Chlamydia trachomatis infections and subfertility: opportunities to translate host pathogen genomic data into public health.

Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) infections in women can result in tubal pathology (TP). Worldwide 10-15% of all couples are subfertile, meaning they did not get pregnant after 1 year. Part of the routine subfertility diagnostics is the Chlamydia Antibody Test (CAT) to decide for laparoscopy or not in order to diagnose TP. The CAT positive and negative predictive value is such that many unneeded laparoscopies are done and many TP cases are missed. Addition of host genetic markers related to infection susceptibility and severity could potentially improve the clinical management of couples who suffer from subfertility. In the present study, the potential translational and clinical value of adding diagnostic host genetic marker profiles on the basis of infection and inflammation to the current clinical management of subfertility was investigated. This review provides an overview of the current state of the art of host genetic markers in relation to CT infection, proposes a new clinical diagnostic approach, and investigates how the Learning-Adapting-Leveling model (LAL, a public health genomic (PHG) model) can be of value and provide insight to see whether these host genetic markers can be translated into public health. This review shows that the preliminary basis of adding host genetic marker profiles to the current diagnostic procedures of subfertility is present but has to be further developed before implementation into health care can be achieved. CT infection is an example in the field of PHG with potential diagnostic to be taken up in the future in the field of subfertility diagnosis with a time line for integration to be dependent on enhanced participation of many stakeholders in the field of PHG which could be advanced through the LAL model.

[GnRH agonists and antagonists in the preoperative therapy of uterine fibroids: literature review]. / Agonisti e antagonisti del GnRH nella terapia pre-chirurgica della fibromiomatosi uterina.

Uterine leiomyomas are the most frequent gynecological benign tumors. Their growth is regulated by ovarian steroids, therefore a hypoestrogenic state, like menopause or pharmacologically induced pseudo-menopause by GnRH-agonists or GnRH-antagonists, is associated with the decrease of their volume. This volume reduction allows a less invasive surgical procedure and may reduce the amount of blood loss during surgery. Therefore, GnRH-agonists and antagonists are used in presurgical treatment of uterine fibromatosis. This review analyses the effects of GnRH-agonists and GnRH-antagonists therapies. GnRH-agonists produce a down-regulation of GnRH receptor, while GnRH-antagonists compete with endogenous GnRH for pituitary binding sites. Due to the lack of any intrinsic activity of GnRH-antagonists, the characteristic initial flare-up observed with GnRH-agonist treatment is absent. So, GnRH-antagonists rapidly suppress gonadotropin release within 4-8 h, while GnRH-agonists show clinical effects after 2 or 3 weeks of treatment. GnRH-antagonist activity is dose-dependent so it is possible to adjust the dose to obtain the proper levels of inhibition. The GnRH-agonist presurgical treatment usually is a short-term therapy (3-6 months), because it causes side-effects like menopause symptoms. GnRH-antagonist clinical effects can be achieved with a short-time therapy too. Their side-effects include flushes and head-ache. After stopping therapy with both drugs, leiomyomas rapidly achieve their original size while side-effects disappear. Further studies are necessary to establish the use of GnRH-antagonists in leiomyomas therapy, but in Italy this is not possible because their use is not approved.

Brucellosis with erythema nodosum-like manifestations diagnosed by isolated positivity of the ELISA test for anti-Brucella IgM.

Brucellosis is endemic in the Mediterranean area. In spite of the false negative results, the standard agglutination test remains the routine test for the diagnosis of brucellosis in southern Italy. We present a case of a patient with undulant fever and erythema nodosum-like skin lesions, with negative serum agglutination test, but isolated positivity of the ELISA test for anti-Brucella IgM. A diagnosis of brucellosis for this patient was supported by the anamnestic and clinical data, and by the response to therapy. This case and a review of the literature urge us to consider the ELISA test indispensable for the serological diagnosis of brucellosis.