Self-Compassion in Adolescents and Young Adults With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Relationship of Self-Compassion to Psychosocial and Physical Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) diagnosed with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at an increased risk for poor physical and mental health due to the complexity of pediatric onset IBD and the unique developmental challenges of this period of life. Self-compassion is increasingly recognized as having an important role in explaining health outcomes and well-being across a range of populations. This study examines the relationship between self-compassion and psychosocial and physical health outcomes in AYAs with IBD. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, AYAs with IBD aged 15 to 25 years completed an online survey between February 2020 and October 2021. Questionnaires included the Self-Compassion Scale-Short Form, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measures for psychosocial, physical and global health outcomes, and IBD disease activity indices. RESULTS: AYAs with higher levels of self-compassion were found to have better psychosocial (ie, anxiety, depressive symptoms, psychological stress, physical stress, peer relationships), physical (ie, fatigue), and global health outcomes. Self-compassion was a significant independent predictor of anxiety (ß = -5.80, P = < .001), depressive symptoms (ß = -7.09, P = < .001), psychological stress (ß = -4.66, P = < .001), physical stress (ß = -3.19, P = < .001), peer relationships (ß = 3.39, P = .003), fatigue (ß = -2.05, P = .019), and improved global health (ß = 5.15, P = < .001). CONCLUSIONS: This study offers preliminary support for the importance of self-compassion in AYAs with IBD and demonstrates the need for further research in this area.

Self-compassion is an important positive psychological construct that may explain differences in key psychosocial and physical health outcomes among adolescents and young adults with inflammatory bowel disease.

Separation of Maternal and Newborn Care in US Hospitals: A Systemic Threat to Survival, Health and Well-Being.

Through greater understanding of past social, cultural, economic, political, scientific and technological forces which shaped our current health systems to separate mothers and newborn infants, we can begin to devise effective approaches to reshape these systems to meet the needs of mothers and newborn infants today. Medical science and technology have evolved vastly in the last century; however, effects of historical factors persist in our current health care systems, reflected in separate maternal and neonatal care in different departments with distinct guidelines, providers, and treatment locations. This separation prevents maternal-infant skin-to-skin contact and bonding, which significantly affects infant development, well-being, and that of their caregivers. We explore historical precedents for the separation of maternal-newborn care, including the transition from midwifery home care to hospital obstetric care, reasons for the increase in hospital births and hospital nursery development, and the effects of world wars, federal acts, health insurance, rooming-in practices, and the development of medical advances such as antibiotics, on hospital infrastructure. This information is evaluated in the context of modern scientific advancements to show that the conditions which shaped health systems to separate mothers and newborns in the past no longer hold. The insights gained will help to identify strategic actions to reshape health care systems to enable more integrated maternal-newborn care and the practice of Kangaroo Mother Care, and to improve survival outcomes and well-being for mothers, families, and their newborn infants.

The emergence of digital mental health in low-income and middle-income countries: A review of recent advances and implications for the treatment and prevention of mental disorders.

In low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs), emerging digital mental health interventions should be accompanied by regular and comprehensive assessment of available scientific evidence. This review aims to support efforts to monitor progress in digital mental health research, ensuring new evidence can guide researchers, clinicians, policymakers and program managers positioned to adopt and implement these digitally-enabled treatments. In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, an electronic database search from 2016 to 2020 yielded 37 digital intervention studies for detection, diagnosis, prevention, treatment, and/or management of a broad range of mental disorders in 13 LMICs. This date range was selected to update previous reviews. Most studies involved online interventions and many reported feasibility and acceptability, reflected by participant satisfaction or program adherence. About half the studies (N = 23) reported clinical benefits based on changes in mental health. For depression and mood disorders, some digital interventions showed improvements in depressive symptoms, quality of life, treatment adherence, and recovery. However, sample sizes were small and studies focused primarily on adults. Further limiting generalizability was the lack of consistency in clinical assessment and measurement tools between studies. No studies reported worsening symptoms, negative acceptability or dissatisfaction with digital interventions, suggesting possible publication bias. While digital interventions show promise, it remains difficult to conclude that digital interventions are effective from these studies, as it is prudent to exercise caution before drawing conclusions about clinical effectiveness. This review reflects continued growth in digital mental health research in LMICs and further highlights the need for rigorous evaluation of effectiveness and cost-effectiveness.