Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Ugeskr Laeger ; 185(7)2023 02 13.
Artículo en Danés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36892231

RESUMEN

Managing critically ill children is a rare and challenging event requiring training to ensure adequate and timely quality of care. Thus, health professionals train for pediatric emergencies in a simulated setting. Virtual reality (VR) is a promising modality for simulation, and current evidence highlights the potential of VR for simulating pediatric emergencies. However, more studies are needed to determine the aspects of VR design and implementation that support transfer of learning.


Asunto(s)
Medicina de Urgencia Pediátrica , Entrenamiento Simulado , Realidad Virtual , Niño , Humanos , Urgencias Médicas , Aprendizaje
2.
J Headache Pain ; 21(1): 62, 2020 Jun 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32493206

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) has recently been implicated in the pathogenesis of post-traumatic headache (PTH), which raises the prospect for therapeutic use of monoclonal antibodies targeting CGRP or its receptor. Therefore, we decided to assess the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of erenumab for prevention of persistent PTH attributed to mild traumatic brain injury. METHODS: A single-center, non-randomized, single-arm, open-label study of erenumab for adults aged 18-65 years with persistent PTH. Patients were assigned to receive 140-mg erenumab monthly by two subcutaneous 1-mL injections, given every 4 weeks for 12 weeks. The primary outcome measure was the mean change in number of monthly headache days of moderate to severe intensity from baseline (4-week pretreatment period) to week 9 through 12. Tolerability and safety endpoints were adverse events (i.e. number and type). RESULTS: Eighty-nine of 100 patients completed the open-label trial. At baseline, the mean monthly number of headache days of moderate to severe intensity was 15.7. By week 9 through 12, the number was reduced by 2.8 days. The most common adverse events were constipation (n = 30) and injection-site reactions (n = 15). Of 100 patients who received at least one dose of erenumab, two patients discontinued the treatment regimen due to adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with persistent PTH, erenumab resulted in a lower frequency of moderate to severe headache days in this 12-week open-label trial. In addition, erenumab was well-tolerated as discontinuations due to adverse events were low. Placebo-controlled randomized clinical trials are needed to adequately evaluate the efficacy and safety of erenumab in patients with persistent PTH. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.Gov, NCT03974360. Registered on April 17, 2019 - Retrospectively registered.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Conmoción Encefálica/diagnóstico , Conmoción Encefálica/tratamiento farmacológico , Antagonistas del Receptor Peptídico Relacionado con el Gen de la Calcitonina/uso terapéutico , Cefalea Postraumática/diagnóstico , Cefalea Postraumática/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Conmoción Encefálica/complicaciones , Antagonistas del Receptor Peptídico Relacionado con el Gen de la Calcitonina/efectos adversos , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Inyecciones Subcutáneas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cefalea Postraumática/etiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
3.
Ugeskr Laeger ; 179(51)2017 Dec 18.
Artículo en Danés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29260694

RESUMEN

When engaged in a demanding task of visual perception we tend to become blind to stimuli, which are not part of our primary task - a bias known as inattentional blindness. This article studies inattentional blindness in radiologists' interpretation of scans. Furthermore, it is discussed, how attention - being a limited resource - is distributed in the diagnostic process. Does focus on one diagnosis make us blind to findings supporting a differential diagnosis? Does focus on typing patient data into electronic health records draw attention away from the general clinical view of the patient?


Asunto(s)
Sesgo Atencional/fisiología , Diagnóstico , Encéfalo/fisiología , Humanos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Radiólogos/normas , Percepción Visual/fisiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...