RESUMEN
UNLABELLED: Contact isolation of infected or colonised hospitalised patients is instrumental to interrupting multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) cross-transmission. Many studies suggest an increased rate of adverse events associated with isolation. We aimed to compare isolated to non-isolated patients in intensive care units (ICUs) for the occurrence of adverse events and medical errors. METHODS: We used the large database of the Iatroref III study that included consecutive patients from three ICUs to compare the occurrence of pre-defined medical errors and adverse events among isolated vs. non-isolated patients. A subdistribution hazard regression model with careful adjustment on confounding factors was used to assess the effect of patient isolation on the occurrence of medical errors and adverse events. RESULTS: Two centres of the Iatroref III study were eligible, an 18-bed and a 10-bed ICU (nurse-to-bed ratio 2.8 and 2.5, respectively), with a total of 1,221 patients. After exclusion of the neutropenic and graft transplant patients, a total of 170 isolated patients were compared to 980 non-isolated patients. Errors in insulin administration and anticoagulant prescription were more frequent in isolated patients. Adverse events such as hypo- or hyperglycaemia, thromboembolic events, haemorrhage, and MDRO ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) were also more frequent with isolation. After careful adjustment of confounders, errors in anticoagulant prescription [subdistribution hazard ratio (sHR) = 1.7, p = 0.04], hypoglycaemia (sHR = 1.5, p = 0.01), hyperglycaemia (sHR = 1.5, p = 0.004), and MDRO VAP (sHR = 2.1, p = 0.001) remain more frequent in isolated patients. CONCLUSION: Contact isolation of ICU patients is associated with an increased rate of some medical errors and adverse events, including non-infectious ones.
Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Errores Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Aislamiento de Pacientes/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To determine whether procalcitonin (PCT) levels could help discriminate isolated viral from mixed (bacterial and viral) pneumonia in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) during the A/H1N1v2009 influenza pandemic. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was performed in 23 French ICUs during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic. Levels of PCT at admission were compared between patients with confirmed influenzae A pneumonia associated or not associated with a bacterial co-infection. RESULTS: Of 103 patients with confirmed A/H1N1 infection and not having received prior antibiotics, 48 (46.6%; 95% CI 37-56%) had a documented bacterial co-infection, mostly caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae (54%) or Staphylococcus aureus (31%). Fifty-two patients had PCT measured on admission, including 19 (37%) having bacterial co-infection. Median (range 25-75%) values of PCT were significantly higher in patients with bacterial co-infection: 29.5 (3.9-45.3) versus 0.5 (0.12-2) µg/l (P < 0.01). For a cut-off of 0.8 µg/l or more, the sensitivity and specificity of PCT for distinguishing isolated viral from mixed pneumonia were 91 and 68%, respectively. Alveolar condensation combined with a PCT level of 0.8 µg/l or more was strongly associated with bacterial co-infection (OR 12.9, 95% CI 3.2-51.5; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: PCT may help discriminate viral from mixed pneumonia during the influenza season. Levels of PCT less than 0.8 µg/l combined with clinical judgment suggest that bacterial infection is unlikely.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones Bacterianas/diagnóstico , Calcitonina/sangre , Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A , Gripe Humana/diagnóstico , Neumonía/diagnóstico , Precursores de Proteínas/sangre , Adulto , Infecciones Bacterianas/sangre , Infecciones Bacterianas/fisiopatología , Biomarcadores , Péptido Relacionado con Gen de Calcitonina , Femenino , Francia , Humanos , Gripe Humana/fisiopatología , Gripe Humana/virología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neumonía/fisiopatología , Neumonía/virología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Few studies have shown that aged packed red blood cells (RBC) transfusion negatively influenced the outcome of ICU patients, probably related to storage lesions which could be decreased by leukodepletion of RBC. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of aged leukodepleted-RBC pack, on the outcome of ICU patients. DESIGN: Retrospective, observational, cohort study in a Medical Intensive Care Unit. PATIENTS: Consecutive patients admitted during the years 2005 and 2006, and requiring a transfusion. We recorded patient's demographic data, number of RBC unit and age of each RBC, length of ICU, mortality during ICU stay. RESULTS: Five hundred and thirty-four patients were included with global mortality was 26.6%, length of stay in ICU six days (3-14) and SAPS II 48 (35-62). RBC equaling to 5.9 were transfused per patients (22.7%<14 days and 57.3%<21 days). The number of RBC was significantly higher in the dead patients group, but the rate of RBC stored less than 21 days was not different (54% versus 60%; p=0.21). In a multivariate logistic model, independent predictors of ICU death were SAPS II (OR=1.02 per point, p<0.001), number of RBC (OR=1.08 per RBC, p<0.001), length of stay in ICU (p<0.001). Similar results were obtained while introducing the age of RBC as time dependent covariates in a multivariate Cox's model. CONCLUSIONS: RBC transfused in our ICU are old. The ICU outcome is independently associated with the number of leucodepleted RBC transfused, but not with their age.