Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Indian J Med Microbiol ; 48: 100559, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38447856

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Colistin is the last resort treatment against resistant Gram-negative bacteria, necessitating reliable and rapid means for sensitivity testing of colistin. Automated systems like VITEK®2 are adopted to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) due to easy usage. Broth microdilution (BMD) for colistin MIC was suggested by EUCAST and CLSI. OBJECTIVE: To compare and evaluate colistin MIC by BMD and VITEK®2 against Gram-negative organisms from the ICU in a tertiary care hospital. METHOD: Clinically significant organisms isolated from ICU patients were included. MIC was determined using BMD and VITEK®2. Very major error (VME), major error (ME), essential agreement (EA), categorical agreement (CA), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), sensitivity, and specificity were analysed. RESULT: 533 isolates were obtained from blood (435,81.60%), respiratory samples (57,10.70%), pus and exudates (20,3.80%), urine (18,3.40%), and CSF (3,0.60%). The Enterobacterales were K. pneumoniae (185,34.70%) E. coli (73,13.70%) and E. cloacae (26,4.90%) while non-fermenters were A. baumannii (209,39.20%) and P. aeruginosa (40,7.50%). The VITEK®2 sensitivity was >99%; specificity ranged from 14.28 to 52.94%. PPV was 93.81% while NPV was 93.75%. VME ranged from 47 to 100% between isolates. ME was up to 20%. The highest VME was obtained in E. coli (100%). The total EA and CA observed were 68.5% and 99.79% respectively. CONCLUSION: Automated system VITEK®2 failed to detect the resistance in 32 (60%) isolates. The obtained VME and ME values were >3%, which is unacceptable as per the standard guidelines. EA of ≥90% wasn't obtained. Sensitivity for VITEK®2 was >99%, but had low specificity (14.28%). Hence, VITEK®2 is not reliable for colistin susceptibility testing.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Colistina , Bacterias Gramnegativas , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Colistina/farmacología , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana/métodos , Humanos , Bacterias Gramnegativas/efectos de los fármacos , Bacterias Gramnegativas/aislamiento & purificación , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/microbiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/diagnóstico , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
2.
Bioengineering (Basel) ; 9(2)2022 Jan 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35200404

RESUMEN

Nosocomial infections, termed hospital-acquired infections (HAIs), are acquired from a healthcare or hospital setting. HAI is mainly caused by bacteria, such as Acinetobacter baumannii, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, Enterococci spp., Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and many more. Due to growing antibacterial resistance, nanotechnology has paved the way for more potent and sensitive methods of detecting and treating bacterial infections. Nanoparticles have been used with molecular beacons for identifying bactericidal activities, targeting drug delivery, and anti-fouling coatings, etc. This review addresses the looming threat of nosocomial infections, with a focus on the Indian scenario, and major initiatives taken by medical bodies and hospitals in spreading awareness and training. Further, this review focuses on the potential role nanotechnology can play in combating the spread of these infections.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA