpus cavernosum secondary to a blunt trauma of the erect penis. The condition is underreported. The commonest causes were coital injuries and penile manipulation. The diagnosis was usually fairly straightforward because of the stereotypical clinical presentation. Associated injuries included urethral rupture. Imaging was helpful in selected cases. Conservative measures were associated with increased complications. Most authors advocated early surgical repair. False explorations have been reported. CONCLUSIONS: Penile fracture is a clinical diagnosis. The ideal management has evolved and remains largely surgical. Preoperative imaging should not delay surgical repair.

Pilot study of ureteral movement in stented patients: first step in understanding dynamic ureteral anatomy to improve stent comfort.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Ureteral stents may cause significant morbidity, including pain, dysuria, hematuria, and infection. New biomaterials, coatings, and designs have been studied in an attempt to reduce stent-related symptoms, but to date, the ideal comfortable stent has not been developed. In order to facilitate development of a stent that will mold and change with patient movement, we examined stent and ureteral movement with changes in patient body position. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four women and two men with a median age of 60.5 +/- 7.7 years who underwent shockwave lithotripsy and insertion of a ureteral stent were enrolled. Static radiographs were performed with the patients in four positions: supine, standing, sitting, and bending forward. Differences in stent position were analyzed digitally relative to fixed bony reference points to determine ureteral movement. RESULTS: The renal stent curl was most cephalad when the patient was supine and moved caudally an average of 2.5 +/- 1.5 cm when the patient stood up. The absolute vertical length of the stent was greatest when the patient was supine (31.1 +/- 1.2 cm) and shortened with standing (28.3 +/- 2.3 cm) and sitting (26.6 +/- 1.5 cm). The bladder curl moved an average of 2.3 +/- 1.2 cm vertically with patient movement. CONCLUSIONS: By measuring stent position, we were able to quantify the range of motion of the ureter during changes in body position. Stent movement appears to be a combination of bowing in the proximal ureter and moving within the bladder. Future stent designs may take this into account to decrease stent-related symptoms.

Design of functional simulation of renal cancer in virtual reality environments.

OBJECTIVES: The preoperative planning of partial nephrectomy can be facilitated by the ability to view the tumor and surrounding tissue in three-dimensional (3D) virtual reality (VR). A technique to convert Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine computed tomography scan data into a fully 3D VR environment was developed. The model can be transferred to a personal computer, allowing the surgeon to view the 3D model in the operating room. METHODS: Computed tomography data from a patient with multifocal renal masses was converted into a 3D polygonal mesh using Amira running on a desktop personal computer with Windows XP Professional. A Silicon Graphics Monster Onyx2 running the Linux operating system was used to view the 3D stereo model in the VR environments: either the CAVE or a specialized desk called the Immersadesk. An application to view and interact with the model on a desktop personal computer was written in C++. RESULTS: A 3D model of the kidney, the multiple tumors, and the associated systems was created. The model could be viewed and manipulated in a true VR environment and on a desktop personal computer. CONCLUSIONS: This project completed two major goals. First, a 3D model of a kidney containing multiple masses was created and viewed in a VR environment. Second, an interface to display the model on a desktop personal computer in the operating room was created. This is the first step in bringing VR technology to the operating room to assist the surgeon directly.