RESUMEN
ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE: Aerial parts of Artemisia ludoviciana are widely used in Mexico for treating gastrointestinal disorders, painful complaints and diabetes. AIM OF THE STUDY: To establish the preclinical efficacy as antinociceptive agent of the essential oil (EO) from the aerial parts of A. ludoviciana using well-known animal models. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Acute antinociceptive effect of EO (1, 10, 31.6, 100, and 316mg/kg, i.p.) was evaluated using the hot plate and paw formalin models in mice. The motor effects were assessed with the rota-rod and open field assays. The volatile components obtained by headspace solid phase microextraction (HS-SPME) and hydrodistillation were determined using gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis. RESULTS: EO decreased first and second phases of formalin test; in the first stage, the better effect was obtained with the treatment of 316mg/kg but in the second phase, time licking was attenuated at the doses of 31.6, 100 and 316mg/kg. The effectiveness of EO (ED50=25.9mg/kg) for attenuating neurogenic pain was corroborated using the hot plate test. The antinociceptive action of EO was blocked by naloxone suggesting that its mode of action involved an opioid mechanism. Furthermore, EO (316mg/kg) did not affect animal motor and coordination functions when tested by the rota-rod and open field tests. The latter results indicated that the pharmacological effects exerted by EO during the hot plate and formalin test are truly antinociceptive. GC-MS analysis of EO revealed that (±)-camphor, γ-terpineol, 1,8-cineole and borneol were the major volatile compounds of the plant. CONCLUSION: EO from A. ludoviciana showed significant antinociceptive effect, which appeared to be partially mediated by the opioid system. These findings could support the long-term use of A. ludoviciana for treating painful complaints in Mexican folk medicine.
Asunto(s)
Analgésicos/farmacología , Artemisia/química , Aceites Volátiles/farmacología , Dimensión del Dolor/efectos de los fármacos , Analgésicos/análisis , Animales , Canfanos/análisis , Alcanfor/análisis , Ciclohexanoles/análisis , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Eucaliptol , Masculino , Ratones , Monoterpenos/análisis , Actividad Motora/efectos de los fármacos , Naloxona/farmacología , Antagonistas de Narcóticos/farmacología , Aceites Volátiles/análisis , Componentes Aéreos de las Plantas/química , Prueba de Desempeño de Rotación con Aceleración ConstanteRESUMEN
ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE: Artemisia ludoviciana, commonly known as "estafiate", plays an important role in contemporary Mexico for treating several diseases including diabetes. To establish the preclinical efficacy of Artemisia ludoviciana as hypoglycemic and/or antihyperglycemic agent using well-known animal models. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Acute hypoglycemic as well as oral glucose (OGTT) and sucrose (OSTT) tolerance tests were used to demonstrate the value of the plant for treating diabetes. An essential oil (EO), an organic extract (OE) and an infusion (AE) were assayed in normal and NA-STZ-treated mice. The acute toxicity of the three preparations was analyzed by the Lorke method. The infusion was subjected to conventional phytochemical study using chromatographic conventional procedures. Some of the isolates were evaluated using the same pharmacological assays as well as an enzymatic test. The latter was employed to assess their potential inhibitory effect on yeast α-glucosidase. RESULTS: Oral administration of OE to normal mice significantly decreased blood glucose level only at the dose of 100 mg/kg; in NA-STZ-mice the hypoglycemic effect was observed at the three doses tested (31.6, 100, and 316 mg/kg). The infusion reduced significantly, blood sugar levels only in diabetic mice; the best effect was observed at the dose of 316 mg/kg. The EO was inactive when evaluated in normal mice. Regarding to the antihyperglycemic effect, the best effect was observed with the OE, during the OGTT and OSTT in diabetic mice. The infusion (AE) showed better effects during the OGTT in both normal and diabetic animals at the dose of 100 mg/kg. Finally, the EO was inactive during an OGTT at the three doses tested (31.6, 100, and 316 mg/kg) in diabetic mice. In addition, the results of AE on the enzymatic test using yeast α-glucosidase revealed an inhibition of 45%; this finding was consistent with the results obtained with the same preparation in vivo during an OSTT. Conventional phytochemical analysis of the active AE led to the isolation and characterization of eupatilin (1), jaceosidin (2), arglanin (3), salvinine (4), and 3,5-dicaffeoylquinic acid (5). Biological testing of 1 and 3 revealed their hypoglycemic effect. The hypoglycemic effect of arglanin (3) was attenuated in the presence of nicorandil, which suggested that the lactone behaved as an ATP-K+-channel blocker as glibenclamide. Salvinine (4) turned out to be a mixed α-glucosidase inhibitor, while 3 was inactive. CONCLUSIONS: Artemisia ludoviciana preparations showed hypoglycemic and antihyperglycemic effects, which could explain its effectiveness for treating diabetes in contemporary Mexico. Some of the active principles of the plant included compounds 1-5. These compounds seem to be acting synergistically on different molecular targets which involved glucose absorption and insulin liberation.