Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Biochem ; 60: 17-23, 2018 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30030979

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus is known to be highly dependent of lipid metabolism to infect new cells and replicate. AIMS: To investigate lipid and apolipoprotein profile in chronic HCV patients according to treatment response. METHODS: Patients recruited from the Hepatitis Treatment Center at Niteroi (Brazil) who received interferon (IFN)-based therapies were separated into two groups, those who achieved sustained virological response (SVR) or not (non-SVR). Another group of patients treated with IFN-free direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapies was followed from before starting the treatment until one year after therapy. Triglycerides, total cholesterol and fractions were determined by colorimetric and/or electrophoresis techniques. Lecithin cholesterol acyltransferase (LCAT) activity and serum levels of apolipoproteins A1, A2, B, C2, C3 and E were assessed by enzymatic and multiplex assays, respectively. RESULTS: We studied 114 patients, and SVR was reached in 28 (39.4%) patients treated with IFN-therapy and in all (100%) patients who received DAA. Non-SVR patients (n = 43) presented altered liver parameters post-treatment. Levels of total cholesterol, LDL-C, VLDL-C and triglycerides were significant higher in SVR group. In contrast, LCAT activity and HDL-C levels were elevated in non-SVR patients. Only apolipoproteins B, C2 and C3 levels were increased in SVR group. The follow-up of SVR-DAA patients (n = 43) revealed a significant and progressive increase in serum levels of total cholesterol, LDL-C, VLDL-C and triglycerides. CONCLUSIONS: After a successful treatment, chronic hepatitis C patients experienced a reestablishment of lipid metabolism. Our results suggest that the monitoring of serum lipids could be a practical and routine laboratory tool to be applied during the treatment follow-up.


Asunto(s)
Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Apolipoproteínas/sangre , Hepatitis C Crónica/sangre , Lípidos/sangre , Anciano , Electroforesis en Gel de Poliacrilamida , Femenino , Hepatitis C Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fosfatidilcolina-Esterol O-Aciltransferasa/sangre , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Rev Soc Bras Med Trop ; 51(1): 14-20, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29513836

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: In 2013, combination therapy using peginterferon, ribavirin, and boceprevir or telaprevir was introduced to treat hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection in Brazil. The effectiveness of this therapy in four Brazilian regions was evaluated. METHODS: Clinical and virological data were obtained from patients of public health institutions in five cities, including sustained virological response (SVR) and side effects. Patients with advanced fibrosis (F3/4), moderate fibrosis (F2) for > 3 years, or extra-hepatic manifestations were treated according to Ministry of Health protocol. Treatment effectiveness was verified by using bivariate and multivariate analysis; p-values of < 0.05 were considered significant. RESULTS: Of 275 patients (64.7% men; average age, 57 years old), most (61.8%) were treatment-experienced; 53.9% had subgenotype 1a infection, 85.1% had advanced fibrosis, and 85.5% were treated with telaprevir. SVR was observed in 54.2%. Rapid virological response (RVR) was observed in 54.6% of patients (data available for 251 patients). Overall, 87.5% reported side effects and 42.5% did not complete treatment. Skin rash, severe infection, and death occurred in 17.8%, 2.5%, and death in 1.4% of cases, respectively. SVR was associated with treatment completion, RVR, and anemia. CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness of hepatitis C virus triple therapy was lower than that reported in phase III clinical trials, possibly owing to the prioritized treatment of patients with advanced liver fibrosis. The high frequency of side effects and treatment interruptions observed supported the decision of the Brazilian authorities to suspend its use when safer and more effective drugs became available in 2015.


Asunto(s)
Hepacivirus/genética , Hepatitis C Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de Proteasas/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Anciano , Protocolos Clínicos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Genotipo , Hepatitis C Crónica/virología , Humanos , Interferones/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oligopéptidos/administración & dosificación , Prolina/administración & dosificación , Prolina/análogos & derivados , Ribavirina/administración & dosificación , Respuesta Virológica Sostenida , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop ; Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop;51(1): 14-20, Jan.-Feb. 2018. tab
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: biblio-897052

RESUMEN

Abstract INTRODUCTION: In 2013, combination therapy using peginterferon, ribavirin, and boceprevir or telaprevir was introduced to treat hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection in Brazil. The effectiveness of this therapy in four Brazilian regions was evaluated. METHODS: Clinical and virological data were obtained from patients of public health institutions in five cities, including sustained virological response (SVR) and side effects. Patients with advanced fibrosis (F3/4), moderate fibrosis (F2) for > 3 years, or extra-hepatic manifestations were treated according to Ministry of Health protocol. Treatment effectiveness was verified by using bivariate and multivariate analysis; p-values of < 0.05 were considered significant. RESULTS: Of 275 patients (64.7% men; average age, 57 years old), most (61.8%) were treatment-experienced; 53.9% had subgenotype 1a infection, 85.1% had advanced fibrosis, and 85.5% were treated with telaprevir. SVR was observed in 54.2%. Rapid virological response (RVR) was observed in 54.6% of patients (data available for 251 patients). Overall, 87.5% reported side effects and 42.5% did not complete treatment. Skin rash, severe infection, and death occurred in 17.8%, 2.5%, and death in 1.4% of cases, respectively. SVR was associated with treatment completion, RVR, and anemia. CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness of hepatitis C virus triple therapy was lower than that reported in phase III clinical trials, possibly owing to the prioritized treatment of patients with advanced liver fibrosis. The high frequency of side effects and treatment interruptions observed supported the decision of the Brazilian authorities to suspend its use when safer and more effective drugs became available in 2015.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Anciano , Inhibidores de Proteasas/administración & dosificación , Hepacivirus/genética , Hepatitis C Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Oligopéptidos/administración & dosificación , Ribavirina/administración & dosificación , Prolina/administración & dosificación , Prolina/análogos & derivados , Protocolos Clínicos , Interferones/administración & dosificación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Hepatitis C Crónica/virología , Quimioterapia Combinada , Respuesta Virológica Sostenida , Genotipo , Persona de Mediana Edad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA