RESUMEN
Immune-activating anti-CTLA4 and anti-PD1 monoclonal antibodies (alone or in combination) are being used to treat advanced melanoma patients and can lead to durable remissions, and long-term overall survival may be achieved in between 50-60% of patients. Although intracranial metastases are very common in melanoma (about 50-75% of all patients with advanced disease), most of the pivotal prospective clinical trials exclude patients with intra-cranial metastases, certainly if their lesions are symptomatic and steroid-requiring and the degree of sensitivity of intra-cranial melanoma to immunotherapy remains uncertain, and requires further investigation especially in view of the demonstrable activity of RAF-MEK inhibitors in this clinical setting and the emergence of stereotactic radiotherapy. Our study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of immunotherapy against advanced melanoma patients with brain metastases. In terms of comparative studies, only retrospective analyses could be identified. Based on 3 retrospective studies, treatment of patients with melanoma brain metastases with immunotherapeutic approaches improves overall survival substantially compared with supportive measures alone (no active anticancer treatment). The efficacy of targeted therapy appeared to be comparable to that of immune therapy in terms of overall survival, based on a small number of patients. The combination of concurrent radiation therapy to the brain and systemic immunotherapy led to improved overall survival compared to radiotherapy alone, suggesting potential synergism between the approaches, and combination treatment could be delivered safely. Our review supports the use of immunotherapeutic strategies for these patients although treatment efficacy appears to be lower for symptomatic lesions. In view of the extremely high efficacy of stereotactic radiotherapy approaches in the brain, understanding the interaction between radiotherapy and immunotherapy is vital and should be an area of active investigation.
RESUMEN
The current case presents a male in his 40s without significant past medical, surgical, or family history. Hematochezia started immediately after one hour of high-intensity interval training (HIIT), which included free-weight exercises and a circuit training instructional video. Relevant investigations included negative stool cultures and flexible sigmoidoscopy showing ischemic colitis in the mid-sigmoid. Histology also supported ischemic etiology, leading to the diagnosis of exercise-induced ischemic colitis (EIIC). The patient made a full recovery following supportive treatment, including intravenous fluid. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of ischemic colitis secondary to HIIT performed at home. The case reviews risk factors for EIIC and highlights the diagnosis as being possible outside the context of long-distance and endurance exercise.
